df
/usr/bin/smbclient //$machine/PDF -N<
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony E. Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as
>
> Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
;
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:03 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as
>
> <<<<>>>>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wow! Kewl!
- -Original Message-
From: Anthony E. Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 4:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as
Burke, Thomas G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
kewl, thanks
- -Original Message-
From: Dave Ihnat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 4:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 01:13:34PM -0800, Burke
Burke, Thomas G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hmmm.. How do you convert a doc to pdf?
My print2pdf script assumes you have a Samba server on the network, and that
the clients are Winboxes. You configure a Postscript printer at each client
(the script gives references that explain how to semi-autom
. 586-254-5800
Fx. 586-254-5804
-Original Message-
From: Murdock, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Robert Adkins
Subject: RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as
You need to have adobe writerthe simp
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 01:13:34PM -0800, Burke, Thomas G. wrote:
> What rpm is that? I wonder if it would work under 6.2?
Well, just install Ghostscript. Print from any PS printer to file,
then feed that to ps2pdf.
I've got a script called 'printpdf' that handles batches of files, too,
and man
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What rpm is that? I wonder if it would work under 6.2?
- -Original Message-
From: Antonio Montagnani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as
t;Subject: RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as
>
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Hmmm.. How do you convert a doc to pdf?
>
>- -Original Message-
>From: Anthony E. Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:05 P
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:49 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as
That is cool to know. Unfortunately, there is a TON of stuff Linux
(RH8.0)can do, and one cant know everything...
- -Original Message-
From
if i might drag this thread back to remotely where it was
when i started it, a brand new posting at linuxtoday.com
reports that "Dept of Homeland Security Site Switches to Linux
from Windows 2000".
score one for the good guys.
rday
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PR
That is cool to know. Unfortunately, there is a TON of stuff Linux
(RH8.0)can do, and one cant know everything...
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Montagnani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: u.s. government recognizes
Murdock, Matt wrote:
You need to have adobe writerthe simpliest way. Does Star Office have
that capability?
Why not the easiest way (at least in RH8.0) and print the document to
the PDF converter installed as default??
Antonio Montagnani
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto
You need to have adobe writerthe simpliest way. Does Star Office have
that capability?
-Original Message-
From: Burke, Thomas G. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:15 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as
<<<<>>>>
1) carefully avoided laying any specific blame by name,
2)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hmmm.. How do you convert a doc to pdf?
- -Original Message-
From: Anthony E. Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as
Buck <[EM
Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>As an experiment, I am trying to setup a Linux computer as an office
>computer running ALL FREE software. It doesn't mean I won't pay for
>some software in the office, but I want to see if I can setup at least
>one computer in the network in which there is NO softw
This signature is SO true, it's not even funny.
--
"one world, one web, one program" - microsoft promotional ad
"ein volk, ein reich, ein fuhrer" - adolf hitler
<>
:
Subject: Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 09:46, gabriel wrote:
> On January 28, 2003 10:38 am, Bret Hughes wrote:
> > I suspect that linux system vulnerabilities don't get the press is that
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as
<<<<>>>>
1) carefully avoided laying any specific blame by name,
2) made absolutely *no* mention of the pos
gabriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On January 28, 2003 07:42 am, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> 1) MS software is nororiously insecure and is largely
>> responsible for the insecurity of the current IT
>> infrastructure, or
>
>
>now i'm not a fan of micros~1, but i feel that i have to check this
s
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:33:15AM -0500, gabriel wrote:
>
> now i'm not a fan of micros~1, but i feel that i have to check this statement
> for accuracy. in cases like "the sql slammer" the one at fault is definately
> not the author of the software, but rather the halfwit who's running it
>
nected unpatched, either.
Anyway, that's my $0.02. And for anyone who read this
far, thanks!
Bill Ward
> -Original Message-
> From: gabriel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:33 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: u.s. government re
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 09:46, gabriel wrote:
> On January 28, 2003 10:38 am, Bret Hughes wrote:
> > I suspect that linux system vulnerabilities don't get the press is that
> > there are not as many of them out there and that the average linux
> > user/admin is WAY more cognizant of what is running o
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 09:33:15 -0500
gabriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On January 28, 2003 07:42 am, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > 1) MS software is nororiously insecure and is largely
> > responsible for the insecurity of the current IT
> > infrastructure, or
>
>
> now i'm not a fan of micro
On January 28, 2003 10:38 am, Bret Hughes wrote:
> I suspect that linux system vulnerabilities don't get the press is that
> there are not as many of them out there and that the average linux
> user/admin is WAY more cognizant of what is running on his box and as a
> result more apt to keep up with
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 09:03, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Robert Adkins wrote:
>
> > Everyone,
> >
> > We can go back and forth all day about how MS creates inherently
> > insecure systems, flame war back and forth about this or that until we
> > are all blue in the fa
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Robert Adkins wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> We can go back and forth all day about how MS creates inherently
> insecure systems, flame war back and forth about this or that until we
> are all blue in the face. However, this is a Red Hat mutual support list,
> not a M
"Home users should also regularly update their personal
computer's operating systems (such as Microsoft Windows,
Linux) and major applications ..."
I am wary of this kind of association that MS is desperately trying to pull
off. It is a 'win' that Linux is associated as a Desktop OS, but it
-Original Message-
From: gabriel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Robert Adkins
Subject: Re: u.s. government recognizes Linux as official desktop OS
On January 28, 2003 07:42 am, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 1)
See the following to see how hot M$ are at patching their own systems...
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/story/0,,t269-s2129418,00.html
Andy
-Original Message-
From: gabriel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: u.s. government
On January 28, 2003 07:42 am, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 1) MS software is nororiously insecure and is largely
> responsible for the insecurity of the current IT
> infrastructure, or
now i'm not a fan of micros~1, but i feel that i have to check this statement
for accuracy. in cases like "th
32 matches
Mail list logo
