Re: %SETHEADER etc. macros

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun 27-Jul-03 4:08pm -0400, Allie Martin wrote: > Bill Mccarthy, [BM] wrote: >>> Just a little addition: providing an easy way to forge >>> X-Mailer/Received headers would immediately classify The Bat! as >>> spamware. BM>> This just sounds like

Re: %SETHEADER etc. macros

Hello Greg, On Sunday, July 27, 2003 at 10:23 GMT -0500, Greg Strong [GS] pressed random keys until the following was produced: GS> Download --> Filter --> Template --> Inbox GS> Januk: GS> New Mail (or QT) --> Template --> Outbox --> Sent Mail GS> If my understanding is correct, then I feel t

Re: %SETHEADER etc. macros

Hello Bill, On Sunday, July 27, 2003 at 15:39 GMT -0400, engineers were awed when Bill Mccarthy [BM] constructed: BM> First of all, you are only addressing pre-Inbox (not pre-Outbox) BM> filtering. Very true, which is why I said it might not be elegant enough. BM> Secondly, this approach, AFAIK

Re: Running own mailserver (was: Re: %SETHEADER etc. macros)

Hello Allie, GS>> I have to many Pop accounts. Once they are set up in TB it isn't GS>> much of a problem, but still to many. I'd like to check into your GS>> configuration, but it would require a change in my ISP. > Why? I believe the TOS expressly states use of enterprise solutions. ISPs in th

Running own mailserver (was: Re: %SETHEADER etc. macros)

Greg Strong, [GS] wrote: I'm cc'ing this response to TBOT so we can continue there. GS> Ok my error. I should have simply stated you need a ISP whose GS> internet gateway will provide the ability for having a mailserver. I GS> should probably check into such an account due to my interest here. I

Re: %SETHEADER etc. macros

Hello Allie, > You don't need a 'business' account to use your own mailserver. I've > never had a business account and my only regret is that I took so long > to start using my own mailserver. It was actually saving me money in > the early stages of using one since it avoided my having to pay for

Re: %SETHEADER etc. macros

Greg Strong, [GS] wrote: GS> There are other things to consider such as available ISPs, their GS> TOS, your individual purpose for email, and costs. If you use email GS> professionally, then you may want a business account that provides GS> the ability to have your own mailserver. You don't need

Re: %SETHEADER etc. macros

Hello Allie, > I do think that this falls out of the scope of a simple MUA. This sort > of processing should be done by the MTA, nuh? It would seem that with > a good mailserver you should be happy. :) It would do all you want, > i.e.,. MDaemon is certainly capable of all that. There are other th

Re: %SETHEADER etc. macros

Bill Mccarthy, [BM] wrote: BM> X-Ray is a fine tool but is a bit buggy. I regularly run into it BM> hanging on output filtering when I send longer emails or emails with BM> attachments. I've noted this as well. However, if you use X-Ray with a local mailserver, negotiations are rapid and the prob

Re: %SETHEADER etc. macros

Bill Mccarthy, [BM] wrote: >> Just a little addition: providing an easy way to forge >> X-Mailer/Received headers would immediately classify The Bat! as >> spamware. BM> This just sounds like paranoia. BM> For sending mail, there are more than enough net tools available to BM> spammers the provi

Re: %SETHEADER etc. macros

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun 27-Jul-03 11:35am -0400, Jan Rifkinson wrote: > At 12:33 AM on Sunday, July 27, 2003 it seems you posted the > following to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in regards to > %SETHEADER etc. macros: >> How about an option to not show any

Re: %SETHEADER etc. macros

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun 27-Jul-03 12:12am -0400, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: JA>> It seems to me that RITLabs has just saved themselves a world of pain JA>> for now. > You've just saved me from a lot of typing. Thank you! ;-) > That was exactly what I was going to say.

Re: %SETHEADER etc. macros

Hi MaXxX, On Saturday, July 26, 2003 at 10:44:43 [GMT +0200], you wrote: > How do they work? I cannot make them work for me... > %SETHEADER("field","value") > %ADDHEADER("field","value") > no action at all... What am I doing wrong? The header fields you try to change have to be set as "Allow to

Re: %SETHEADER etc. macros

B-stok/PL, Saturday, July 26, 2003 Hello MaXxX, On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, at 10:44:43 (which was 10:44 where I live) in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: M> no action at all... What am I doing wrong? You have to add it to the list in "Messages" -> "Message headers" in

%SETHEADER etc. macros

Hi! How do they work? I cannot make them work for me... %SETHEADER("field","value") %ADDHEADER("field","value") no action at all... What am I doing wrong? -- |\ /| \~~~/ \~~~/ WWW: http://none :( | \/ | /\ > < \~/ >