Re: HELP : Getting particular messages

2003-01-15 Thread Stefan Sievert
Hi Murugesan, a couple of comments First of all, you should change the line memcpy(md.CorrelId, "COR1", sizeof(md.CorrelId)); into memcpy(md.CorrelId, "COR1", 4); in both programs. You were obviously lucky that this didn't cause a GPF (0xC5 memory fault) during execution, and that might alre

Re: HELP : Getting particular messages

2003-01-15 Thread Roger Lacroix
Hi, Your code looks fine, except you are doing a programming no-no. I don't like the following line: memcpy(md.CorrelId, "COR1", sizeof(md.CorrelId)); The string "COR1" is only 4 bytes (memcpy does not copy the NULL) but you are copying 24 bytes (because sizeof(md.CorrelId) is 24). Theref

HELP : Getting particular messages

2003-01-15 Thread Murugesan Ravuthan
Hi all, Let me explain the scenario I have 3 MQ series client. All 3 clients post the messages on the same queue . The idea is, whoever posted the message only they should get the response for that message. To do that I group the messages by CorrelId, For Client1 the CorrelId is COR1 Clie

Re: Segmentation on OpenVMS

2003-01-15 Thread David Awerbuch
Anant, MQSeries for OpenVMS/VAX is release 2.1, and does NOT support segmentation. MQSeries for OpenVMS/Alpha is release 5.1, and DOES support segmentation. You must be on the Alpha platform. If you need to simulate segmentation, it can easily be done a unique message or correlation identifier t

Re: Using MQSeries for ALL Synchronous Traffic

2003-01-15 Thread Miller, Dennis
>Now the powers that be want to use this type of asynchronous facility for >all communications. Even if the user MUST get a valid reply on the status >of the request and MUST get this in a timely manner. Matching the best technology to the job at hand should be science, but taking broad b

Re: Segmentation on OpenVMS

2003-01-15 Thread Miller, Dennis
Seems to me it would not be a feature of the client, but rather a feature of the qmgr to which the client connects. In any case, you can always accomplish that functionality at the application level. regards, Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Joshi, A (Anant) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: One bad character during ASCII to EBCDIC conversion

2003-01-15 Thread Douglas Pierson
Many thanks to all that replied to my post. Excellent information. I'll be testing with the 037 CCSID. Thanks again! Doug -Original Message- From: Kelly Urban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wed 1/15/2003 1:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: One bad character during ASCII to EBCDIC conversion

2003-01-15 Thread Yasuo Takei
$)C Hello Doug, > If the ASCI x'21' to EBCDIC x'4F' is "correct", ... This is correct, if "your" EBCDIC is CCSID500. See the following char table of CodePage500. x'4F' means exclamation mark. On the other hand, in the EBCDIC CCSID924(=CodePage924), x'5A' means exclamation mark. http://www-1.ib

Re: One bad character during ASCII to EBCDIC conversion

2003-01-15 Thread Kelly Urban
Doug - We had a similar issue (exact same OS's on both sides). I ended up in a crash course on character sets. Best place for an overall view of your issue, and what IBM wants you to do about it is at : http://www-3.ibm.com/software/ts/mqseries/support/faqs/convert.html Depending on

Re: One bad character during ASCII to EBCDIC conversion

2003-01-15 Thread Vladimir Anisimov
Hi Doug, The ASCII-EBCDIC Chart is available, for instance, at: http://www.natural-innovations.com/computing/asciiebcdic.html You may also consider using a C/C++ snippet available, for instance, at: http://www.cppfrance.com/article.aspx?Val=467 Vladimir Anisimov -Original Message- From:

Re: One bad character during ASCII to EBCDIC conversion

2003-01-15 Thread Potkay, Peter M (PLC, IT)
Use CCSID 037 (US EBCIDIC) on OS/390 instead of 500 (International EBCIDIC). It solves the ! problem. (Why ! isn't a valid international character beats me) Peter Potkay IBM MQSeries Certified Specialist, Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] X 77906 -Original Message- From: Douglas Pierson [ma

One bad character during ASCII to EBCDIC conversion

2003-01-15 Thread Douglas Pierson
Hi Everyone, I have an MQI application that sends character data from Win2K (MQ 5.2, CCSID 437) to OS/390 (MQ 2.1, CCSID 500). Conversion is requested of the qmgr by the application on the MQGET. The data is converted, except for one problem. An exclamation point, ASCII x'21', is conve

Re: problem send binary message nt > os/390 #2

2003-01-15 Thread Jim Ford
We had a similar problem, right down to the x'7F's. It turned out that it wasn't MQSeries that was doing the translation. Instead, it was because the VB program read in the file before writing it to the queue, and the way it read it caused VB to translate the input file into 2-byte Unicode. Some of

Re: 2059-Sender Channel os390 to as400

2003-01-15 Thread vemulapati narasimha reddy
Even I too faced the same problem..See if you have any changes in the Channel settings. I got solved this problem by stopping and staring the channel..Some times you may get the problem with Network as well.Please check the log under \mqm\log\(may in As/400 the path will be differrent) Cheers Redd

Re: MQSeries supplied trigger program for TXSeries CICS

2003-01-15 Thread Barney Scott
This is under CICS on AIX (aka TXSeries), so there are no CK* transactions; but Robert Sloper's suggestion does exactly what's needed - a clean shutdown of the trigger monitor, which can then be restarted OK once the initiation queue has had GETs re-enabled. Many thanks. Barney Scott. - Ori

Re: problem send binary message nt > os/390 #2

2003-01-15 Thread David C. Partridge
But Deborah specifically said that the message format was set to MQFMT_NONE (well actually she said blank, but that's the same), so no conversion should apply. I suspect some form of application error reading or writing the file (e.g. file read as text rather than binary). Dave Instructions for

Re: problem send binary message nt > os/390 #2

2003-01-15 Thread Potkay, Peter M (PLC, IT)
"...a os/390 process needs to pick the message up unconverted" Insure that the mainframe is not specifying MQGMO-CONVERT. Peter Potkay IBM MQSeries Certified Specialist, Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] X 77906 -Original Message- From: Rick Tsujimoto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wedn

Re: Analysis of MQ SMF Records Type 115 and 116

2003-01-15 Thread K K
It appears that it is written for MQ5.2? Has anyone tried it on MQV5.3? Any precaution to take before using it for MQ5.3? TIA - Original Message - From: "Jan van Kemenade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 11:24 PM Subject: Re: Analysis of MQ SMF

Re: problem send binary message nt > os/390 #2

2003-01-15 Thread Rick Tsujimoto
You could try setting the CCSID in the message to that of your QMGR on OS/390. When MQ sees that the there's no difference in the CCSID, it should bypass any conversion attempts.

Re: CICS DPL BRIDGE BACK OUT QUESTION?

2003-01-15 Thread Robert X. Sloper
Perhaps you could post the content of your MSGUSR sysout from the CICS region around the abend. As was said before, a bad message should not terminate the bridge monitor (CKBR) but will terminate the bridge task (CKBP), there is a separate CKBP for each message received. Any failure in a CKBP shou

Re: 2195 Error

2003-01-15 Thread Jeffrey Ross
Hi, What I am finding in the error logs and FDC files are "AMQ6209: An unexpected asynchronous signal (15) has been received and ignored." Also receiving "AMQ6183: An internal MQSeries error has occurred." The FDC file also contained Major Errorcode "xecE_W_UNEXPECTED_ASYNC_SIGNAL" As stated, th

problem send binary message nt > os/390 #2

2003-01-15 Thread deborah damore
Heres  info on my environment   XP pro, mqseries client 5.1   Os/390 2.1 mqsersies 5.3   I am trying to send a pdf as the content of a mq message from NT to os/390, a os/390 process needs to pick the message up unconverted. The problem is some characters are getting converted in the m

2059-Sender Channel os390 to as400

2003-01-15 Thread JoE JK
Hi, I came across this problem a few days ago in our production box. Upon checking on our host log, the message appears as 'Remote qmgr not available' and when check at the receiver end, the qmgr is up and running. Found the error at the receiever end with 2059 on the channels(os390 to as400). Any

Re: 2195 Error

2003-01-15 Thread Robert Broderick
LOOK for the deraded FDC files in /var/mqm/errors/ This may have generated some dumps. bobbee From: Jeffrey Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2195 Error Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:08:16 -0600 Hello Fellow MQer

Re: MQSeries supplied trigger program for TXSeries CICS

2003-01-15 Thread Robert Broderick
If this is under CICS go to the CICS Adapter screen (type in CKQC) and under the heading of CKTI I believe you can stop it there. bobbee From: "Robert X. Sloper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROT

Re: MQSeries supplied trigger program for TXSeries CICS

2003-01-15 Thread Robert X. Sloper
I have not used this trigger monitor but the nomal approach would be to get disable the queue that the trigger monitor is polling. Barney Sco

Re: 2195 Error

2003-01-15 Thread Paul Clarke
>Hello Fellow MQer's, >I have this weird problem with MQ V5.2, AIX 4.3.3.  Our AIX Admins rebooted the machine.  After the reboot I started MQ and the Client Server and connected through MQ Explorer on >WIn2K.  An application team that uses this particular server informed me they have been get

MQSeries supplied trigger program for TXSeries CICS

2003-01-15 Thread Barney Scott
Hi, I'm trying to get the MQSeries trigger program for TXSeries CICS (amqltmc0) running. In fact, it runs, and triggers CICS transactions, fine. The problem is stopping it. The manuals (MQ, or TXSeries) don't seem to address this at all. A Purge of the transaction, via CEMT, does nothing; a F

AW: Re: COBOL Copybook with Redefines clause and WMQI

2003-01-15 Thread Saraswathy A
it is solved, WMQI treats redefines element as choice elements. My copy book had 07 ELEMENT1PIC X(6). 07 ELEMENT2 REDEFINES ELEMENT1. and so only one of them, either ELEMENT1 or ELEMENT2 needed to be assinged and not both. Thank you -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von:T