quot;
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 12:16 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Merging Basic Sources into Sourcewriter
Brian,
I for two, would also like to have the opportunity to merge the old
and the new and face any dire consequences with a warning I am
sure there are others that also would l
Brian,
I for two, would also like to have the opportunity to merge the old
and the new and face any dire consequences with a warning I am
sure there are others that also would like that choice...
Thanks...
...Lew
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Arnold Sprague wrote:
> Brian,
>If I
Brian,
If I read your reply correctly, the merge problem does not
happen all the time. Perhaps, it only happens in isolated instances.
If this is so, is it possible for us to BE ALLOWED to do
merges WITH LEGACY FIRST INFORMING us that bad, very bad, things may
happen *and* that
Thank you, Brian. That's all I was asking for. Sorry if I caused any
problem. Have a nice day...
Lew
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Brian/Support
wrote:
> Lew,
>
> When I tested this and reported the problem with merging basic sources into
> sourcewriter sources I found that the detail entri
Lew,
When I tested this and reported the problem with merging basic sources
into sourcewriter sources I found that the detail entries from the old
style source were lost.
The Basic source details were not copied to the sourcewriter template
fields. Initially when you look at the source in th
:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 22:40:17 -0800
> From: rfvanwasshn...@gmail.com
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Merging Basi
Thank you, Richard. I have not seen any announcement from Legacy that
the "source conversion tool" is ready to be released but even if it
is, I would still like to know what is wrong with the "combine" method
and why it was taken away.
Lew
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Richard Van Wasshnova
e descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
>
> - Original Message - From: "Wynthner"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 8:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Merging Basic Sources into Sourcewriter
>
>
>> Perhaps, then again, perhaps not...
Hi Lew,
I'm with you. I also did several such merges under build 55 and
although everything seemed to be satisfactory and definitely the
quckest way to shrink my sources list I'd like to be sure.
I have been told it is because the "Source conversion tool" is ready
to be rolled out in the next buil
urces into Sourcewriter
Perhaps, then again, perhaps not...
But until a full explaination of just why the feature was pulled and the
warning issued one is left to wonder.
--- On Tue, 1/6/09, Elizabeth Richardson
wrote:
From: Elizabeth Richardson
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Merging Basic So
I believe some-one wrote a few days ago that the Source Conversion tool
is due in the next build, so perhaps removing what we had was a
preliminary step?
-
JL
JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists
http://www.jgen.ws/jlog
Wynthner wrote:
Perhaps, then again, perhaps not...
But
Perhaps, then again, perhaps not...
But until a full explaination of just why the feature was pulled and the
warning issued one is left to wonder.
--- On Tue, 1/6/09, Elizabeth Richardson wrote:
> From: Elizabeth Richardson
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Merging Basic Sources into Source
) Thompson
- Original Message -
From: "Chick Lewis"
To:
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Merging Basic Sources into Sourcewriter
I am not getting any error message, nor is there any evidence of
damage that I can see, but Legacy must have removed
; Cc: ; ;
>
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 4:47 PM
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Merging Basic Sources into Sourcewriter
>
>
>> Sorry to keep asking about this issue and I hate to be a pest, but I
>> really need to know what, if any damage has been done to my file
>> becaus
Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
- Original Message -
From: "Chick Lewis"
To:
Cc: ; ;
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 4:47 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Merging Basic Sources into Sourcewriter
Sorry to keep asking about this issue and I hate to be a pest, but I
really need to know wh
Sorry to keep asking about this issue and I hate to be a pest, but I
really need to know what, if any damage has been done to my file
because I merged basic sources into sourcewriter before that feature
was removed for some unknown reason in build 7.0.0.72. A response
from Legacy would be greatly
ere
> getting from the list.
>
> Kirsten
>
> -Original Message-
> From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com]on
> Behalf Of Chick Lewis
> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 4:52 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [L
Of Chick Lewis
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 4:52 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Merging basic sources into sourcewriter
Hi Kristen,
Thank you for your comment, but I am confused. I noticed at the bottom
of your message that an **Original
: "Chick Lewis"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Merging basic sources into sourcewriter
Hi Kristen,
Thank you for your comment, but I am confused. I noticed at the bottom
of your message that an **Original Message from
k...@legacyfamilytree.com o
k Lewis
> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 11:31 AM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Merging basic sources into sourcewriter
>
>
> Maybe so, but it would be nice if Legacy would at least acknowledge
> why the merge feature has been remove
yfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Merging basic sources into sourcewriter
Maybe so, but it would be nice if Legacy would at least acknowledge
why the merge feature has been removed and tell us the pitfalls of
having done it that way. Legacy has been extremely silent on this
question and has
Maybe so, but it would be nice if Legacy would at least acknowledge
why the merge feature has been removed and tell us the pitfalls of
having done it that way. Legacy has been extremely silent on this
question and has not answered a message I sent directly to support.
If, as you say, the sourcewr
Hi Lew,
I too was very upset with Legacy after upgrading from build 55. I had
done a half dozen merges of old syle to source writer which required
only slight touch ups. By the time I got back to trying to do more
(after build 55 was trashed) Legacy was protecting me from myself and
not allowing.
g directly with the company seems a much better way to do it.
>
> Elizabeth
> researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
>
> - Original Message - From: "Chick Lewis"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 1:00 PM
> Subject: [L
mething you'd like to suggest,
> communicating directly with the company seems a much better way to do it.
>
> Elizabeth
> researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
>
> - Original Message - From: "Chick Lewis"
> To:
> Sen
Elizabeth
> researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chick Lewis"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 1:00 PM
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Merging basic sources into sourcewriter
>
>
>
er way to do it.
Elizabeth
researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
- Original Message -
From: "Chick Lewis"
To:
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 1:00 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Merging basic sources into sourcewriter
I would like to hear from Lega
I would like to hear from Legacy as to why this feature was removed
(build 76, I think) It seems to work very well and I have had no
problems converting sources from FTM16 into sourcewriter using this
method. Apparently there are others also that liked this feature. I
think Legacy should explain wh
28 matches
Mail list logo