The announcement letter is here for 8 Gbps:
http://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_ca/7/897/ENUS109-417
Shipments should start very soon (on July 31, 2009). FICON Express8 is
available for System z10 EC and BC. IBM is withdrawing FICON Express4
adapters for z10 machines (only) effective October 27,
Interesting, but I would think that FTP is all I/O over a
very slow path. Unless you are doing some heavy duty software
based encryption/decryption, FTP should not consume enough
CPU for WLM to even notice.
I agree. All the TCP related hints others gave are more probable
to be of help.
I will be out of the office starting 07/23/2009 and will not return until
08/03/2009.
I will respond to your message when I return.
If your request requires immediate attention, Please contact the MVS
Technical Support Hotline
at 1-866-866-4488 x12000
Good luck fella - there's a lot of (justified IMHO) bad blood out there
you're going to have to overcome.
It'd better be good.
Shane ...
..
.
Scott Fagen
Principal Architect
Mainframe 2.0
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
You can view XMI files in PC ONLY if the original library in HOST is a
classic
PO.
If the base file to build de XMI file is a PDSE, you cannot inspect the file in
PC,
but yo can upload to a HOST y recreate it without problems.
Angel Luis Domínguez
If Scott's the architect, it definitely is worth our time to look at it.
Just my $.02. Make that $.01 if cap and tax and/or universal healthcare
pass.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Scott Fagen
Sent: Wednesday, July
And when you find that Mark, please post it. I have been looking for
that for weeks.
Ken Klein
Sr. Systems Programmer
Kentucky Farm Bureau Insurance - Louisville
kenneth.kl...@kyfb.com
502-495-5000 x7011
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Klein, Kenneth
John, the problem is that the same name exists on the system I am
running on. I think I might try iehmove.
Shouldn't make any difference. We have duplicate RESVOL sets for each
z/OS image we run,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Klein, Kenneth
Allan, the problem is that the datasets are on the target res vol
with
the same name as the dataset on the currently running res vol and they
are catalogged in the master cat. Eg. sys1.serblink,
Yes, you are both correct. The serious warning messages, some in red,
just scared the heck outta me. Now I have iebcopied the full datasets to
larger ones and done the renames manually with ispf being sure to only
affect the inactive resvol that is the target for my maint. Now the
target pack is
in /etc/profile I added
set -o vi
and then I can do esc k to recall previous commands. Now if I can figure
out how to change the keyboard in PuTTY to send an esck for the up arrow.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Klein, Kenneth kenneth.kl...@kyfb.comwrote:
And when you find that Mark,
We started looking at using this but soon found out it does not support
secure FTP so that came to a quick halt. CA has said this may come in the
future. With PCI requirements SFTP is a must for us.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Klein, Kenneth
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 7:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: What's the difference in SMP/E between the SOURCEID's
called RSU and PUT ???
Yes, you
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 6:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CA Mainframe 2.0
snip
Mainframe 2.0 provides a generalized framework that any ISV
or
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Linda Mooney
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 10:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Need to delete olsolete entries from tape volcat
Thanks, John, is it possible to delete a
I agree with Scott as the architect, it has the potential to be greatly
improved over ca-aggravator.
- Original Message -
From: Richards, Robert B. robert.richa...@opm.gov
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 5:45 AM
Subject: Re: CA
I just installed it, thank you!
Honestly, it's my first time with ShowzOS. g
I just get tons of informations, some of them are clear for me, but
there are sections which I understand.
Is there any description of ShowzOS's output available?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
BRE Bank SA
I would hazard a guess that we would require SFTP as well.
Scott, your mission should you choose to accept it.
As always, this email will self-destruct in 5 seconds.
Bob
-
Robert B. Richards(Bob)
US Office of
snip
We now have a problem in that we want to remove all of the volcat entries
from the shared volcat that belonged to the old hardware VTS that has been
de-installed
unsnip
deleting the various entries is a way to go but the VCAT is a catalog. you
could also AMS REPRO the old range to another
While I finally bit the bullet and learned (somewhat) how to use vi, I
think using it as the command editor is overkill. The emacs keys for
recalling commands and moving forward and back on the line are much more
amenable to key bindings. I do:
set -o emacs
and set up arrow to CTRL-p, down arrow
Yes, that's how I remember it. And to correct myself we do have the
DDDef's hard coded with a specific volser. We clone the target.csi and
zonedit to create a new sandbox for maint.
Ken Klein
Sr. Systems Programmer
Kentucky Farm Bureau Insurance - Louisville
kenneth.kl...@kyfb.com
502-495-5000
I could be wrong (and often am) but I think PCI only cares about cardholder
data and some ancillary processes (like system security).
A documented (and management approved) exception with compensating controls
ought to be sufficient. Of course, much depends on the quality of the auditors.
Robert B. wrote:
As always, this email will self-destruct in 5 seconds.
Your self-destruct mechanism isn't working! ;-D
It is now 16:28 (GMT 14:28) and I had to destroy your mail.
Feel free to destroy my email... ;-D
--
We've been using MSM beta version, and we're very impressed at this early stage.
As an example, it took me about 2 minutes work to get VTAPE installed (not
configured). Elapsed time longer obviously, due to downloading and SMP/E
batch work, but you can put your feet up whilst you wait, or
I just read through a lot of the announcement letter from the link quoted
below. This sounds very interesting. I don't know what the FICON Express8
channels cost, but I know if you just bought your machine, and you decide
you need those channels, you it will probably cost a lot to convert. I
Techtarget is running a survey on Mainframe usage etc.
The first 2 or 3 pages is boring stuff but it is worth it to get to the real
mainframe questions.
Link = http://go.techtarget.com/r/8764676/1317583
I'm posting it here to make sure they get the right audience for the survey.
quote
The
Agreed -- we are allowed no unsecured file transfer to the mainframe due
to PCI. Our preference is FTPS but we could (for certain kludges) work
with SFTP. All vendors need to be reconsidering their supported
protocols.
Jerry Whitteridge
Mainframe Engineering
Safeway Inc
925 951 4184
Eric Bielefeld pisze:
I just read through a lot of the announcement letter from the link
quoted below. This sounds very interesting. I don't know what the
FICON Express8 channels cost, but I know if you just bought your
machine, and you decide you need those channels, you it will probably
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Jerry
Whitteridgejerry.whitteri...@safeway.com wrote:
Agreed -- we are allowed no unsecured file transfer to the mainframe due
to PCI. Our preference is FTPS but we could (for certain kludges) work
with SFTP. All vendors need to be reconsidering their
No -- the problem is the credentials are in clear if you use your method. The
link has to be encrypted.
Jerry Whitteridge
Mainframe Engineering
Safeway Inc
925 951 4184
jerry.whitteri...@safeway.com
If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough.
-Original
I doubt if the new channels will be significantly more expensive if you buy
them with a new machine. If you just took delivery of your machine 2 months
ago, and then realize these chanells could help because you have a huge DASD
farm, you might be talking significant dollars, although if you
Just curious, why do you or your security folks care about the encryption at
an external company where the data transfer is all incoming (to you). Seems
that CA should be the one concerned about the security of their system (But
they can't required secure transfer for everyone). I don't see
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Jerry Whitteridge
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 11:06 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CA Mainframe 2.0
No -- the problem is the credentials are in clear if you use
your
McKown, John wrote:
I am not familiar with CA's framework. But I do like ShopzSeries' delivery
methodology.
ShopzSeries is not available to entities outside IBM. It's primarily an
order fulfillment tool.
SMP/E RECEIVE FROMNETWORK can be used by anyone who understands it.
--
Edward E
Eric,
Yes, you would definitely bury Escon channels doing anything with
current disk or tape. However, moving to 4 Gb Ficon (much less 8 Gb)
you won't see any significant delays across the channels - unless you
have a huge, well-balanced DASD farm (without balanced channels :-) )
Rex
We have learnt that there is not always logic involved in what the PCI
QSA demands to certify we are compliant. Not all QSA's have a good
grounding in Mainframe strengths and weaknesses - despite our best
efforts in education.
However I agree that a transfer initiated from the mainframe using
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 11:25 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CA Mainframe 2.0
McKown, John wrote:
I am not familiar with CA's framework. But I do like
It appears to be a survey from CA since at the end it asks if you want CA
to send you the survey results.
I said 'yes', and supplied my email address. After which it promptly told
me I wasn't the demographic they were looking for and thank you for
playing...
hmmm
Now that we have z10's in the environment I started to look at the new
'stuff' I can turn on. One of them is ZHPF but that requires a
chargeable feature to the DASD array. Our DASD manager doesn't see any
problems with not having the feature installed and I don't know enough
about the benefits of
It appears to be a survey from CA since at the end it asks if you want CA to
send you the survey results.
I said 'yes', and supplied my email address. After which it promptly told me
I wasn't the demographic they were looking for and thank you for playing...
hmmm
To quote Teal'c: Indeed!
The
I said 'no' and got the same response.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Bill
Washburnbwashb...@winwholesale.com wrote:
It appears to be a survey from CA since at the end it asks if you want CA
to send you the survey results.
I said 'yes', and supplied my email address. After which it
It does the same response to pretty much everyone, no matter what your
answers were.
- Original Message -
From: Bill Washburn bwashb...@winwholesale.com
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: TechTarget Mainframe
I answered two questions and go the Not in the demographic response.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Don Leahy don.le...@leacom.ca wrote:
I said 'no' and got the same response.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Bill
Washburnbwashb...@winwholesale.com wrote:
It appears to be a survey from
Guess they are not going to share the results with anyone.
Bobbie Jo just...@peoplepc.com
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
07/23/2009 01:00 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
Subject
Re: TechTarget
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:42:17 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
SMP/E RECEIVE FROMNETWORK can be used by anyone who understands it.
Well, what I like is the Download Director which downloads all the
subdirectories files for a given order.
Can't this be done with a handful of MGETs? Is Download
I answered two questions and go the Not in the demographic response.
Just what is the 'proper demographic'.
Why don't they just say:
I'm sorry, but your responses are not the ones we were expecting!
I'm sorry, but I thought you were looking for staff in mainframe shops.
-
Too busy driving to
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:21:38 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
No -- the problem is the credentials are in clear if you use
your method. The link has to be encrypted.
Jerry Whitteridge
There would be 1 of 3 possible methods (as I see it).
sftp - which is a type of file transfer over an SSH tunnel.
Mark Jacobs wrote:
Does anyone have any real world experiences with ZHPF that I can bring
to the attention to management?
We have done extensive in-house testing comparing standard non-zHPF
DX/LR[E], non-zHPF PFX, and zHPF channel programs. The tests measure
elapsed time, connect time,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 12:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CA Mainframe 2.0
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:42:17 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
SMP/E RECEIVE
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 12:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: TechTarget Mainframe Survey
I answered two questions and go the Not in the demographic
Has Pat Artis weighed in on this yet?
snip
We have done extensive in-house testing comparing standard non-zHPF
DX/LR[E], non-zHPF PFX, and zHPF channel programs. The tests measure
elapsed time, connect time, and throughput. We see *significant*
differences between these three approaches, with
We reset the MAXASSIZE to 900M. The OMVS options display shows that the
parm has been reset, but one of our LPARs shows (through the help of rexx
routine and getrlimit) that the Max AS is 825M. What parameter/resource
would limit getting the new value? Trying to keep question simple without
I remember that there is a AMAXSIZE parm set for the RACF userid (or something
similar) that can override MAXASSIZE.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Brian Szott
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:47 PM
To:
Where can I find the archives to this listserv?
Thks,
Bill J.
ASPG, Inc.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
Last line of every message.
*Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html*
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
William Janulin
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of William Janulin
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: LISTSERV archives
Where can I find the archives to this listserv?
Thks,
Bill J.
Thanks guys, that will teach me not to scroll down, eh?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: LISTSERV archives
-Original
On 7/23/2009 at 7:03 AM, Klein, Kenneth kenneth.kl...@kyfb.com wrote:
And when you find that Mark, please post it. I have been looking for
that for weeks.
Have you tried man sh ? Or, if you have access to a Linux system, man ksh
? I've never been interested in running ksh myself, but a
Visa does have cards beginning w/2. Don't know what they are yet.
Robert A. Rosenberg hal9...@panix.com
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
07/15/2009 06:31 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
Subject
If you want IBM's initial response to zPrime, ask your IBM business partner.
You can get a letter written by Mark Anzani (IBM VP and CTO, System z)
dated July 10.
Paragraph 4 and 5 lay out their position.
Seems like IBM thinks you might owe them more money not less if you
implement zPrime.
Found this on the web
http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/mainframe-blog/ibm-warns-custo
mers-about-neons-zprime/
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of JE Thinnes
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:00 PM
To:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Kirk Talmanrkueb...@tsys.com wrote:
Visa does have cards beginning w/2. Don't know what they are yet.
See http://www.merriampark.com/anatomycc.htm
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Anyone have a copy/example of using sysparm in the USSTAB for VTAM logon
screen,, to place system-id on screen.
I know there is something once on the cbt tape but I do not have access to
it..
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:13:50 +0200, R.S.
r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
You're welcome. It's self documented :-))
To be honest most part is based on all DISPLAY comands.
What kind sounds a secret to you?
BTW: SHOWzOS 7.19 will fail on z/OS R10 and z10. Fix will be ready soon
Roland
I
Anyone have a copy/example of using sysparm in the USSTAB for VTAM
logon screen,, to place system-id on screen. I know there is something once
on the cbt tape but I do not have access to it..
No sample, but code BUFFER=(addr,SCAN) on the USSMSG macro, and code
within the buffer wherever you
That should specify two ampersands and the character string 'SYSPARM'
without my quotes and without spaces.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message:
Hal Merritt wrote:
Old days? Still very much so today here in the US. It is called 'off road' diesel, and, except for the color and tax, it's exactly the same fuel. Or so I'm told.
Don't know the price difference but I'd suspect it's substantial. As the penalties for using it for
In a message dated 7/23/2009 2:01:00 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
william.janu...@aspg.com writes:
Where can I find the archives to this listserv?
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
**Dell Deals: Treat yourself to a sweet deal on popular
not a guro on asmblr... trying to figure out where this is to go and
coding it from older copy I have..
From:
Martin Kline martin.kl...@yrcw.com
To:
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:
07/23/2009 03:16 PM
Subject:
Re: USSTAB
Sent by:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Anyone have a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Anthony Giorgio
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Offload work to zIIP with zPRIME
Hal Merritt wrote:
Old days? Still very much so today here in the
Umm, uh, yes I know, uh uh, a friend told me. Yea that's it. A friend told
me.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Anthony Giorgio
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Offload
Did anyone else see the CA Mainframe 2.0 video? I just watched it. You can
find it at:
http://www.ca.com/lean-it-mainframe.aspx
It's 8 minutes long. The first 4 minutes could have all been said by IBM.
I've heard IBM presentations that sounded very similar. The last 4 minutes
talked
I just commented about the MCMG meeting that I attended last Friday. On the
ziip and zaap session that Al Sherkow gave, he talked quite a bit about the
zPrime product, as several people there had seen the discussion on IBM-Main.
He didn't have any knowledge (or at least he said he didn't)
Ron
This is not a matter for VTAM since an USSTAB is created from the assembler
(and linkage editor - or whatever it's called these days).
The VTAM support is described in Network Implementation Guide - Chapter 3
Implementing a VTAM network - Using MVS system symbols. It does *not*
include
Dave,
The best way to obtain CA MSM is to contact the AD/AM on your account.
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:21:29 -0700, Gibney, Dave gib...@wsu.edu wrote:
Hi Scott,
One question, when can we have it. We might have tried today :)
Point of strangeness, I actually sorta liked Aggravator :) nut I was
Eric Bielefeld wrote:
I attended the Midwest Computer Measurement Group (MCMG) meeting in
Milwaukee last Friday. Al Sherkow gave 2 good sessions on IBM's
pricing by workload license charging, and about ziip and zaap
processors. I believe he mentioned several times how complicated
their
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 14:00 -0500, JE Thinnes wrote:
If you want IBM's initial response to zPrime, ask your IBM business partner.
You can get a letter written by Mark Anzani (IBM VP and CTO, System z)
dated July 10.
Paragraph 4 and 5 lay out their position.
Seems like IBM thinks you
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Shaneibm-m...@tpg.com.au wrote:
This just has to get uglier.
Seems every vendor (IBM included) has been been announcing (to great
fanfare) new exploitation of specialty engines. Presumably with IBMs
imprimatur.
So the initial concept has become quite a bit
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Edward
Jaffeedja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
That might be their objective. If so, it's a failed strategy.
IBM knows that many ISVs figured out long ago how to enable 3rd-party code
to run on zAAP/zIIP. (A fun exercise.) If IBM bought NEON (or zPrime) to
The PCI Data Security Standard only addresses the protection of cardholder
information. The standard is not intended for any other data (although, in
my opinion, the specification would tend towards being a good idea for any
*sensitive* information that you would want to protect.) See
P S wrote:
My SWAG: This is NEON's way of getting IBM to buy them, to put them
out of their misery, a la PSI.
That might be their objective. If so, it's a failed strategy.
IBM knows that many ISVs figured out long ago how to enable 3rd-party
code to run on zAAP/zIIP. (A fun exercise.) If
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Shane
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Neon's zPrime - IBM response from July 10
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 14:00 -0500, JE Thinnes wrote:
If
I forgot to mention that in my last post, but yes, Al did bring up his
working as a consultant for zPrime. He also mentioned that a good part of
his consulting work is for IBM. He was very open about this, so I don't
think he would mind my mentioning it.
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. Systems
I will be out of the office starting 07/23/2009 and will not return until
07/29/2009.
I will be out of the office beginning Friday, July 24th, and will return on
Wednesday, July 29th. Thanks.
The information contained in this communication is confidential, private,
proprietary, or otherwise
Hi Ron,
The box does have Truecopy Async running on it to a site about 1000km
away. Our hardware vendor is still investigating, but has said a 'slot lock' is
being seen in shared memory/cache generated by some internal task within
the disk subsystem.
Unfortunately, we have to play a wait and
Hi,
the field in the RACF OMVS segment is ASSIZEMAX. It has to be seen
together with the BPXPRMxx symbol MAXASSIZE. Check the Unix System
Services Planning Guide, chapter 3.6.3.3 for details. These max-values are
among others which I call hard limits. In addition, Unix processes may
obtain
On Wednesday 22 July 2009, Vikesh Bhoola wrote:
On Wednesday 22 July 2009, Bob Woodside wrote:
Try this. Edit the file zip.c.
[snip]
Thanks for your assistance, done the above I get the following :
[snip]
Zip special compilation options:
* size of int: 4
* size
87 matches
Mail list logo
