I am starting Memcache in my Linux machine the following way , the second
ip below is the replication port , configured with the help of repcached
*memcached -d -u nobody -l 10.1.1.101 -p 11211 -m 64 -x 10.1.2.102 -v (Server
1)*
and
*memcached -d -u nobody -l 10.1.2.102 -p 11211 -m 64 -x
First of all I want to thank all of you for your replys and I want to
apologize, that I didn't replied earlier, but part of last week I was ill.
However, I may have not put enough emphasis on my real problem. Some users
losing their sessions is one thing that isn't that pretty, but not the end
Hi ,
My Application is Using Memcache installed on two machines 10.1.1.12 and
10.1.1.12.203 on which Memcache server is started the following way
memcached -d -u nobody -l 10.33.143.203 -p 11211 -m 64 -x 192.168.13.242 -v
net.rubyeye.xmemcached.exception.MemcachedException: Xmemcached is stopp
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 5:09 AM, SAE wrote:
> But as explained above. If one of the memcached servers goes down. Some
> users experience the problem, that they not only get logged out but also
> have problems browsing the site at all or logging back in. Every page needs
> minutes to load then and
Hi ,
I have memcached-14.5 and -repcached-2.2 installed on memcached on ubuntu.
They install went great and when i start memcached i get: replication:
connect (peer=server1:11212) replication: marugoto copying replication:
close replication: listen This looks good and for testing purpose i se
Hi all,
I am a graduate student at UC San Diego and we recently presented a paper
on latency bottlenecks in cloud. Our study used Memcached as an example of
latency sensitive application. I want to share some of our results with you
all.
In our study we found that Memcached application logic i
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Kiran Kumar wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I have memcached-14.5 and -repcached-2.2 installed on memcached on ubuntu.
> They install went great and when i start memcached i get: replication:
> connect (peer=server1:11212) replication: marugoto copying replication:
> close repl
a point... a query like
select * from session_table where session_id='x'
where session_id is a primary key is very very fast, we are talking
about < 0.1 seconds, with memcached you are trying to go down to <0.01
seconds
why should you care about speed in internet if the time to consider a
page
hum, could you reproduce the tests with last 3.6.3 kernel? i'm not
sure but i read some changes in latency of kernel maybe this could
help too since you tested with 2.6.28
2012/10/22 Rishi :
> Hi all,
>
> I am a graduate student at UC San Diego and we recently presented a paper on
> latency bottle
Hi ,
I am using Memcace server as active active (Master Master ) where two
servers will be reciving requests , and applied repcached to those servers
for replication
What i observed is that the CAS Key stored by XMemcacheClient 1.3.5 is not
being replicated among hese servers
RIght now t
10 matches
Mail list logo