On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
> Hello Stuart,
> After some closer look at the RFC Compliant manuals you suggested,
> I have determined that the creator of that code was in fact RFC821
> Compliant.
> Being that this was a code I found several years ago, RFC822 may not have
@Stuart
Ah, then you are right that they were not compliant. The code is not
that old.
Thank you so much for the links and information too. Much more than I
expected.
I did not know that they were sent OS-Independent, but that makes
perfect sense.
Again, please excuse my lack of understandi
Hi
Is it true that a script will not execute if it was uploaded/ftp-ed in a
Binary mode rather that ASCII?
Ajdin
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, _lallous wrote:
> Hmm? Are you trying to run it as a shell script? If so it doesn't matter
> where you put it as long as it have the Execute flag turned on and
Hello Stuart,
After some closer look at the RFC Compliant manuals you suggested,
I have determined that the creator of that code was in fact RFC821
Compliant.
Being that this was a code I found several years ago, RFC822 may not
have been in effect.
This being the reason (I believe) that the cr
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
> @Stuart,
> Actually that is what made me look into the PHP_EOL Stuart. Wanting to do
> things right.
> Did you not read my initial email? I am not suggesting anyone adopt my
> code.
> The question was directed to what the differences are s
I see. Yes, I was referring to the PHP manual.
I will investigate the RFC manuals as well like you had noted.
No offense taken. Thank you for the clarification.
Best,
Karl
On Jul 3, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Stuart Dallas wrote:
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Karl DeSaulniers
wrote:
@Stuart,
Act
On Wed, April 25, 2007 6:43 am, Henning Eiben wrote:
>>> Are there multiple threads spawned?
>>
>> Depends on server API. ISAPI does, fastCGi doesn't.
>
> OK; so for serving multiple concurrent clients ISAPI would sound to me
> like the better choice, since it can use threads, or what would be the
Richard Lynch wrote:
Are there multiple threads spawned?
>>> Depends on server API. ISAPI does, fastCGi doesn't.
>> OK; so for serving multiple concurrent clients ISAPI would sound to me
>> like the better choice, since it can use threads, or what would be the
>> advantage of using fastcgi?
>
To: McShen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] Re: php editors
> I am looking for good php editors. Currently, i am using PHP coder. It
> highlights syntax and checks my syntax. It's also executes my PHP codes.
Are
> there any editors like that? I just want a editor that highlights
homesite is very nice
www.allaire.com
almir
""Richard Lynch"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
01f901c0b0c8$291ba800$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:01f901c0b0c8$291ba800$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I am looking for good php editors. Currently, i am using PHP coder. It
> > highlights syntax and
Hi
simply recompile ur php _without_ the config options
--with-apxs
or
--with-apache ...
thats it
best regards
attila strauss
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Can someone tell me from where can I get the binary file of php so that
I
> > can run php files from the command line of Unix.
>
> if linux check y
the attached file implements a minimal telnet client and is
free to use.
re,
tc
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 02:16:36PM -0800, Chris Lee wrote:
> if I nc to my server on port 23 I get the same thing. ie there is nothing
> wrong. your going to have to emulate the telnet protocal now,
:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
=?iso-8859-1?Q?M=EB=F2v=20=EE=89=E7=EE=CE=20=F2sy=EFn?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP-JavaScript
Would it be possible to have javascript insert a hidden input tag in the
html
and then php could pick it up?
Just an idea,
Andy
Mëòv î?çîÎ òsyïn wrote:
>
Rodrigo Dominguez wrote:
>I made a mistake while I was writting the example, in my original code I
>wrote it as you did, with $this->b[0] = new one(); but it doesn't work.
>Thank you.
>
>"Philip Hallstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
right...
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 2:53 PM
Subject: Fw: [PHP] Re:[PHP]question
> I think because of my bad english I made you misunderstand..I ment this :
> for example when a person miss an input to fill on the from and then
wrong?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Wards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Meltem Demirkus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 5:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Re:[PHP]question
>
&
Meltem,
Your english is very good but you have lost me :) could you explain more
slowly
John
- Original Message -
From: "Meltem Demirkus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Wards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 3:32 PM
Subject: Re:
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 October 2002 18:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP & XML
Hello,
Most of what you are looking for is already implemented and fully working in
our Krysalis Professional platform.
We help you create dynamic XML files, we provide you reusable taglibs to
a
>To me this is a lot of work and processing for limited benefits, a simple db
>abstraction layer provides you with a divide between you db queries and the
>presentation of your site, what benefits do you see in doing this?
I have to agree with Simon. I am at a loss when it comes to seeing
any be
El mié, 16-10-2002 a las 10:22, Joshua Alexander escribió:
> I have to agree with Simon. I am at a loss when it comes to seeing
> any benefit to XML that doesn't involve data exchange between at
> least two parties.
>
> I've spent the last two years building database-backed websites, so
> I'm
until then I will save myself from the extra work.
Cheers
Simon
-Original Message-
From: José León Serna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 October 2002 10:40
To: Joshua Alexander
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: PHP & XML
El mié, 16-10-2002 a las 10:22, Joshua Alexa
El mié, 16-10-2002 a las 11:02, Simon Taylor escribió:
> Sure in this context I agree with you, but how often do you have a website
> which needs to publish in many different formats? I have designed and built
> websites for a while and have never come across such an application.
> But if I were e
I still wouldn't use XML for this. I mean, all the articles are in
the database, and I'm already using PHP to pull them out and format
them into html, right? I can just as easily use PHP to put them into
all those other formats.
So again, why waste time with XML unless I need to feed these
ar
El mié, 16-10-2002 a las 11:13, Joshua Alexander escribió:
> I still wouldn't use XML for this. I mean, all the articles are in
> the database, and I'm already using PHP to pull them out and format
> them into html, right? I can just as easily use PHP to put them into
> all those other formats.
The benefit would be in dividing business logic from presentation layer.
Stas.
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 7:35 AM
Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: PHP & XML
> To me this is
Ultimately it's about flexibility and seperating content from
presentation.Even if you don't have sites that need to be output into
multiple formats you will almost cetainly need to redesign some or all
of the presentation at some point even if it is only in html. Have you
ever had your boss/
tion.
But if I were ever I would definitely invest the effort that is required,
but until then I will save myself from the extra work.
Cheers
Simon
-Original Message-
From: José León Serna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 October 2002 10:40
To: Joshua Alexander
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subje
---
> From: Alexandru COSTIN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 15 October 2002 18:50
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP & XML
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Most of what you are looking for is already implemented and fully working in
>
> our Krysalis Profession
Thanks to everyone for your suggestions. I went with
EditPlus 2. The project features, easy access to all
files, and directory-wide search-and-replace
functionality are what hooked me. I'm still looking
around, though, so if anyone has any other
suggestions, let me know.
The Zend product looks ni
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Liam Gibbs wrote:
> Thanks to everyone for your suggestions. I went with EditPlus 2. The
> project features, easy access to all files, and directory-wide
> search-and-replace functionality are what hooked me. I'm still looking
> around, though, so if anyone has any other sugges
I develop my stuff in TextPad as well. You can download other syntax
highlighting files as well, not just PHP. So if you develop in Windows and
like to code in a text editor TextPad would be my definite recommendation.
-josh
"Miguel Cruz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 1 May 2002, Liam Gi
>> It's no BBEdit, but what can you do?
vim? It's free and runs on every system I ever heard of.
--
---
Greg Donald - http://destiney.com/
http://phprated.com/ | http://phplinks.org/ | http://phptopsites.com/
---
Hello:
> The big disappointment was QaDRAM Studio, which was so
> buggy and unstable, it only took me until I tried to
> create a project (the first thing I did upon loading
> the software) before it crashed my entire system and
> forced me to reboot. Trying to uninstall it is
> impossible, as wel
use vim (http://www.vim.org/)
highlight syntax
code complition
autoindent
and more...
:q
José León Serna a écrit :
> Hello:
> > The big disappointment was QaDRAM Studio, which was so
> > buggy and unstable, it only took me until I tried to
> > create a project (the first thing I did upon loadin
ot;Maurice
Kevenaar"To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP]
I'm ex-USAF.
FUBAR means "Fucked-Up Beyond All Repair"
-Original Message-
From: Liam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 9:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] Re:[PHP] Why?
25/03/2002 3:01:36 PM
"FBAR" was a term used in the second
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 09:24:13PM +0100, Peter wrote:
> If you want an all in one solution without having to have two versions,
> can't you read the status of register_globals from the config file and base
> the rest of the script on this?
> eg
> if (register_globals == 'on') {
> $name = _POST['n
> foreach($HTTP_POST_VARS as $var => $val) {
> $$var = $val;
> }
>
> // repeat for the other relevant $HTTP_*_VARS
>
> The result was a short script that could be require_once'd at the
> top of every script that depended on register_globals being off.
Er, I mean 'that depended on registe
http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.strpos.php
-Stewart
-Original Message-
From: Kevin P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 August 2001 20:44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP indexOf()?
For someone used to Java & JavaScript.. what function would rep
On 8/21/2001 3:43 PM this was written:
> For someone used to Java & JavaScript.. what function would replace
> myString.indexOf(myStringPiece) ??
Strstr()
Or stristr() for case insensative search
http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.strstr.php
--
Thomas Deliduka
IT Manager
---
> Encode (or compile) the source.
>
> Zend's compiler costs 2400 dollars. At this cost is better to
> release your code on an open source license ;-)
The open source license is only as effective as your ability to hire a
lawyer to enforce it. ;)
It also depends on:
a.) How much you're charg
If you can't trust your clients with the source code, what are you telling
your clients?
J
Erik H. Mathy wrote:
>> Encode (or compile) the source.
>>
>> Zend's compiler costs 2400 dollars. At this cost is better to
>> release your code on an open source license ;-)
>
> The open source lic
--
From: J Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: August 24, 2001 5:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: PHP secure
If you can't trust your clients with the source code, what are you telling
your clients?
J
Erik H. Mathy wrote:
>> Encode (or compile) the source.
&g
>-Original Message-
>From: J Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 8:28 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: PHP secure
>
>
>If you can't trust your clients with the source code, what are you telling
>your clients?
>
???
- Original Message -
From: "Shawn McKenzie"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 7:39 PM
Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP Security
Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
I am currently setting up the next generation web server for our company
and am in need of general consulting/advice on
Grant Peel wrote:
???
I think you can safely assume that was a joke.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> Grant Peel wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am currently setting up the next generation web server for our company and
>> am in need of general consulting/advice on php set up security issues.
>>
>> Any one with knowledge and expierience please fee
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 21:33 -0500, Martine Osias wrote:
> The sessions variables are OK. They don't print when I put them on the HTML
> page with this code.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> align="right">
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Martine
>
> ""Martine Osias"" wrote in message
> news:95.0c.13686.c7cd
arthaelon @ yandex.ru; Jabber: arthaelon @
jabber.org
Yahoo! messenger: andre.polykanine; ICQ: 191749952
Twitter: m_elensule
- Original message -
From: Martine Osias
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Date: Saturday, March 13, 2010, 4:33:34 AM
Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP Sessions
The sessions variables are
> From: Martine Osias
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Date: Saturday, March 13, 2010, 4:33:34 AM
> Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP Sessions
>
> The sessions variables are OK. They don't print when I put them on the HTML
> page with this code.
>
>
>
>
>
&g
+1 for CI.
If you search the group archives, a little while back I asked about
micro PHP frameworks and got a ton of good replies.
So folks, how'z about a PHP framework with a built-in admin interface?
That would be pretty sweet. :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscri
On 7/21/2011 4:00 PM, Micky Hulse wrote:
> +1 for CI.
>
> If you search the group archives, a little while back I asked about
> micro PHP frameworks and got a ton of good replies.
>
> So folks, how'z about a PHP framework with a built-in admin interface?
> That would be pretty sweet. :)
>
So, w
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Jim Lucas wrote:
> So, what would said admin interface allow you to administrate?
Your app models?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Micky Hulse wrote:
> Your app models?
More specifically, your app model data. :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 07/21/2011 07:44 PM, Micky Hulse wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Micky Hulse wrote:
>> Your app models?
>
> More specifically, your app model data. :)
A la CakePHP. Will automagically build controllers and views for the
admin of your tables/models if you wish.
--
Thanks!
-Shawn
h
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> A la CakePHP. Will automagically build controllers and views for the
> admin of your tables/models if you wish.
Oooh, interesting! I will check out CakePHP! Thanks for tip! :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscri
On 21 July 2011 23:56, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> On 07/21/2011 03:59 PM, Chris Stinemetz wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am thinking about venturing into PHP frameworks, but I would like to
>> get advice on what the correct selection would be for someone that is
>> about intermediate in PHP knowledge.
Investing your time on Zend Framework is worth it.I do mostly php
development under Magento Platform, and Zend Framework becomes one of
the vital skills I need.Apart from that, ZF is also a well thought
Library that is a joy to work with.As one mentioned, the best part of it
it gives the option to
using Drupal
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Jim Giner wrote:
> And how are you generating the email?
>
>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
--
http://alexus.org/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
T
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:50 PM, alexus wrote:
> using Drupal
>
If you're using Drupal to send the mail, or any module installed in
Drupal, than there are most likely settings in Drupal (module) that
allow you to set the from address. If these functions call the mail
command with a different From
Mikey wrote:
> To get values such as price=500 then you will need to encode that into
> your URL. At the moment you are making thePrices=price500, so the
> value you are seeing is correct.
>
> Tf you had price=500 then you would see a variable called price with a
> value of 500.
>
> I suspect you
Hi,
This is an exercise, would you elaborate, as I'm fairly new to PHP-
>FLASH
On Mar 15, 2007, at 12:55 PM, Mikey wrote:
To get values such as price=500 then you will need to encode that
into your URL. At the moment you are making thePrices=price500, so
the value you are seeing is c
Hi,
This is an exercise, using a simple file for the sake of learning.
Any assistance would be appreciated.
CK
On Mar 15, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Andrei wrote:
Mikey wrote:
To get values such as price=500 then you will need to encode that
into
your URL. At the moment you are making theP
ahscomputing.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 9:52 AM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks
>
> HallMarc Websites wrote:
>> First time caller; long time listener..
>>
>>
>>
>> I have been looking at various PHP MVC
details at http://www.yiiframework.com/
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Micah Gersten [mailto:news.php@micahscomputing.com]
>> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 9:52 AM
>> To: php-general@lists.php.net
>> Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks
>>
>> HallMa
does seem to be a promising
future contender.
Thanks - Marc
"Measure twice and cut once."
-Original Message-
From: haliphax [mailto:halip...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:00 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks
On Sun, Mar 8, 2
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Marc Christopher Hall
wrote:
> @todd; Micah - Precisely why I presented the question anew. Not only do I not
> have enough time to troll through the archives; I was looking for a fresher
> set of responses based on today's smorgasbord. Thank you for your input; I
> wrote:
>> @todd; Micah - Precisely why I presented the question anew. Not only do I
>> not have enough time to troll through the archives; I was looking for a
>> fresher set of responses based on today's smorgasbord. Thank you for your
>> input; I have looked at both YII and CI and they look
>Thank you to everybody that replied...but it almost seems it is making
extra
>work.
>I can understand using an include for a menu, since they tend to change
>often and it is on every page, but the normal content I am not
understanding
>the benefit. If I have a page that has unique content on
From: Gary
>
> Thank you to everybody that replied...but it almost seems it is making
extra
> work.
>
> I can understand using an include for a menu, since they tend to
change
> often and it is on every page, but the normal content I am not
understanding
> the benefit. If I have a page that h
Gary wrote:
Thank you to everybody that replied...but it almost seems it is making extra
work.
I can understand using an include for a menu, since they tend to change
often and it is on every page, but the normal content I am not understanding
the benefit. If I have a page that has unique co
haliphax wrote:
Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
writing this, I'll say that overhead/bloat vs. productivity of the
developer is a trade-off you're going to have to make for ANY of the
framework
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Jason Norwood-Young
wrote:
> haliphax wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
>> discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
>> writing this, I'll say that overhead/bloat vs. productivity of the
>> dev
Jason Norwood-Young wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
writing this, I'll say that overhead/bloat vs. productivity of the
developer is a trade-off you're going to have to m
haliphax wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Jason Norwood-Young
wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
writing this, I'll say that overhead/bloat vs. productivity
Jason Norwood-Young wrote:
haliphax wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Jason Norwood-Young
wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Perhaps I should have phrased it a bit more concise: This has been
discussed many times--often, and RECENTLY. Anyway, since I'm already
writing this, I'll say that overh
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 15:10 +, Mayer, Jonathan wrote:
> >Thank you to everybody that replied...but it almost seems it is making
> extra
> >work.
>
> >I can understand using an include for a menu, since they tend to change
>
> >often and it is on every page, but the normal content I am not
>
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
Just thought I'd point out that it's recommended against giving non-php
extensions to PHP code pages. Basically, making all of your include
files .inc without the server correctly configured to recognise all .inc
files as PHP files, you are opening yourself up to possible h
On Monday 09 March 2009 3:07:17 pm Nathan Rixham wrote:
> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > Just thought I'd point out that it's recommended against giving non-php
> > extensions to PHP code pages. Basically, making all of your include
> > files .inc without the server correctly configured to recognise al
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 15:23 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Monday 09 March 2009 3:07:17 pm Nathan Rixham wrote:
> > Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > > Just thought I'd point out that it's recommended against giving non-php
> > > extensions to PHP code pages. Basically, making all of your include
> > >
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
> haliphax wrote:
>>
>> Framework = Overhead (when compared to vanilla PHP). Period. I'm not
>
> by vanilla do you mean vanilla from lussimo? [http://getvanilla.com/] ?
You know damn well I didn't. :)
--
// Todd
--
PHP General Mailing List
haliphax wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
haliphax wrote:
Framework = Overhead (when compared to vanilla PHP). Period. I'm not
by vanilla do you mean vanilla from lussimo? [http://getvanilla.com/] ?
You know damn well I didn't. :)
I'd love to lol - but really n
-Original Message-
From: Ashley Sheridan [mailto:a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk]
Sent: 09 March 2009 19:55
To: Mayer, Jonathan
Cc: Gary; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: PHP includes
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 15:10 +, Mayer, Jonathan wrote:
> >Thank you to everybod
Mayer, Jonathan wrote:
Just thought I'd point out that it's recommended against giving non-php
extensions to PHP code pages. Basically, making all of your include
files .inc without the server correctly configured to recognise all .inc
files as PHP files, you are opening yourself up to possib
figured id top-post on this one, since the original message was so long..
i recommend debugging with a tool like wireshark. that way you can
see whats in the packets going over the wire and hopefully it will lead
to a solution.
-nathan
On Dec 19, 2007 12:54 AM, vixle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
well i mean even if we would not consider that particular piece of code as
an example of the code that i have issues with im still rather interesting
if theres some different between the socket model used by say, c++(winsock
in my case) and the sockets used in php
because when made a simple c++
vixle wrote:
> well i mean even if we would not consider that particular piece of code as
> an example of the code that i have issues with im still rather interesting
> if theres some different between the socket model used by say, c++(winsock
> in my case) and the sockets used in php
> because
With any code doing a basic socket functionality, the code that i gave in
the original post is suppossed to connect to a deamon, and get a message
from it , instead it "makes the deamon go crazy" in the sense that it starts
endless looping and loads the system resources up to max.
"Jim Lucas" <
> -Original Message-
> From: tbt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 3:22 AM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] re[PHP] gister_globals
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm a newbie to php and i would like to set register_globals to
I'm a newbie to php and i would like to set register_globals to 'on' from my
php script itself(eg:- index.php). Is there any way of doing this.
You can't do this from inside the script with ini_set() as
register_globals has already had it's affect at that point, so you can
put this in a .htacc
tbt schreef:
Hi,
I'm a newbie to php and i would like to set register_globals to 'on' from my
php script itself(eg:- index.php). Is there any way of doing this.
you think you would like that. but you are wrong. register_globals is a security
risk in the hands of someone who doesn't know exactl
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 15:33:04 Jochem Maas wrote:
> tbt schreef:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm a newbie to php and i would like to set register_globals to 'on' from
> > my php script itself(eg:- index.php). Is there any way of doing this.
>
> you think you would like that. but you are wrong. register_
On Wed, January 16, 2008 12:21 am, tbt wrote:
> I'm a newbie to php and i would like to set register_globals to 'on'
> from my
> php script itself(eg:- index.php). Is there any way of doing this.
You can't turn it "on" really, because by the time your PHP script is
running and trying to turn it "o
Sancar Saran schreef:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 15:33:04 Jochem Maas wrote:
tbt schreef:
Hi,
I'm a newbie to php and i would like to set register_globals to 'on' from
my php script itself(eg:- index.php). Is there any way of doing this.
you think you would like that. but you are wrong. reg
Hello
> >
> > Hell frezezer over.
>
> odd verb. but I get the message. indeed it's seem it hath freezeth nicely.
>
> > Me thinks regsiter_globals are evil too.
> >
> > And what about this
> >
> > session_start();
> >
> > $_SESSION['refString'] = $_GET['refNo'];
>
> what about it?
>
> 1. you mean t
Sancar Saran schreef:
Hello
Hell frezezer over.
odd verb. but I get the message. indeed it's seem it hath freezeth nicely.
Me thinks regsiter_globals are evil too.
And what about this
session_start();
$_SESSION['refString'] = $_GET['refNo'];
what about it?
1. you mean the fact that the G
-Original Message-
From: Hulf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 4:06 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] Re: php SHOW
I mean get the schema.
""Hulf"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is there a way
On 9/1/07, Jens Kleikamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OOzy Pal schrieb:
> > On 9/1/07, Jens Kleikamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> OOzy Pal schrieb:
> >>
> >>> I have php4 running on Ubuntu Feisty. I can see php5-tidy in the
> >>> Synaptic (Package Manager) but can not see php4-tidy or php-ti
> >> Ubuntu = Debian + New Life
> >
> > Mandriva has Eclipse and PHPEclipse 'out of the box' along with Apache
> > and PHP
> > I can build a fully functional development machine from a pile of bits
> > in under an hour ;)
> > And currently that includes downloading the latest updates :)
> >
>
>
On Friday 09 November 2007 18:45:27 Instruct ICC wrote:
> > >> Ubuntu = Debian + New Life
> > >
> > > Mandriva has Eclipse and PHPEclipse 'out of the box' along with Apache
> > > and PHP
> > > I can build a fully functional development machine from a pile of bits
> > > in under an hour ;)
> > > And
1 - 100 of 178226 matches
Mail list logo
