Hello Richard,
By the way, hope your hand is better now.
Yes, it's getting better. The cast was removed last Monday and, although
I still have another 4-5 weeks to go before they declare me apt for
combat, I should be able to start typing again with both hands soon.
Thanks :)
--
Best
Hello Steven,
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SPV The other three weeks I'm out of town and would love to use
SPV something like Voyager if it could contain a complete copy of what
SPV was in TB when I left, and then update TB to what's in Voyager when
SPV I return.
Just
Hello Richard,
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 11:24:07 +0200 GMT (20/10/2006, 16:24 +0700 GMT),
Richard Wakeford wrote:
SPV The other three weeks I'm out of town and would love to use
SPV something like Voyager if it could contain a complete copy of what
SPV was in TB when I left, and then update TB to
Hello Thomas,
Or: When using Voyager, BCC to yourself, and leave the messages on the
server. When you get back home, just download the messages as usual.
Nothing personal to you or anyone but, don't you guys think this thread
belong in TBUDL and not in TBBeta?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A.
Hello MAU,
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M Nothing personal to you or anyone but, don't you guys think this thread
M belong in TBUDL and not in TBBeta?
That's a debatable one as Maxim asked folks to test 3.86.03 only 3 days
ago!
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.86.03
Hello Thomas,
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TF When using Voyager, BCC to yourself, and leave the messages on the
TF server. When you get back home, just download the messages as usual.
That's my preferred method. I do the same with TB! because it saves on
writing sent
Hello Richard,
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:33:38 +0200 GMT (20/10/2006, 23:33 +0700 GMT),
Richard Wakeford wrote:
TF When using Voyager, BCC to yourself, and leave the messages on the
TF server. When you get back home, just download the messages as usual.
RW That's my preferred method. I do the same
Hello Thomas,
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TF That's the case here too. But a wish is in the list:
Missed that one so have now added my support.
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.86.03 ALPHA (beta) with POP3 account AntispamSniper 1.7.0.0
| Windows XP (build 2600)
Thomas,
Friday, October 20, 2006, 11:20:15 AM, you wrote:
RW Do the reverse when you get home.
TF Or: When using Voyager, BCC to yourself, and leave the
TF messages on the server. When you get back home, just
TF download the messages as usual.
That's often three to four hundred messages PER
Hello Steven,
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SPV especially since most are SPAM.
Try AntispamSniper. It deletes spam on the server and has a very high
accuracy rate for me. It also is designed to run with both TB! and
voyager.
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.86.03
Hi Thomas,
on Fri, 20 Oct 2006 23:47:48 +0700GMT, you wrote:
TF ... a wish is in the list:
TF https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0003319
This wish has somehow escaped my attention. Thanks for the reminder.
It belongs in the same category as
Hello Richard,
M Nothing personal to you or anyone but, don't you guys think this thread
M belong in TBUDL and not in TBBeta?
That's a debatable one as Maxim asked folks to test 3.86.03 only 3 days
ago!
Everything is debatable my friend, even if beer is good or not ;)
But the message
Hello MAU,
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M But the message starting this thread was sent some 7 hours before Maxim
M asked to test Voyayer 3.86.03 and provided a link to it. And the
M 'Activation limit' being discussed does not refer to something
M introduced or changed
Hello Richard,
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:01:53 +0200 GMT (21/10/2006, 00:01 +0700 GMT),
Richard Wakeford wrote:
TF That's the case here too. But a wish is in the list:
RW Missed that one so have now added my support.
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
ROBOTRON: Unsere Mikroelektronik ist die
Hello Thomas,
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:12:35 +0700 GMT (18/10/2006, 08:12 +0700 GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
So do I - but in those situations (Internet cafe) it's often the
only solution, simply because you are not allowed to run any
program file.
That would be pretty boring. Sitting in an
Vili,
Monday, October 16, 2006, 1:43:55 PM, you wrote:
I agree, I myself wasn't aware of this limitation until
it came up in this thread.
V I agree with Krzysztof also. Online users should be warned
V PRIOR the sale.
That only sounds fair, or at a minimum something in the
install procedure
On 06-10-17 (17:46), you wrote:
I think that is enough.
IMVHO it is not enough.
b. RITs sould provide some explicit and user-friendy procedure of
extending limitation in question.
I can't see why one should need mor than 5 activations.
You should talk with customers who need it.
Hi Krzysztof!
a. users of Voyager should be warned about the limitation before they
download software;
Ah, I got informed that I have 4 of my 5 activations left, when I
installed my Voyager. I think that is enough.
b. RITs sould provide some explicit and user-friendy procedure
Hello Peter,
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:19:06 +0200 GMT (17/10/2006, 14:19 +0700 GMT),
Peter Hampf wrote:
PH nothing to say against your arguments. For sure.
Thanks. As I know you know a lot about computers, this is an
appreciated compliment.
TF In what situations and on whose computers to you use
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:47:53 +0200, Peter Hampf wrote:
My back-up is the webmail, which I hate.
So do I - but in those situations (Internet cafe) it's often the
only solution, simply because you are not allowed to run any
program file.
That would be pretty boring. Sitting in an Internet Cafe,
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:01:30 +0200, Peter Hampf wrote:
Anyway, for what it's worth: Forte Agent is the perfect
portable solution for mailing in an Internet Cafe.
Have you ever tried it in cafes with the above mentioned
restrictions? Good luck!
That's one of the two reasons why I wrote: for
Hello Arjan,
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:42:00 +0200 GMT (18/10/2006, 01:42 +0700 GMT),
Arjan de Groot wrote:
So do I - but in those situations (Internet cafe) it's often the
only solution, simply because you are not allowed to run any
program file.
That would be pretty boring. Sitting in an
Hello Krzysztof,
That means that the same key was used to activate Voyager 5(?)
Yes.
times... It can be an _indication_ of software piracy.
I know It's probably reason to make this limitation.
Contact Ritlabs and explain the situation asking to extend the
activation number...
Hmmm
On 2006-10-15 (19:57), you wrote:
What is uncomfortable in it?
Necessity to make a plenty of manual intervetions - first: user must send
a message with description, next RITs must evaluate this, next RITs must
reset 'counter' per user to offer next activation. More: RITs must have
Hello Krzysztof,
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:38:48 +0200 GMT (16/10/2006, 22:38 +0700 GMT),
Krzysztof Kudlacik wrote:
What is uncomfortable in it?
KK Necessity to make a plenty of manual intervetions - first: user must send
[...]
I think I'm with Vili on this one. A limitation makes sense.
Hello Krzysztof,
What is uncomfortable in it?
Necessity to make a plenty of manual intervetions - first: user must
send a message with description, next RITs must evaluate this, next
RITs must reset 'counter' per user to offer next activation. More:
RITs must have very detailed
Hello Thomas,
What is uncomfortable in it?
KK Necessity to make a plenty of manual intervetions - first: user must send
[...]
I think I'm with Vili on this one. A limitation makes sense. The
question is whether 5 is enough. A registered user of TB Pro can use
Voyager on five USB sticks.
Hello Vili,
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:43:26 -0400 GMT (16/10/2006, 23:43 +0700 GMT),
Vili wrote:
V If it adds something to the statistics: no Hungarian user ever
V reported to me that they used up the 5 licenses... Not even small
V companies with 1-user license purchased...
That's
On 2006-10-16 (17:51), you wrote:
A limitation makes sense.
No doubt, it makes sens. I don't deny it. I only suggest two ponits:
a. users of Voyager should be warned about the limitation before they
download software;
b. RITs sould provide some explicit and user-friendy procedure
Hello Krzysztof,
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:23:10 +0200 GMT (17/10/2006, 00:23 +0700 GMT),
Krzysztof Kudlacik wrote:
A limitation makes sense.
KK No doubt, it makes sens. I don't deny it. I only suggest two ponits:
KK a. users of Voyager should be warned about the limitation before they
KK
Hello Thomas,
A limitation makes sense.
KK No doubt, it makes sens. I don't deny it. I only suggest two ponits:
KK a. users of Voyager should be warned about the limitation before they
KK download software;
I agree, I myself wasn't aware of this limitation until it came up in
this
Hi Peter,
on Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:03:29 +0200GMT, you wrote:
PH This is not a solution for Ritlabs, but a solution for the user:
PH I use Voyager on a virtual drive. Software that provides encrypted virtual
PH discs are for example Ritlabs Thebat Private Disk or Truecrypt.
PH Now I'm going to
Hi Peter,
on Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:03:47 +0200GMT, you wrote:
PM AFAIK, Voyager depends on the volume-ID of the particular drive. If it's
PM different from the previous one, a new activation is required.
PH Correct. But the VolId does not change when mounting the virtual disc, no
PH matter which
Hello Peter,
V You have used up your 5 chances. It is also uncomfortable for Ritlabs.
V But if you know a better way to handle users who activates Voyager
V more than 5 times, please explain that. I dont...
This is not a solution for Ritlabs, but a solution for the user:
I use Voyager on
Hello Vili,
Monday, October 16, 2006, 1:22:23 PM, you wrote:
I dont get it... If it is a virtual drive, a software must be
installed on the host PC, right? But then you have to carry/install
the VD software into all PCs you are using, and install prior
Voyager... right?
Portable Freeware
Hello Peter,
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:39:38 +0200 GMT (17/10/2006, 04:39 +0700 GMT),
Peter Hampf wrote:
PH You can carry the VD software on the USB stick as well as the image. You
PH call it from there and mount the virtual drive. That's it.
PH The only drawback is that you usually need admin
'Activation Limit Exceeded' error during activation of Voyager... How to
deal with this situation?
Best regards, Krzysztof Kudłacik
--
pb _, )\__/( ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat! |
/'.;`-.`{..}',-';.`\ http://thebat.pl |
/'.'; `-,`--',-' ;`.`\ The
Hello Krzysztof,
'Activation Limit Exceeded' error during activation of Voyager... How to
deal with this situation?
That means that the same key was used to activate Voyager 5(?)
times... It can be an _indication_ of software piracy. Contact Ritlabs
and explain the situation asking
On 2006-10-15 (16:47), you wrote:
That means that the same key was used to activate Voyager 5(?)
Yes.
times... It can be an _indication_ of software piracy.
I know It's probably reason to make this limitation.
Contact Ritlabs and explain the situation asking to extend the
Hello Ian A. White everyone else,
on 15-Okt-2006 at 23:04 you (Ian A. White) wrote:
When was activation introduced?
IIRC it was part of the Voyager installation right from the start,
because Voyager doesn't write to the registry of the local machine (or
at least it shouldn't:-) it cannot
40 matches
Mail list logo
