Jackie
I agree but I'd like to clarify your statement at the end of first paragraph "
... and it does help identify someone as being from a particular family". This
is where errors can occur. Blood/marriage lines can be identified this way but
it can also merely mean that the family were retai
Laura, Yes, The information is carried forward from FTM to Legacy and
appears in the . It seems that the check boxes, Assigned Sources> Edit
Detail> Tag/Comments, are not auto populated. In my example only the
source name appears in the narrative report. If the check boxes are
selected, the source
I logged a bug in June, 2010 (ticket [04A-13A13DF1-6EE4]) that sounds very
similar to this, if I understand correctly. In my case, I was testing the
export from Legacy and then re-import to Legacy. The source database has a
mixture of Basic and SourceWriter sources.
The problem was with the checkb
Of course, for those of us who dabble in the medieval, this runs right
into the question of the so-called by- names - the infamous "of
Hereford", "of Gloucester" etc. They aren't true surnames - nor are they
true locative names. In many cases they only indicate where a family's
seat of power was a
Leonard,
I am a previous user of FTM16 (and still do a gedcom backwards to the
program for various charts, etc that Legacy does not do). My sources
transferred correctly without any problems. All fields of the source
transferred correctly to Legacy from the FTM16 gedcom. Did you use the
followi
Hard to understand why you wouldn't use a residence event and you could forget
the "OF." If "OF" has been used correctly, it ALWAYS means the person lived
there. Jerry
Carl Cox wrote:
>
>
>>
>
>The software I use on my web site requires a GEDCOM input, and d
Hi again,
Trying to understand exactly what the import has done.
Is your Master Source in Legacy just --> Census, 1900 CT? And, is this
consistent with the FTM equivalent of Master Source, or is your FTM master
source at a lower level e.g. including county, township, district?
Is there a
Paul and Ron, FTM v16 uses a straight forward two screen templet similar
to Legacy's basic source approach. V16 was discontinued in 2008 when
Ancestry tried to invent the wheel, but there is little difference
between the two programs when selecting an existing source or
adding/creating a new sourc
Nannette;
I'm sorry to hear you're having problems too. I'm glad I had a backup.
Unfortunately it was an older backup so I lost a some of my recent work, but it
was better than nothing. I haven't checked my sources and photos yet. I hope
I haven't lost any of them.
From: Nannette Fretw
Ron;
Thank you for the reply, but I ran check/repair immediately after noticing the
problem with the data. It didn't find any problems.
From: Ron Ferguson [mailto:ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk]
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 4:38 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG
I can't really comment on the data transfer between FTM and Legacy.
But, if I understand you correctly, the missing information is on the edit
source detail screen, under the text and/or comments tab.
Have you checked, under the text and comments boxes, the "add this text to the
source citation
Leonard,
Am I correct in thinking that FTM16 has a template system for its sources
similar to Legacy’s Source Writer? If so the problem is that a GEDCOM does not
recognise the layout – it is the same with the Legacy version. I suspect that
the best you can hope for is some sort of Basic Sourcin
Michele - In the Ancestor Book menu go to Report Options and then format.
You will find Use Short Locations toward the bottom of the left column.
Kay
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 9:52 AM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Am I totally missing this?
I am doing an Anc
Thank you, Julia
Michele
-Original Message-
From: julia _
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 12:55 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Am I totally missing this?
I see it under the Format tab of the Report Options (left side, second from
the bottom).
Julia
I see it under the Format tab of the Report Options (left side, second from the
bottom).
Julia
> From: cranberryf...@cobridge.tv
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Am I totally missing this?
> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:52:06 -0500
>
> I a
Thank you to all that responded to my question, both privately and via the UG
mailing list. It was extremely helpful!
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Ar
<>
The software I use on my web site requires a GEDCOM input, and does not
handle events and sources well, if at all. I strive for accuracy, but if
anyone desires more details, I am glad to supply them. I chose my
display software because it displays much like Legacy, with families,
notes, ances
Hello,
I am wondering how others source naturalization records.
There are frequently several pages to an individual's record,
The petition for naturalization, declaration of intentions,oath,witness
statement, the certificate itself etc.
All from many different places throughout the U.S.
Now I am cr
I use my very old Adobe Photoshop Essentials v. 2 and have no trouble opening
and editing a stitched photo.
- Original Message -
From: Paula Ryburn
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 2:26 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Flip-Pal scanner stitched image q
On 12/02/2012 04:26, Carl Cox wrote:
>
> My use of my Legacy file must be different from others. The place I am
> using them will not display events nor sources, so I need a way to
> indicate the first place I find a location for a person, and 'of'' works
> well. But I appreciate how others use the
20 matches
Mail list logo