On 06Sep2015 22:54, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Cameron Simpson [09-06-15 22:41]:
On 06Sep2015 21:38, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>* Grady Martin [09-06-15 21:32]:
>>Hello, fellow puppies. The mutt mailing list is
On 06Sep2015 21:38, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Grady Martin [09-06-15 21:32]:
Hello, fellow puppies. The mutt mailing list is magical. Executing a
regular results in a prompt that confirms the recipient (list or
sender).
[...]
line wrapping
* Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de [05-27-15 15:07]:
El día Wednesday, May 27, 2015 a las 07:57:29PM +0200, Matthias Apitz
escribió:
El día Wednesday, May 27, 2015 a las 12:35:18PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan
escribió:
I just used group-reply with the MUA 'dekko' on Ubuntu phone. May
On 2014-10-13, Derek Martin wrote:
- edit_headers
This is what I do now to solve my problem.
--
Greetings
Elias
Hi Chris
On 2014-10-16, Chris Bannister wrote:
Oooops, sorry, I meant shift-l, i.e: L
Ok ;-)
No it doesn't. See my previous post.
--
Greetings
Elias
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 06:01:24PM +0200, Elias Diem wrote:
Hi Chris
On 2014-10-14, Chris Bannister wrote:
try CTRL-L
Does it do what you want?
Hmmm. From the manual, CTRL-L is used to refresh the screen.
What do I miss here?
Oooops, sorry, I meant shift-l, i.e: L
--
If you're
'
is my address:
header
From: A
To: B, ME
/header
Now I'd like to reply to A and B and I want those addresses
to be both in the To: field. The new header would look
something like this:
header
From: ME
To: A, B
/header
At the moment when I press 'g' to group-reply, the header
looks like
Hi Chris
On 2014-10-14, Chris Bannister wrote:
try CTRL-L
Does it do what you want?
Hmmm. From the manual, CTRL-L is used to refresh the screen.
What do I miss here?
--
Greetings
Elias
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 05:59:13PM +0200, Elias Diem wrote:
So let me precise it. I don't talk about mailing lists but
messages that come from one person to many.
[...]
Now I'd like to reply to A and B and I want those addresses
to be both in the To: field. The new header would look
Hi Derek
On 2014-10-14, Derek Martin wrote:
That said, I believe the intended behavior is to put only the To
addresses in the To: field, and everything else in the Cc: field. The
difference between To: and Cc: is basically that if the author puts
you in the To: field, the author expects
Hi all
I often group reply to messages. I'd like to set the To:
field with the reply addresses instead of the Cc: field. Is
this possible? I didn't find anything on the list archive.
--
Greetings
Elias
Greetings!
*** Elias Diem li...@webconect.ch [2014-10-13 21:24]:
I often group reply to messages. I'd like to set the To:
field with the reply addresses instead of the Cc: field. Is
this possible? I didn't find anything on the list archive.
I think that article is good for explaining
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:20:36PM +0200, Elias Diem wrote:
I often group reply to messages. I'd like to set the To:
field with the reply addresses instead of the Cc: field. Is
this possible? I didn't find anything on the list archive.
I think your question is a little vague to get good
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:20:36PM +0200, Elias Diem wrote:
Hi all
I often group reply to messages. I'd like to set the To:
field with the reply addresses instead of the Cc: field. Is
this possible? I didn't find anything on the list archive.
try CTRL-L
Does it do what you want
'%L fam_grp' family
^^
Where is the use of '%L and other such magic documented?
In mutt, press F1¹, then either search for %L (about the
third hit includes the text GROUP), or go to section
3.1. Pattern Modifier. (It's the same place.)
...
Where is -group within an alias
I don't know if this is possible.
When someone CCs me and I reply group it of course includes my email
address (I have several).
Anyway of having it not reply to my email(s)? If I remember then I
edit the To: field, but of course I sometimes forget.
Ideas?
Dave
On 2012-07-03, David Woodfall wrote:
I don't know if this is possible.
When someone CCs me and I reply group it of course includes my email
address (I have several).
Anyway of having it not reply to my email(s)? If I remember then I
edit the To: field, but of course I sometimes forget
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 05:41:28PM +0100, David Woodfall wrote:
When someone CCs me and I reply group it of course includes my email
address (I have several).
Anyway of having it not reply to my email(s)?
Set 'alternates'[1] to match your email addresses. Ensure 'metoo'[2] is
unset.
[1
On (18:24 03/07/12), Simon Ward si...@bleah.co.uk put forth the proposition:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 05:41:28PM +0100, David Woodfall wrote:
When someone CCs me and I reply group it of course includes my email
address (I have several).
Anyway of having it not reply to my email(s)?
Set
On 10May2012 01:23, Stephen Butler stephe...@hotmail.com wrote:
| My grateful thanks for the comments and advice.
| Once I've packaged mutt for microcore (with mail group) and reboot
| into stock system, I can send an email via mutt without mail group via
| smtp fine. Does mutt need the mail group
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 01:12:03AM +, Stephen Butler wrote:
So anyway, I created the mail group and everything compiled fine
after that. I was wondering if its possible to change the required
group from mail to something else, such as a group called staff ?
You probably really don't want
My grateful thanks for the comments and advice.
Once I've packaged mutt for microcore (with mail group) and reboot into stock
system, I can send an email via mutt without mail group via smtp fine. Does
mutt need the mail group for general email, maintenance, or interaction with
other software
Can't
fix mutt_dotlock's permissions! 2 ; exit 1 ; } \fichgrp: invalid group:
`mail'Can't fix mutt_dotlock's permissions!make[4]: *** [install-exec-hook]
Error 1make[4]: Leaving directory `/mnt/hdb1/mutt/mutt-1.5.21'make[3]: ***
[install-exec-am] Error 2make[3]: Leaving directory
`/mnt/hdb1/mutt
\ chmod 2755
/tmp/package/usr/local/bin/mutt_dotlock || \ { echo Can't fix
mutt_dotlock's permissions! 2 ; exit 1 ; } \fichgrp: invalid group:
`mail'Can't fix mutt_dotlock's permissions!make[4]: *** [install-exec-hook]
Error 1make[4]: Leaving directory `/mnt/hdb1/mutt/mutt
nobody else would be
able to access things belonging to the mail group. Your staff group
has one or more people in it. Even on a system with only one person
using it, separation of privileges is good.
ĸen
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
I have two questions about groups. Up until now, I've created all of my
groups while creating aliases. I now realize there is a distinction between
the two, and don't really need most of the aliases for the groups, just the
group definitions themselves. Whereas before I would write:
alias
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 02:47:45PM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 13May2010 09:53, Udo Hortian udo_hort...@web.de wrote:
| I tend to use reply accidentally instead of group reply if I reply to
| messages sent to a group of persons. Is there a way to be asked by mutt
| if one wants to use
Dear mutt users,
I tend to use reply accidentally instead of group reply if I reply to
messages sent to a group of persons. Is there a way to be asked by mutt
if one wants to use group reply instead of reply in case that there
is more than one recipient in the mail one is answering?
Udo
On 13May2010 09:53, Udo Hortian udo_hort...@web.de wrote:
| I tend to use reply accidentally instead of group reply if I reply to
| messages sent to a group of persons. Is there a way to be asked by mutt
| if one wants to use group reply instead of reply in case that there
| is more than one
On 20100411_200302, Michael Elkins wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 04:59:19PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
On 20100409_103212, Michael Elkins wrote:
It was unclear from your message exactly where the problem lies. Are
you seeing the address list truncated in the compose menu? I do see
that
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 04:59:19PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
On 20100409_103212, Michael Elkins wrote:
It was unclear from your message exactly where the problem lies. Are
you seeing the address list truncated in the compose menu? I do see
that Mutt truncates the *display* of the address
On 20100409_103212, Michael Elkins wrote:
Paul,
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 08:42:06AM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
A group of my personal friends have an informal mailing list in which
each member has a long list of the email addresses that they use as
the Cc: list for their emails
In the default setup of mutt from debian, the 'g' key starts a reply,
but with the headers set to include the recipients of the email to
which I am replying. But ...
A group of my personal friends have an informal mailing list in which
each member has a long list of the email addresses
Paul,
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 08:42:06AM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
A group of my personal friends have an informal mailing list in which
each member has a long list of the email addresses that they use as
the Cc: list for their emails to the group. When I use 'g' the Cc:
list is truncated
Currently Mutt doesn't have any way to accomplish creating a group alias
in this manner.
I think the easiest implementation would be to make the alias creation
honor the tag-prefix such that the user can tag several emails.
For the most part, the user should be using an external address
Hi, I did some search on google but didn't find any native solution
for mutt. If I press a in the index then mutt will ask me if I would
like to append this address to alias. Sometimes I want to define a
group alias which contains several contacts. I wish there would be
such a function: when I
All,
I'm wondering if there's some way to tell mutt to automatically remove
self from group replies. I find this to be a pain sometimes when on
long email threads.
Thoughts?
-j
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tuesday, August 18 at 08:55 AM, quoth James:
All,
I'm wondering if there's some way to tell mutt to automatically remove
self from group replies. I find this to be a pain sometimes when on
long email threads.
To quote the muttrc man page
:
All,
I'm wondering if there's some way to tell mutt to automatically remove
self from group replies. I find this to be a pain sometimes when on
long email threads.
To quote the muttrc man page:
metoo
Type: boolean
Default: no
If unset, Mutt will remove your
and now it's so simple and
does exactly what I want (include me on group reply but not on normal
replies). I just set this to 'yes' in my .muttrc – thank you very much. :-)
Greets
Alex
--
»With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured,
the first thought forbidden, the first
Hi Marianne!
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008, Marianne Promberger wrote:
The macro would pipe the message to formail, which would extract the
To: headers, then pipe that through sed or awk to give a meaningful
mutt alias line and append that to your mutt aliases file. Possibly the
macro could as a last
Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 04:14:26PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sometimes I receive an email that is sent to a group of people. I want
to alias all such addresses in the To: list. What is the easiest way to
do it.
I do it like this: in my alias file
On Saturday, 13 September 2008, 10:57 (UTC-0700), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 04:14:26PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sometimes I receive an email that is sent to a group of people. I want
to alias all such addresses in the To: list
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 04:14:26PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sometimes I receive an email that is sent to a group of people. I want
to alias all such addresses in the To: list. What is the easiest way to
do it.
I do it like this: in my alias file :
alias name-of-alias [EMAIL PROTECTED
Sometimes I receive an email that is sent to a group of people. I want
to alias all such addresses in the To: list. What is the easiest way to
do it.
Another question is, sometimes I don't want to make an alias but
nonetheless want to send an email to all the people in the To: list
(like group
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 04:14:26PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sometimes I receive an email that is sent to a group of people. I want
to alias all such addresses in the To: list. What is the easiest way to
do it.
Sorry, I don't know this one.
Another question is, sometimes I don't want
Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For this, if you have the edit_headers option set, then your mail
editor will display the full message to you with the headers. The
easiest way to achieve your goal would be to scrap the In-Reply-To
header. You can, of course, edit the subject.
Good tip
I would like to set up a group and an alias for that group. I read the manual
and the wiki and the recent post and still to dumb to figure it out.
I want the group name to be fargo. I would like the alias to be fargo if the
group name and alias can be the same.
The email addreses are [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, July 29 at 06:59 PM, quoth Tom:
I would like to set up a group and an alias for that group. I read
the manual and the wiki and the recent post and still to dumb to
figure it out. I want the group name to be fargo. I would like
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 08:43:58PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Tuesday, July 29 at 06:59 PM, quoth Tom:
I would like to set up a group and an alias for that group. I read
the manual and the wiki and the recent post and still to dumb to
figure it out. I want the group name to be fargo
Hi Kyle,
thank you very much for your help especially with respect to
infinite loops (I was traped in one).
* Kyle Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05. Nov. 2007]:
Don't trigger the hook except on messages that are not already
signed/encrypted:
send2-hook '!~g !~G ^%C gpg-full' 'push
Gregor Zattler wrote:
I configured a group gpg-full which matches all emailaddresses to
which a valid gpg key exists in my keyring. I'm able for instance
to search for emails matching %Cgpg-full in the index and the scroll
bar jumps to the next message which is addressed to somebody who's
* Todd Zullinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-06 02:47 -0500]:
Gregor Zattler wrote:
I want to use this group feature to switch encryption on and off
depending on emailaddresses:
FWIW, another way I think you can achieve your goal is to use Nicolas
Rachinsky's crypt-autohook patch[1
Dear Mutt users,
I configured a group gpg-full which matches all emailaddresses
to which a valid gpg key exists in my keyring. I'm able for
instance to search for emails matching %Cgpg-full in the index
and the scroll bar jumps to the next message which is addressed
to somebody who's gpg key I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, November 5 at 05:01 PM, quoth Gregor Zattler:
I want to use this group feature to switch encryption on and off
depending on emailaddresses:
:) I do that a lot myself.
send2-hook . set crypt_autosign=no
send2-hook . set
I know this has come up before, but I can't find it anywhere:
When I group reply to a message, is there any way to remove my own
address from the recipient list?
--
David Rock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
msg30933/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
David Rock wrote:
I know this has come up before, but I can't find it anywhere:
When I group reply to a message, is there any way to remove my own
address from the recipient list?
unset metoo should do what you want.
if that doesn't work, perhaps you don't have $alternates set correctly
* David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020912 21:02]:
When I group reply to a message, is there any way to remove my own
address from the recipient list?
Mutt should do this for you if you have set alternates
correctly...
-Johan
--
Johan Almqvist
http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/
* Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-12 21:10]:
* David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020912 21:02]:
When I group reply to a message, is there any way to remove my own
address from the recipient list?
Mutt should do this for you if you have set alternates
correctly...
Duh, worked great
Alas! David Rock spake thus:
6.3.96. metoo
Type: boolean
Default: no
If unset, Mutt will remove your address from the list of recipients
Mutt can only know who you are by $alternates.
Neither of these really explains that metoo needs alternates
* David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-12 19:32]:
* Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-12 21:10]:
* David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020912 21:02]:
When I group reply to a message, is there any way to
remove my own address from the recipient list?
Mutt should do this for you
Hi all.
How should i configure my muttrc to make mutt don't include my address
in group replies messages? The variable metoo is unset, but my address is
still there (CC).
TIA
--
Eduardo Gargiulo
^ejg(-.*)?@ar\.homelinux\.org$
msg27635/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 2002-04-25 Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
How should i configure my muttrc to make mutt don't include my address
in group replies messages? The variable metoo is unset, but my address is
still there (CC).
Did you set alternates correctly, so that mutt knows, who you are?
Regards,
Christoph
Christoph Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2002-04-25 Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
How should i configure my muttrc to make mutt don't include my address
in group replies messages? The variable metoo is unset, but my address is
still there (CC).
Did you set alternates correctly, so
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
...
% set alternates=egargiulo@ingdesi.(net|com)?
% set alternates=ejg(-.*)?@ar.homelinux.org
Unlike mailboxes or lists, alternates is a basic regexp, so your second
setting will step on your first and no egargiulo addresses will be
recognized.
David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
...
% set alternates=egargiulo@ingdesi.(net|com)?
% set alternates=ejg(-.*)?@ar.homelinux.org
Unlike mailboxes or lists, alternates is a basic regexp, so your second
setting will step on your first
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
% David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%
% ...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
% %
% ...
% % set alternates=egargiulo@ingdesi.(net|com)?
% % set alternates=ejg(-.*)?@ar.homelinux.org
...
%
%set
When I do a group-reply, how can I automatically filter out *my* email
address?
I'm already writing all sent messages to folders with save_name and I'm
getting a second useless mail unless I manually remove my name from the
To or CC list
--
Andrew Bell
On 2002.03.01, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Andrew P. Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I do a group-reply, how can I automatically filter out *my* email
address?
I'm already writing all sent messages to folders with save_name and I'm
getting a second useless mail unless I manually remove
Let's say person A mails me and cc:'s person B. Now, I want to reply
to all of them, so I do a `g'roup-reply. It seems that mutt's default
behavior is to compose a message to person A and cc:'d to me and
person B. What's the rationale for this?
I would prefer that 'g' only send the message to
msg.pgp
, and it
is also off by default.
i am pretty sure that metoo works for group reply as well. my guess is
that you don't have 'alternates' set correctly or set at all... what is
your 'alternates' line?
i have this in my .muttrc
set alternates = (will|william).*@.*(newdream|infinitejazz\.net|unixverse
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 12:11:52PM, David Petrou wrote:
[clip]
set followup_to=no
david
---end quoted text---
--
Para La Queja Mexica
Este Sueño De America
Celebramos La Aluna
De Siempre, Ahorita
-- Bertrand Cantat, Tostaky (Le Continent)
Benjamin Michotte[EMAIL PROTECTED]
i am pretty sure that metoo works for group reply as well. my guess is
that you don't have 'alternates' set correctly or set at all... what is
your 'alternates' line?
that was it! thanks!
w
david
Hello,
Is there a way to delete a group of messages from the message index in
a way like:
delete all messages from the currently selected message to #49 inclusive
Thanks,
Viraj.
Masand, Manish [mutt-users] 19/06/01 17:11 +0200:
Could anyone pls help me out with this.
I want to fire mutt from commandline so that it mails to a group of people
Basically, something that i can set up in muttrc...for eg
product_users ([EMAIL PROTECTED] , [EMAIL PROTECTED] , .and so
Masand, Manish [mutt-users] 19/06/01 17:26 +0200:
Thanks for your prompt reply,Suresh.
how to use mutt -x ..could u pls give an example.
Thanks a lot.
man mutt ... please.
-suresh
[and also trim your signature, and most if not all of the reply ...]
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian
Masand, Manish [mutt-users] 19/06/01 17:38 +0200:
Oh...sorry about the signature part.
Actually there is no manual entry for mutt, hence...
What? Oh well, then search for the mutt documentation - that should be there.
i did a mutt -x , but i specified 2 different mail id's.
Is it
into it on stdin, in
summary. Read about mutt's alias command if you want to define
a group, rather than putting all the destination addresses
on the command line. Read the popen() man page, if you haven't
done this kind of thing before from C before, or the equivalent
in whatever language you're
Masand, Manish ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect on 06/19/2001:
i was looking at the /etc/aliases file
a sample set up would be :-
# Alias for distribution list, members specified here:
staff:wnj,mosher,sam,ecc,mckusick,sklower,olson,rwh@ernie
so would staff be the
Sam Roberts [mutt-users] 19/06/01 11:51 -0400:
Have you tried this, Suresh?
It says emulates mailx, and that's it.
And on my system (RedHat, which is fairly mainstream) mailx
does not exist.
So? It'll work. And mailx == /bin/mail, more or less.
to do this programmatically, I'd like to
Quoting Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED], who wrote:
Sam Roberts [mutt-users] 19/06/01 11:51 -0400:
Have you tried this, Suresh?
It says emulates mailx, and that's it.
And on my system (RedHat, which is fairly mainstream) mailx
does not exist.
So? It'll work. And mailx ==
Sam Roberts [mutt-users] 19/06/01 12:50 -0400:
Huh? What will work? mailx? And the man page for mail also
only describes it's use as an interactive mail program, not
for programmatic injection of mail into the mail transfer
system.
Do me a favor, try it first.
suresh@blackehlo:~$ cat
Hi Mutters,
I would like to set up a group of addresses, and send email to all of the
members of the group with just using the name of the group as an alias.
This is what I think of: similarly to saving a message to a folder, I would
like to use the "a" command, and get a prompt whet
- Original Message -
From: "Viktor Lakics" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 4:37 AM
Subject: Set up a group of addresses - how?
Hi Mutters,
I would like to set up a group of addresses, and send email to all of
the
members of the group
hi,
Question as the subject. I dont need to get a CC when Group-Reply. I
know, I can remove it manually, but is there any hook could be used
here?
thanks,
jack
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 03:40:19PM -0500, Jack wrote:
Question as the subject. I dont need to get a CC when Group-Reply. I
know, I can remove it manually, but is there any hook could be used
here?
unset metoo
If you have different addresses, make sure that you set up $alternates
Hello, I just started using mutt today and I was wondering if
anyone knows a way to create a group for broadcast messages...I can't find
anything in the man pages or the documentation.
Thanks
Jeff --
...and then Jeff Morris said...
% Hello, I just started using mutt today and I was wondering if anyone knows a way to
create a group for broadcast messages...I can't find anything in the man pages or the
documentation.
Yes, you can; aliases can be either single or multiple. Check out
Hi
I'm using mutt 1.1.5 and I have q. if is possible tell mutt to remove my adress
from recipients when I'm group replying ?
unset metoo is in my understanding different but I tryed it and it does not
work.
--
Keso
don't worry about
On 2000-02-25 10:42:12 +0100, Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE wrote:
I'm using mutt 1.1.5 and I have q. if is possible tell mutt to
remove my adress from recipients when I'm group replying ?
unset metoo is in my understanding different but I tryed it and
it does not
work.
metoo
Thomas Roessler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
On 2000-02-25 10:42:12 +0100, Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE wrote:
I'm using mutt 1.1.5 and I have q. if is possible tell mutt to
remove my adress from recipients when I'm group replying ?
unset metoo is in my understanding different
I posted this a week or so ago and got no response, so I thought I would
try again with a different (and hopefully more appropriate) subject line.
I am using mutt 1.0i and am have a problem with group reply. In my .muttrc
file I have remapped the g and ^G keys as follows:
bind
* Jeffery Small [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000204 01:20]:
In my .muttrc file I have remapped the g and ^G keys as follows:
When I am in the index or pager and type ? it reports:
^G group-replyreply to all recipients
However, when I type ^G nothing happens.
The ^G is used
On Sat, Jun 19, 1999 at 05:29:50AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
set reply_to=ask-yes (or something)
[snip]
group-reply will go to everyone in the To: and Cc: fields unless there is
On a somewhat related subject (well, related to these two bits, anyways),
is there a feature in Mutt (that I've
Jim --
...and then Jim Graham said...
% On Sat, Jun 19, 1999 at 05:29:50AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
%
% set reply_to=ask-yes (or something)
% [snip]
% group-reply will go to everyone in the To: and Cc: fields unless there is
%
% On a somewhat related subject (well, related to these two
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 09:48:56AM -0400, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
[I wrote:]
do a group-reply when I hit 'r'? I often need to do a group-reply, but
forget and do a normal reply
Well, since a group of one could still be a group reply, why not just
use 'g' all of the time
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=kfjH4zxOES6UT95V; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=oJ71EGRlYNjSvfq7; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
101 - 200 of 203 matches
Mail list logo