On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 11:49:01AM +0200, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
I knew that many did not want renamings to occur, being touted as
expensive, so I still stand behind my last proposal (that has been
trimmed here) which seems to me like a possible compromise:
I'll just chime in belatedly
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Whoops. There is a line in there :
Where capitalised, these terms are to be used as per the definitions
found in RFC 2119 (Reference).
So I think I was thinking (which is a lot of thinking) the same thing :.
Will fix.
Fix what? Looks like you already did it. I was
RoUS said,
People often lost the precious e-mails due to the current
Here SPAM
There SPAM
Everywhere SPAM, SPAM
oh, you mean like all the 'apache newsletter' messages i've received
on just about every single asf list i'm on? grin/
Iyaannn :-) Apparently they were not
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
iproject name is an effort undergoing incubation at the Apache
Software Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the name of sponsoring
entity. Incubation is required of all newly accepted projects until
a further review indicates that the
Sam Ruby wrote:
Can I ask that you document the process of updating the site?
Looks like it's already there, but not very obvious. I will add to the
side-bar, but in the interim :
http://incubator.apache.org/updating_docs.html
I want to make sure that there is a set of requirements for what
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 19:00:57 -0400
Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judging from the move we made with james, CVS was easy. ezmlm a bit more
involved, but our users seemed to find us easily enough when the list
address changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
[EMAIL
Sam Ruby wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
...
Good point. My post was more aimed at the people who are shepherding the
project (e.g. Sam) rather than the developers. IMO, Sam should know
better, and should have fixed this long ago.
Let me turn this around. You note a problem with a prior project. You
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
From my point of view, disclaimer page would be enough and
the best alternative.
+1
--
Stephen J. McConnell
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 11:49:01 +0200
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, but this has not worked.
I guess you had a karma for jakarta-site2 and you had left
1. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
..
at
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
iproject name is an effort undergoing incubation at the Apache
Software Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the name of sponsoring
entity. Incubation is required of all newly accepted projects until
a further review indicates that the infrastructure, communications,
and
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 19:00:57 -0400
Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judging from the move we made with james, CVS was easy. ezmlm a bit
more
involved, but our users seemed to find us easily enough when the list
address
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
People often lost the precious e-mails due to the current
Here SPAM
There SPAM
Everywhere SPAM, SPAM
oh, you mean like all the 'apache newsletter' messages i've received
on just about every single asf list i'm on? grin/
In the business world, inbubation/incubator
David Jencks wrote:
As podlings are not yet fully accepted as part of the Apache Software
Foundation, any software releases (including code held in publically
available CVS) made by Podlings will not be endorsed by the ASF.
Podlings in Incubation SHALL NOT perform any releases of
On Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:48 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
XMLBeans is an incubated subproject under the sponsorship of the
Apache Software Foundation's (ASF) XML project.
it all looks good, except for this. i think i would prefer something
like
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:47:50PM -0400, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
XMLBeans is an incubated subproject under the sponsorship of the Apache
Software Foundation's (ASF) XML project.
it all looks good, except for this. i think i would prefer something
like
Greg Stein wrote:
...
To what document do I need to add rule that says a project ABSOLUTELY
MUST make clear that it is under incubation?
If we kept all incubated projects under the incubator it would have been
clear enough.
We've already been through
this process where incubated projects are
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 02:19:50PM +0200, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
...
To what document do I need to add rule that says a project ABSOLUTELY
MUST make clear that it is under incubation?
If we kept all incubated projects under the incubator it would have been
clear
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 11:59, Sam Ruby wrote:
I'm under the weather, and a little irritable, but this is starting to
get under my skin.
I am trying to follow http://incubator.apache.org/process.html
I have asked for this to be updated.
I have asked for information on how I can update
Added myself to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. Yes, my +1 to Berin (if i may).
Thanks,
dims
--- Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted Leung wrote:
On 10/3/2003 10:37 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
[The members of the Incubator PMC are:]
Aaron Bannert
Nicola Ken Barozzi (Chair
Sam Ruby wrote:
I am trying to follow http://incubator.apache.org/process.html
I have asked for this to be updated.
I have asked for information on how I can update this.
Berin Lautenbach is beginning to update the incubator documents. Apparently
you need to use Forrest. Parenthetically, I
Greg Stein wrote:
If we kept all incubated projects under the incubator it would have been
clear enough.
I'm alright with that, but I think we need infrastructure sign-off first.
If they respond with, holy crap. moving cvs repositories and mailing
lists are the biggest pains in the ass
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 19:00:57 -0400
Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judging from the move we made with james, CVS was easy. ezmlm a bit more
involved, but our users seemed to find us easily enough when the list
address changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Moving the
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
I'm under the weather, and a little irritable, but this is starting to
get under my skin.
I am trying to follow http://incubator.apache.org/process.html
I have asked for this to be updated.
I have asked for information on how I can update this.
Sam,
I
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judging from the move we made with james, CVS was easy. ezmlm a bit
more
involved, but our users seemed to find us easily enough when the list
address changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Moving the web site
(CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
It seems that the same goes for the JaxMe, too.
Anyway, please take a glance at
http://ws.apache.org/
... note section.
Regards,
-- Tetsuya. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 04:00:36 -0700
(Subject: Re: Disclaimer text for incubated projects)
Greg Stein [EMAIL
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 08:38:40PM +0900, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
(CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
It seems that the same goes for the JaxMe, too.
Anyway, please take a glance at
http://ws.apache.org/
... note section.
That note section has zero bearing on the wsrp4j pages themselves. I hit
(CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 04:39:00 -0700
Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, please take a glance at
http://ws.apache.org/
... note section.
snip/
But what pisses me off the most is that I raised this about wsrp4j a
couple weeks ago, but it wasn't fixed.
Aha,
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:10:58PM +0900, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 04:39:00 -0700
Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, please take a glance at
http://ws.apache.org/
... note section.
snip/
But what pisses me off the most is that I raised this about wsrp4j a
Confirmed. Really great job! (Otsukare sama desita)
-- Tetsuya. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
P.S. I think you can change the URL of the link to Pluto
(@ left-side navi on wsrp4j project website):
http://jakarta.apache.org/pluto/
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 05:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
(Subject: Re: Disclaimer text
Greg Stein wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:10:58PM +0900, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 04:39:00 -0700
Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, please take a glance at
http://ws.apache.org/
... note section.
snip/
But what pisses me off the most is that I raised this about
Greg Stein wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 08:38:40PM +0900, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
(CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
It seems that the same goes for the JaxMe, too.
Anyway, please take a glance at
http://ws.apache.org/
... note section.
That note section has zero bearing on the wsrp4j pages themselves.
Sam Ruby wrote:
I'm under the weather, and a little irritable, but this is starting to
get under my skin.
I am trying to follow http://incubator.apache.org/process.html
I have asked for this to be updated.
I have asked for information on how I can update this.
Sam,
I am 90% of the way through
After getting positive feedback from this list about the idea of allowing
incubated projects to publish binary releases as long as they clearly
identified them as being part of an incubated project, I've written the
following paragraph to be used on the web site and inside the README
file (in
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
XMLBeans is an incubated subproject under the sponsorship of the Apache
Software Foundation's (ASF) XML project.
it all looks good, except for this. i think i would prefer something
like
'XMLBeans is an effort undergoing incubation at the Apache Software
Foundation
On 01/10/2003, at 06:47, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
XMLBeans is an incubated subproject under the sponsorship of the
Apache
Software Foundation's (ASF) XML project.
it all looks good, except for this. i think i would prefer something
like
'XMLBeans is an effort
35 matches
Mail list logo
