Re: Stripping PAW and WOW from subject

2004-03-14 Thread frank theriault
ck Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Stripping PAW and WOW from subject Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 09:34:44 - Not on a PDA screen it isn't as the end is truncated. I read all my PDML messages on an Ipaq and find the PREfix u

Re: Stripping PAW and WOW from subject

2004-03-14 Thread Nick Clark
Not on a PDA screen it isn't as the end is truncated. I read all my PDML messages on an Ipaq and find the PREfix useful a I can order by subject and deal with the high volume of traffic that way. The PDA email client doesn't have sophisticated parsing and filtering options like a desktop client

Re: Stripping PAW and WOW from subject

2004-03-13 Thread Bob W
Hi, Saturday, March 13, 2004, 9:50:36 PM, Shel wrote: > Interesting ... never though about that. Mabe on one's "doing it" then and some > mail programs just make their own decisions for us. ;-)) if people would put it at the end of the subject, in lower case, then it wouldn't happen. It would

Re: Stripping PAW and WOW from subject

2004-03-13 Thread Shel Belinkoff
ning disappeared. I believe it is > because the subject became "WOW:" Outlook stripped it out for me, I guess, with > the same algorithm that keeps subject lines from becoming something like > > "RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: FW: RE: RE: FW: RE: Stripping PAW and WOW from subj

RE: Stripping PAW and WOW from subject

2004-03-13 Thread Kevin Thornsberry
"RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: FW: RE: RE: FW: RE: Stripping PAW and WOW from subject" I wonder if putting "WOW -" instead wold work better. I'll send a test to make sure. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shel Belink

Stripping PAW and WOW from subject

2004-03-13 Thread Shel Belinkoff
I've noticed that a number of messages have the PAW or WOW stripped from the subject line when comments are made about the photos. The idea of putting PAW and WOW into the subject line was to allow people to identify the messages and to perhaps filter them in their mail system. Would whoev

Re: PAW and WOW

2004-03-12 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi! BL> Q. What is PAW and/or WOW I am seeing every now and then in the BL> message subject? BL> A. Picture A Week and Workshop A Week respectively. Usually it is a BL> way PDMLers take a pause from their normal PDML talk... These two BL> acronyms are quite often used in other photography related

Re: PAW and WOW

2004-03-11 Thread Boris Liberman
from answering the same questions over and over. I think that PAW and WOW deserve to appear in PDML FAQ on PDML site (www.pdml.net) Boris

Re: PAW and WOW

2004-03-11 Thread Peter Alling
And where did you have this Alpah cluster... -Original Message- From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Mar 11, 2004 1:09 PM To: pentax list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: PAW and WOW On 11/3/04, TOM R disgorged: >Well, Mac's have become more pc like over the y

Re: PAW and WOW

2004-03-11 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Hi ... I believe it means "Workshop of the Week." It's a setup where you post your pics and then others will adjust them in PS or other editing software. The idea is that there may be some specific area that a photog may have a problem with, such as contrast or color control, or s/he may just wan

Re: PAW and WOW

2004-03-11 Thread Mark Roberts
"Steve Desjardins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I'll try again with this thread. What does WOW stand for? You saw Greywolf's picture of me and you still have to ask??? ;-) -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com

Re: PAW and WOW

2004-03-11 Thread Steve Desjardins
Aha! That's why no one answered me. No one knows. . . I had actually figured out the basic idea but I'm glad to see the original post. It's a really good idea, BTW. In all honesty, I would like to learn more about PS at this point in my "photo career" than I would basic shooting techniques.

Re: PAW and WOW

2004-03-11 Thread graywolf
Ok,Lasse, you and Shel had great ideas. Now you have to pay the price. Write up a WOW FAQ. I will provide web space and when someone asks you can just point them to the FAQ. Same for Shel, write a PAW FAQ and I will put that up also. That will save everybody from answering the same questions ov

Re: PAW and WOW

2004-03-11 Thread Lasse Karlsson
From: "Steve Desjardins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'll try again with this thread. What does WOW stand for? Steven Desjardins Steve, I just reiterate the parts of a few of messages where WOW came about. >From there it just caught on to become a small PDML digital organism of it's own... Everyone is

Re: PAW and WOW

2004-03-11 Thread graywolf
ursday, March 11, 2004 2:17 PM Subject: Re: PAW and WOW I'll try again with this thread. What does WOW stand for? Steven Desjardins Department of Chemistry Washington and Lee University Lexington, VA 24450 (540) 458-8873 FAX: (540) 458-8878 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- graywolf http://gray

Re: PAW and WOW

2004-03-11 Thread Tom Addison
--- Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wish someone would answer you because I have no > idea what it means > either!!! > > > > I'll try again with this thread. What does WOW > stand for? > > Please Guys 'n Gals.. seems you have contracted acronimitis since I was here a few years ago, co

Re: PAW and WOW

2004-03-11 Thread Christian
I wish someone would answer you because I have no idea what it means either!!! Christian - Original Message - From: "Steve Desjardins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 2:17 PM Subject: Re: PAW and WOW > I'll try

Re: PAW and WOW

2004-03-11 Thread Steve Desjardins
I'll try again with this thread. What does WOW stand for? Steven Desjardins Department of Chemistry Washington and Lee University Lexington, VA 24450 (540) 458-8873 FAX: (540) 458-8878 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: PAW and WOW

2004-03-11 Thread graywolf
Well, Mac's have become more pc like over the years and Windows has become more Mac like. I still want a DEC Alpha Cluster though. -- Rob Studdert wrote: On 10 Mar 2004 at 23:40, Cotty wrote: Whats wrong with a PC as long as you don't run Windows on it? Frits Wüthrich LOL. Yes I guess, if

Re: PAW and WOW

2004-03-11 Thread graywolf
Mark Roberts wrote: Frits Wüthrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Whats wrong with a PC as long as you don't run Windows on it? I just look terrible wearing one of those propeller beanies ;-) Can you see this guy in a propeller beanie? http://graywolfphoto.com/paw.html I can. Actually, I think Cesar

Re: PAW and WOW

2004-03-11 Thread Jostein
Bot PAW and WOW are great ideas. Thanks to Shel for PAW, and to Lasse for WOW. Cheers, Jostein -- Photos at: http://www.oksne.net --

Re: PAW and WOW

2004-03-10 Thread Rob Studdert
On 10 Mar 2004 at 23:40, Cotty wrote: > >Whats wrong with a PC as long as you don't run Windows on it? > > >Frits Wüthrich > > LOL. Yes I guess, if the Mac O/S was ever ported to the PC hardware platform Apple would be screwed. :-) Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GM

Re: PAW and WOW

2004-03-10 Thread Mark Roberts
Frits Wüthrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Whats wrong with a PC as long as you don't run Windows on it? I just look terrible wearing one of those propeller beanies ;-) -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com

Re: PAW and WOW

2004-03-10 Thread Cotty
>> On 10 Mar 2004 at 17:36, Lon Williamson wrote: >> >> > It amazes me that Pentax shooters can be Techno folks. >> >> LOL, next you'll say you're surprised we don't all use Mac's >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> Rob Studdert >Whats wrong with a PC as long as you don't run Windows on it? >Frits Wüth

Re: PAW and WOW

2004-03-10 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Hi Lon ... I don't understand your comment about smackin' me with a backhoe. Is that anything like gittin' whupped upside the haid with a 2x4 that's been soakin' in creosote for dang near a month? If so, thet sukka's sure gonna hurt some Anyway, I'm glad you like the PAW and the WOW (which I h

Re: PAW and WOW

2004-03-10 Thread Frits Wüthrich
Whats wrong with a PC as long as you don't run Windows on it? On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 00:31, Rob Studdert wrote: > On 10 Mar 2004 at 17:36, Lon Williamson wrote: > > > It amazes me that Pentax shooters can be Techno folks. > > LOL, next you'll say you're surprised we don't all use Mac's > > Chee