http://devwiki.pfsense.org/DevelopersBootStrapAndDevIso/
is how to setup a developers machine.
I just used this http://www.thoughtpolice.co.uk/vmware/#freebsd7.0
vmware image to setup a VM and then ran the script from the wiki.
sai
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Alexsander Loula wrote
up and pfsense should have that
>> ability.
>
> Please, somebody confirm this bug or help me solve possible
> misconfiguration, I really need to have wan failover.
>
> ---
> Veiko
>
>
provide a network diagram with ip addresses and maybe screen shots of
the web interface
post your firewall rules. you do not need static routes or arp-proxy
for what you are trying to do.
also your clients need to have EntA clients to have 192.168.10.128 as
the gateway and dns server.
can .129 ping .130 ?
sai
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Thomas Elsgaard
wrote:
> Hi G
n compile from source yourself.
Accountability is there. The devs have have their reputation at stake.
When I run pfSense on a production environment, my reputation is at
stake so I test the code. This is the same with any software, open o
andom people you don't know if it is secure enough, then
> yes, it is secure enough for you. If you really want to know if it is
> "secure", you need to do your own testing.
:-)
I just realised that I've been tr
upstream arp cache.
that means the arp cache on the machines connected to the pfSense
machine, not the pfSense machine itself.
sai
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Michel Servaes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> wouldn't the ARP cache be cleared by rebooting the pfsense box ?? (i
>
arp caching can produce problems like this. solution is to reboot the
switches, the firewall and everything else connected to them. I have
wasted whole days debugging problems like this
sai
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Glenn Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well still no go - h
how is your network setup?
<1> PC ---switch UT ---pfsense
or
<2> PC ---switch ---pfsense UT
I would suggest trying <2> since you just want the CP on pfsense
sai
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 9:53 PM, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 2
lly valid data set, and the port range is
quite limited, but it looks ok.
could one of the devs confirm that dns cache problem is mitigated ?
sai
refs:
[1] http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2008/Jul/0104.html
[2] http://blog.spoofed.org/2008/07/mitigating-dns-cache-poisoning-with-pf.html
[3] ht
nothing wrong. just different. it may have side effects, which needs
some thinking.
sai
On 7/7/08, Ermal Luçi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 7:47 AM, sai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I tested this and it looks like this is a side eff
I tested this and it looks like this is a side effect of the new shaper.
sai
On 6/19/08, sai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this normal? I just opened my log files and clicked on one of the
> red icons. I seem to remember that blocked packets only had one
> associated r
if you add descriptions to the rules, the text of the description
comes up in the popup window when you click on the pass/block icon.
sai
On 6/22/08, Craig Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking at my logs trying to work out which rule number 262 is?
>
> is there a
Is this normal? I just opened my log files and clicked on one of the
red icons. I seem to remember that blocked packets only had one
associated rule. I get this:
<10.10.10.10>
The rule that triggered this action is:
@2 block drop in log all label "Default deny rule"
@20 block drop in on ! rl1 in
start off by downloading the dev iso
http://mirror.qubenet.net/mirror/pfsense/downloads/developers/pfSense-1.2-BETA-1.iso.gz
and installing it.
sai
On 6/18/08, Matias Surdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm an experienced web developer and I have some FreeBSD syst
http://imageshack.us/
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/
On 5/30/08, Peter Todorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where I can upload screanshots to show ?
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 5/29/08, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 5/29/08, sai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > custom overlay was not working for me (used to work until a few weeks
> ago).
> >
> > in builder-scripts/builder_common.sh the overlay directory
> &g
up on me at a critical point in time?
sai
you should probably be using a 6.2 or 6.3 kernel on pfsense 1.2
the 7 kernel would not be a good idea.
sai
On 5/28/08, Aziz THRAYA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I modify some FreeBSD kernel without problems but modding pfsense Kernel it
> is to hard
way set to the firewalls interface ip address.
the subnet mask for both should be the same.
sai
: Single host / 192.168.1.2
destination port: SMTP
This will allow sending of email.
You can add other rules to allow other protocols like POP, secure SMTP ...
HTH
sai
On 4/23/08, Toto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> help me !!!
>
> i want ip 192.168.1.2 colud not open web but only do
curtis, what was the previous setting?
sai
On 4/8/08, Curtis Maurand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The problem turned out to be packet state maintenance. I set it to "Keep
> State" for all of my rules having to do with NAT and tunnels and it solved
> all of the pr
skype is similar to p2p. lots and lots of connections to home dsl lines. or
it might be some sort of minimalist trojan :-)
sai
On 3/10/08, Michel Servaes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I didn't think of filtering out P2P traffic, I actually wanted to detect
> it... (but now
I think that there is a bug in the bandwidthd package. the xml states that
bandwidthd REQUIRES pfsense 2.0
this package will NOT filter out p2p, it will just try to detect
it. not suitable for blocking the p2p. you might want to try snort for that.
sai
On 3/8/08, Michel Servaes <[EM
take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stateful_firewall
On 3/6/08, Mike Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Thanks Sean for the clarification.
>
>
>
> One point of clarification.. can you please define exactly what a 'state' is
> ?
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
>
>
> Mike Lever
>
>
>
> Ten
try to use the bios to disable some of the non-required devices like
floppy drive etc.
your problem may be due to shared IRQs and this may solve it.
sorry my Russian is zero :-)
sai
On 2/29/08, Serg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi. I'm a novice in FreeBSD, please, help me to und
well I did have this one problem that was solved by reinstalling from
scratch..really from scratch. I think that the routing table was
wrong...
sai
On 2/29/08, Michael Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Reinstall from scratch" <-- Still safe to export/import my conf
reinstall from scratch.
sai
On 2/28/08, Michael Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I've got a dual-wan setup and I want to cause traffic between an internal
> machine, and external machine to occur over WAN2 (I could use source or
> destination as criteria
bandwidthd or darkstats packages might help. they show download/upload
by IP address.
sai
On 2/26/08, Bosco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am using pfSense solution for a while (about 6 months) - version
> 1.2 with 1 LAN + 3 WANs - and somet
ll from the
WAN interface.
If you are loadbalancing for users in the LAN then you just need to
worry about the LAN interface rules, the WAN rules are not needed.
sai
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
e to pfsense from the m0n0wall gui.
> On Jan 27, 2008 11:07 PM, Fernando Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You cannot upgrade to pfsense from m0n0wall from the gui, its in the
> > faq somewhere.
> >
> >
> > On Jan 27, 2008 10:49 PM, sai <[EMAIL PROTECTED
if the m0n0 is known to work then you could install the m0n0 image and
then use the gui to change the firmware to pfSense.
sai
On 1/28/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've modified the configuration file to point to vr0/vr1/vr2 as
> appropriate, however ther
Yes, paid support is available, but a lot of support is provided by
the devs is free.
sai
On 1/24/08, Sean Cavanaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> technically it already is. if you want elevated support, they charge for it.
> but out of that comes upgrades and feature e
I saw this after upgrading to RC4
Fix:
using exec.php
rm -rf /var/db/rrd*
Then in the Execute PHP command box type in:
enable_rrd_graphing();
This will delete all your rrd data :-(
sai
On 1/25/08, Wade Blackwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems ve
Recommended Hardware Vendors : http://pfsense.org/index.php?id=40
sai
On Nov 5, 2007 9:00 AM, Jeremy Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been running PFsense successfully on a handbuilt PC for about a
> year now, and am stoked that it works so well. I'd like to mov
unless
> you label the media...
>
The System page tells you which version and the build date. The build
date is useful for tracking snapshots.
sai
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you not just use a crossed cable for the CARP interfaces?
sai
On 9/27/07, Shane B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Are these unmanaged switches?"
>
> Yeap, little 5 port workgroup switches (Linksys EZXS55W
> http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?c=L_Product_C2&a
,port : any,any
gateway WAN2
hth
sai
On 10/2/07, Ingvald Grimstveit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Current setup:
> 1x WAN PPPoE
> (running PPTP VPN server on pfSense with local user db.)
>
>
> Need:
> 1x Additional WAN
>
>
> Configuration woul
How do you know that the ISP isnṫ acting up or maybe your ISPs modem?
sai
On 9/16/07, Chris Lasater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It does have an DHCP address still, but it happens multiple times a
> day... should I be losing the IP that quickly? and it is usually at
> irre
There have been some problems discussed in the forum with some
ISPs/cable operators. Maybe that wil help.
Does the WAN have an IP address when it goes down? It might be a
problem with ip address renewal in DHCP.
sai
On 9/16/07, Chris Lasater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nothing worth
WAN is DHCP? What do you mean by ? Anything in
the System log?
sai
On 9/15/07, Chris Lasater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been using PFSense on a Soekris Net5501 box for about a month now
> and it has been working perfectly. Recently it has been losing
> connection cons
It was all working before and now its all messed up?
Ah, that be the Networking Gremlins. :-)
When this sort of thing happens I usually have to restart from the
begining - probably missed a small but vital bit of config. Maybe even
reinstall.
sai
On 9/14/07, Shane B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ies the A
> record as it should have initially, it gets a reply very quickly and
> immediately pulls down the web page with no delays whatsoever.
>
Is this a Vista thing we should look out for? If so, whats the fix
that worked here?
sai
Traffic shaper currently only works with 1 WAN interface
sai
On 8/15/07, Jan Zorz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi gang (again).
>
> I already posted this question on forum, but no replies, so I'm trying
> my luck here.
>
> I went through traffic shaper wizard and
secondary.
sai
On 7/18/07, Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have installed pfsense 1.2beta1 built on Mon Apr 30 10:47:18 EDT 2007, LAN
with half a dozen XP and a few Linux machines. ADSL. Primary name server on
the general setup tab is fixed to the ISP's name server, seconda
addresses you can run a traceroute or use something like nmap.
You can even use google.com as a monitor.
sai
On 7/20/07, William Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Again,
I've asked questions about this previously and have gotten much help, Thank
You. Now I have some questions that w
nto a CF installed as hard disk
(cf-ide converter). That works fine.
Since your board doesn't detect the card then probably a problem with
your BIOS settings.
sai
On 7/14/07, Dave Cabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've tried to install pfsense onto the CF as if it was a hard driv
something!") and
the response was that that this was fixed several days ago.
:-(
sai
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
help.
sai
On 7/5/07, William Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have 3 WANS. Each has a static ip assigned by the ISP based on login. I
have the router/modems set to login and give each of my WAN interfaces an
IP. 192.168.2.10, 192.168.1.10 and 192.168.0.10. (I also DMZed those IPs
again
i currently install Freebsd pfSense.local 6.1RELEASE-p10 and do all the
package installation + configuration
TQ
Diagnostics > Backup/restore will save your configuration and allow
you to copy it across to another installat
On 7/2/07, Dave Cabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How does pfS handle multiple IPs on the WAN interface? Would it just be
filter rules or the port fowarding?
My ISPs gateway will be x.x.x.145. I've got x.x.x.146-x.x.x.150 (netmask
255.255.255.248) I'll set the WAN port to x.x.x.150, but I need
e is 100,000 by default - this is huge.
With 256MB I can up this to 200,000 with no problems.
Is your WAN ip static or DHCP? My cable ISP (motorola surfboard modem)
gives me no end of grief with DHCP.
sai
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
snapshots are not too stable. the one produced after 2 hours might be
a bit different to the current one.
if you are new to pfSense then try a BETA or RELEASE version.
sai
On 6/7/07, Quirino Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just downloaded and burned the pfsense snapshot fr
If they have the same gateway, I would use 'other' for setting up a
different monitor ip. Use the ISPs DNS server or web server.
If both lines have the same monitor ip you will have problems.
sai
On 5/19/07, Chris Flugstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Much Easier, thanks Scott
172.16.0.2:80 <-> 192.168.0.200:80 <- 192.168.0.36:4196
SYN_SENT:ESTABLISHED.
This is a connection from your LAN not from OPT.
sai
On 5/8/07, Quirino Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
I'm dealing again with the task of publishing my servers' services ov
You mean that you can access the web site using one IP address, but
not the other IP address? Or are you using the domain name?
What does the states page show about the connections that are made/attempted?
sai
On 5/2/07, Quirino Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I was try
Everytime a packet comes in that might match the rule, you would have
to do a DNS lookup. Not a good idea, as this would REALLY screw up the
latency on your firewall.
sai
On 4/22/07, Rob Terhaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
don't think this is possible, or a good idea ether.
You need to force
the firewall to send the request down the correct interface.
sai
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
adding somewhere? Any information you can provide would
be appreciated.
Robert
Use the same settings that you got working on your laptop?
Can you ping the gateway in question from the pfsense firewall?
sai
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
http://www.notetab.com/ is an excellent windows text editor that can
save in Unix format.
sai
On 3/27/07, Sean Cavanaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
what are you using to edit it? Notepad is notorious for adding hidden
characters that screw up *nix txt files.
Try editing it in WordP
Firewall Rules > add a rule for the subnet2 interface that allows the traffic.
post the config for the interface and also the firewall rules for subnet2
sai
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comma
ware with via the web
gui. You would probably need to make changes to the kernel config
file.
do post a howto if you get it to work :-)
sai
ps. I dont know too much about this FreeBSD stuff either!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
duplicate packets might be generated more than once.
not sure about the State options
sai
On 3/3/07, Brookenmire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Sai, but the it raises a couple of questions:
Why am I seeing multiple blocks from the same IP and port if it is the last
packet ?
Also
http://doc.m0n0.ch/handbook/faq-legit-traffic-dropped.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
REALLY excellent.
sai
On 1/30/07, AngChorEng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Sai,
Do you have any other recommendation for better solution, please advice.
Thank you.
From:
CE Ang
> - Original Message -
> From: AngChorEng
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Sent: Monday, January 29
he Netscreen so that if something
is messed up you can put the Netscreen back in and your network works
again.
sai
On 1/29/07, AngChorEng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Sai,
Thanks for your message, i had successfully installed the PFSENSE with
lastest snap, thank you.
By the way, d
Wade, can you explain in more detail? How would the rules be subverted
and how would the firewall know that this has happened? Maybe give us
an example.
sai
On 1/27/07, Wade Blackwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No a little fancier than that,
I am taking the layered security appro
the latest snapshots would be here:
http://snapshots.pfsense.com/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1/ which have improved
the load balancing user interface.
On 1/26/07, sai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the download mirrors are here:
http://pfsense.com/mirror.php?section=downloads
a copy of the Live iso i
-Installer.iso.gz.md5
I hope that this is what you were asking for
sai
On 1/26/07, AngChorEng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Scott,
Thanks for your information, sorry for the same question, do you have any
source of address in LIVECD.iso download for my PFSENSE installation, by
using livecd, it i
I am running pfsense-1.0.1 and want to recompile the kernel.
I have the dev iso installed and running. If I run build_updates.sh it
gives me a current snapshot which seems to be running fine.
How do I do build an older version , say 1.0.1, rather than the
current snapshot?
I have updated Free
APIC is usually settable in BIOS. Maybe the mobo manufacturer has a
new version of the BIOS ?
sai
On 1/23/07, Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've put pfsense 1.0.1 on a box with K6-2 CPU and 3 NICs. Hardware is
nothing special, should work out of the box, but I find t
This is probably what you are looking for:
http://pfsense.trendchiller.com/transparent_firewall.pdf
sai
On 12/20/06, Brad Bendy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi List,
I was wondering if pfSense can handle this:
WAN connection with a /28
LAN block of /24, being NAT'ed to 1 or more p
This is interesting problem.
I have no idea, butc ould it be solved using the ADvanced Options in
the Firewall rules?
Simultaneous client connection limit
Maximum state entries per host
Maximum new connections / per second
State Timeout in seconds
sai
On 12/12/06, Josep Pujadas i Jubany
27;t anything for you, and can cause more
problems.
Can you explain why fast CF cards might cause problems? I just got
some 144x card !
sai
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11/18/06, Angelo Turetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sai wrote:
>
> Your Passive Mode setting should have your real ip address, not your
> private ip address.
>
Well, we are talking about NAT, so how do you think the internal ftp
server is going to know what's the pub
you enter Passive Mode your ftp server should respond with the
real ip address, not 192.168.255.2 that it is doing in the above
email.
Your Passive Mode setting should have your real ip address, not your
private ip address.
sai
---
I suppose that you would have to find out where the cert was stored
and then replace it in the file system.
On 11/18/06, Kelvin Chiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Josep, yes I did. I did not have issue using the certificates. I wish to
find out how to incorporate a customized certificate in th
then make another rule
Interface : Lan
source: however you wan to specify Your 192.168.0.51 subnet
gateway: your second 2024 isp
You will want to make the rules a bit more secure by specifying
destination ports.
hth
sai
On 11/3/06, Gerente Técnico ERP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I e
thanks - never used fwe or even firewire before so wasn't sure about
it. will keep on trying.
I see the fwe interface fine, just can't use it.
sai
On 10/4/06, Espen Johansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have used it sucessfully with pfsense but not recently, and no there is
crossed cables - is there any requirement like that
here?
sai
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
eeks ago and scanned my computers and no viruses exist.
I would say your ISP's virus checker is acting up?
Scott
what AV is the isp using?
sai
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
need to have some idea of the network layout. where is the ip phone ,
where is the asterisk server?
sai
On 9/22/06, Guillaume Mathieu-Thérien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm having a problem with my SIP Phones and Asterisk.
I think it's due to a timeout.
If
The forums are now working for me...the ISP was giving me DNS problems
so that might have been related.
sorry for the OT noise
sai
On 9/8/06, sai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Never seen this before - been using this same ISP for a few months.
sai
On 9/8/06, Holger Bauer <[EMAIL
Never seen this before - been using this same ISP for a few months.
sai
On 9/8/06, Holger Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's not a problem with proxies in general. This is happening when the proxy
has some strange configuration. Not too sure about what is causing this but I
ha
Trying to access forum.pfsense.com, I get
"Stop it. Trying to hide in a proxy makes me cranky.."
My ISP is probably using a proxy :-(
How do I get my forum fix for the day?
sai
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
Ah, right. I messed up the outbound NAT.
Thanks Holger.
sai
On 5/9/06, Holger Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You have to use advanced outbound NAT and the tutorial covers this. Otherwise
your connections from your node one will be natted to the REAL IP of the
interface, not the CA
you cant boot from a floppy. You can only use a CD-ROM or harddisk.
sai
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Holger,
I dont really understand the question (!) , but I am not using
advanced outbound NAT.
I just followed the tutorial on
http://www.pfsense.org/mirror.php?section=tutorials/carp/carp-cluster-new.htm
sai
On 5/6/06, Holger Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are you using advanced ou
ill store the
config on your pc. You can restore the config if your floppy dies.
sai
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enabled
Synchronize rules
Synchronize aliases
Synchronize nat
Synchronize Virtual IPs
Synchronize DNS Forwarder
sai
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cated carp interface and have only allowed traffic between
the 2 pfsense machines on this interface.
I see failover work, and I see rules added to the master being
propogated to the slave.
I do not see any carp traffic on my other interfaces being blocked.
tion
port as 25 and source port as *
sai
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
91 matches
Mail list logo
