Re: OpenPGP Validation

2009-06-09 Thread Eugene Gladchenko
Hello, >>> When I press the "envelope with the question mark" icon on the >>> headers pane of TBBETA Mission Statement message, I can see nothing >>> but the quickly losing focus window saying "unknown signature >>> format". I can switch to this window by moving The Bat's main window >>> aside. An

Re: Again IMAP Support (was: The Bat! 4.2 release)

2009-06-09 Thread Rick
> On Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 7:13:48 PM, Rick wrote: >>> Maybe its time to call this thread to an end. >> Ya THNK? Why don't we all go over to the table, have cake and ice >> cream and enjoy the rest of the evening :) > I think the cake and ice cream is a good idea. I'm going to watch the > Stan

Re: Again IMAP Support (was: The Bat! 4.2 release)

2009-06-09 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 7:13:48 PM, Rick wrote: >> Maybe its time to call this thread to an end. > Ya THNK? Why don't we all go over to the table, have cake and ice > cream and enjoy the rest of the evening :) I think the cake and ice cream is a good idea. I'm going to watch the Stanley Cup

Re: Again IMAP Support (was: The Bat! 4.2 release)

2009-06-09 Thread Rick
> Hello Arjan, > Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 6:19:48 PM, you wrote: >> Believe me. I've been on TBUDL and TBBETA since version 1.4x and it >> has always been like this (and I guarantee you it will always be >> like this). Nothing surprises me anymore.Each new Ritlabs blunder >> just fills me with mild

Re: Again IMAP Support (was: The Bat! 4.2 release)

2009-06-09 Thread Ethan J Mings
Hello Arjan, Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 6:19:48 PM, you wrote: > Believe me. I've been on TBUDL and TBBETA since version 1.4x and it > has always been like this (and I guarantee you it will always be > like this). Nothing surprises me anymore.Each new Ritlabs blunder > just fills me with mild amuseme

Re: Again IMAP Support (was: The Bat! 4.2 release)

2009-06-09 Thread Arjan de Groot
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 19:16:34 -0400, Gleason Pace wrote: >One thing that could be done is that the rest of us "Us" is a rapidly shrinking minority on these lists. >could agree that there is no sense communicating with >people who have nothing but vituperation to contribute. Suit yourself. Messa

Re: Again IMAP Support (was: The Bat! 4.2 release)

2009-06-09 Thread Gleason Pace
Arjan, > Believe me. I've been on TBUDL and TBBETA since version 1.4x and it > has always been like this (and I guarantee you it will always be > like this). Nothing surprises me anymore.Each new Ritlabs blunder > just fills me with mild amusement. Otherwise I couldn't care less. One thing that

Re: Again IMAP Support (was: The Bat! 4.2 release)

2009-06-09 Thread Arjan de Groot
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:34:26 -0400, Gleason Pace wrote: >Certainly those hopefuls are having too much fun to >allow themselves to be run off. In a way it is funny indeed, because everything is so predictable. Release 4.1 was an unpleasant surprise for many users, because they were, suddenly &

Re: TheBat 4.2.4 Final: Crashes with on-the.fly encryption

2009-06-09 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo GwenDragon, On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:04:00 +0200GMT (9-6-2009, 11:04 +0200, where I live), you wrote: G> If TheBat 4.2.4 Pro is started (fresh installation with no accounts) G> and on-the-fly encryption is activated, TheBat crashes after entering G> the masterpassword twice. Confirmed! G> Ca

Re: The Bat Icon and Windows 7

2009-06-09 Thread Marek Szymanski
Hello, > Hello. > The Bat! v4.2 still does not have a proper moving icon for > Windows 7. > It is becoming frustrating as I have to manually check if I have new mail. > Screenshot attached. (You can see The Bat's icon is not moving, even > though there was new mail in my Inbox.) > Wi

Re: Again IMAP Support (was: The Bat! 4.2 release)

2009-06-09 Thread Gleason Pace
Dwight, > On Monday, June 8, 2009, 5:44:30 PM, Marek Mikus wrote: > >> I hope, this is enough now to stop imap-related discussion until anything >> related to IMAP will be announced. > > > I would say just the opposite, that an IMAP announcement might stop > the imap related discussion

Re: Again IMAP Support (was: The Bat! 4.2 release)

2009-06-09 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Monday, June 8, 2009, 5:44:30 PM, Marek Mikus wrote: > I hope, this is enough now to stop imap-related discussion until anything > related to IMAP will be announced. I would say just the opposite, that an IMAP announcement might stop the imap related discussion by either raising hopes

Re: The Bat Icon and Windows 7

2009-06-09 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Scott, Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 4:47:08 AM, you wrote: SS> The Bat! v4.2 still does not have a proper moving icon for SS> Windows 7. I thought I had read a reply from one of the RitLabs guys that it probably would not be possible to implement this in Windows 7?? SS> It is becoming f

Re: The Bat Icon and Windows 7

2009-06-09 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Tuesday, June 9, 2009, 4:47:08, Scott Sims wrote: > The Bat! v4.2 still does not have a proper moving icon for > Windows 7. I can't confirm, but I'm not using the Aero theme, which may be the reason for the difference. -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ > [ T

TheBat 4.2.4 Final: Crashes with on-the.fly encryption

2009-06-09 Thread GwenDragon
Hello, If TheBat 4.2.4 Pro is started (fresh installation with no accounts) and on-the-fly encryption is activated, TheBat crashes after entering the masterpassword twice. Can you confirm this? If yes, please confirm in bugtracker at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7620, too. -- Kind reg

Lack of Clear Communication (was: Again IMAP Support)

2009-06-09 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: »Marck D Pearlstone« · 2009-06-09 · 01:08 h (CET)] Moin, Marck! > pardon accepted, but we in TBBETA are not only customers. Oh, come on, Marek! If we are primarily *not* customers, what do you think we are? >>> read carefully what I wrote. You are customer, but not only

Re: Again IMAP Support (was: The Bat! 4.2 release)

2009-06-09 Thread Sebastian Murawski
Hello TheBat Beta List Members!!! Someday, and that was in Tuesday night, Marek wrote something like this: Pardon me, but the customer – in this case it is *us* – does not care about *internal* plans behind closed doors. The customer wants to rely on official statements from RITL