if
> nobody else here is interested in becoming a committer, or if your
> project is not Hadoop related :-), then you should first start building
> a community.
>
> If you don't have at least three committers, you will als not be be able
> to cut a release.
>
> Cheers
Hi all,
I've been out of the Apache loop for a while, but I have a new project I'd like
to propose for incubation. I know new Incubator projects require a champion. As
an ASF member myself, can I act as my own champion, or does another member need
to act as champion on my behalf?
It certainly
+1
Sounds very useful!
G
On Dec 23, 2011, at 9:32 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi Incubator PMC,
>
> The proposal at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DeviceMapProposal
> (copied below) is open for discussion, I'm planning to start the vote
> to accept it sometime next week.
…
---
donated in support of
the project. Pivot has produced THREE major releases during its stay in the
Incubator - that is no small achievement, and we couldn't have done it without
your help!
To echo Gurkan's sentiments, we are also very proud to be part of the Apache
family. Thank you!
If I can attempt to summarize, there is a difference between the
*concept* of a leader and the *title* of a leader here at ASF (please
correct me if I am wrong). In Pivot's status report, we were
attempting to capture the concept, not the title. However, since it is
a loaded term, it makes
Traditionally the "leadership" comes from the membership
of the Project Management Committee. People tend to take
on a variety of roles within a project, some being more
leader-follower type roles and others revolving around a
small team that shares collective control over direction
of the projec
ive
notions of "leadership" such as Control.
-- Niclas
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Greg Brown wrote:
Apologies. I'm fired up about another discussion on the pivot-dev
list and
I'm letting it bleed over here.
My assertion stands, though. I don't think that it i
ot;leader" (or leaders), will go nowhere.
G
On Aug 10, 2009, at 11:18 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Greg Brown
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 11:12:36 PM
Subject: Re: incorrect terminology: lead developers
We don't
We don't have a notion of fixed leadership at Apache. Leadership is
always welcome but it is determined by the will of the group in
question
at a given point in time, not based on one's official status. We
try to
avoid status symbols in order to retain the fair balance of individual
decisio
others on this list share David's
opinion? If so, how do you think such projects should be managed?
On Aug 10, 2009, at 10:23 PM, Greg Brown wrote:
Ordinarily, I'd refrain from comment on a topic such as this. But I
think it's pretty unrealistic to consider any project, especia
Ordinarily, I'd refrain from comment on a topic such as this. But I
think it's pretty unrealistic to consider any project, especially one
of Pivot's magnitude, to be practically fostered without any kind of
"leader". I don't claim authority, and I don't think that my vote
counts any more th
[I presume the three browns above are all one
in the same person.)
Yes - all me. :-) I believe they reflect my user name on the various
SVN repositories in which Pivot has resided (java.net, Google Code,
and now ASF).
---
Its still good to have some minimal diversity of the active committers
and right now it looks like Pivot only has two people actively
committing code and they're both from the same employer.
It may be worth noting that Pivot is not technically a "VMware
project". Todd and I work on Pivot on o
>> p.s. on the trunk, we've just migrated the demos sub-project and the
>> JFreeChart provider off of the ASF repository for good
>
>Were they license incompatible? I'd really like to have demos at the ASF,
>not just the core code. But they should be demos that the project is
>willing to maintain
>There are rules as to what 3rd party dependencies are allowed.
>
>For example, LGPL dependencies cannot be included in distributions;
>furthermore, any such dependencies must be optional. That is not
>something that can be fixed later.
We don't have any LGPL libraries in the distribution - only i
>I've just tried a build on Win/XP, Java 1.6.0.
>
>This reports quite a few compilation warnings, for example:
>
>[javac] wtk\src\pivot\wtk\content\TreeViewFileRenderer.java:34:
>warning: sun.awt.shell.ShellFolder
> is Sun proprietary API and may be removed in a future release
...
>Does Pivot o
>One minor problem I noticed: the LICENSE file contains some odd
>characters towards the end which don't display well.
Looks like it is encoded in UTF-8 for some reason (the others appear to use
standard ASCII). We can easily change that, if necessary.
-
te on this release. We really appreciate it.
Thanks,
Greg Brown
Pivot Development Lead
On Monday, April 13, 2009, at 07:32AM, "Todd Volkert"
wrote:
>> web/lib/servlet-api.jar : It looks like you mention this under your
>> notice file but I don' t see details about it&#x
mention in the notice
file sufficient?
Thanks,
Greg
>From: "Greg Brown"
>To:
>Date: March 20, 2009 09:05:43 AM EDT
>Subject: Re: pivot copyrights/?/
>
>Hello,
>
>A question recently came up on the pivot-dev mailing list about copyright
>notices. One of the p
Great news! We can't wait to get started. Thank you!
On Sunday, January 25, 2009, at 03:58AM, "Niclas Hedhman"
wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>> The Pivot team would like to present the Pivot toolkit for incubation
>> at the Apache Incubator.
>
>We got 9 votes, a
Thanks, Martijn. I've added you to the mentor list.
Greg
On Tuesday, January 06, 2009, at 08:02AM, "Martijn Dashorst"
wrote:
>Count me in.
>
>Martijn
>
>On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The proposal
Hello all,
The Pivot team would like to present the Pivot toolkit for
consideration to the Apache Incubator. We are excited about the
prospect of joining the Incubator and are looking forward to your
feedback.
Thanks,
Greg Brown
Abstract
Pivot (http://pivot-toolkit.org) is an open
>All in all, appears to be a very nice proposal. :-)
Thanks. :-)
>You might want to reorganize and elaborate a bit. In particular, you list
>Flex, Silverlight, and OpenLazlo up top, but you don't appear to compare
>against them, whereas JavaFX is mentioned and compared against in a sort of
>bu
Looks like that link didn't come through quite right. The message I was
referring to is dated Fri, 21 Nov, 15:07. In any event, the Swing issues will
be reviewed in more detail in the proposal.
On Thursday, December 18, 2008, at 08:25PM, "Greg Brown"
wrote:
>I'll admi
I'll admit that I'm not terribly familiar with Spring Rich Client, but it
appears to be based on Swing. We believe that Swing has a number of inherent
limitations that make it a less than ideal foundation for future development
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200811.m
Thanks Niclas! We'll put together a draft proposal and send it to you for
review.
Greg
On Monday, December 01, 2008, at 12:22AM, "Niclas Hedhman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Greg Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello a
>I examined your project for getting more information, its great, screens
>look beautiful.
Thanks... :-)
>- Why you created own set of widgets using Java2D instead of using core Java
>Swing component set?
Swing has a number of limitations that make it a less than ideal option for
building ric
Hi all,
Unfortunately, we're probably talking about a different Greg Brown. I
didn't participate in the Summer of Code two years ago. :-)
Nonetheless, I and the rest of the Pivot team are very committed to
open source and would very much like to see Pivot adopted as an
lease let us know.
Thank you for your consideration.
Greg Brown and Todd Volkert, Pivot Toolkit
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
29 matches
Mail list logo
