Yes this is a open issue.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2894
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Geert Van Huychem wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm using Solr 4.5 in a multi-core environment.
>
> I've setup
> - one core per documenttype: text, rss, tweet and external documents.
> - one distrib core
Hi
I'm using Solr 4.5 in a multi-core environment.
I've setup
- one core per documenttype: text, rss, tweet and external documents.
- one distrib core which basically distributes the query to the 4 cores
mentioned hereabove.
Facet pivot works on each core individually, but when I send the exact
Thank you.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 5:13 AM, Sohan Kalsariya
> wrote:
> > So in short i want to ask that Is it possible not to define the
> `distance`
> > parameter ? So I can get my desired results?
>
> No, the distance parameter is required
Thanks for reply
Does that mean I need to compile SOLR with my custom request processor ? or
there is way to extend existing framework and plugin new implementation
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Intercept-updates-and-cascade-loading-of-Index-tp41
You could probably use a commit hook script (in solrconfig.xml) and
then pull the relevant documents/fields (if they are stored) into the
other instances either with DIH (
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#SolrEntityProcessor ) or
just as a triggered import.
Otherwise, you may have the
Arabic if complex. Basically, don't trust anything you see until you
put that content on the screen with the surrounding tag marked with
attribute dir='rtl' (e.g. arabic test).
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovit
A follow up question on this (as it is kind of new functionality).
What happens if several documents are submitted and one of them fails
due to that? Do they get rolled back or only one?
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexand
Some more info to provide:
-Replication almost never completes following the "this IndexWriter is
closed" stacktraces.
-When the replication begins after "this IndexWriter is closed" error, over
a few hours the replica eventually fills the disk to 100% with index files
under data/. There are so ma
Hi Guys..
I require to obtain Tf-idf score from Solr for a certain set of documents.
But the catch is that, I needs the IDF (or DF) to be calculated on the
documents returned by the specific query and not the entire corpus.
Please provide me some hint on whether Solr has this feature or if I can
Hi,
I have just found out what the problem was: Solr does not support non
native types like BigDecimals.
Moving my schema fields to plain float solved the problem.
Regards,
Ugo
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Ugo Matrangolo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ran in a weird error while replicating the index us
Check the admin page for the number of used cache entries as time passes.
I'm wondering if you're consuming lots of memory but it's not apparent at
first, your caches might be filling up over time...
FWIW,
Erick
On Feb 5, 2014 8:19 AM, "Johannes Siegert"
wrote:
> Hi Erick,
>
> thanks for your
There is no callback in Solr. You can either have your indexer
application provide a call back or you can write a custom
UpdateRequestProcessor which can extract the relevant fields into a
new document and use SolrJ to write it to another collection.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:17 PM, soodyogesh wro
Sometimes you can spoof the many fields problem by using prefixes on the
data. Rather than fielda, fieldb... Have field and index values like
fielda_value, fieldb_value into a single field. Then do the right thing
when searching. Watch tokenization though.
Best
Erick
On Feb 5, 2014 4:59 AM, "Mike
On 2/6/2014 9:56 AM, samarth s wrote:
> Size of index = 260 GB
> Total Docs = 100mn
> Usual writing speed = 50K per hour
> autoCommit-maxDocs = 400,000
> autoCommit-maxTime = 1500,000 (25 mins)
> merge factor = 10
>
> M/c memory = 30 GB, Xmx = 20 GB
> Server - Jetty
> OS - Cent OS 6
With 30GB of
: I want to write a custom updateRequestHandler.
: Can you pl.s guide me the steps I need to perform for that ?
https://people.apache.org/~hossman/#xyproblem
XY Problem
Your question appears to be an "XY Problem" ... that is: you are dealing
with "X", you are assuming "Y" will help you, and you
Hi,
I have been using the solr version 3.4 in a project for about more than a
year. It is only now that I have started facing a weird problem of never
ending back to back commit cycles. I can say this looking at the InfoStream
logs, that, as soon as one commit cycle is done with another one almost
Use the pf parameter and then you won't have to modify the original query at
all! And you can add a boost for the phrase, which is a common practice.
pf=search-field^10.0
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Srinivasa7
Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2014 11:21 AM
To: solr-user@luc
Update: RESOLVED
On a hunch I decided to forego trying to separate the EdgeNGramFilterFactory
from this one column and apply it to all columns that are copied into the
'text' filed that Solr uses for searching. I moved the filter factory into
fieldType 'text_general' which is the type that 'text'
Did you remember to completely reindex your data after changing the
analyzer?
Also, use the Solr admin UI Analysis page to verify the analysis for the
test cases, both index and query.
The fact that you are using the default query operator of OR means that even
the symmetric analysis should
: How do I achieve, add if not there, fail if duplicate is found. I though
You can use the optimistic concurrency features to do this, by including a
_version_=-1 field value in the document.
this will instruct solr that the update should only be processed if the
document does not already exis
HI Jack,
I am not using pf parameter rather I am sending query in Quotes.
So sample query string for 'east ende rs'
I am querying "east ende rs"+OR+east+ende+rs with defType is solrconfig set
to edismax.
Other than that I am not using any parameters (pf, pf2, pf3)
Thanks
Srinivasa
--
Jack,
Thanks for responding! I had tried configuring this asymmetrically before
with no luck, so I tried it again, and still no luck. My understanding is
that the default behavior for Solr is "OR" and I do not have a 'q.op='
anywhere that would change that behavior. Since it is only a 1 term searc
Are you using the "pf" parameter to automatically add the quoted phrase? You
can include a boost in pf so that documents with the full phrase rank
higher.
Generally, dismax and edismax should give comparable performance, but some
parameter settings (e.g., pf, pf2, pf3) do add somewhat to query
I would like to know is there a way to intercept or callback whenever new
documents get added to Collection
My use case is I would have one Collection split across shards and whenever
new document arrives in Collection I would like to get callback with
document itself so that I can take some of th
Hi Fatima,
I don’t think there’s an actual problem, it just looks like it because the
program you’re using to look at the JSON makes a different choice for laying
out the highlighting results than it does for the field values.
In fact, all the bytes are the same, and in the same order for bot
Hi All,
I have a requirement to search a query for entire string in the query
parameter, so I have shifted my query processor to edismax, and sending the
query as 'actual query string'+OR+actual+query+string.
It it returning desired results how ever I am wondering whether there is a
performance
Hello,
I am getting highlight results in Arabic, but the order of the words are
backwards. Querying on that field gives me the correct result, though. Is there
are setting I’m missing?
An extract from an example query from my Solr Console is below:
{
"responseHeader": {
"status": 0,
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 5:13 AM, Sohan Kalsariya
wrote:
> So in short i want to ask that Is it possible not to define the `distance`
> parameter ? So I can get my desired results?
No, the distance parameter is required for geofilt.
If you are still looking to calculate distance for returned docum
Hi,
ran in a weird error while replicating the index using SolrCloud.
On a 4.6.1 cluster the indexing replica process fails for most of the
documents with an error like this (on the replica side):
2014-02-06 11:55:45,249 [qtp-75] DEBUG
org.apache.solr.update.processor.LogUpdateProcessor - PRE_U
Hey Sohan!
On 06.02.2014 11:13, Sohan Kalsariya wrote:
Well I am explaining my problem more in detail.
I working with the website http://allevents.in ( It is events discovery and
promotion platform)
I am applying solr search in this site. So whenever anyone visit this
website and search the eve
On 2/5/2014 11:20 PM, Sesha Sendhil Subramanian wrote:
> I am running solr cloud with 10 shards. I do a batch indexing once everyday
> and once indexing is done I call optimize.
>
> I see that optimize happens on each shard one at a time and not in
> parallel. Is it possible for the optimize to ha
Hi Toke!
Thanks for answering. That's it: I talk about index corruption just to
prevent, not because I have already noticed it. During some tests in the
past I checked that a mergeFactor of 2 improves more than a little bit
search speed instead common merge factors such as 10, for example. Of
cour
Well I am explaining my problem more in detail.
I working with the website http://allevents.in ( It is events discovery and
promotion platform)
I am applying solr search in this site. So whenever anyone visit this
website and search the events for example:
"Concerts in London". For that I am using
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 10:22 +0100, Luis Cappa Banda wrote:
> I knew some performance tips to improve search and I configured a very
> low merge factor (2) to boost search
> operations instead of indexation ones.
That would give you a small search speed increase and a huge penalty on
indexing speed
Hi Chris,
Thank you very much for your response! It was very instructive. I knew some
performance tips to improve search and I configured a very low merge factor
(2) to boost search operations instead of
indexation ones. I haven't got a deep knowledge of internal Lucene behavior
in this case, but
I restarted one of the Solr server of the SolrCloud and then domain creation
worked. Not sure why this happened, whether anybody has seen it, and when this
problem will happen again.
Thanks,
Ray
On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 11:19 AM, Ray Cheng
wrote:
Some more information that may help
36 matches
Mail list logo