pippin wrote:
> No, it's a misunderstanding. Spotify DOES have a feature to normalize
> volume across tracks and it DOES do additional dynamics compression
> degrading the dynamics of your track.
> It is, however, in the player software and it's an option you can turn
> off, Triode's plugin suppo
bezbozhnik wrote:
> Looks like you may have compiled against a newer version of libc than is
> available on some people's systems. When I try to run the helper app
> manually, I get:
>
> ./spotifyd64: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.17' not
> found (required by ./spotifyd64)
>
Btw you are supposed to help spotify with this they have a content team
, you can report bad tracks .
These are known issues that some tracks can be mangled by the uploader .
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD6
dafiend wrote:
> No, but see my next post. I don't see why the big players in the
> business have the incentive to degrade the lossy audio they serve on
> purpose. Therefore, I'm focusing on debunking the myth that 320 kbps MP3
> is audibly inferior to the lossless source. (I also feel the hypoth
dafiend wrote:
>
> This is a conspiracy theory.
>
No, it's a misunderstanding. Spotify DOES have a feature to normalize
volume across tracks and it DOES do additional dynamics compression
degrading the dynamics of your track.
It is, however, in the player software and it's an option you can tu
garym wrote:
> this is an important point, as I have seen other discussions, including
> in this thread, questioning whether some odd volume normalization scheme
> is being used by some of the streaming services which can even make the
> 320kbs files not transparent. That's certainly a variable t
dafiend wrote:
> 1.) You cannot trust your ears. It is naive to think your hearing is the
> only factor affecting what you perceive to hear. If you do not control
> for other factors (such as your prior conscious or subconscious beliefs
> about which format sounds better), there is a big risk of
callesoroe wrote:
> Why not trust your own ears, instead of what "others" might have
> heard..
> I can defanately hear the diffference on my system, and thats it for
> me
1.) You cannot trust your ears. It is naive to think your hearing is the
only factor affecting what you perceive to he
erland wrote:
> Does it only affect iPeng or do you have similar issues if you try to
> rate through the context menu on a Squeezebox or one of the other smart
> phone apps ?
I answered this above. I took the information to pippin, who was able to
reproduce the issue, and his 'reply'
(http://for
pippin wrote:
> OK, the command gets sent but TrackStat then throws an error:
Yep, that's the error I see as well. I included that in my 'post'
(http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?49483-Announce-New-versions-of-erlands-plugins&p=793941&viewfull=1#post793941)
in erland's plugins thread.
prabbit wrote:
> Reminder, as requested.
OK, the command gets sent but TrackStat then throws an error:
Code:
[14-10-26 23:57:03.4754] Plugins::TrackStat::Storage::saveRating (706)
Execute UPDATE track_statistics set rating=useContextMenu:1 where url = ? or
url = ?
pippin,
Yes, it is an iPad 4 and yes, I do have some longish track names that
scroll (though I try to keep the track names short) and I have quite a
lot of longish album names (for classical music) that scroll.
Thanks for your help - it is much appreciated!
Touch, Meridian G92, Meridian G55,
Mnyb wrote:
> Found the problem in my case I just had to press apply on the settings
> page as for some reason it said that the password was not set .
>
> Note I did not reenter the password It was still there I saw the dots in
> password field and my correct identity , i just pressed apply agai
Man in a van wrote:
> Just remembered what I did, Googled the phrase and found it had in the
> past been related to log in issues with Spotify; tried to run the Self
> Test and kept getting the incorrect password thing, checked that my
> account was still current and filled in my user name and pa
Mnyb wrote:
> Found the problem in my case I just had to press apply on the settings
> page as for some reason it said that the password was not set .
>
> Note I did not reenter the password It was still there I saw the dots in
> password field and my correct identity , i just pressed apply agai
Found the problem in my case I just had to press apply on the settings
page as for some reason it said that the password was not set .
Note I did not reenter the password It was still there I saw the dots in
password field and my correct identity , i just pressed apply again
--
Why Im suddenly using noflac ? and an older version of libspotify
[18:55:36.716698] main:448
/var/lib/squeezeboxserver/cache/InstalledPlugins/Plugins/Spotify/Bin/i386-linux/spotifyd
2.3.4 started ( libspotify: 12.1.51.g86c92b43 Release Linux-i686 )
[15:40:11.265255] main:448
/var/lib/squeezebox
Yes seing this to .
Error reading headers: Server closed connection without sending any data
back at /usr/share/squeezeboxserver/CPAN/Net/HTTP/Methods.pm line 306.
...propagated at /usr/share/squeezeboxserver/CPAN/Net/HTTP/NB.pm line
32.
Dont know if it is the 7.9 beta or the plugin it might ac
paulster wrote:
> I was listening to Spotify this morning, and then noticed that there was
> an update for the plugin.
>
> Installed that, and tried listening to Spotify again this afternoon
> after a couple of hours.
>
> Now I get this:
>
> Error reading headers: Server closed connection with
I was listening to Spotify this morning, and then noticed that there was
an update for the plugin.
Installed that, and tried listening to Spotify again this afternoon
after a couple of hours.
Now I get this:
Error reading headers: Server closed connection without sending any data
back at /usr/s
iPad 4, right?
Sorry, it's a know issue with long track names that scroll. It's
actually a bug in the iPad 4's GPU as it seems.
We have a workaround that was in the last iPeng 7 version but
accidentally got deactivated in iPeng 8, it will be active in the next
update again.
---
learn more about
callesoroe wrote:
> Why not trust your own ears, instead of what "others" might have
> heard..
> I can defanately hear the diffference on my system, and thats it for
> me
Its a bit hard to do properly , I switched back and forth with spotify
premium 320k ogg (better than wimp 256k mp3 fo
I recently updated iPeng to iPeng 8 and have found that it regularly
locks up my iPad (the Home and Sleep/On/Off buttons don't work and parts
of the iPeng 8 screen flicker). The only "escape" is to do a hard reset
(holding the Home + Sleep buttons for a few seconds).
The OS is iOS 7.1.2 and ther
dafiend wrote:
> Are you basing this claim on double-blind tests? If not, your statement
> is audiophool folklore. Blind testing is required to rule out that
> perceived differences are due to the placebo effect.
>
> Your claim of an audible difference at 320 kbps contradicts what I've
> seen in
Juls2783 wrote:
> Hello there !
>
> First, thank you for this excellent plugin ! :cool: It works fine when
> running LMS on my computer! But I recently installed a Synology NAS with
> LMS running on it. The problem is Qobuz plugin version on the NAS LMS is
> only 1.203 and streaming isn't workin
pippin wrote:
> Actually no. If you remind me tomorrow I'll have a look at the menu
> TrackStat creates.
Reminder, as requested.
prabbit's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11142
View this thread: h
Squeezemenicely wrote:
>
> Lossless Streaming services do sound better than lossy Streaming
> services - this is a completely different discussion than the lossy /
> non lossy debate.
> The lossy streaming services simply do nt sound as good as the should/
> could.
>
>
this is an important po
bezbozhnik wrote:
> Looks like you may have compiled against a newer version of libc than is
> available on some people's systems. When I try to run the helper app
> manually, I get:
>
> ./spotifyd64: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.17' not
> found (required by ./spotifyd64)
>
Well, I have been using Spotify for quite a wile now and mostly use it
for streaming "pop" music. Which is fine, but I used Qobuz lossless or
my own Flac collection for classical - and there really is quite a
difference.
I do not like classical music via Spotify, it is not horrible, but there
is
callesoroe wrote:
> This is rubbish. There is a huge difference between Wimp 320 kbs and
> Wimp-hifi(flac) .
>
Are you basing this claim on double-blind tests? If not, your statement
is audiophool folklore. Blind testing is required to rule out that
perceived differences are due to the place
callesoroe wrote:
> Wimp normal is 256 MP3 with squeezeboxes and FLAC as lossless in
> Wimp-hifi. You can get 320 AAC but as far as I know not for SB.
Ok 256kBps mp3 you cant get the 320k AAC on Squeezeboxes , that makes
normal spotify for squeezebox better than non hifi wimp .
I thought they w
Mnyb wrote:
>
> Edit spotify are using OGG rigth ? and WIMP AAC
Wimp normal is 256 MP3 with squeezeboxes and FLAC as lossless in
Wimp-hifi. You can get 320 AAC but as far as I know not for SB.
Callesoroe
Living room: Transporter, Tact RCS 2.2X digital preamp, Martin Logan
Vista speakers, AMP
callesoroe wrote:
> This is rubbish. There is a huge difference between Wimp 320 kbs and
> Wimp-hifi(flac) . You must have a system that can not reveal the
> differences. And if you are happy with that, then that is it for you.
> But when I only had the possibility to use Spotify 320 kbs stre
Stuart / DSTMK is there any way to adjust the audio buffer / latency to
help bring the shairtunes playback in line with other Apple Airplay
devices?
even if this is just setting a static amount of buffer rather than a
dynamic sync.
--
nidzo wrote:
> more than that. after a new install of LMS everything from erland
> has disappeared
Forgive me if this is obvious, but do you have access to some other 3rd
party plugins?
LMS 7.9 on VortexBox Midi running Xubuntu 14.04, FLACs 16->24 bit,
44.1->192kbps. Wired Touch + EDO,
dafiend wrote:
> The point is that they don't sell better sound quality. The sell a
> fantasy or a lifestyle or whatever you want to call it. They target
> people who want to get "the best" but don't realize that what they're
> purchasing isn't any better.
>
> Actually, there are disadvantages l
johan d wrote:
> Hello,
>
> since LMS stopped running on my QNAP since i upgraded the NAS to 4.1.1,
> are there any alternative server software, where SB players can connect
> to?
no, SB players need LMS.
*Location 1:* VortexBox 4TB (2.3) > LMS 7.8 > Transporter, Touch, Boom,
Radio w/Battery
Hello there !
First, thank you for this excellent plugin ! :cool: It works fine when
running LMS on my computer! But I recently installed a Synology NAS with
LMS running on it. The problem is Qobuz plugin version on the NAS LMS is
only 1.203 and streaming isn't working. I've been looking for a wa
Hello,
since LMS stopped running on my QNAP since i upgraded the NAS to 4.1.1,
are there any alternative server software, where SB players can connect
to?
johan d's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=
more than that. after a new install of LMS everything from erland
has disappeared
LMS 7.3.2 on Nas Synology DS-213
Queezebox Duet
Squeezebox Boom
Squeezebox Touch
nidzo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/memb
hi
i had to unistall (just to test some performance problems) some plugins.
among these, trackstat.
now, it's note available anymore in the list.
note: ia have full licence to erland's plugins.
any help?
LMS 7.3.2 on Nas Synology DS-213
Queezebox Duet
Squeezebox Boom
Squeezebox Touch
--
41 matches
Mail list logo