On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 11:34:50PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 07:02:39PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 12:43:35PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > > And if this is OK, I should do the same for iint, ii
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 05:28:58PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 11:04:39PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 11:34:50PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 07:02:39PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
&
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 06:18:13PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 9/8/20 4:50 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >
> > Riki, this is also needed in stable.
>
> OK.
Committed at 34f33b27.
--
Enrico
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 12:40:36AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 05:28:58PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 11:04:39PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 11:34:50PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
&
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 10:33:44AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 09/09/2020 à 01:41, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > > No, you did it right. My point was that the other patch was only hiding
> > > the problem.
> >
> > In the absence of comments fro
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 12:01:32PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 09/09/2020 à 11:00, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > > Do you have a concrete case in mind where deriving requirements from the
> > > contents of the macro goes wrong? Note that in this case, we could
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:06:37AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> commit f25253f89ac121b1981fe26f0b90af9e2bbbe849
> Author: Daniel Ramoeller
> Date: Tue Sep 15 08:04:16 2020 +0200
>
> Show toolbar context menu only when clicking on the toolbar
>
> Previsouly it was on the who
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 01:06:03AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 06:48:12AM +0200, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> > commit ea81faa911fc2561a017eb36c3a3d0bbe5b86756
> > Author: Enrico Forestieri
> > Date: Sun Jun 24 20:06:40 2018 +0200
> &
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 10:26:22AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> There is still a mystery (to me) of why I got different PDF output if I
> opened the .lyx file in the GUI and clicked on the View button, as
> opposed to exporting on the command line. On the command line export, it
> seems that
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 07:29:15PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 10:26:22AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> > There is still a mystery (to me) of why I got different PDF output if I
> > opened the .lyx file in the GUI and clicked on the View b
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:14:09AM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 9/25/20 6:08 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 01:06:03AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 06:48:12AM +0200, Richard Kimberly Heck w
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 12:02:41PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 05:22:45PM +0200, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > commit 5d7efd2fa934b138933ffed5a1e19c9d52e8d933
> > Author: Scott Kostyshak
> > Date: Sun Sep 27 11:44:59 2020 -0400
> >
> > Update layouts
> >
> >
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 09:24:37PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> I think the attached patch
> is what is missing.
Sorry, there was a colon missing in the "if" line. Corrected patch attached.
--
Enrico
diff --git a/lib/scripts/layout2layout.py b/lib/scripts/lay
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 04:51:55PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 09:37:20PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 09:24:37PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > >
> > > I think the attached patch
> > > is what i
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 09:39:23PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> The following chunk causes a tex2lyx assertion on current master, if I
> paste as LaTeX (or if I save it to a file and import).
>
> % excerpt from here:
> % https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/280891/12212
> \author[Short Name (U ABC)]
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 12:40:27AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Luckily, in the end, it was possible to
> compile on Windows without the hassle of cygwin/mingw.
He, he... That only demonstrates how opinions can differ.
AFAIC, luckily, it is possible to compile on Windows with
cygwin/min
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 10:25:38PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> for...@lyx.org wrote:
> > Author: forenr
> > Date: Thu Apr 8 22:22:20 2010
> > New Revision: 34095
> > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34095
> >
> > Log:
> > Use cheaper conversion method.
> >
> > Modified:
> >lyx-devel/t
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 01:10:55AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef:
> >
> >Le 9 avr. 10 à 21:03, rgh...@lyx.org a écrit :
> >>Log:
> >>Mark new files dirty. Otherwise, you can't save them, and maybe you want
> >>to do that right away.
> >
> >The rationale was th
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:42:25AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> But of course, word-level diff might bring more.
And also produce more readable results. In some cases, I see entire
paragraphs changed in a succession of striked out and underlined
characters, making them practically unreada
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 04:09:25AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> + FileName const path(doc_buffer->temppath());
> + string const texname = addName(path.absFilename(),
> doc_buffer->latexName());
> + string const outname = addName(path.absF
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:27:41AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Ben M. wrote:
> > As I understand, once the reverse search regression
> > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6415
> > gets fixed, we'll be able to go back and forth between LyX and dvi in v2.0?
>
> yes, #6415 is mustfix for 2.0. hello Ab
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 01:33:53PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> ok. btw can you post the correct yap command for the documentation?
That would be
\forward_search "yap -1 -s $$n$$t $$o"
(no typos here, that is right $$n$$t, sigh).
However, I think that we need \forward_search_dvi and \forward_
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 01:48:02PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> next question - there are more methods in manual how to setup the the
> search. is someof them recommended?
The new synctex machinery should obsolete all other methods, but I think
that it is not available in all TeX distributions.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 04:45:50PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 15/04/2010 15:55, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
>> Then, there is another issue. Some applications require that the files are
>> quoted. However, there is no way to embed a quote in a preference string.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 04:52:58PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > However, I think that we need \forward_search_dvi and \forward_search_pdf
> > instead of simply \forward_search.
>
> was thinking about this, but concluded that user uses just
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 05:32:28PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri writes:
> > Hmm... If you add a menu, you should be able to specify either
> > "forward-search dvi" or "forward-search pdf", otherwise, without any
> > argument, fo
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 05:49:56PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 05:32:28PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Enrico Forestieri writes:
> > > Hmm... If you add a menu, you should be able to specify either
> > > "forward-se
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:32:34PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Hmm, the user already has a way to set the preferred format /per document/.
> > Are you really hinting that it is not enough and that we should have a
> > submenu
> > Forward Search>DVI/PDF/DjVu/Custom.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:55:26AM +0200, uwesto...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: uwestoehr
> Date: Fri Apr 16 11:55:25 2010
> New Revision: 34157
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34157
>
> Log:
> Spanish manuals: updates by Ignacio and me
>
> Modified:
>lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/li
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:55:52AM +0200, uwesto...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: uwestoehr
> Date: Fri Apr 16 11:55:51 2010
> New Revision: 34158
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34158
>
> Log:
> Spanish manuals: updates by Ignacio and me
>
[...]
> \begin_layout Plain Layout
> -LYX_USERDIR_
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:09:08AM +0200, sa...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: sanda
> Date: Fri Apr 16 10:09:07 2010
> New Revision: 34149
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34149
>
> Log:
> Guify forward search.
Pavel, I am getting the following warnings when opening the preferences:
Object::
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:27:39PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > Object::connect: No such signal QComboBox::textChanged(QString) in
> > > ../../../../src/frontends/qt4/GuiPrefs.cpp:371
> > > Object::connect: (sender name: 'dviCB')
> > > Object::connect: (receiver name:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 03:21:41PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > IOW, it seems we need to issue
> >
> > okular --unique 'file:path/to/dvifile.dvi#src: texfile.tex'
> >
> > and
> >
> > okular --unique 'file:path/to/pdffile.pdf#src:
> > path/to/texfile.tex'
> >
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 03:04:41PM +0200, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: rgheck
> Date: Sat Apr 17 15:04:41 2010
> New Revision: 34186
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34186
>
> Log:
> LyX version info for InsetInfo.
I am not able to load old documents anymore:
Traceback (most recent c
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 03:30:10PM -0400, rgheck wrote:
> On 04/17/2010 02:16 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 03:04:41PM +0200, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
> >
> >>Author: rgheck
> >>Date: Sat Apr 17 15:04:41 2010
> >>New Revisi
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 02:52:13PM -0400, BH wrote:
> I'm delighted to see work being done on forward search. I wonder,
> though, how to get it working for Mac.
>
> Currently, the Navigate > Forward Search menu item is greyed-out for
> me, I assume because LyX doesn't know about any Mac .pdf view
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 06:19:29PM -0400, rgheck wrote:
> On 04/17/2010 05:19 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 03:30:10PM -0400, rgheck wrote:
> >
> >>On 04/17/2010 02:16 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >>>On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 03
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 01:03:54AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 06:19:29PM -0400, rgheck wrote:
>
> > On 04/17/2010 05:19 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > >On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 03:30:10PM -0400, rgheck wrote:
> > >
> > >>
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:48:27AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> * I think we should provide a switch "activate forward search" that selects a
> working syntax for the selected viewer(s), and keep what we have now as
> customization possibility.
Yes. That means associating a forward search
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 12:06:00PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > * Forward search should be aware of different chains. If a have viewed
> > > both DVI and PDF, forward search only applies to DVI. There should be a
> > > way to
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:14:16PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > * This should also take care about the required other selections. I.e., it
> > should enable synctex (or, if this is not available, an alternative way to
> > add
> > src specials)
>
> i was thinking ab
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:43:15PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:14:16PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >
> > > Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > > > * This should also take care about the required other selection
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 02:14:25AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Uwe Stöhr schreef:
> >But I noticed another very annoying behaviour:
> >
> >When I export a file as PDF LyX asks me if I want to replace the
> >existing PDF. This is OK, but replacing should be the default and
> >not keeping
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 08:06:10AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> The manual already contains this warning:
> "Note that PDFSync might affect the output layout of your document. It is
> therefore advised to disable PDFsync for final documents."
>
> I'm not aware of similar problems with scrl
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 03:37:25PM -0400, rgheck wrote:
> On 04/19/2010 11:22 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 02:14:25AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> >
> >>Uwe Stöhr schreef:
> >>>But I noticed another very annoying behaviour
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 05:22:40PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 02:14:25AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>
> > There is room for improvement here, Enrico ?
>
> Maybe the alert dialog could be redesigned for accepting 4 buttons
> inste
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:33:21PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 03:37:25PM -0400, rgheck wrote:
>
> > On 04/19/2010 11:22 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > >On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 02:14:25AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> >
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 02:34:15AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 19.04.2010 16:40, schrieb rgheck:
>
> >>Uwe was talking about the button which had the focus by default.
> >>
> >Oh, I see. I guess you can see what I thought he meant.
> >
> >So, Uwe: I have no objection to making "replace" have def
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:27:00PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > > >This has always been like that and I didn't change it. It is surprising
> > > > >that this has never annoyed you and suddenly now it does.
> > > > &
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 01:58:56PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 20 avr. 10 à 13:38, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >No, they do not. I explicitly check that the switch is only obeyed
> >when
> >operating in batch mode. It is easy to make it work also in GUI
> &g
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 09:20:32AM -0400, rgheck wrote:
> On 04/20/2010 09:16 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>In this case, I don't see how we could take advantage of that.
> >>If the alert is never displayed again, the choice cannot be reverted.
> >>Then, the alert doesn't distinguish between
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 04:46:33PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 08.05.2010 16:05, schrieb for...@lyx.org:
>
> >Log:
> >Rename IEEE_special_paper_notice as Special_Paper_Notice and
> >IEEE_after_title_text as After_Title_Text, and move them such
> >that they appear in the correct order in the layo
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 07:12:10PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > No, you can put it in whatever order in the .tex file and it always
> > comes out in the predetermined order. What I did was to order it
> > such that one knows in advance the order by which it will be
> > typeset.
>
> But markboth is
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 09:24:56AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> for...@lyx.org wrote:
> > Author: forenr
> > Date: Sun May 9 01:53:35 2010
> > New Revision: 34390
> > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34390
> >
> > Log:
> > Fix reverse search when the filename contains a forbidden character
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 04:41:34AM -0700, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 4:33 AM, rgheck wrote:
> > The os variable here is an odocstream. So we can create a temporary
> > odocstringstream, write to that
>
> ah, that was what i was looking for. i was fiddling with a
> ostringstrea
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:24:31AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > 1.6.7?
>
> OK.
Done at r3.
--
Enrico
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 02:35:55PM +0200, uwesto...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: uwestoehr
> Date: Sun May 23 14:35:54 2010
> New Revision: 34466
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34466
>
> Log:
> IEEEtran.layout: revised for IEEEtran 1.7a (backport from trunk)
This commit should be either rev
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:08:35AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 02:35:55PM +0200, uwesto...@lyx.org wrote:
> > Author: uwestoehr
> > Date: Sun May 23 14:35:54 2010
> > New Revision: 34466
> > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/c
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 03:00:47PM +0200, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote:
> Note that ObsoletedBy allows to rename styles painlessly.
Doh! Thanks, I used it in trunk for IEEEtran.layout. I'll leave to
Uwe the task of sorting out the mess in branch.
--
Enrico
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 05:20:52PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Author: forenr
> > Date: Wed May 26 15:17:36 2010
> > New Revision: 34514
> > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34514
> >
> > Log:
> > We have the magic keyword ObsoletedBy which allows renaming styles
> > (thanks JMarc fo
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 03:00:47PM +0200, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri writes:
> > You changed BiographyNoPhoto to Biography_without_photo, such that old
> > documents created with earlier versions cannot be correctly loaded with
> > lyx 1.6.6. This is a
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 06:55:10PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 05:20:52PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > > Author: forenr
> > > Date: Wed May 26 15:17:36 2010
> > > New Revision: 34514
> > > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ch
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:10:39PM +0200, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> an empty line between this is a test and \[ causes
> unnecessary spaces.
This happens because you hit the Enter key before the equation. If you
go to "Preferences->Look&Feel->Display" and select "Mark end of
paragraphs", you will see a
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 07:24:17PM +0300, Amir Rachum wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm writing a document of type article(hebrew) and some of the sections in
> it are in English.
> LyX's output pdf prints the section name ok in the document itself, but it
> prints it backwards in the table of contents.
>
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 09:37:15PM +0300, Amir Rachum wrote:
> This works, and I already use this sort of workaround (only with an empty
> math-mode).
> However, when I do this, it prints the section header (in the section
> itself) aligned to the right side of the page instead of the left, and it
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 04:57:33PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> forenr wrote:
> > Author: forenr
> > Date: Sun May 30 18:29:11 2010
> > New Revision: 34541
> > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34541
> >
> > Log:
> > Fix bug #2844: Need option to overwrite without dialog popup
>
> Enr
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 12:08:56PM +0200, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote:
> This leads to the following patch. Now is looks like the code should be
> useful on other platforms too. Is this problem with page down also
> present for Mac OS or Windows?
Not on Windows. The scrolling stops immediately whe
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 04:59:35PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> For example, the bug that files can't be opened anymore in 1.6.6.
Yeah, who did that should be mercilessy pilloried.
--
Enrico
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 02:42:33AM +0200, for...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: forenr
> Date: Sun Jun 6 02:42:33 2010
> New Revision: 34604
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34604
>
> Log:
> Add GUI support for big delimiters variants without 'l', 'm' or 'r' endings.
> They differ from their c
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:01:59AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 6 juin 10 à 02:45, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 02:42:33AM +0200, for...@lyx.org wrote:
> >
> >>Author: forenr
> >>Date: Sun Jun 6 02:42:33 2010
>
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 07:39:37PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:01:59AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > Le 6 juin 10 à 02:45, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > >On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 02:42:33AM +0200, for...@lyx.org wrote:
>
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 07:45:39AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> > I am curious: what would be the interest of using Cygwin when Windows
> > binaries are readily available?
>
> For Linux users (who have to use windows), cygwin provides an
> integrated working environment that can be more comfortable to
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 07:36:44AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> > What do you mean by "official"? We do have a cygwin port for 1.6.6.1 from
> > Enrico here:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.6.6.1/
>
> Official means that users can use the cygwin setup tool to install
> lyx, which is much easier
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:33:38AM -0400, Joost Verburg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently we're using a wrapper application (LyXLauncher) on Windows to
> hide the command prompt windows that keep popping up when LyX starts
> external applications for e.g. image conversion. These windows appear
> due
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 07:53:41PM -0400, Joost Verburg wrote:
> On 6/17/2010 5:17 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>> I don't know whether Windows 7 broke something in this respect, but once
>> the console is hidden, launching external applications should not pop up
>> any
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 03:00:52AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> I think that the solution could be hiding the console from inside
> LyX itself. Once there was code for doing that, but I don't remember
> anymore why it was nuked.
The attached patch hides the console win
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:59:05AM -0400, Joost Verburg wrote:
> On 6/17/2010 9:00 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >So, this patch does not help in this respect, as the launcher is needed
> >for hiding the initial console that would otherwise open.
> >I think that the solutio
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 08:00:57PM +0200, Peter Kuemmel wrote:
>
> > I investigated the code a little more and it appears that QProcess is
> > used for the actual image/LaTeX conversions. ForkedCalls/runCommand are
> > only used for internal Python scripts for display images / lyx2lyx etc.
>
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 08:41:31PM -0400, Joost Verburg wrote:
> On 6/18/2010 2:00 PM, Peter Kuemmel wrote:
> >Wouldn't be the cleanest solution to use QProcess also for ForkedCalls?
> >(Enrico, I hear you scream ;)
>
> Yes, the Systemcall code in LyX doesn't create any console windows
> because
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 09:33:22AM -0400, Joost Verburg wrote:
> On 6/19/2010 5:49 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >Maybe because they serve different purposes? I don't think that
> >changing something without having a clear understanding of why it
> >is as it is and
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:22:29AM -0600, Rob Oakes wrote:
> Dear LyX Developers,
>
> I've been trying to build the most recent SVN version of LyX using mingw
> and cmake on Windows (via Qt Creator). However, I've run into a snag
> and cannot get os_win32.cpp to compile. After configuring (whic
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 08:00:43AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Please let me know if there are any issues you would like to sort out
> for this release.
What about the attached fix for the IEEEtran.lyx document template?
--
Enrico
Index: lib/templates/IEEEtran.lyx
===
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 03:23:08PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> 2010/6/28 Enrico Forestieri :
> > What about the attached fix for the IEEEtran.lyx document template?
>
> Yes, this should go in. I forgot about this.
Committed.
--
Enrico
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 10:09:18AM +0200, sp...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: spitz
> Date: Sat Jul 10 10:09:14 2010
> New Revision: 34829
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34829
>
> Log:
> * fr/Customization.lyx
> * fr/Extended.lyx:
> - updates by Jean-Pierre
[...]
> -LYX_USERDIR_VER
> +
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 07:10:55PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> Hi,
> this is so wide spread that I hesitate to sent a patch.
>
> I: lyx: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/lyx collapsable collapsible
> I: lyx: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/tex2lyx collapsable collapsible
>
> It's even in a
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:46:04AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Peter Kuemmel wrote:
> > It's a bug in the STL implementation of msvc10:
> >
> > http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/572376/msvc1
> > 0-c-std-numpunct-has-a-hardcoded-dllimport-in-definition
> >
> >
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 07:39:16PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > some of my script do not work anymore due to the fact that lyx silently
> > fails to overwrite exported files.
> > i vaguely remember introducing -f switch to enforce overwriting, which must
> > be
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:54:07PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > this is a showstoppper for anybody using lyx in scripts.
> >
> > Come on, simply add -f if you don't care overwriting existing files.
> > The way it worked be
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 07:01:04PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> hi,
>
> some of my script do not work anymore due to the fact that lyx
> silently fails to overwrite exported files.
This is rather a trunk regression, as in branch you get notified
when the file is not overwritten.
--
Enrico
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 01:10:18AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> core of my complaint was that changing semantics of traditional
> switch is pita and will be hardly changed by disputing nitpicks
> of selected examples inside coreutils.
Core of my answer was that switches of commands can be change
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 01:15:52AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > some of my script do not work anymore due to the fact that lyx
> > > silently fails to overwrite exported files.
> >
> > This is rather a trunk regression, as in branch y
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 03:50:50AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> you really mean "lyx -e lyx foo.lyx" seriously? :) its just pretty normal that
> if you ask on command line to write output over the input file it gets
> overwritten
> like the infamous 'cat file1 file2 > file1' mistake. don't see t
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:05:49AM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Just discovered another issue. The user directory suffix for the 1.6
> series has always been "16" (directory called lyx16), while CMake sets
> it to "1.6" (directory
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:42:19AM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>
> Do you build with autotools on Windows? It's a windows only patch.
Yes, I happily build with autotools on Windows using MinGW.
--
Enrico
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:13:37AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 14 Juli 2010 schrieb Joost Verburg:
> > On 7/13/2010 6:12 PM, Joost Verburg wrote:
> > > I think this should definitely be fixed for 1.6.8 but maybe we can go
> > > ahead now with 1.6.7.
> >
> > Just discovered another iss
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:25:35PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >> Is it OK when I set PACKAGE to 'LyX16' instead 'LyX1.6' on Windows?
> >
> > I think the current is "lyx16" (in case case matters on win).
>
>
> Windows is case insensitive. Cygw
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:45:54AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > So, let's have a poll:
> >
> > 1) Leave things as they are (need -f to overwrite)
> > 2) The main file should always be overwritten
> > 3) If no -f switch is given, us
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 02:04:16PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > as i said i accept both 2 or 3 but will strongly opose to 1 since it not
> > > only
> > > changes the behaviour but also make impossible for anybody to reuse old
> >
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 02:24:56PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 14 Juli 2010 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:13:37AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch 14 Juli 2010 schrieb Joost Verburg:
> > > > On 7/13/2010 6:12 PM, Jo
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 01:48:38PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:25:35PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> >>> Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >>>> Is it OK when I set PACKAGE to
501 - 600 of 4930 matches
Mail list logo
