On shopgoodwill.com there's FF-1 and FE-1 finders for sale.
Just b/c I don't see them very often ...
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDM
More concerned about not growing older.
On 5/19/2017 16:38, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Those of us who have achieved LXXV scoff at your concerns about growing
older,
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
LX
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
ld bastard (reaching LX entitles you to that accolade :-)
)
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On May 18, 2017, at 10:16 AM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
On Saturday I set sail
erested:
> https://web-options.com/
>
> When I get back I'll figure out how to use it for a portfolio of shots.
>
> Q: Why is this post entitled LX?
> A: Whilst there I'll become eligible for free prescriptions, free public
> transport in London, and 30% off rail tr
XXV to C then?
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Daniel J. Matyola
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 10:38 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: LX
Those of us who have achieved LXXV scoff at your concerns about growing
older,
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
LX
I'm with Dan!
John in Brisbane
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Daniel J. Matyola
Sent: Saturday, 20 May 2017 6:38 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: LX
Those of us who have achieved LXXV scoff at your concerns about growing
It’s a LXury.
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
> On May 19, 2017, at 4:38 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> Those of us who have achieved LXXV scoff at your concerns about growing
> older,
>
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
>
>> LX
>
Those of us who have achieved LXXV scoff at your concerns about growing
older,
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
> LX
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.
ll
>>>> have gratis transit in Philly and modest discounts here and there.
>>>
>>>
>>> Mere youngsters!
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Have a great trip! Looking forward to the photos.
>>>
>>>
>>&
ran
>>
>> I have re-jigged my website as a blog so that people can follow me,
>> and I can post phone snaps along the way. If anyone here is
>> interested: https://web-options.com/
>>
>> When I get back I'll figure out how to use it for a portfolio of
&
9, 2017, at 01:01 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
> >> I???ll be crossing a similar chronological meridian in 2 1/2 weeks; I???ll
> >> have gratis transit in Philly and modest discounts here and there.
> >
> >
> > Mere youngsters!
> >
> >
> >>
> >
is transit in Philly and modest discounts here and there.
>
>
> Mere youngsters!
>
>
>>
>> Have a great trip! Looking forward to the photos.
>
>
> Ditto, you old bastard (reaching LX entitles you to that accolade :-)
> )
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
ptions.com/
>
> When I get back I'll figure out how to use it for a portfolio of
> shots.
>
> Q: Why is this post entitled LX?
> A: Whilst there I'll become eligible for free prescriptions, free
> public transport in London, and 30% off rail travel
>
> I
old bastard (reaching LX entitles you to that accolade :-)
)
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
>
> Rick
>
> http://photo.net/photos/RickW
>
>
> > On May 18, 2017, at 10:1
Go well. I'm sure you'll have a great time.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Bob W-PDML
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 4:16 PM
To: Mail List Pentax-Discuss
Subject: LX
On Saturday I set sail for France, cycling hopefully from Roscoff to Avignon
and thence to a gite for a
> On May 18, 2017, at 10:16 AM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>
>
> Q: Why is this post entitled LX?
> A: Whilst there I'll become eligible for free prescriptions, free public
> transport in London, and 30% off rail travel
This alone would make the trip to France worthwhile! Very
my website as a blog so that people can follow me, and I can
> post phone snaps along the way. If anyone here is interested:
> https://web-options.com/
>
> When I get back I'll figure out how to use it for a portfolio of shots.
>
> Q: Why is this post entitled LX?
>
On 18/5/17, Bob W-PDML, discombobulated, unleashed:
>A: Whilst there I'll become eligible for free prescriptions, free public
>transport in London, and 30% off rail travel
Et bon anniversaire :-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
io of shots.
>
>Q: Why is this post entitled LX?
>A: Whilst there I'll become eligible for free prescriptions, free public
>transport in London, and 30% off rail travel
>
>I'll unsubscribe sometime tomorrow for the duration.
Bon voyage Bob!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/
;
> When I get back I'll figure out how to use it for a portfolio of shots.
>
> Q: Why is this post entitled LX?
> A: Whilst there I'll become eligible for free prescriptions, free public
> transport in London, and 30% off rail travel
>
> I'll unsubscribe someti
a blog so that people can follow me, and I can
post phone snaps along the way. If anyone here is interested:
https://web-options.com/
When I get back I'll figure out how to use it for a portfolio of shots.
Q: Why is this post entitled LX?
A: Whilst there I'll become eligibl
>wrote:
>>> It's only a complete set if you get the two ghastly gold colored
>Vivitar
>>> anniversary lenses.
>>>
>>>
>http://camera-wiki.org/wiki/Vivitar_Series_1_50th_Anniversary_Lens_Set
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 4/3/2
Article: "We Tried It: Pentax LX"
Cover:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsmithy/33730266031/in/dateposted-public/
Page 1:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsmithy/33859602975/in/dateposted-public/
Page 2:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsmithy/33730256121/in/dateposted-publ
lenses.
>>
>> http://camera-wiki.org/wiki/Vivitar_Series_1_50th_Anniversary_Lens_Set
>>
>>
>>> On 4/3/2017 11:56 AM, Gonz wrote:
>>>
>>> You mean like this Ann? :
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.ebay.com/itm/VERY-RARE-PENTAX-LX
11:56 AM, Gonz wrote:
>>
>> You mean like this Ann? :
>>
>>
>> http://www.ebay.com/itm/VERY-RARE-PENTAX-LX-GOLD-SET-SPECIAL-EDITION-ONLY-300-PIECES-MADE-/302259334173?hash=item46600f6c1d:g:iqsAAOSwWxNY0UMf
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 11:54 AM, ann s
It's only a complete set if you get the two ghastly gold colored Vivitar
anniversary lenses.
http://camera-wiki.org/wiki/Vivitar_Series_1_50th_Anniversary_Lens_Set
On 4/3/2017 11:56 AM, Gonz wrote:
You mean like this Ann? :
http://www.ebay.com/itm/VERY-RARE-PENTAX-LX-GOLD-SET-SP
LOL! no, not exactly , Gonz
ann
On 4/3/2017 11:56 AM, Gonz wrote:
You mean like this Ann? :
http://www.ebay.com/itm/VERY-RARE-PENTAX-LX-GOLD-SET-SPECIAL-EDITION-ONLY-300-PIECES-MADE-/302259334173?hash=item46600f6c1d:g:iqsAAOSwWxNY0UMf
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 11:54 AM, ann sanfedele wrote
You mean like this Ann? :
http://www.ebay.com/itm/VERY-RARE-PENTAX-LX-GOLD-SET-SPECIAL-EDITION-ONLY-300-PIECES-MADE-/302259334173?hash=item46600f6c1d:g:iqsAAOSwWxNY0UMf
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 11:54 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
> Too bad we didnt unearth that sooner last month -- may have had s
ark C wrote:
Thanks for posting that. I have absolutely no recollection of it at
all but enjoyed the gallery and write up. I last used my LX a year ago
while on a trip - need to give it a work out just to keep it functioning.
Mark
On 4/2/2017 1:12 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
...and now for a b
Thanks for posting that. I have absolutely no recollection of it at all
but enjoyed the gallery and write up. I last used my LX a year ago while
on a trip - need to give it a work out just to keep it functioning.
Mark
On 4/2/2017 1:12 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
...and now for a bit of
rver, I
> (re)discovered the Pentax LX Gallery - an epic opus prepared many
> years ago on the legendary LX. It's not just a gallery of photos
> taken with the LX but includes detailed technical information as
> well. It was (I think) mainly the work of Bill Robb & Rob Studdert.
...and now for a bit of nostalgia.
Fossicking through the various directories on Komkon's PUG server, I
(re)discovered the Pentax LX Gallery - an epic opus prepared many years
ago on the legendary LX. It's not just a gallery of photos taken with
the LX but includes detailed technical i
On 2/22/2017 3:19 PM, mike wilson wrote:
Any other interesting system bits?
Lots. I'll send you an inventory this weekend, probably not until Sunday
afternoon my time.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PD
> On 22 February 2017 at 21:14 Bill wrote:
>
>
> On 2/22/2017 1:24 AM, mike wilson wrote:
> >> On 21 February 2017 at 21:52 Bill wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/21/2017 3:10 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> >>> I just found this ar
On 2/22/2017 1:24 AM, mike wilson wrote:
On 21 February 2017 at 21:52 Bill wrote:
On 2/21/2017 3:10 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
I just found this article.
A bit of nostalgia for the LX cognoscenti
https://www.casualphotophile.com/2017/02/19/pentax-lx-camera-review-the-best-professional
class, especially as it's the top class. However it means that if and
>when I decide to replace the LX I dropped not long ago, or if it's
>repairable, (the prism is probably a total loss), or the prism after
>the
>body is repaired, I'll have to pay a higher pric
hen I decide to replace the LX I dropped not long ago, or if it's
repairable, (the prism is probably a total loss), or the prism after the
body is repaired, I'll have to pay a higher price than I would otherwise
for an under appreciated gem.
On 2/21/2017 4:10 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
I'm of two minds about articles like this. Yes, it's nice that the
author reinforces my belief that my favorite film camera is best in
class, especially as it's the top class. However it means that if and
when I decide to replace the LX I dropped not long ago, or if it'
On 2/22/2017 1:24 AM, mike wilson wrote:
On 21 February 2017 at 21:52 Bill wrote:
On 2/21/2017 3:10 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
I just found this article.
A bit of nostalgia for the LX cognoscenti
https://www.casualphotophile.com/2017/02/19/pentax-lx-camera-review-the-best-professional
> On 21 February 2017 at 21:52 Bill wrote:
>
>
> On 2/21/2017 3:10 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> > I just found this article.
> >
> > A bit of nostalgia for the LX cognoscenti
> >
> > https://www.casualphotophile.com/2017/02/19/pentax-lx-camera-re
On 2/21/2017 3:10 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
I just found this article.
A bit of nostalgia for the LX cognoscenti
https://www.casualphotophile.com/2017/02/19/pentax-lx-camera-review-the-best-professional-35mm-slr-around/
Nice.
I'm in the process of moving from a storage lock-up that
I just found this article.
A bit of nostalgia for the LX cognoscenti
https://www.casualphotophile.com/2017/02/19/pentax-lx-camera-review-the-best-professional-35mm-slr-around/
Cheers
Brian
+
Brian Walters
Webmaster
Australian Native
Man this is looking like a bad Friday to have spent all my money
already on a 60-250. :(
Oh well. At least I will have a 60-250 after wanting one for years. :)
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Miserere wrote:
> Up for sale, my Pentax LX; it's one of the versions with ASA setting
>
Up for sale, my Pentax LX; it's one of the versions with ASA setting
up to 3200. It's in very good cosmetic shape, and was given a thorough
going-over by Eric Hendrickson maybe 24 months ago. The only problem
it has is the shutter release lock doesn't lock, and Eric says he
can'
On 04/03/2015 2:18 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
So today I mounted the FA 20-35mm F4.0 on the K-5II, and felt the same
cognitive dissonance that I always felt mounting the mostly plastic,
(though really optically excellent), lens on my LX, and realized I have
pretty much a digital LX, just not in the
So today I mounted the FA 20-35mm F4.0 on the K-5II, and felt the same
cognitive dissonance that I always felt mounting the mostly plastic,
(though really optically excellent), lens on my LX, and realized I have
pretty much a digital LX, just not in the in way I always wanted one.
--
I don&#
t;
>>>>>> On 7/19/2013 1:03 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Its not great for portraits. Bokeh is a bit busy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Walt wrote:
>>>>>>
ortrait lens. [Grumble.]
>
> -- Walt
>
>
> On 7/19/2013 11:42 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
>>
>> I've got a few items that need to find new homes. Actual shipping will
>> need to be added to the prices below. I'll be happy to ship WORLDWIDE
>> to pdml members.
>>
elow. I'll be happy to ship WORLDWIDE
to pdml members.
Firstly,
I've got a nice working LX body (the later version that goes to 3200
ASA). It's main apology is a dimple dent to the right of the film
advance lever (top side, towards the rear). Doesn't seem to have
affected an
>>
>>>> I've got a few items that need to find new homes. Actual shipping will
>>>> need to be added to the prices below. I'll be happy to ship WORLDWIDE
>>>> to pdml members.
>>>>
>>>> Firstly,
>>>> I've got a nice
;>>>> If I weren't up to my eyeballs in trying to get something resembling a
>>>>>> studio set up, I'd be all over that 35-105mm.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Strikes me as a potentially excellent portrait lens. [Grumble.]
>>>>&
omething resembling a
>>>> studio set up, I'd be all over that 35-105mm.
>>>>
>>>> Strikes me as a potentially excellent portrait lens. [Grumble.]
>>>>
>>>> -- Walt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/19/2013 11:42 AM, Darren Addy wr
be added to the prices below. I'll be happy to ship
WORLDWIDE
to pdml members.
Firstly,
I've got a nice working LX body (the later version that goes to
3200
ASA). It's main apology is a dimple dent to the right of the film
advance lever (top side, towards the rear). Doesn't seem to
be all over that 35-105mm.
>>>>>
>>>>> Strikes me as a potentially excellent portrait lens. [Grumble.]
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Walt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/19/2013 11:42 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
>>>>>
I've got a few items that need to find new homes. Actual shipping will
need to be added to the prices below. I'll be happy to ship WORLDWIDE
to pdml members.
Firstly,
I've got a nice working LX body (the later version that goes to 3200
ASA). It's main apology is a dimple dent
py to ship WORLDWIDE
to pdml members.
Firstly,
I've got a nice working LX body (the later version that goes to 3200
ASA). It's main apology is a dimple dent to the right of the film
advance lever (top side, towards the rear). Doesn't seem to have
affected anything, just a cosmetic bo
ind new homes. Actual shipping will
>>>> need to be added to the prices below. I'll be happy to ship WORLDWIDE
>>>> to pdml members.
>>>>
>>>> Firstly,
>>>> I've got a nice working LX body (the later version that goes to 3200
&
to ship WORLDWIDE
to pdml members.
Firstly,
I've got a nice working LX body (the later version that goes to 3200
ASA). It's main apology is a dimple dent to the right of the film
advance lever (top side, towards the rear). Doesn't seem to have
affected anything, just a cosmetic boo-bo
w homes. Actual shipping will
need to be added to the prices below. I'll be happy to ship WORLDWIDE
to pdml members.
Firstly,
I've got a nice working LX body (the later version that goes to 3200
ASA). It's main apology is a dimple dent to the right of the film
advance lever (top side, t
I use my LX fairly regularly nd love it. I was using it recently and
thought that that Pentax should come out with a D-LX DSLR body with the
real-time metering and other cool features of the LX bundled into a
state of the art DSLR. Maybe they will.
You never know, and you may be lucky, but
I have 3 LX Bodies with most all of the really great M lens from 14m/m to
500m/m
Other than 1 CLA by Pentax in Colorado for each body. I have found them to
be very reliable.
I imagine environmental factors such as humidity, ozone, etc could degrade
the bumpers and seals quickly.
One of the LX I
Just like the wife.
Dario
-Messaggio originale-
From: Mark Roberts
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 1:55 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Anybody still shoot with an LX ?
wrote:
I love the LX, but I don't miss it.
A true PDML MARK !
I'm way ahead of you. :
wrote:
>> I love the LX, but I don't miss it.
>
>A true PDML MARK !
I'm way ahead of you. :)
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSC
I love the LX, but I don't miss it.
A true PDML MARK !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Bill"
Subject: Re: Anybody still shoot with an LX ?
On 07/03/2013 9:14 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
I tripped across
After reading this thread, I took my LX out of the display case where it lives
and fired the shutter a few times to make sure the mirror wasn't sticking after
quite a few years of storage with only an occasional shutter activation. It was
fine at high speeds. Then I tried some slow s
Replacing the bumpers is difficult enough that a lot of very good camera techs
won't attempt it. Probably not a good DIY project. But that being said, the LX
is a marvelous camera. I still have mine. Time to take it out for a spin again.
Paul
On Mar 7, 2013, at 7:18 PM, Rob Studdert
On 8 March 2013 02:14, Darren Addy wrote:
> I'm hopeful that I can put in a mirror bumper pad and seals in the
> film back (myself) and be good to go, but that remains to be seen. I
> was hoping that those of you with an LX (or experience with them)
> might tell me what sort
the camera more delicate than something
like a K1000.
I like the lx, but it has its share of faults. I would consider
an mz-s if the mount wasn't crippled
Crippled? How so?
For now my cheap zx-7 works wonderfully and has an uncrippled
mount. It came with an fa 28-80 that
If I was going to buy another mf body, I would get an mx personally. I like
the lx, but it has its share of faults. I would consider an mz-s if the
mount wasn't crippled
For now my cheap zx-7 works wonderfully and has an uncrippled mount. It came
with an fa 28-80 that
Try this.
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/technology/topBodies/index.html
Alan
--
From: "Darren Addy"
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 5:14 PM
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: Anybody still shoot with an LX ?
I tripped a
On 7/3/13, Bill, discombobulated, unleashed:
>So, what can go wrong with an LX?
>Pretty much everything.
Yup.
Mark!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Producion
--
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis
On 07/03/2013 9:14 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
I tripped across a cosmetically gorgeous LX body (FA finder) yesterday
and it seemed to be priced right, so I impulsively purchased it (long
distance). *After* doing so, I started doing a little research on it.
: )
It appears that I may have taken a bit
LX is a wonderful camera.
All your digitals will feel like fat pigs in comparison.
The exposure metering is masterful,
and the range of viewfinder accessories is outstanding.
If you are lucky, somebody else fixed the sticky mirror.
When you get the camera, don't just fire off some shutter
I tripped across a cosmetically gorgeous LX body (FA finder) yesterday
and it seemed to be priced right, so I impulsively purchased it (long
distance). *After* doing so, I started doing a little research on it.
: )
It appears that I may have taken a bit of a gamble, since it looks
like a lot can
hi
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Bob W wrote:
>
> > From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> > Cotty
> >
> > The only thing wrong with my LX is the LCD on the back is farked, so I
> > use it for jamming in an end flap of
Hi!
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:37 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
>> Hi! On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Paul Stenquist
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> A lot of very good camera repair services won't work on the LX. Too
>>> many parts out of production, and a lot of compl
Hi! On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Paul Stenquist
wrote:
A lot of very good camera repair services won't work on the LX. Too
many parts out of production, and a lot of complexity.
Actually, LX is on the list of serviceable cameras on their web
site: http://essexcamera.com/camera_lis
On May 28, 2012, at 11:00 AM, Dmitry Gromov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Paul Stenquist
> wrote:
>> A lot of very good camera repair services won't work on the LX. Too many
>> parts out of production, and a lot of complexity.
>>
Hi!
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> A lot of very good camera repair services won't work on the LX. Too many
> parts out of production, and a lot of complexity.
>
Actually, LX is on the list of serviceable cameras on their web site:
http://e
A lot of very good camera repair services won't work on the LX. Too many parts
out of production, and a lot of complexity.
On May 28, 2012, at 1:56 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
> You got it right. I sent a non-functioning Rolleicord and a non-functioning
> Konica III to them, and they c
Hi!
Thanks for the tip... Wondering, how I forgot about them, but I bet
they charge serious money for any work by now :(
Luckily, the LX I got should hold up fine for some time. But I'll
start saving now for future SLA...
Camera Savings Account, anyone? :)
Dmitry
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at
You got it right. I sent a non-functioning Rolleicord and a non-functioning
Konica III to them, and they came back to me in perfect working order. And the
price was reasonable. I don't know if they do digital well, but they do wonders
with mechanical.
Jeffery
Sent from my iPad
Jeffery L. Smit
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
> No matter what the issue, Essex in NJ seems to make it right when locals say
> they can't.
>
Are you talking about Essex Camera repair? Never used them, however
remember them being advertised by Popular Photography...
If not - could you ple
No matter what the issue, Essex in NJ seems to make it right when locals say
they can't.
Jeffery
Sent from my iPad
Jeffery L. Smith
New Orleans, Louisiana
USA
On May 27, 2012, at 23:55, Dmitry Gromov wrote:
> rubber.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/li
So... I got LX... Locally from friend of a friend, very good deal on a
very good body...
Thanks everyone here, who (off list) offered help! This was really
helpful and really appreciated.
No hard feelings that I did not got yours :)
While working on getting LX, I got together a list of thing
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> Cotty
>
> The only thing wrong with my LX is the LCD on the back is farked, so I
> use it for jamming in an end flap of the film box to remind me what's
> loaded...
>
if you hollow it out you&#
Hi!
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> Body with viewfinder or just body???
Body with viewfinder. Preferably FA-1, but FA-1W may work too.
Dmitry
--
//DG LOC(NJ)
//*
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCR
Body with viewfinder or just body???
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Dmitry Gromov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:31 AM, wrote:
>>
>> Dmitry hi,
>> Are looking for a body only or a complete camera? I have 3 LX cameras, and I
>> could sell you one.
Hi!
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:31 AM, wrote:
>
> Dmitry hi,
> Are looking for a body only or a complete camera? I have 3 LX cameras, and I
> could sell you one. Contact me off line.
> Jonathan [ma...@redwoodhorses.com]
>
I'm looking for a body only. I'll email you
Dmitry hi,
Are looking for a body only or a complete camera? I have 3 LX cameras, and I
could sell you one. Contact me off line.
Jonathan [ma...@redwoodhorses.com]
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Dmitry Gromov
Sent: Sunday, May 13
Hi!
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:25 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
>
> From: Dmitry Gromov
>>>
>> Yeah, I know about early and late models and the differences, wanted
>> to get newer one, hope it more common, but there is no way to know it
>> from KEH's description :(
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Dmitry
>
>
> I think
From: Dmitry Gromov
Hi!
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Mark C wrote:
Been years since I dealt with KEH, but when I did they were fine.
As you may already know, there were two versions of the LX - one with ISO 6
- 1600 and a later one supporting ISO 6-3200 and some other differences. ?I
The only thing wrong with my LX is the LCD on the back is farked, so I
use it for jamming in an end flap of the film box to remind me what's
loaded...
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnap
Hi!
>
> Ok, thanks for the reminder about pentaxs.com - I remember this place
> was mentioned on the list before, should have searched better :)
> Going to ask Eric about current prices...
>
So, if anyone else cares (or interested) - I emailed Eric and got a reply.
LX CLA
;s description :( Thanks! Dmitry
>
>
> You might want to email KEH and ask about the sensitivity range. My LX is a
> leter model, but I had it modified so that the meter activated when the
> button that releases the ISO dial is pressed. I might be wrong but I think
> that might have been
e. My LX
is a leter model, but I had it modified so that the meter activated when
the button that releases the ISO dial is pressed. I might be wrong but I
think that might have been a feature of the latest LX's - not sure of
that at all though. Someone else here might know. But that might be
Hi!
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Mark C wrote:
> Been years since I dealt with KEH, but when I did they were fine.
>
> As you may already know, there were two versions of the LX - one with ISO 6
> - 1600 and a later one supporting ISO 6-3200 and some other differences. I
> t
Been years since I dealt with KEH, but when I did they were fine.
As you may already know, there were two versions of the LX - one with
ISO 6 - 1600 and a later one supporting ISO 6-3200 and some other
differences. I think that there were other variations within the
boarder "early'
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:10 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> Last I checked Pentax was still servicing the LX. However probably the best
> place to send if for a CLA, if you know it doesn't need any parts is
> Pentaxs.com. Eric does excellent work for reasonable prices. He just
>
Last I checked Pentax was still servicing the LX. However probably the
best place to send if for a CLA, if you know it doesn't need any parts
is Pentaxs.com. Eric does excellent work for reasonable prices. He
just recently started charging return postage but that's a small price
1 - 100 of 3775 matches
Mail list logo
