Sunday, June 06, 2004 at 6:56 PM Pacific
Hello TBUDL,
I have the box "Leave messages on server" in all of my accounts but
some are getting deleted anyway. Has anyone else had this problem? I
am using Windows 98SE.
--
Wayne
Current version is 2.1
Hello Wayne,
Monday, June 7, 2004, 3:59:46 AM, you wrote:
WB> I have the box "Leave messages on server" in all of my accounts but
WB> some are getting deleted anyway. Has anyone else had this problem? I
WB> am using Windows 98SE.
Do you have a 'Selective download' filter? 'Selective download'
fi
Sunday, June 06, 2004 at 10:54 PM Pacific
Hello Cyrille, This is a reply to your message dated
Sunday, June 06, 2004 at 10:23 PM, when you wrote:
WB>> I have the box "Leave messages on server" in all of my accounts but
WB>> some are getting deleted anyway. Has anyone else had this problem? I
WB>>
If I set The Bat to leave files on the server, it will continue to
download *all* the files left on the server over and over. It doesn't
take long to end up with a gazillion dupes.
Anybody know a cure?
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" info
Hey Craftsman,
My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.61)' was used
to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Sunday, December 15, 2002 at 2:53:04 PM.
C> If I set The Bat to leave files on the server, it will continue to
C> download *all* the files left on the server over and over. It
C> doesn
Hello Craftsman,
On Sunday, December 15, 2002, 14:53:04 -0500 GMT (which was 20:53
local time), Craftsman wrote:
C> If I set The Bat to leave files on the server, it will continue to
C> download *all* the files left on the server over and over. It doesn't
C> take long to end up with a gazillion
Hello Andre Wichartz,
on 2002-12-15 at 21:31 CET you wrote:
AW> Hello Craftsman,
AW> On Sunday, December 15, 2002, 14:53:04 -0500 GMT (which was 20:53
AW> local time), Craftsman wrote:
C>> If I set The Bat to leave files on the server, it will continue to
C>> download *all* the files left on th
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Craftsman [C] wrote:'
C> If I set The Bat to leave files on the server, it will continue
C> to download *all* the files left on the server over and over. It
C> doesn't take long to end up with a gazillion dupes.
That's likely a server configuration p
Hello Craftsman,
C> If I set The Bat to leave files on the server, it will
C> continue to download *all* the files left on the server
C> over and over. It doesn't take long to end up with a
C> gazillion dupes.
I had the same problem, but only when I switched to 1.62;
I now leave all messages on t
Hi Allie,
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:29:21 -0500
"Allie C Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If I set The Bat to leave files on the server, it will continue
>> to download *all* the files left on the server over and over. It
>> doesn't take long to end up with a gazillion dupes.
> That's likely a
Dear Peter,
On 11:03 16.12.2002, you [Peter Palmreuther
([EMAIL PROTECTED])] wrote...
> The trouble the OP might "be run into" will likely be: the POP3-server
> does not generate the same UID for the same message every time.
> This is a known, but not wide spread problem which can only be fixed o
Hi Johannes,
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:05:34 +0100
Johannes Posel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The trouble the OP might "be run into" will likely be: the
>> POP3-server does not generate the same UID for the same message
>> every time. This is a known, but not wide spread problem which can
>> only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, December 16, 2002, Peter Palmreuther wrote...
> The trouble the OP might "be run into" will likely be: the
> POP3-server does not generate the same UID for the same message
> every time. This is a known, but not wide spread problem which ca
Dear Craftsman,
On 00:53 20.12.2002, you [Craftsman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])] wrote...
> server, though a client should be able to "handle" identical copies
> with the same unique-id [oxymoron there, huh?].
There's always the message ID left, which will be a same unique ID if
you're accesing the same
Hello Johannes,
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:25:25 +0100 GMT (20/12/02, 07:25 +0700 GMT),
Johannes Posel wrote:
>> server, though a client should be able to "handle" identical copies
>> with the same unique-id [oxymoron there, huh?].
> There's always the message ID left, which will be a same unique ID
Dear Thomas,
On 04:39 20.12.2002, you [Thomas Fernandez ([EMAIL PROTECTED])]
wrote...
> What is the UID for anyway, since the MID is already unique?
The MID is only in the headers of the message. The client would have
to issue TOP for each message in order to see wheter it already has
that messa
Hello Johannes,
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:19:34 +0100 GMT (20/12/02, 16:19 +0700 GMT),
Johannes Posel wrote:
> The MID is only in the headers of the message. The client would have
> to issue TOP for each message in order to see wheter it already has
> that message. Server ssupporting UIDL can give y
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 19:51:57 +0700
Thomas Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The MID is only in the headers of the message. The client would have
>> to issue TOP for each message in order to see wheter it already has
>> that message. Server ssupporting UIDL can give you such a lis
Hello Johannes,
Monday, December 16, 2002, 6:05:34 AM, you wrote:
JP> Dear Peter,
JP> On 11:03 16.12.2002, you [Peter Palmreuther
JP> ([EMAIL PROTECTED])] wrote...
>> The trouble the OP might "be run into" will likely be: the POP3-server
>> does not generate the same UID for the same message ev
Hello Jonathan,
Thursday, December 19, 2002, 5:42:36 PM, you wrote:
JA> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
JA> Hash: SHA1
JA> On Monday, December 16, 2002, Peter Palmreuther wrote...
>> The trouble the OP might "be run into" will likely be: the
>> POP3-server does not generate the same UID for
Hello, Batmen and women,
One option I use frequently in Datula and EdMax is to leave
certain messages on the server without downloading them, so I can
download them from a different location later.
For example, I don't want to read all the messages for the Datula
and EdMax lists while I'm
Hello Doc,
On Sunday, January 30, 2000 at 09:41:39 GMT +0900 (which was 4:41 PM where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
> Hello, Batmen and women,
> I'd like to do the same thing in The Bat!, but this feature appears
> to be missing. Is it? (I know I can do it with the dispatcher,
> but I
Januk Aggarwal wrote...
>The Bat downloads the messages first, then it applies the appropriate
>filter sets, so what you request can't be done exactly the way you
>describe. But there is a work around that might do what you need.
I already have separate folders for messages from the developer a
Hi Januk,
On 31 January 2000 at 16:53:50 GMT -0800 (which was 00:53 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
>> I'd like to do the same thing in The Bat!, but this feature
>> appears to be missing. Is it? (I know I can do it with the
>> dispatcher, but I w
Hello Doc,
On Sunday, January 30, 2000 at 11:02:47 GMT +0900 (which was 6:02 PM where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
> Januk Aggarwal wrote...
>>The Bat downloads the messages first, then it applies the appropriate
>>filter sets, so what you request can't be done exactly the way you
>>de
25 matches
Mail list logo
