Re: [linux-audio-dev] Question regarding network coding

2002-08-30 Thread rm
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 11:49:32PM -0400, Ivica Bukvic wrote: > Hi all, > > I am already aware of some networking stuff, but am not sure as to how > to make client aware that the server has finished sending the struct > (since some values, like strings can be of different lengths, I can not > sim

[linux-audio-dev] Proposal of LADSPA port hint DATA_PRESENT

2002-08-30 Thread robbins jacob
I suggested this a while ago and the more i thought about it the more i thought it was a good idea, hopefully others can set me straight:) /* Hint LADSPA_HINT_DATA_PRESENT indicates that the data item should be used to signal that the audio stream has stopped. It must be used in conjunction wi

[linux-audio-dev] Question regarding network coding

2002-08-30 Thread Ivica Bukvic
Hi all, I have a quick question and am in a kind of a time crunch, so I'd appreciate any help I can get (except for the RTFM-like comments :-). I am working on an app where I'll need some networking done. Basically, I just need the application to be able to be both the server and a client (in an

RE: [linux-audio-dev] Notation program.

2002-08-30 Thread Ivica Bukvic
To me it seems like you do not have to have an application aware of pitches (unless you feel uncomfortable using conventional notation for custom-assigned pitches -- i.e. c is c, c# is a bit flat, d is more like c# etc. so you'd need 2 conventional octaves for one 24-pitch microtonal octave). Many

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Notation program.

2002-08-30 Thread Brian Redfern
One thing lacking on any platform is notation software with user adjustable pitch tables that supports midi tuning standard. I have a lot of experience working with altered tunings and pitch tables studying balinese gamelan, my C/C++ skills still suck right now, but I sent my girlfriend away for t

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Re: [linux-audio-dev] Notation program.

2002-08-30 Thread cannam
Richard Bown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It's true that our printing facilities are a bit limited > at the moment I would say that if you want really good printing, you should probably accept a non-WYSIWYG approach and use Lilypond as your printing engine at least, even if you use an intera

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Notation program.

2002-08-30 Thread Richard Bown
On Friday 30 August 2002 19:41, Charles Read wrote: > Hi folks, > > is there a music notation program for linux that really does the > job well - you play your MIDI keyboard and a reasonable approximation > to a score appears on your screen? I've tried "rosegarden" but the > editing facilities

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Notation program.

2002-08-30 Thread jjbenham
Last time I did a score in CMN. If I were to do what you want to do I would try Rosegarden or Muse to create a raw midi file. Then I would export that then import it into lilypond. I would then edit it by hand. I actually like this idea better than working with Finale. Finale was always screw

[linux-audio-dev] Notation program.

2002-08-30 Thread Charles Read
Hi folks, is there a music notation program for linux that really does the job well - you play your MIDI keyboard and a reasonable approximation to a score appears on your screen? I've tried "rosegarden" but the editing facilities are a bit primitive and it doesn't really print out

Re: [linux-audio-dev] a jack question

2002-08-30 Thread Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
> given kernel capability patch applied, does jackd give real-time > capability to existing running process (normal user) that decide to > become a jack client? yes, it gives the needed capabilities to the audio thread that gets created for each new client (not the whole application, of course).

[linux-audio-dev] a jack question

2002-08-30 Thread Likai Liu
given kernel capability patch applied, does jackd give real-time capability to existing running process (normal user) that decide to become a jack client? liulk

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [SOURCE] rt monitor to kill runaway RT processes

2002-08-30 Thread Ingo Oeser
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 09:12:07PM +0200, Stefan Westerfeld wrote: > I am very interested in that. In all the discussions we had > about the RT issue in aRts, things usually came to the point: > basically, it is a kernel bug, that as soon as you use RT prio, > your system becomes unstable. Especia