Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> "Serious Cyclists..."
Oh, yes, your absolutely right. If you've got panniers attached you
_must_ be so much more serious than anybody else.
> (Cycling Active magazine keeps running features on it) but no-one else has
> ever even heard of it.
That says more about the ma
On 11 May 2010 21:30, martyn wrote:
> In Hertfordshire, East Herts publish maps that are drawn on top of an OS
> layer. But for each parish, they also publish a text description of
> each numbered right of way, last updated in 2006. Useful as not all
> real-world physical signs have the number.
Thanks Kevin, I've corrected the page. I should have checked it and not
relied on my flaky memory. :(
Cheers, Chris
Kevin Peat wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Thanks for this, very helpful. I just followed this through and
> converted data for some woods near me and it all worked okay apart
> from your
In Hertfordshire, East Herts publish maps that are drawn on top of an OS
layer. But for each parish, they also publish a text description of
each numbered right of way, last updated in 2006. Useful as not all
real-world physical signs have the number. So using that with the NPE
layer in Potl
Hi Chris,
Thanks for this, very helpful. I just followed this through and converted
data for some woods near me and it all worked okay apart from your ogr2ogr
command line has the output and input files around the wrong way (gdal
1.7.2).
Kevin
On 11 May 2010 18:28, Chris Hill wrote:
> Tim
Jerry Clough gave me the fix, so he might explain the detail. The
difference seems to vary across the country. Close to my home is was
nearly 150m off which was too large for me to use, so I'm glad I waited
to get a proper solution.
Cheers, Chris
Jason Cunningham wrote:
> Thanks Chris
>
> Why
Thanks Chris
Why have the OS done wrong in their prj file?. The test ogr2ogr I performed
using the OS prj files were only slightly off when compared to the prj files
you provided, and I didnt realise there was a problem until you provided the
a new prj file.
Now that Chris has provided us with so
Tim Francois wrote:
> Chris
>
> Any chance of providing some command snippets for using gdal's ogr2ogr
> for us plebs who've never used it? I do not understand the man page
> whatsoever!!
>
> Thanks
> Tim
Done.
Cheers, Chris
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Tal
Chris
Any chance of providing some command snippets for using gdal's ogr2ogr
for us plebs who've never used it? I do not understand the man page
whatsoever!!
Thanks
Tim
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/
I've written up the way I have used OS shapefiles in the wiki
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_OS_Shapefiles
Cheers, Chris
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
I talk to a number of officers on various matters and my take is that
Solihull Council, if they could ever get the manpower (half a footpath
officer can't do much) they'd be more than happy to release their data -
we tried doing stuff on TPO trees and the only restriction was technical
ability
>Apparently OS regards the PRoW data as containing IP belonging to the
>local authorities (who maintain the definitive maps), and so were
>unable to release them as part of OpenData. There is an agreement that
>allows OS to include PRoW data in their Explorer and Landranger Maps.
Sorry, meant to s
Robert Whittaker (OSM Talk GB writes:
>Apparently OS regards the PRoW data as containing IP belonging to the
>local authorities (who maintain the definitive maps), and so were
>unable to release them as part of OpenData.
This is a nicely executed bureaucratic tangle. It might help to have an
of
On 11 May 2010 11:58, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
> It's my intention to ask about the whole "path" issue (will they release
> footpaths; definitive maps; derived data) at the presentation tomorrow
> evening (see other message).
There are some interesting comments from OS about why they didn't /
couldn
>> OK. Thanks for the correction. I guess after that hullabaloo down
>> South settles down, the thing to do is to get my local friendly MP to
>> table a question on this and see where that leads. you'd hope it'd be a
>> fairly open door, as it should not need the underlying mapping released
>> an
On 11/05/10 11:39, Ian Spencer wrote:
> OK. Thanks for the correction. I guess after that hullabaloo down
> South settles down, the thing to do is to get my local friendly MP to
> table a question on this and see where that leads. you'd hope it'd be a
> fairly open door, as it should not need th
OK. Thanks for the correction. I guess after that hullabaloo down South
settles down, the thing to do is to get my local friendly MP to table a
question on this and see where that leads. you'd hope it'd be a fairly
open door, as it should not need the underlying mapping released and
public scru
On 11/05/10 11:22, Ian Spencer wrote:
> I presume that the definitive map is a public document that should be
> freely available. (???!!!)
You assume wrongly. Well sort of - you have a right to inspect it but
that doesn't mean you have a right to copy things from it.
The main problem is that de
(Newbie alert!! - another try without the HTML setting) I suspect this
has been discussed before, but it seems to me that there is a big hole
in open source mapping, and that is getting hold of definitive maps in
electronic form to be able to document them.
I presume that the definitive map is
(Newbie alert!!) I suspect this has been discussed before, but it seems
to me that there is a big hole in open source mapping, and that is
getting hold of definitive maps in electronic form to be able to
document them.
I presume that the definitive map is a public document that should be
freel
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> In case of interest here:
>
> There is a British Computer Society talk given by a couple of guys from
> the Ordnance Survey on OpenSpace and the release of free data at my work
> place tomorrow.
>
> It's at Room HC029, Southampton Solent University, 6pm f
Just a reminder that the Surrey meetup is tonight at 7pm.
Etienne
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:38 PM, 80n <80n...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Folks
> There will be a pub-meetup for Surrey OSMers on Tuesday May 11th at 7pm.
> The venue is the Hand and Spear adjacent to Weybridge railway station:
> http://o
Can't quite make that one .. but it sounds great. Any chance of a YouTube'd
version appearing?
Phil
On 11 May 2010 09:51, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> In case of interest here:
>
> There is a British Computer Society talk given by a couple of guys from
> the Ordnance Survey on Op
Hello everyone,
In case of interest here:
There is a British Computer Society talk given by a couple of guys from
the Ordnance Survey on OpenSpace and the release of free data at my work
place tomorrow.
It's at Room HC029, Southampton Solent University, 6pm for 6.30pm.
Nick
_
24 matches
Mail list logo
