On 09/10/12 14:06, Andrea Aime wrote:
> The same could be said for builds against OpenJDK, JDK 7, Windows and so on.
Not quite. In my view, JDBC is core functionality, on a core platform. I
agree with you that supplementary builds like OpenJDK, JDK, Windows, and
builds in paths with spaces can b
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote:
> On 08/10/12 03:03, Andrea Aime wrote:
>
>> the JDBC build keeps on failing and keeps on polluting the devel mailing
>> list.
>>
>
> It is not polluting the list. It is warning the list that this test is
> br
On 08/10/12 03:03, Andrea Aime wrote:
> the JDBC build keeps on failing and keeps on polluting the devel mailing
> list.
> Since it's clear we get no short term fix
I think I might have a long term fix. Would that do?
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/36
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GE
On 08/10/12 03:03, Andrea Aime wrote:
> the JDBC build keeps on failing and keeps on polluting the devel mailing
> list.
It is not polluting the list. It is warning the list that this test is
broken. That is what it is for. The solution should be to fix the test
or the underlying code that cause
On 08/10/12 23:41, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> @Ben: What db's do you run the jdbc tests for?
Both kinds: PostGIS *and* Oracle:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSZfUnCK5qk
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre
--
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>
> Aside, the jdbc builds seem to occupy the build server for a long time.
>>
>> Indeed, it might make sense to shut that build off completely on the main
> build server if other build servers are running the same tests.
>
>
I plan to have
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> +1. Shall we set it up as another google group?
> geotools-bui...@googlegroups.com ?
Works for me
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowol
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Michael Bedward
wrote:
> > On Monday, 8 October 2012 at 5:03 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> >
> > Actually, what I'm proposing is that we create a separate, parallel,
> mailing
> > list
> > for builds that are not the "main" one, the one that people get their
> head
> > o
+1. Shall we set it up as another google group?
geotools-bui...@googlegroups.com ?
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi,
> the JDBC build keeps on failing and keeps on polluting the devel mailing
> list.
> Since it's clear we get no short term fix can we move that build mails o
On 08/10/12 04:09, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Do we have any idea what is killing the JDBC Build.
[GEOT-4204] Intermittent JDBCJoinTest failures
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4204
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Resear
> On Monday, 8 October 2012 at 5:03 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
>
> Actually, what I'm proposing is that we create a separate, parallel, mailing
> list
> for builds that are not the "main" one, the one that people get their head
> off if they break.
Seems like a very good idea.
Aside, the jdbc builds
Sounds good Andrea, I would rather a separate email list then shutting off
communication completely.
Do we have any idea what is killing the JDBC Build.
--
Jody Garnett
On Monday, 8 October 2012 at 5:03 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi,
> the JDBC build keeps on failing and keeps on polluting
Hi,
the JDBC build keeps on failing and keeps on polluting the devel mailing
list.
Since it's clear we get no short term fix can we move that build mails off
the
devel list?
Actually, what I'm proposing is that we create a separate, parallel,
mailing list
for builds that are not the "main" one, th
13 matches
Mail list logo
