I'm using Spring therefore I tried to configure the
OpenEntityManagerInViewInterceptor, if this works as it's supposed to
I shouldn't get JDODetachedFieldAccessException anymore, but I still
get it.
And what state are the objects in when you access the field ?
detached ? and what
Hi all,
This is the first time I'm posting about Gaelyk in this group, I hope it's
okay according to the netiquette of the Group.
If not, please advise me the best place to give some news on that topic, on
an occasional basis.
I wanted to share with you the r*elease of Gaelyk 0.3.2, a
Another approach I've just found is doing something like:
ApiProxy.getCurrentEnvironment().getClass().getName().contains
(LocalHttpRequestEnvironment)
Not sure in the end what's the best approach of them all.
On 24 nov, 16:29, Marcel Overdijk marceloverd...@gmail.com wrote:
Or use a Listener
I am using XMPP and getting following error when I try
/CODE*/
Message msg = new MessageBuilder()
.withRecipientJids(receiverJid)
.withFromJid(new JID(recipientJid[0].getId()) )
.withMessageType(MessageType.NORMAL)
Realized the issue - didn't realize there was a cross domain
restriction on AJAX. Problem solved. thanks
On Nov 27, 5:09 pm, shaz ssh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to submit an HTTP request via AJAX from the client to the
Google Maps Geocoding service. I keep getting a status of 0.
I
On Nov 27, 7:19 pm, Diana Cruise diana.l.cru...@gmail.com wrote:
Ted... java.lang.Thread, you want to launch new processes from within
your app server...that's a job for URLFetch.
Unlike Thread, I can't use URLFetch to perform a task asynchronously
and return a result to the calling thread.
I am not sure, but i think you dont need to(should not) set fromJid, as
message will be sent from your application JID.
I am running following code and its working .
JID jid = new JID(responseJid);
Message msg = new MessageBuilder()
.withRecipientJids(jid)
Problem solved
I found solution at comment 16 of Issue 1226
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/browse_thread/thread/24aadd04f3ae0245
Regards
Sahil
On Nov 25, 11:14 pm, Sahil Mahajan sahilm2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Stephan
I am new to gae. My JAVA_HOME variable has value
Actually, many people had the same reaction when GAE/J was released.
See for instance,
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/2009/04/16/google-app-engine-java-sucks
Without a doubt if some smaller player created such an incompatible
implementation they would not be allowed to call it 'Java'.
On Nov 27,
hi, can anyone comments whether my architecture is ok for using
@transactional with spring on service layer?
http://tinyurl.com/ybmev2b
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to
I removed .withFromJid(new JID(recipientJid[0].getId()) )
but I am still facing problem.
The servlet works correctly for first two messages. But problem starts
when servlet receives third message.
I find this strange. Initially it works fine, but gives problem from
third message.
Regards
Sahil
It's interesting for me too.
This is not the answer but may be useful:
http://blog.cloudwhiz.com/2009/09/exposing-soap-service-on-gae-part-1.html
-Andrey
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send
Hi all,
I have a problem with a fairly basic JPA query that contains a Like
clause
My query looks like this
SELECT FROM package.Object q WHERE q.property LIKE 'w%'
According to the discussions in this forum there should be limited
support for this. However I can´t get this limited query (which
Is there a way to import the source code into eclipse of a previously
deployed project from the app engine cloud? I want to work on the site
but from another pc that does not share the workspace.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for
I developed an program with Spring MVC + annotations. He done in my
computer. But when I make deploy and try acess the application, the GAE
throws an error. Someone got use annotations with Spring MVC?
--
Rafael Reuber
MSN/Gtalk: psico.in...@gmail.com
--
You received this message because you
Hi,
found the problem, I was still using an old GAE version. When I switch
to GAE 1.2.6 the query described above works
regards
Wouter
On Nov 28, 8:53 pm, Wouter wouter.nie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem with a fairly basic JPA query that contains a Like
clause
My query
A simple project (where the JSF2 framework initializes and a default page is
displayed) is available at Google Code: http://code.google.com/p/jsf2template/.
This is the source code for the application I wrote developing the tutorial
for configuring a JSF 2 project to run on Google App Engine -
You might want to use a framework like Struts or Spring. I also have a
redirect.jsp in my app like Rusty, only that any of my Spring MVC
controllers can use it and package in the request the url where the
page will be redirected.
Anyway the benefit I see here is that for one you don't have to
Hi.
I tested execution by the following source.
JID jid = new JID(x...@gmail.com); // set your send gmail address
Message msg = new MessageBuilder().withRecipientJids(jid)
.withFromJid(new JID(x...@appspot.com) ) // set your
ap...@appspot.com
.withMessageType(MessageType.NORMAL)
On Nov 27, 2:42 pm, 风笑雪 kea...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, I just want to know how to avoid big entity group, is it
possible or not.
It obvious has some other parts need to be figured out, but I'm not
really building a bank system, just concern about it.
Main anomaly called arbitrage (no such
Why can you not set up forwarding from the naked domain to www? It is
a DNS function, not anything to do with your browser.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to
On Nov 28, 9:38 am, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote:
Why can you not set up forwarding from the naked domain to www? It is
a DNS function, not anything to do with your browser.
Onway supplierdependent got enom records, godaddy records, offsite,
onsite, looks
Hi,
I added an index to a table with approx 300 records almost 6 hours ago
and the index is still building. I am starting to worry, in particular
since I will have to add indexes in the future when there are many
more records. Is this kind of delay the norm? I don't see any quota
related errors,
By default, the development server should preserve data between runs.
Are you sure you're not launching dev_appserver with the -c or --
clear_datastore flags?
On Nov 27, 11:38 pm, james_027 cai.hai...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
How do i preserve my data during the development stage. Every time I
Same pb here with a table containing approx 100 records. Already 30
minutes and still building.
On 28 nov, 14:07, HC hc...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
I added an index to a table with approx 300 records almost 6 hours ago
and the index is still building. I am starting to worry, in particular
since I
On Nov 28, 3:19 pm, JDT john.david@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello All,
I have an application where I need store the difference in time
between two events. Unfortunately the datastore only supports storing
'time' as a datetime.datetime object.
In an attempt to circumvent this constraint,
same here. i was testing a new class design and indexes are stuck for 5
records :(
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send
same problem here...
following is my JDO class:
@PersistenceCapable(identityType = IdentityType.APPLICATION)
public class _Contact{
@Persistent(primaryKey = true)
private String EmailID;
@Persistent
private String Name;
@Persistent
private ListString Groups;
}
Thanks for the response.
Maybe I don't understand something, but why should the 5 second setup
on a new instance bother me? A new instance should be created when
other instances are near capacity, and not when they exceed it, right?
So once initialized it can be dummy-run internally and only
Another question, you both recommended Python for some of its
features, but isn't Python much slower than Java? So wouldn't that
necessitate many more instances/CPUs to keep with the query load?
On Nov 28, 9:45 am, Niklas Rosencrantz teknik...@gmail.com wrote:
1) pricing
absolutely seems so.
Are you using a Mac ?
On Nov 28, 3:21 pm, dburns drrnb...@gmail.com wrote:
By default, the development server should preserve data between runs.
Are you sure you're not launching dev_appserver with the -c or --
clear_datastore flags?
On Nov 27, 11:38 pm, james_027 cai.hai...@gmail.com wrote:
An app instance cannot serve 2 request at the same time.
Suppose you have 100 requests/sec, and GAE offers 100 app instances to
serve these requests.
At one time it suddenly raise up to 200 requests/sec, so GAE tries to
create 100 more app instances to serve.
But create a new Java instance may
On the command line, you can use:
appcfg.py --emai...@b.com update [dir]
You still have to enter your password. But I find it only prompts me
for my password every 24 hours.
On Nov 27, 8:44 pm, samwyse samw...@gmail.com wrote:
*sigh*
Thanks for letting me know it isn't just me. Maybe
Another question, you both recommended Python for some of its
features, but isn't Python much slower than Java?
Maybe, maybe not, but it may not matter. What fraction of your run-
time actually depends on language speed?
On Nov 28, 9:13 am, Eric shel...@gmail.com wrote:
Another question, you
Maybe I don't understand something, but why should the 5 second setup
on a new instance bother me? A new instance should be created when
other instances are near capacity, and not when they exceed it, right?
So once initialized it can be dummy-run internally and only
available 5 seconds later
Yes ! My index is serving :-)
On 28 nov, 17:04, Prashant antsh...@gmail.com wrote:
same here. i was testing a new class design and indexes are stuck for 5
records :(
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group,
mine too...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more
Hey all,
I've been looking at the Task Queue API and counter example. In my
app, each user will have a couple of counters maintained for them,
counting various things.
Thing is, these counters need to be accurate. So I'm not sure if the
example given for the Task Queue API using memcache would
Thanks for all your comments.
Regarding Python/Java speed, 99% of the runtime is spent iterating in
an attempt to converge to some numerical solution .
Loops, arithmetic and memory updates. I would guess an interpreted
language like Python (am I right?) would be much slower.
About the instance
I think there would have to be some divergence between what the counter
should be and what the user will actually see at any given time.. since if
you have a high rate of counts happening for a user.. you'd get contention
when trying to update all the count each time the event being counted
I was wondering: isn't using reference properties a waste of space?
Wouldn't it make more sense to store the id (assuming not using
key_name) of the entity. After all, if the Kind is known, one can
easily generate the full key based on that. And with a reference
property it actually stores the
To be fair, this method I described may be overkill.
I developed it when I was thinking about how to lighten up insert costs to
the datastore.
I figured that, if one could store some of the relevant information in the
Column name (specifically, string info like who's count is this?), that
would
Hey Eli,
Thanks very much for your replies.
You're thinking along the same lines as me, although I wasn't
considering using Expandos to store the data.
My concern is sort of independent of this anyway - i'm worried that
you can actually have more than one task aggregating changes to a
counter
Well, it sounds like you're wanting to have the aggregation task fired off
when a count event happens for a user. So, then, as you mention, you'd need
a way to check if there wasn't already an aggregation task running. And, in
the worst case scenario, you could have two tasks get fired off at
Though, let me re-iterate... all the round-about stuff I'm talking about is
something to consider if you don't want to try and modify the sharded
counter technique mentioned in this article:
http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/sharding_counters.html
oh, and duh.. the first part of that article does the sharded counting..
using transactions without memcached.
So, presumably, it should do exactly what you want.
you just need to modify that to allow counting for an arbitrary number of
users.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Eli Jones
Are you an Apps user (ie. /a/mydomain.com) as opposed to a gmail.com
user?
On Nov 27, 6:55 pm, mika-vienna mka...@deepsec.net wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to Google Apps and Wave, experimenting with Wave Bots
I registered my first App with SMS verification and it doesn't appear
in my
2009/11/29 Eric shel...@gmail.com:
Thanks for all your comments.
Regarding Python/Java speed, 99% of the runtime is spent iterating in
an attempt to converge to some numerical solution .
Loops, arithmetic and memory updates. I would guess an interpreted
language like Python (am I right?)
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Eric shel...@gmail.com wrote:
Another question, you both recommended Python for some of its
features, but isn't Python much slower than Java? So wouldn't that
necessitate many more instances/CPUs to keep with the query load?
Yes, the python VM is slower than
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:09 AM, MajorProgamming sefira...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering: isn't using reference properties a waste of space?
Wouldn't it make more sense to store the id (assuming not using
key_name) of the entity. After all, if the Kind is known, one can
easily generate the
50 matches
Mail list logo
