Le 7/8/16 à 17:01, webwarrior a écrit :
stepharo wrote
...
In June we spent three days to understand if we should merge Bloc2
into Bloc and we decided the inverse because
his implementation is based on SDL and a separate window) it does
not suffer from the morphic plague. So for e
stepharo wrote
> ...
>
> In June we spent three days to understand if we should merge Bloc2
> into Bloc and we decided the inverse because
> his implementation is based on SDL and a separate window) it does
> not suffer from the morphic plague. So for example
> the event bubbling
Le 2/8/16 à 15:47, Ben Coman a écrit :
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
Hi Stef,
from past discussions/threads I know "Bloc" as Pharo's possible future UI,
watched the video [1] and have played with the premade
image from the CI Server. Also the Brick layer (which is
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
> Hi Stef,
>
> from past discussions/threads I know "Bloc" as Pharo's possible future UI,
> watched the video [1] and have played with the premade
> image from the CI Server. Also the Brick layer (which is on top of Bloc) was
> announced as
Hi,
We are still in exploration mode with respect to design and this is why you see
several internal names. We expect to have a clear structure within a couple of
weeks, and there will be an announcement on that. In the end, there will be
exactly one single Bloc and one single Brick.
Cheers,
D
Hi Stef,
from past discussions/threads I know "Bloc" as Pharo's possible future UI,
watched the video [1] and have played with the premade
image from the CI Server. Also the Brick layer (which is on top of Bloc) was
announced as a preview once [2].
Now in some of the mails it was mentioned th