Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [testperf] poll for APAC friendly time slot for weekly meeting

Unless someone from Europe accepts a time, this appears to be an APAC-only meeting (it’s doubtful anyone from North America will join at the proposed times: something to discuss if this wasn’t the intention). Al From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [daisy4nfv]

Hi Chris Thanks for reminding me. I updated the meeting logistics info at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Meetings B.R., Zhijiang 发件人: Christopher Price 收件人: , , , , , , , , , , 抄送: 日期: 2016-08-10 18:38 主题: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [daisy4nfv] Hi Zhi

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [testperf] poll for APAC friendly time slot for weekly meeting

So far, four participants have taken the poll. See http://doodle.com/poll/fa4nspdf4ta2u7pb I would suggest we close the vote before this weekend. -- Yujun On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 10:25 PM Yujun Zhang wrote: > Dear testers, > > As an action of last weekly meeting, I have created a poll to selec

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Committer at large nomination: Bob Monkman

Thanks, Dave, I humbly accept the nomination. Robert (Bob) Monkman Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager 150 Rose Orchard Way San Jose, Ca 95134 M: +1.510.676.5490 -Original Message- From: Dave Neary [mailto:dne...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 8:17 AM To: opnfv-tech-discus

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [SPC Polestar WG] OPNFV SPC Polestar Working Group Meeting: Thursday, August 11

Just a reminder there will be a Polestar Working Group Meeting at 8AM U.S. Pacific Time, Thursday, August 11. Meeting details are below and also posted on the Polestar Working Group's wiki page here: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/polestar/Meetings - IRC channel: #opnfv-polestar - GTM

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] opnfv-tech-discuss[QTIP]

Hi, Zhihui, It seems you are working on installer adaptors recently. Could you give some hint on how to make it work? @Sudha, I wonder if you could share your patch (git diff) and complete log message so we can have a better understanding about your issue. On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:16 PM Kumari

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Update release documentation [opnfvdocs]

Hello, Sofia, For multisite, Kingbird is a new service for quota management in multisite project, an installation guide without installer support(installers not supported it yer) for the new service is provided. User guide/installation guide/configuration guide is provided in multisite project,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Maybe it's my strange mind, but I can't help thinking bat guano on that one, Bryan. :) I like the musical theme myself -- it's a bit whimsical but obviously yield to the community. HRK On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 4:21 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote: > How about Bat-Mano? > > On Aug 5, 2016, at 8:52

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

How about Bat-Mano? On Aug 5, 2016, at 8:52 AM, Bob Monkman mailto:bob.monk...@arm.com>> wrote: Guiseppe, Chris, Good comments and I like fun names. I see both sides on this one. I thought it was worth a look, since Yuan brought it up and I could see how it could _possibly_ be

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] Aug 5 Dovetail meeting notes

+1. Let me give an example of IPv6, which Dovetail is using it as a template of developing test cases: Step 1: understand IPv6 feature and its gaps with Mitaka and Boron * Reference: http://artifacts.opnfv.org/ipv6/docs/userguide/index.html Step 2: understand current test case coverage in Fu

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] Aug 5 Dovetail meeting notes

Chris, I either don't understand or don't agree to the statement that the Functest isn't designed to be generic, at least as a framework. Certainly where we leverage upstream test suites e.g. Tempest/rally they are contextual, but so far we have no other cloud VIM in OPNFV except for OpenStack.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] Aug 5 Dovetail meeting notes

I would say rather that the Dovetail system needs to be aware of what system and components are under test, and select as fully as possible the compatible tests from the Functest and Yardstick suites. We should not narrow down the scope to just what will run across all implementations, even pr

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for the dovetail meeting

I support fewer distinct channels also. If it turns out we have an adhoc meeting conflict, we can setup #opnfv-alt1/2/3 ala OpenStack, ping others and move conversations there as needed. Just like CB radio. On Aug 10, 2016, at 8:54 AM, Dave Neary wrote: Hi, I agree with Chris. There is also

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV] [Mano WG] Support for OPNFV MANO releated projects - Meeting today 20.30 UTC (1.30 PM PDT)

Hi all Please join us in discussing MANO WG and review the Catalog Interface Demo today irc: #opnfv-mano GTM Link : https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/843517045 Meeting Wednesday(2nd and 4th weeks in month) 20.30 UTC (1.30 PM PDT) Agenda (Continuing from last meeting and Monday meetings) MANO W

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] TSC Committer At Large nomination: Tom Nadeau

I humbly accept the nomination. Thank you for thinking of me. 8) --Tom On 8/10/16, 1:31 PM, "opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org on behalf of Dave Neary" wrote: Hi all, * Name: Tom Nadeau * Employer: Brocade * As an outgoing TSC member, I think To

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Network issues during OPFNV deployment

Hey there. Can you please confirm that your jumphost (that is running your FUEL node) has connectivity (over the bridges - I am assuming you are doing an nested installation ) to the COMPUTE/CONTROLLER Nodes once they are deployed? It would appear that why you have FUEL talking to your nodes, y

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Technical Community Discussion Canceled Tomorrow (8/11)

Hello community, There is no new project proposal in the backlog. And there is not urgent issue to discuss either. So I propose to cancel our technical discussion tomorrow (8/11) so that everyone can focus on Colorado release, catch stable branch window, and meet documentation milestone. Than

[opnfv-tech-discuss] TSC Committer At Large nomination: Tom Nadeau

Hi all, * Name: Tom Nadeau * Employer: Brocade * As an outgoing TSC member, I think Tom would be another great representative of the Silver members in the TSC, and his practical experience in open source has been, and will continue to be, invaluable to the group. I would like to nominate him for

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [PHAROS][INFRA}Revisiting PHAROS SPECIFICATION vs. DEPLOYMENT EXAMPLES

Hey there. I think it might be worthwhile to ask around and understand what the point of the Pharos specficaiton is/was. The idea in the specification was to provide a common setup that all installers could build against and to be able to communicate a common baseline that we all (all 5+)_ ins

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for the dovetail meeting

Hi, I agree with Chris. There is also a very well suited channel for general discussion, not limited to Dovetail, #opnfv - I propose we use that if there are topics that need real-time interaction. Also, please remember the old Apache dictum: "If it didn't happen on the mailing list, it didn't ha

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Opening nominations for the Committers-at-Large TSC elections

All, Just a quick reminder that the nomination period closes this Friday at 5pm Pacific Time. Please send in your nominations or post self nominations at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/2016+Commiters-at- Large+TSC+Election+Self-Nominations Thanks, Ray On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Raymo

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Committer at large nomination: Bob Monkman

Hi, I would like to nominate Bob Monkman from ARM as a TSC member. * Nominee: Bob Monkman * Employer: ARM * Bob has been very active in DPACC and ARMband, and I think he would be a great addition to the TSC. There is an added bonus that this would increase the representation of our Silver member

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Network issues during OPFNV deployment

Hi All, I've trying to deploy OPFNV environment using Fuel (IP: 10.20.0.2) as Jump Host based on http://artifacts.opnfv.org/functest/brahmaputra/docs/configguide/configguide.pdf instructions. Problems occur on the step 3.3 Preparing the Functest environment. Execution of ${repos_dir}/functest/

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Working with the docs toolchain locally on your laptop.

Hi Chris, thanks – at least with the instructions provided (I did not scrub the deploy script) – things also don’t work for the entire project (it looks as if the script needs to be run at top level – but even then it comes back and moans that “docs” does not exist). Cc’ing Ryota. So am back to

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [bottlenecks] bottlenecks weekly meeting 04-28 (1:00-2:00 UTC, Thursday, 9:00-10:00 Beijing Time, Thursday, PDT 18:00-19:00 Wednesday )

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:W. Australia Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:DAY

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Canceled: [bottlenecks] bottlenecks weekly meeting 04-28 (1:00-2:00 UTC, Thursday, 9:00-10:00 Beijing Time, Thursday, Pacific time 17:00-18:00 Wednesday )

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:CANCEL PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:W. Australia Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:DAYL

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [bottlenecks] bottlenecks weekly meeting 04-28 (1:00-2:00 UTC, Thursday, 9:00-10:00 Beijing Time, Thursday, Pacific time 17:00-18:00 Wednesday )

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:W. Australia Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:DAY

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [bottlenecks] bottlenecks weekly meeting 04-28 (1:00-2:00 UTC, Thursday, 9:00-10:00 Beijing Time, Thursday, PDT 18:00-19:00 Wednesday )

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:W. Australia Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:DAY

[opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: 答复: [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for the dovetail meeting

Hi Chris: Sure. hongbo 发件人: Christopher Price [mailto:chrispric...@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2016年8月10日 20:26 收件人: Tianhongbo; Dave Neary; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 主题: Re: 答复: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for the dovetail meeting Ok, interesting no-one mentioned that on t

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for the dovetail meeting

Ok, interesting no-one mentioned that on the last meeting.  Can we discuss it as a group on Friday before changing what was agreed 5 days ago?  (Note: releng did create it’s own channel but no longer uses it, rather they work on community channels as separate channels are at times not very

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Working with the docs toolchain locally on your laptop.

Hi Frank, That’s not possible with the instructions/scripts provided.  There may be some black magic that could be done but I am really not familiar enough to provide it. In general though, the docs rendering is not a heavyweight activity and it should not take more than a few seconds to

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Update release documentation [opnfvdocs]

Hi everyone, After reviewing the status for Colorado we have agreed that: Feature projects should produce a ”user guide” for their feature according to: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/18311/ Scenario’s should also have a brief description provide

[opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for the dovetail meeting

Hi Chris: Yes, we agreed to use the opnfv-meeting. But now, there is a requirements that all people like to talk in the IRC all time for dovetail like done in the releng or yardstick. If we use opnfv-meeting, we cannot do that. That is the problem. Best Regards hongbo 发件人: Christopher Price [m

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Working with the docs toolchain locally on your laptop.

Just to clarify: I’d like to use the OPNFV tool chain on a set of specific files only and see whether they render correctly – as opposed to just use rst2html (which is what I currently do). Thanks, Frank From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Working with the docs toolchain locally on your laptop.

Hi Chris, thanks for the pointer. Is there a way to just check whether a single file builds/parses correctly – rather than always building the entire project? Thanks, Frank From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Christo

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [daisy4nfv]

Hi Zhijang, It’s fantastic that you have such a good engagement with your source communities and this looks like a good way to maintain that focus. I would only ask that, since this channel is not monitored and logged by our collabbot that you ensure the meeting minutes (from the openstack col

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]suggest to use the #opnfv-dovetail for the dovetail meeting

Hi Hongbo, If I recall, there were comments on the last meeting that people preferred to use opnfv-meeting.  I had not heard anyone speak to the desire to create another IRC channel for this meeting series. My only thought is that it seems unnecessary to create another channel, our commi

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Working with the docs toolchain locally on your laptop.

Hi Community, While our CI system provides a complete docs renderer that gives you up to date links to your documentation when you push a patch for review it may be useful for you to work with the toolchain locally while doing you Colorado documentation. This has been made rather simple by our

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [multisite]Weekly meeting of Aug.11

Hello, team, Good progress in functest integration, let's dicsuss the project in weekly meeting: Agenda of Aug.11 2016 * functest issues * documentation review * KB 0.2.0 tagging IRC: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=opnfv-meeting 7:00-8:00 UTC (During summer time, means CET 9:00 AM

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Opening nominations for the Committers-at-Large TSC elections

Hi Ray, I would like to propose a nomination: - Morgan Richomme (morgan.richo...@orange.com) - Employer: Orange As PTL of the Functest Project, Morgan has been a committed leader of our testing community from the establishment of OPNFV. The emergence of the “Testing Working Group” can be attr

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] Aug 5 Dovetail meeting notes

Hi all: Thanks for the deep suggestion and discussion. The Dovetail and C&C have discussed many times about some of the questions. I will add the related slides and works on the I created a wiki page for these questions discussions. It will help others who missed the discussions. If you have an

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Bottlenecks] Some proposals in Bottlenecks weekly meeting

Hi Yang： Ok，Thanks Best regards Hongbo From: Yuyang (Gabriel) Sent: 2016年8月10日 15:45 To: Tianhongbo; Lijun (Matthew); wangyaoguang (A); Liyiting; mrebel...@sandvine.com Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: [Bottlenecks] Some proposals in Bottlenecks weekly meeting Hi Hongbo, We ha

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Bottlenecks] Some proposals in Bottlenecks weekly meeting

Hi Hongbo, We have some proposals about the development in Bottlenecks and we would like to share and discuss it in Bottlenecks weekly meeting. Please add it to the agenda. Furthermore, I also would like to help send out the meeting notice. Thanks, Yang