On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 11:06:46PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> I agree. I actually don't think there is a need for a vote because the
> majority of those who took part in the discussion prefer for a new
> layout file. I'm glad that we took the time to discuss this issue (and
> we have been w
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 07:45:57AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 10:19:51PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> >> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 08:40:39AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> >>
> >> The current status is now (see the
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 10:19:51PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
>> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 08:40:39AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
>>
>> The current status is now (see the docs list for details):
>>
>> - Pedro Neves proposed some different transla
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 10:19:51PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 08:40:39AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> >> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:21:52PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> >>
> >> Unfortunately I overlooked somethin
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 12:11:56AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> This decision is not forever, I mean we can switch to another one in case
> problems arise during the 2.2.x life cycle.
Yes we have a good foundation for future discussion.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 10:37:00PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
>
> It seems to me that, despite Guenter's recent change of mind, there is a
> clear majority in favor of the policy that was proposed some time ago,
> discussed on the list, and then documented, in draft form, in
> Development.lyx, nam
It seems to me that, despite Guenter's recent change of mind, there is a
clear majority in favor of the policy that was proposed some time ago,
discussed on the list, and then documented, in draft form, in
Development.lyx, namely:
> Every now and then, there are changes to LaTeX document classes
Am Mittwoch, 6. April 2016 um 23:58:20, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> Am 05.04.2016 um 10:16 schrieb Kornel Benko:
>
> > Recently someone probably merged the po files on a windows system.
>
> Yes, this was me.
> as described in our file README.localization I did:
>
> "
> - on Windows: either build the up
Am 06.04.2016 um 00:27 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
1. discussion
This is where we are at now. We are discussing a topic that is at least
5 years old.
Yes, and we are now already discussing this for more than 2 months. I
don't understand why so much time is necessary to come to a decision.
T
Am 05.04.2016 um 10:23 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
If the translators know where to look for the files, they are not
personal anymore. Just move them to lib/doc, don't be shy.
OK. Since I am a bit out of the development project I fear I can break
something in Git short before a release. Cou
Am 05.04.2016 um 10:16 schrieb Kornel Benko:
Recently someone probably merged the po files on a windows system.
Yes, this was me.
as described in our file README.localization I did:
"
- on Windows: either build the update-po target in MSVC
or run the command: msbuild po\update-p
On 2016-04-06, Georg Baum wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>> There was well based objection to the proposal of a new version-layout by
>> Georg in http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/161202 from
>> 28 March:
>> Before discussing the case of incompatible versions with the same name
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 08:40:39AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
>> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:21:52PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
>>
>> Unfortunately I overlooked something in the portuguese translation, I
>> hope I'll get an answer today, so that
Guenter Milde wrote:
> There was well based objection to the proposal of a new version-layout by
> Georg in http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/161202 from
> 28 March:
>
> Before discussing the case of incompatible versions with the same name
> further, I'd like to see an examp
Dear Scott,
On 2016-04-06, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2016-04-06, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> > The only question would be whether it is
>>> > allowed to change translatable strings (we are past string freeze).
Below is a minimal patch for the acmsiggraph template that incorporates
changes for 20
On 2016-04-06, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 04/05/2016 01:06 PM, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2016-04-05, Richard Heck wrote:
>>> On 04/05/2016 04:36 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
>>> +1 no new document class cluttering the selection list
>>>(especially as this is an "exotic" class (not on CTAN, not in T
On 2016-04-06, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 06:15:11PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> > The only question would be whether it is
>> > allowed to change translatable strings (we are past string freeze).
>> What have we
Dear all,
On 2016-04-06, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 04/05/2016 06:15 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 10:41:42PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
>>> Guenter Milde wrote:
This point (do we allow a new layout version when there is no change in
the *.cls file name) was still no
18 matches
Mail list logo