On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 00:38 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> The common arch/powerpc code calls in to functions in setup-bus.c
> so some builds of ppc32 would fail.
>
> Note, ppc32 usage of setup-irq.c is limited to arch/ppc and should be
> removed when arch/ppc goes away.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gal
Hi Kumar,
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:43:38 -0600 (CST) Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Let's see what sfr finds wrong with this patch :)
A challenge! :-)
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/stx_gp3.c
> +static void __init stx_gp3_pic_init(void)
> + np = of_find_node_by_type(np, "open-
On Jul 26, 2007, at 3:42 AM, Zhang Wei wrote:
> This patch adds the memory management driver to RapidIO.
> The RapidIO system size is changed to automatically detection.
> Add the memory mapping driver to RapidIO basic driver.
> Multi master ports are supported.
> Add a simple Bitmap RapidIO spac
---
The defconfig has been removed from the patch to protect the innocent.
Let's see what sfr finds wrong with this patch :)
- k
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/stx_gp3_8560.dts | 216 ++
arch/powerpc/configs/stx_gp3_defconfig | 1183
arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kco
The common arch/powerpc code calls in to functions in setup-bus.c
so some builds of ppc32 would fail.
Note, ppc32 usage of setup-irq.c is limited to arch/ppc and should be
removed when arch/ppc goes away.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[EMAIL PROT
This patch needs to come before the previous one ("UCC TDM driver for
QE based MPC83xx platforms") as that uses some of the fields defined here.
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:19:44 +0530 (IST) Poonam_Aggrwal-b10812 <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +u32 get_brg_clk(enum qe_clock brgclk, enum qe_clock *brg_
On Jan 24, 2008, at 12:28 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 00:07 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> The common arch/powerpc code calls in to functions in setup-bus.c
>> so some builds of ppc32 would fail.
>>
>> Note, ppc32 usage of setup-irq.c is limited to arch/ppc and should
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 00:07 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> The common arch/powerpc code calls in to functions in setup-bus.c
> so some builds of ppc32 would fail.
>
> Note, ppc32 usage of setup-irq.c is limited to arch/ppc and should be
> removed when arch/ppc goes away.
I don't understand... the ol
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 12:07:32AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> The common arch/powerpc code calls in to functions in setup-bus.c
> so some builds of ppc32 would fail.
>
> Note, ppc32 usage of setup-irq.c is limited to arch/ppc and should be
> removed when arch/ppc goes away.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kum
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:16:42 +0530 (IST) Poonam_Aggrwal-b10812 <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +static int ucc_tdm_probe(struct of_device *ofdev,
> + const struct of_device_id *match)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np = ofdev->node;
> + struct resource res;
> + const
The common arch/powerpc code calls in to functions in setup-bus.c
so some builds of ppc32 would fail.
Note, ppc32 usage of setup-irq.c is limited to arch/ppc and should be
removed when arch/ppc goes away.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Greg, recent changes that BenH has made t
Add support for dual network (net_device) interface so that ethernet
and wireless can own separate ethX interfaces.
V2
- Fix the bug that bringing down and up the interface keeps rx
disabled.
- Make 'gelic_net_poll_controller()' extern , as David Woodhouse
pointed out at the previous
From: Poonam Aggrwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Modified Documentation to explain new properties introduced for UCC TDM
driver. Also two new nodes have been added "brg" and "clocks" to configure
a BRG from device tree.
Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <[EM
From: Poonam Aggrwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch makes necessary changes in the QE and UCC framework to support
TDM. It also adds support to configure the BRG properly through device
tree entries. Includes the device tree changes for UCC TDM driver as well.
It also includes device tree entrie
From: Poonam Agarwal-b10812 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The UCC TDM driver basically multiplexes and demultiplexes data from
different channels. It can interface with for example SLIC kind of devices
to receive TDM data demultiplex it and send to upper modules. At the
transmit end it receives data for d
Reworked patches after incorporating comments of Andrew, Stephen and
Tabi and Kumar.
Kumar could you please consider them for linux-2.6.25.
There are three patches
[PATCH 1/3] drivers/misc : UCC TDM driver for mpc83xx platforms. This
driver is usable in VoIP iind of applications to interface wit
Jon Loeliger writes:
> +extern void _nmask_and_or_msr(unsigned long nmask, unsigned long or_val);
Hmmm, I wish someone would think of a better name for it. In fact I
have tended to avoid using it, and instead done things like
mtmsr((mfmsr() & ~x) | y);
where necessary instead.
Paul.
_
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Right, so it might have functioned before, but the correctness was
> wobbly at best... Certainly the memoryless patch series has tightened
> that up, but we missed these SLAB issues.
>
> I see that your patch fixed Olaf's machine, Pekka. Nice work
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:12:44PM -0800, Geoff Levand wrote:
> On 01/22/2008 04:58 PM, John W. Linville wrote:
> > I thought Geert's had been applied, but I guess I was looking at
> > it wrong. Is there a powerpc tree that has them?
>
> Not yet, they are now only in ps3-linux.git. I sent them
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:45:07 +0300 Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc836x_rdk.c
> +static int __init mpc836x_rdk_declare_of_platform_devices(void)
> +{
> + const struct of_device_id mpc836x_rdk_ids[] = {
Please change this to static, __initdata
On Jan 23, 2008, at 7:51 PM, Liu Yu wrote:
>
> How about this one?
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=15942
I've been trying to get some feedback from the glibc guys. The code
is pretty common and if the issues exists in one it exists in the
other.. I'm not sure if they have so
Please pull from 'for-2.6.25' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/galak/powerpc.git for-2.6.25
to receive the following updates:
(I fixed up the memreserve patch, it builds for me on ppc64)
Documentation/powerpc/00-INDEX|3
Documentation/powerp
On Jan 23, 2008, at 6:50 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:42:50 -0600 Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/storcenter.c
>> +static void __init storcenter_init_IRQ(void)
>> +{
>> +struct mpic *mpic;
>> +struc
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> Kumar,
>
> Here is the StorCenter port with the MTD partitions
> re-written to be hard-coded PHYSMAP partitions for now.
>
> Addressed list and private commentary as well.
>
> Janitorial Karma has now caussed it to be 4 patches
> instead of the original 3
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> This patch adds support to use the fixed-link property
> of an ethernet node to fs_enet for the
> CONFIG_PPC_CPM_NEW_BINDING case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Acked-by: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Acked-by: Vitali B
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Grant Likely wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/ep88xc.c |5 ++---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/mpc86xads_setup.c |5 ++---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/mpc8
How about this one?
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=15942
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Kumar Gala
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 12:43 AM
> To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> Subject: patches for 2.6.25
>
> I'm
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:37:33 +0100
Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> logical/bitand typo
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
> index ebf9e21..dcfb459 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
> +++ b/arch/powe
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 01:18 +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
> when you use git-grep -n "\(&&\|||\)${s}0x\([A-Z0-9]*\|[a-z0-9]*\)",
> (with s="[[:space:]]*") there will be false positives []
> so i'd propose to change that to
> +# Check for bitwise tests written as boolean
> + if ($line =~ /(?:
Hi Jon,
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:42:50 -0600 Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/storcenter.c
> +static void __init storcenter_init_IRQ(void)
> +{
> + struct mpic *mpic;
> + struct device_node *dnp;
> + const void *prop;
> + int size;
Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 23:37 +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
>> index ebf9e21..dcfb459 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
>> @
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 23:37 +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
> index ebf9e21..dcfb459 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void ibm4
Anton,
Can you try this patch and see if it resolves the issue for you.. (You'll
still get the Apple FW messages)
- k
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c
index 4005739..bf13c21 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c
@
Kumar Gala writes:
> There were several issues if a memreserve range existed and happened
> to be in highmem:
>
> * The bootmem allocator is only aware of lowmem so calling
> reserve_bootmem with a highmem address would cause a BUG_ON
> * All highmem pages were provided to the buddy allocator
>
On Jan 23, 2008, at 4:40 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Kumar,
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:38:29 -0600 (CST) Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
>>
>> +++ b/arch/ppc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ads_common.c
>> @@ -190,6 +188,7 @@ mpc85xx_exclude_device(u_char bus, u_char devfn)
>> #endif /* CON
logical/bitand typo
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
index ebf9e21..dcfb459 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/4xx.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void ibm4xx_denali_fixup_memsize(void)
val = DD
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> The one who needs this patch (CPU card vendor 1):
>
> MPC5200CVR400B, M62C REV 1, QCW0723T
>
> The CPUs who do not need this patch (CPU card vendor 2):
>
> SPC5200CBV400B, M62C REV 1, QAG0610C
> MPC5200CVR400B, M62C REV 1, QAJ0613F
This is all Rev.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > Is it really exactly the same CPU revision? My guess is that
> > one is rev. B and the other one is older...
>
> The processor on my board which needs the BSDIS-patch has following
> label:
> MPC5200CVR400B
And the one which doesn't need it is a ..
Hi Jochen,
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:01:57 +0100 Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/ep88xc.c
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
> #include
> #include
> #include
> -#include
> +#include
> #include
Something has whitespace damaged this patch.
--
Cheers,
S
Hi Kumar,
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:38:29 -0600 (CST) Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +++ b/arch/ppc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ads_common.c
> @@ -190,6 +188,7 @@ mpc85xx_exclude_device(u_char bus, u_char devfn)
> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_RAPIDIO
> +extern void mpc85xx_rio_s
Hi Marian,
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:12:19 +0100 Marian Balakowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> + label = of_get_property(op->node, "label", NULL);
> + if (label == NULL) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR __FILE__ ": "
> + "No label property provided for LED %s\n",
> +
On Jan 23, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 01:42:56PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> [...]
>>> PCI: Probing PCI hardware
>>> PCI: 0001:01:00.0: class b20 doesn't match header type 01. Ignoring
>>> class.
>>> PCI: Closing bogus Apple Firmware region 1 on bus 0x02
>>>
On 23.01.2008 [13:14:26 -0800], Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
> > I think Mel said that their configuration did work with 2.6.23
> > although I also wonder how that's possible. AFAIK there has been some
> > changes in the page allocator that might explain th
> "David" == David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> On Wednesday 23 January 2008, Grant Likely wrote:
>> The question is about the device structure which used to be provided
>> by the platform device instances and now there just uses the c67x00's
>> device struct. I was under t
> "Grant" == Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Grant> Okay, I've had a chance to read through this. I haven't
Grant> tested it, but I don't see anything I strongly disagree with.
Grant> I've just got a few editorial comments below and a question.
Ok, great.
Grant> The question is
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> I think Mel said that their configuration did work with 2.6.23
> although I also wonder how that's possible. AFAIK there has been some
> changes in the page allocator that might explain this. That is, if
> kmem_getpages() returned pages for memoryless nod
Hi,
On Jan 23, 2008 9:52 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On at least one of the machines in question, wasn't it the case that
> node 0 had all the memory and node 1 had all the CPUs? In that case, you
> would have to boot off a memoryless node? And as long as that is a
> physi
This is new board made by Freescale Semiconductor Inc. and
Logic Product Development.
Currently supported:
1. UEC{1,2,7,4};
2. I2C;
3. SPI;
4. NS16550 serial;
5. PCI and miniPCI;
6. Intel NOR StrataFlash X16 64Mbit PC28F640P30T85;
7. Graphics controller, Fujitsu MB86277.
Not supported so far:
1.
On 1/23/08, Matt Sealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Jon Smirl wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/chips/tps65010.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/chips/tps65010.c
> > @@ -571,6 +571,10 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id tps65010_id[] = {
> > { "tps65011", TPS65011 },
> > { "tps65012", TPS65012 }
Jon Smirl wrote:
> --- a/drivers/i2c/chips/tps65010.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/chips/tps65010.c
> @@ -571,6 +571,10 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id tps65010_id[] = {
> { "tps65011", TPS65011 },
> { "tps65012", TPS65012 },
> { "tps65013", TPS65013 },
> + OF_ID("ti,tps65010",
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 01:35:41PM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:00:12 +0100
> Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 11:31:46AM -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> > > Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > >>What impact do the have on boards in arch/ppc being able
On 23.01.2008 [19:29:15 +0200], Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Applied in combination with the N_NORMAL_MEMORY revert and it fails to
> > boot. Console is as follows;
>
> Thanks for testing!
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > [c05c3
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 01:42:56PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
[...]
> >PCI: Probing PCI hardware
> >PCI: 0001:01:00.0: class b20 doesn't match header type 01. Ignoring
> >class.
> >PCI: Closing bogus Apple Firmware region 1 on bus 0x02
> >PCI: Closing bogus Apple Firmware region 2 on bus 0x02
>
>
On Jan 23, 2008, at 1:37 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> Hello Benjamin, Kumar,
>
> Using galak/powerpc.git's e4a0d8a1f7e6a9741ec46 head, MPC8568E-MDS
> is oopsing during PCI-E probe, like this:
>
> - - - -
> Found FSL PCI host bridge at 0xe0008000. Firmware bus
> number: 0->255
> PCI host
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:00:12 +0100
Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 11:31:46AM -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> > Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >>What impact do the have on boards in arch/ppc being able to build?
> > >
> > >Byt the way what are the plans for powerpc?
> > >We
Hello Benjamin, Kumar,
Using galak/powerpc.git's e4a0d8a1f7e6a9741ec46 head, MPC8568E-MDS
is oopsing during PCI-E probe, like this:
- - - -
Found FSL PCI host bridge at 0xe0008000. Firmware bus number: 0->255
PCI host bridge /[EMAIL PROTECTED] (primary) ranges:
MEM 0x8000..0x
Hi Powerpc.
Just a heads up.
When building the provided defconfig for powerpc I get the following bunch
of section mismatch warnings:
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x83c0): Section mismatch: reference to
.devinit.text:.start_secondary in '.start_secondary_prolog'
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0xe878): Sec
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> Fine. But, why are we hitting fallback_alloc() in the first place? It's
> definitely not because of missing ->nodelists as we do:
>
> cache_cache.nodelists[node] = &initkmem_list3[CACHE_CACHE];
>
> before attempting to set up kmalloc caches.
Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Andy Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/configs/storcenter_defconfig | 1174 +
1 files changed, 1174 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/configs/storcenter_defconfig
diff --g
Use cuImage bootwrapper until U-Boot port is completed.
Derived heavily from Linkstation port.
Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Andy Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile |3 +-
arch/powerpc/boot/cuboot-824x.c
Based on the Kurobox DTS files.
Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Andy Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/storcenter.dts | 138 ++
1 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/d
Prevents miscellaneous users from declaring it locally.
Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/mpc7448_hpc2.c |2 --
include/asm-powerpc/system.h |2 ++
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arc
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Mel Gorman wrote:
> This patch adds the necessary checks to make sure a kmem_list3 exists for
> the preferred node used when growing the cache. If the preferred node has
> no nodelist then the currently running node is used instead. This
> problem only affects the SLAB allocat
Kumar,
Here is the StorCenter port with the MTD partitions
re-written to be hard-coded PHYSMAP partitions for now.
Addressed list and private commentary as well.
Janitorial Karma has now caussed it to be 4 patches
instead of the original 3.
Please pick up for 2.6.25!
Thanks,
jdl
_
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> Furthermore, don't let kmem_getpages() call alloc_pages_node() if nodeid
> passed
> to it is -1 as the latter will always translate that to numa_node_id() which
> might not have ->nodelist that caused the invocation of fallback_alloc() in
> the
> firs
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> I still think Christoph's kmem_getpages() patch is correct (to fix
> cache_grow() oops) but I overlooked the fact that none the callers of
> cache_alloc_node() deal with bootstrapping (with the exception of
> __cache_alloc_node() that even has a
Hi Kumar,
> Do we really need the prototypes you moved into asm/mpc8xx.h here? can
> they just live in platforms/8xx/8xx.h or something like that?
At least drivers/pcmcia/m8xx_pcmcia.c uses the symbol m8xx_pcmcia_ops
which is conditionally defined in platforms/8xx/m8xx_setup.c. However,
this dr
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 11:31:46AM -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >>What impact do the have on boards in arch/ppc being able to build?
> >
> >Byt the way what are the plans for powerpc?
> >We have:
> >arch/ppc
> >arch/ppc64
> >arch/powerpc
> >
> >It was my understanding that arc
On Wednesday 23 January 2008, Grant Likely wrote:
> The question is about the device structure which used to be provided
> by the platform device instances and now there just uses the c67x00's
> device struct. I was under the impression that each USB HCD needs to
> have it's own struct device. I
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> As far as I can tell, there are two ways to fix this:
[snip]
> (2) initialize cache_cache.nodelists with initmem_list3 equivalents
> for *each node hat has normal memory*
An untested patch follows:
---
mm/slab.c | 39 -
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> What impact do the have on boards in arch/ppc being able to build?
>
> Byt the way what are the plans for powerpc?
> We have:
> arch/ppc
> arch/ppc64
> arch/powerpc
>
> It was my understanding that arch/powerpc was supposed
> to be the future unified powerpc architecture bu
Hi,
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Applied in combination with the N_NORMAL_MEMORY revert and it fails to
> boot. Console is as follows;
Thanks for testing!
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Mel Gorman wrote:
> [c05c3b40] c00dadb4 .cache_grow+0x7c/0x338
> [c05c3c00] c00
>
> What impact do the have on boards in arch/ppc being able to build?
Byt the way what are the plans for powerpc?
We have:
arch/ppc
arch/ppc64
arch/powerpc
It was my understanding that arch/powerpc was supposed
to be the future unified powerpc architecture but it
does not even provide a defconf
On 1/21/08, Peter Korsgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Grant" == Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Grant> Personally, I'd prefer to see the v3 series picked up now (as I
> Grant> believe all outstanding comments from the list have been addressed)
> Grant> and have new patches
On 1/23/08, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Olof Johansson wrote:
> > ...
> > >
> > > I disagree, I have one defconfig for all our boards to date. It means I
> > > only have one kernel to build to test on all boards, instead of having
> > > t
On Jan 23, 2008, at 9:58 AM, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is a series against paulus for-2.6.25 tree to clean up various
> 8xx related stuff.
> The series can be pulled from git://git.bocc.de/dbox2.git cleanup.
> Patch 6 has been modified to remove the #ifdefs as suggested by
> Arnd
On Jan 23, 2008, at 10:00 AM, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> m8xx_pic_init is declared in ppc8xx_pic.h but defined nowhere in the
> ppc
> tree. Remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
if we respin the patches, merge this with 2/8 - Rename m8xx_pic_init
to mpc8xx_pics_in
On Jan 23, 2008, at 10:00 AM, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Move cpm1 specific prototypes to asm/commproc.h and mpc8xx specific
> prototypes to asm/mpc8xx.h. Adjust includes accordingly. Remove now
> unneeded sysdev/commproc.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> arch/powe
Buffer descriptors are used by both CPM1 and CPM2. Move the definitions
from the cpm dependent include file to common cpm.h
Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/asm-powerpc/cpm.h | 73
include/asm-powerpc/cpm1.h | 65 -
Rename commproc.[ch] to cpm1.[ch] to be more consistent with cpm2. Also
rename cpm2_common.c to cpm2.c as suggested by Scott Wood. Adjust the
includes accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/ep88xc.c |2 +-
arch/powerpc/platf
Directly include mpc885ads.h from mpc885ads_setup.c. Now we can get rid
of the arch dependent includes in mpc8xx.h.
Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/mpc885ads_setup.c |2 +
include/asm-powerpc/mpc8xx.h | 34 +++-
Move cpm1 specific prototypes to asm/commproc.h and mpc8xx specific
prototypes to asm/mpc8xx.h. Adjust includes accordingly. Remove now
unneeded sysdev/commproc.h.
Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/ep88xc.c |3 +--
arch/powerpc/platf
m8xx_pic_init calls both mpc8xx_pic_init and cpm_pic_init. Renaming the
function to use the same name space as the rest of the mpc8xx
specific funtions and to be more meaningful.
Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/ep88xc.c |2 +-
arch
m8xx_pic_init is declared in ppc8xx_pic.h but defined nowhere in the ppc
tree. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/ppc/syslib/ppc8xx_pic.h |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ppc/syslib/ppc8xx_pic.h b/arch/ppc/syslib/
m8xx_calibrate_decr seems to be a misspelled prototype for
mpc8xx_calibrate_decr. As it's not needed anyways, just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/m8xx_setup.c |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/
m8xx_cpm_hostalloc is still defined in commproc.c, but no users are left
in the kernel tree. m8xx_cpm_hostfree and m8xx_cpm_hostdump are only
defined in the headers. Remove this dead code.
Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/sysdev/commproc.c | 37 -
Hi,
this is a series against paulus for-2.6.25 tree to clean up various 8xx related
stuff.
The series can be pulled from git://git.bocc.de/dbox2.git cleanup.
Patch 6 has been modified to remove the #ifdefs as suggested by Arndt Bergmann.
Patch 8 is a new one.
[POWERPC] Remove unused m8xx_cpm_hos
On (23/01/08 16:49), Pekka J Enberg didst pronounce:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> > > I still think Christoph's kmem_getpages() patch is correct (to fix
> > > cache_grow() oops) but I overlooked the fact that none the callers of
> > > cache_alloc_node() deal with bo
Hi,
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> > I still think Christoph's kmem_getpages() patch is correct (to fix
> > cache_grow() oops) but I overlooked the fact that none the callers of
> > cache_alloc_node() deal with bootstrapping (with the exception of
> > __cache_alloc_node() that
On (23/01/08 15:27), Olaf Hering didst pronounce:
> On Wed, Jan 23, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > This patch in combination with a partial revert of commit
> > 04231b3002ac53f8a64a7bd142fde3fa4b6808c6 fixes a regression between 2.6.23
> > and 2.6.24-rc8 where a PPC64 machine with all CPUS on a memoryles
On 1/23/08, Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, like, the other day Jon Smirl mumbled:
> > Convert MPC i2c driver from a platform_driver to a
> > of_platform_driver. Add the ability to dynamically load i2c drivers
> > based on device tree names. Routine names were changed from fsl_ to
> >
On 1/23/08, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hallo Jochen,
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:23:58 +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> > Hi Jean,
> >
> > > Do you have an updated patch addressing Stephen's comment?
> > >
> > > Note: you'd rather send updates of this patch to the i2c list rather
> >
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> I still think Christoph's kmem_getpages() patch is correct (to fix
> cache_grow() oops) but I overlooked the fact that none the callers of
> cache_alloc_node() deal with bootstrapping (with the exception of
> __cache_alloc_node() that even has a c
So, like, the other day Jon Smirl mumbled:
> Convert MPC i2c driver from a platform_driver to a
> of_platform_driver. Add the ability to dynamically load i2c drivers
> based on device tree names. Routine names were changed from fsl_ to
> mpc_ to make them match the file name. Common code moved to
>
On Wed, Jan 23, Mel Gorman wrote:
> This patch in combination with a partial revert of commit
> 04231b3002ac53f8a64a7bd142fde3fa4b6808c6 fixes a regression between 2.6.23
> and 2.6.24-rc8 where a PPC64 machine with all CPUS on a memoryless node fails
> to boot. If approved by the SLAB maintainers,
Hi Mel,
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Mel Gorman wrote:
> diff -rup -X /usr/src/patchset-0.6/bin//dontdiff
> linux-2.6.24-rc8-005-revert-memoryless-slab/mm/slab.c
> linux-2.6.24-rc8-010_handle_missing_l3/mm/slab.c
> --- linux-2.6.24-rc8-005-revert-memoryless-slab/mm/slab.c 2008-01-22
> 17:46:32.
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:37:59 -0600 Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/storcenter.c
>
>> +extern void _nmask_and_or_msr(unsigned long nmask, unsigned long or_val);
>
> This clearly needs to be decalred in some
This patch in combination with a partial revert of commit
04231b3002ac53f8a64a7bd142fde3fa4b6808c6 fixes a regression between 2.6.23
and 2.6.24-rc8 where a PPC64 machine with all CPUS on a memoryless node fails
to boot. If approved by the SLAB maintainers, it should be merged for 2.6.24.
With memo
On (23/01/08 13:14), Olaf Hering didst pronounce:
> On Wed, Jan 23, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > Sorry this is dragging out. Can you post the full dmesg with loglevel=8 of
> > the
> > following patch against 2.6.24-rc8 please? It contains the debug information
> > that helped me figure out what was go
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 13:36 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 13:18 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >
> > 810e95ccd58d91369191aa4ecc9e6d4a10d8d0c8 is first bad commit
> > commit 810e95ccd58d91369191aa4ecc9e6d4a10d8d0c8
> > Author: Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Mo
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
