On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 02:01:46PM -0700, David E. Fox wrote:
> On Sun, 9 May 2004 14:12:37 -0400
> Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 09 May 2004 01:23 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
>
> > It's actually much easier to hear with earphones, which is the only way my
> > wife will let m
On Sun, 9 May 2004 14:12:37 -0400
Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 09 May 2004 01:23 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> It's actually much easier to hear with earphones, which is the only way my
> wife will let me listen to my music. :-)
Speaking of headphone listening, have you done an
On Sun, 9 May 2004 09:56:00 -0400
"Ronald J. Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom, I've used the XMMS diskwriter route to burning audio CD's here ever since
> the first time I saw you post it some time back... :-)
Me too :), and probably longer. I'm very happy with it for two reasons -
one, i
On Sun, 9 May 2004 17:01:37 -0400
Todd Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> alt.binaries.sounds.ogg
> alt.binaries.sounds.lossless
>
> But shhh.
Too late; I overheard something.
> Todd
--
David E. Fox
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 05:12:37PM -0500, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> On Sunday 09 May 2004 04:01 pm, Todd Slater wrote:
> > alt.binaries.sounds.ogg
> > alt.binaries.sounds.lossless
> >
> > But shhh.
> >
> > Todd
>
>Damn. Masha Danki Todd!! Never occurred to me to search
> those terms (og
On Sunday 09 May 2004 04:01 pm, Todd Slater wrote:
> alt.binaries.sounds.ogg
> alt.binaries.sounds.lossless
>
> But shhh.
>
> Todd
Damn. Masha Danki Todd!! Never occurred to me to search
those terms (ogg, lossless) OTOH, what'a fsck is a .ape
or .flac ?
Never mind let me do some
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 08:44:25AM -0500, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> On Saturday 08 May 2004 03:03 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
> > > ->I'll give a prize to the first poster that can recognize
> > > the song I used by ->listening to this. I did compress it
> > > again to save bandwidth, but it won't ->change
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 10:12:50AM -0400, Greg Meyer wrote:
> On Sunday 09 May 2004 09:34 am, Todd Slater wrote:
> > On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 12:33:12PM -0400, Greg Meyer wrote:
> > > I have been playing around with various encoding techniques trying to
> > > hear what is removed from a wav file whe
Aron Smith wrote:
On Sunday 09 May 2004 06:44 am, Tom Brinkman wrote:
alias cpaudiocd='ripacd && normall && bacd &&
rm -f /home/tom/wav/*
alias ripacd='cdparanoia -vB 1- /home/tom/wav/'
alias normall='normalize -m /home/tom/wav/*'
alias bacd='cdrecord -v -eject driveropts=burnfree speed=32
dev=1,0
On Sunday 09 May 2004 01:23 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> > I think he was referring to what the compression did to it. I
> > listened to what the link had and it was ugly. I had to crank
> > my Monsoon speakers almost max and listen a couple of times
> > before I figured out what it was.
>
> Same a
On Sunday 09 May 2004 08:55 am, Aron Smith wrote:
> > alias cpaudiocd='ripacd && normall && bacd &&
> > rm -f /home/tom/wav/*
> >
> >
> > alias ripacd='cdparanoia -vB 1- /home/tom/wav/'
> > alias normall='normalize -m /home/tom/wav/*'
> > alias bacd='cdrecord -v -eject driveropts=burnfree speed=32
On Sunday 09 May 2004 08:56 am, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Sunday 09 May 2004 09:44 am, Tom Brinkman wrote:
>
> ->Hell, I'm still tryin to figure out what y'all are talkin
> ->about ;)Not to hijack, but I will since the original
> query ->seems to be satisfied ;)
>
> I think he was referrin
On Saturday 08 May 2004 03:03 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
> > ->I'll give a prize to the first poster that can recognize
> > the song I used by ->listening to this. I did compress it
> > again to save bandwidth, but it won't ->change your
> > impreion about how much of a track is lost when it is
> >
On Saturday 08 May 2004 04:03 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
->We have a winner. I said you'd get a prize, but I lied :-p
->
->It is really astounding to me that one can figure out the song from
listening ->to the difference between the original and the compressed
version.
TBH, it took me awhile. I'm f
14 matches
Mail list logo
