Hello all,
We have setup a Microsoft Cluster Server (MSCS) cluster, with two nodes, using W2K,
and now are in the process of deploying Oracle 9i on it. For the purpose of high
availability (HA), we are deliberating on setting up either RAC or Oracle Fail Safe.
The confusion is over the fact
dnesday, July 16, 2003 7:44 PM
> Hello all,
>
> We have setup a Microsoft Cluster Server (MSCS) cluster, with two nodes,
using W2K, and now are in the process of deploying Oracle 9i on it. For the
purpose of high availability (HA), we are deliberating on setting up either
RAC or Oracle Fa
have setup a Microsoft Cluster Server (MSCS) cluster, with two nodes, using W2K,
and now are in the process of deploying Oracle 9i on it. For the purpose of high
availability (HA), we are deliberating on setting up either RAC or Oracle Fail Safe.
The confusion is over the fact that if we get HA
cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: RAC or Oracle Fail Safe
[EM
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/16/2003 10:59 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:Re: RAC or Oracle Fail Safe
EE is not required to FailSafe. It comes at
gt; Hello all,
>
> We have setup a Microsoft Cluster Server (MSCS) cluster, with two nodes,
using W2K, and now are in the process of deploying Oracle 9i on it. For the
purpose of high availability (HA), we are deliberating on setting up either
RAC or Oracle Fail Safe. The confusion is over the fact
Title: RE: RAC or Oracle Fail Safe
Hi Hussain !
RAC can have Active-Active or Active-Passive combination for two nodes. While OFS can't give you Active-Active combination of two nodes. Basically a resource sharing is not possible in Oracle Fail safe so one resource can be used by onl
Title: RE: RAC or Oracle Fail Safe
Answers in line...
-- I also believe that setting up RAC is more complex,
That's not totally true, For a DBA it shouldn't matter much, whether he is setting up RAC or OFS. But yes relatively RAC is a bit complex to manage.
-- and any chan
e recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hello all,
We have setup a Microsoft Cluster Server (MSCS) cluster, with two nodes,
using W2K, and now are in the process of deploying Oracle 9i on it. For the
purpose of high availability (HA), we are deliberating on setting up either
RAC or Oracle Fail Safe. The co
Title: RE: RAC or Oracle Fail Safe
Hi Rajesh,
Thanks for
the detailed reply and I really appreciate that. Certain clarifications.
1.
With reference to what you said about using both the
nodes, you meant that we can install another database (lets say for reporting
Title: RE: RAC or Oracle Fail Safe
Hi Hussain,
Replies
are inline ….
With
reference to what you said about using both the nodes, you meant that we can
install another database (lets say for reporting purpose) or/and also 9iAS on
one node and our main production
Title: RE: RAC or Oracle Fail Safe
Hi!
Of
course you have to plan your servers' capacity accordingly, that in the event of
node failure, the other node will not get too loaded. When one node crashes, the
second one has to deal with queries and transactions of both servers and we must
12 matches
Mail list logo