Is it April 2008 already, or what is happening on this mailing list ?
I am about two weeks behind reading but out of curiosity I read a few
emails in this thread and well, almost can't believe it.
I better stop reading this list for a while and come back after doing
something usefull, like instal
knitti wrote:
you tell me that there is some correlation between HTTP keep alives and
a socket ending up in CLOSE_WAIT for some time. That is the practical
observation. But I'm interested in whether this is by design or not.
RFC 2616 doesn't mention implementation details, and I can't see why
the
Thank You all for the pointers
I now have it up and running and only have a small persistent route problem.
Bret
Stuart Henderson wrote:
>On 2007/12/11 08:40, Bret wrote:
>
>
>>OK here is the update:
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>ral0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
>>ieee80211: nwid tri-statebroadband.com_2
On 12/11/07, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Guenther wrote:
> > On Dec 11, 2007 12:30 AM, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Curious problem here, though I'm probably missing something obvious. I
> >> have apm enabled through /etc/rc.conf.local (apmd_flags=""), and wh
Nick Guenther wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007 12:30 AM, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Curious problem here, though I'm probably missing something obvious. I
have apm enabled through /etc/rc.conf.local (apmd_flags=""), and when I
issue 'shutdown -h -p now', the system powers off correctly.
Nick Guenther wrote:
On 12/11/07, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nick Guenther wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007 12:30 AM, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Curious problem here, though I'm probably missing something obvious. I
have apm enabled through /etc/rc.conf.local (
On Dec 11, 2007 3:48 PM, Siegbert Marschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it April 2008 already, or what is happening on this mailing list ?
No, but it is about the time for the monthly "what is happening to
misc" comments ;)
-B
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:11:25PM -0700, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> Jacob Meuser wrote:
> >his absolutism also causes people to see BSD as a "problem", a
> >"social failure".
> >
> In everything, there is light and dark, interwoven :-)
> >recently we saw theft of BSD to GPL, and a large part of the
Lars NoodC)n wrote:
>
>> Argh, the GPL is so ridiculously complex; nobody understands it.
>>
>
> Many do, though. For me it's rather straight forward, as is the BSD
> license. There are many ways to look at the positive goals of the GPL,
> but they're not relevant here, since OpenBSD is a
I'd like to add two things I forgot earlier on, for Richards consideration:
On 12/12/2007, ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is IMHO very similar to the way the OpenBSD ports system is
> related to unfree software:
> - The unfree software is not hosted by OpenBSD. The ports tree
> effective
Yesterday, after a long time, it give me a empty page.
Today, It's OK.
2007/12/12, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Dec 11, 2007 11:26 AM, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 11, 2007 12:58 AM, Dongsheng Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > 2007/12/11, Darren Spruell
* ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-12 01:17:32]:
*snip*
>
> In addition, it is *considerably harder* to install unfree software on
> OpenBSD than on gNewSense. This eg. is what installing Skype entails:
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.bsd.india/352
> On gNewSense, it is *much* easier to
Wow. I didn't know this changed.
So if there are security bugs in a package or port shipped with
OpenBSD 4.2, there will be no updated package or updated port available?
I'm in no position to ask someone to do this, so I won't. But this
really bites.
On Dec 11, 2007, at 8:09 AM, Antoine
Jacob Meuser wrote:
the
README.libcdio file in the libcdio sources mentions this file and
says it can't be included because it's not GPL. I contacted the
libcdio maintainer about this file, and he again said he could not
include it because the BSD license is incompatible.
Yes, our community o
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Joe wrote:
Wow. I didn't know this changed.
This was announced on ports@ IIRC.
So if there are security bugs in a package or port shipped with OpenBSD 4.2,
there will be no updated package or updated port available?
That is correct.
--
Antoine
Greetings,
Try to install OpenBSD 4.2 i386 on a new HP Compaq dc7700 Small Form Factor,
but when it comes to install the software sets from the CD, the install
fails:
...
...
...
Password for root account? (will not echo)
Password for root account? (again)
Let's install the sets!
Loc
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
