2016-08-07 23:47 GMT+02:00 Michael Havens :
> I found the control points. Of the three pictures one of them would not do
> it automatically so I inserted a couple manually. As for verifying the ones
> it found automatically I didn't inspect them other than glancing at
>> Now that I think of it I don't know what I was thinking! What I meant
>by
>that is you have control point 'x' and 'y' on one picture and you have
>the
>corresponding 'x' and 'y' points on the other picture. but the second
>x/y
>points were taken at a different zoom factor... you know what I
>
> > What maybe someone could do is make it so control points from images
> > proportionally scale to fit together.
>
> Others have addressed your probable issues, but I'm still left
> wondering what you mean with this suggestion. Can you elaborate?
>
> Now that I think of it I don't know
thank you all for your assistance. I like the idea of using dt to correct
distortion. but I just spent a little time playing with the lens
calibration. How should I reset that back to its original state?
While I mentioned that I tried calibrating this with a starburst image. The
corrected
On August 7, 2016 6:23:04 PM EDT, Michael Havens
wrote:
>I figured out lens distortion but what should I take a picture of? I
>think
>that image with lines radiating from a central point. What do you know?
>I
>just took a picture of my monitor. with that it found two x
I figured out lens distortion but what should I take a picture of? I think
that image with lines radiating from a central point. What do you know? I
just took a picture of my monitor. with that it found two x axis lines and
one y.
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Michael Havens
I found the control points. Of the three pictures one of them would not do
it automatically so I inserted a couple manually. As for verifying the ones
it found automatically I didn't inspect them other than glancing at them
and seeing they appeared correct.
How do I figure out lens distortion?
Hi Michael
On 07.08.2016 18:02, Michael Havens wrote:
> Here are the photos and stitced picture.
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2xvsVTZy4y1T0NsMkdOdGo2TWs
>From what I understand from the pics you have posted (and thank you for
not sending them out to everyone on this mailing list but
On August 7, 2016 12:02:16 PM EDT, Michael Havens
wrote:
>Here are the photos and stitced picture.
>https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2xvsVTZy4y1T0NsMkdOdGo2TWs
>
>On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 11:32:43 AM UTC-4, Michael Havens wrote:
>>
>> Hello gentlemen (and women),
Here are the photos and stitced picture.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2xvsVTZy4y1T0NsMkdOdGo2TWs
On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 11:32:43 AM UTC-4, Michael Havens wrote:
>
> Hello gentlemen (and women),
>
> I take pictures of the interior of houses. I use hugin in lew of
> purchasing a wide
I forgive you! Thanks, I kicked it up to 100% where it belongs IMHO.
On 03/26/2013 12:18 PM, Donald Johnston wrote:
70% because it was version 0.7! ;o) Sorry … it had to be said.
On 2013-03-26, at 11:03 AM, T. Modes thomas.mo...@gmx.de wrote:
Hmmm. Here, the Simple interface's optimal size
Great explanation! :-)
And it's so much easier to understand than e.g.
http://wiki.panotools.org/Diffraction#Resolution
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_Preferences#Auto_align
This reminded me of something similarly elegant, the compression haiku
by Bradford Bohonus, posted a long time ago on
On 03/25/2013 06:40 AM, T. Modes wrote:
On 25 Mrz., 04:34, Gnome Nomad gnomeno...@gmail.com wrote:
On the screen you see after pressing the Create Panorama button, there
are two spin boxes for setting size. Could we have an Optimal Size
button, please? Thanks.
When this dialog is shown, the
Hmmm. Here, the Simple interface's optimal size (1553x284, as indicated
by the spinners) is noticeably smaller than the optimal size (2266x727,
as calculated by the button on the Stitch tab of the Advanced
interface).
That's the downscale factor: 70 % as default. As already written.
I
Gnome Nomad schrieb am 26.03.13 11:13:
On 03/25/2013 06:40 AM, T. Modes wrote:
On 25 Mrz., 04:34, Gnome Nomad gnomeno...@gmail.com wrote:
On the screen you see after pressing the Create Panorama button, there
are two spin boxes for setting size. Could we have an Optimal Size
button, please?
70% because it was version 0.7! ;o) Sorry … it had to be said.
On 2013-03-26, at 11:03 AM, T. Modes thomas.mo...@gmx.de wrote:
Hmmm. Here, the Simple interface's optimal size (1553x284, as indicated
by the spinners) is noticeably smaller than the optimal size (2266x727,
as calculated by the
On 25 Mrz., 04:34, Gnome Nomad gnomeno...@gmail.com wrote:
On the screen you see after pressing the Create Panorama button, there
are two spin boxes for setting size. Could we have an Optimal Size
button, please? Thanks.
When this dialog is shown, the output size is already set to the
17 matches
Mail list logo