ted in the future at series opening?
Yes.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
ave solid empirical evidence that this is indeed
too hard for many testers in practice.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
sbuild and
pbuilder first.
Somebody in ~techboard would need to make the actual change, if you
think it's appropriate. For example, the following in "lp-shell
production devel" would do it for all supported Ubuntu series:
for name in ("bionic", "focal", "h
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 05:35:42PM -, Ubuntu Package Archive Administrators
wrote:
> The membership status of Ubuntu Technical Board (techboard) in the team
> Ubuntu Package Archive Administrators (ubuntu-archive) was changed by
> Colin Watson (cjwatson) from Administrator to De
sort of thing:
https://help.launchpad.net/API/launchpadlib
Regards,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
acklist it then in order to quieten auto-sync, but you don't need to
do that preemptively.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
mmediate problems while leaving future timebombs around
(which might relate to patching grub-install).
That's a rough idea of what I plan to look at here. As you can see it's
extensive and will require a good deal of continuous concentration; I
expect to have to carve out at least thr
e grub2 packaging, is not a good starting point for a
conversation.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
anation, and I think that practice should generally be
deprecated.
You seem to have escalated to the Technical Board rather rapidly without
first trying to find common ground on the bug report, so I infer (I may
be wrong) that perhaps there is some history of disagreement between you
ind of seems to me that this should work out on
its own.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
arker
> Marianna Raffaele
> Martin Mrazik
> Paul McKenney
> Zach Pfeffer
> Will Cooke
Also:
Hugh Blemings (was here due to being temporary Foundations manager)
Michael Hope (Linaro)
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
ere's been no history at all.
Are you sure?
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+publishinghistory suggests
otherwise. I think perhaps there was something wrong with the script
used to generate this.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
e felt that our barrier to
entry could use a little bit of adjusting downwards for a while now, and
this seems like a sensible step. All of the concerns I can think of
have already been brought up in this thread and addressed.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
erved more than four years, including helping with some pretty
major changes in our governance (for instance, when I started the
Developer Membership Board didn't exist and none of the package set
infrastructure was in place), and it's about time to let somebody else
have a
after moderator review. AIUI, moderators have also
> whitelisted some non-developers after a good experience of valuable
> contribution. I don't think that should change.
Yep. We do continue to reject posts that are unsuitable or more
suitable elsewhere, too.
--
Colin Watson
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 04:27:20PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Colin Watson [2013-05-27 15:22 +0100]:
> > It's a UK bank holiday today, so I won't be around this evening.
> >
> > I believe it's a US public holiday too; should we defer the meeting?
>
>
It's a UK bank holiday today, so I won't be around this evening.
I believe it's a US public holiday too; should we defer the meeting?
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.u
the moment in conjunction
with vUDS coming up, so another evening meeting is rather too much for
me right now.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
c case, at least one squid upstream developer has
explicitly stated fairly recently that it's a violation to distribute
squid linked against OpenSSL, so I have an extremely hard time seeing
how we could possibly start doing so without a similarly explicit
statement of permission, regardless of an
es. (The builds in question appear to have
been dealt with by now.)
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
question" interface on Launchpad
instead, and that's monitored by people who can do something about this
kind of problem:
https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board
appears to be "pat-mcgowan" instead
> Bill Filler: bfiller
> Michael Frey: mfrey
> Zoltan Balogh: bzoltan
Done.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
compilation
sbuild will normally kill the build after 150 minutes of no output. I'm
not sure why that didn't happen here; without the +build URL for the
individual build in question it's hard to be sure.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
t
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 03:16:29PM -, dino99 wrote:
> grub2 compile endlessly since 12 hours now, without that process been
> killed to let other packages compiling
I don't know what happened here, but it seems to have been sorted out by
now as actinium is building something else.
rs to cancel this.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
g-chair
duties. Matt, do you have time for this, or do you need somebody else
to sort it out?
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
ebian plus our own
obviously-platformish additions as the "platform" here. While this
doesn't reduce our current load, it means that we aren't faced with
trying to tag versions of some undefined number of future apps developed
with the Ubuntu phone/tablet
cking any references during a meeting is likely to be
unconscionably painful.
I will check the IRC logs afterwards to see if anything interesting
happened ...
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubunt
My understanding is that "formally responsible" in Martin's minutes
should be read as something like "responsible but only for form's sake".
A better phrasing would be to say something along the lines of
indicating that the Foundations team has agreed to support the flavour
until such time as they can fend for themselves. Would you be OK with
that?
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
ives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2013-February/001012.html
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 09:48:53PM +0100, Soren Hansen wrote:
> I've contracted some variant of FOSDEM flu, so I'm going to skip the
> meeting today and try to get some rest instead. Sorry about the short
> notice.
Thanks for the note. Get well soon
his.
> In order for us to ensure that MAAS provides a great user experience, and a
> critical bug free software, it is important that we SRU MAAS [3] to both
> Quantal and Precise. The SRU involves:
With Steve's amendments, I'm happy with this. I'd still welcome
comments from
aiting till they come online or poking webops so I can deal with
> > requests in a timely fashion.
>
> This seems fine to me. Can other buildd-admins speak up in support too?
This is fine by me too. In the absence of any other objections, I've
gone ahead
couldn't find any
brand new recruits ...
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 04:48:15PM +0200, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> On 07.01.2013 16:19, Colin Watson wrote:
> >I probably don't have much in the way of objection. However, the only
> >SRU for sssd that's ever made it as far as -proposed was for bug 585885,
> >which
885,
which failed the SRU process due to a lack of testers. Do you have
plans for marshalling efforts to verify SRUs under an MRE such as this?
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
?
I have no problem with sticking to 21:00 London time. If nothing else
it might render Google Calendar that little bit less confused. The
worst case is that we have a week or two of confusion per year when
North America and Europe change DST at different times.
--
I just got the calendar notification for tonight's meeting; I'm afraid
I'll be travelling and won't be able to make it. Sorry.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
http
on on, but let me know if you object.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:44:22AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> * Transferring the kernel package set
> * https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2012-August/001363.html
> * Launchpad API limitations mean that we cannot currently change the
> owner of the current ke
situation where
we do an -experimental update for Important Game Vendor A and find that
it breaks Important Game Vendor B's best-selling title from last month.
Would we need to arrange testing with all sufficiently important vendors
before releasing updates? (But then we have the problem
c. on
release upgrade in favour of nvidia-current etc.
* Think of some way in which we can make the package management system
consider nvidia-current-updates etc. as opt-in on every upgrade.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mai
> Membership Board team page
> > (https://launchpad.net/~developer-membership-board).
>
> Can you set our mailing list as our team e-mail address on LP, please?
Done. An admin of that list will need to fish the confirmation message
out of the moderat
at all three of these aren't managed packagesets at all, but
> > are packagesets generated from seeds.
>
> Quite likely. However, these were dropped from the seeds long ago, so
> if we delete them now they should not come back. Colin, would that be
> ok?
Correct. Dropping t
Administration Rights for ubuntu-sru: archive 'primary', pocket
'Updates' in precise
$ for pocket in release proposed; do edit-acl -p ubuntu-release -S quantal
--pocket $pocket -t admin add; done
Added:
Queue Administration Rights for ubuntu-release: archive 'primary', pocket
'Release' in quantal
Added:
Queue Administration Rights for ubuntu-release: archive 'primary', pocket
'Proposed' in quantal
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:24:07PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> My fix to https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/914779 (second time
> lucky) will hopefully be rolled out tomorrow, or failing that on Monday.
> Once that's in place, I would like to add the following upload
&g
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:37:46PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:24:07PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > My fix to https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/914779 (second time
> > lucky) will hopefully be rolled out tomorrow, or failing that on Monday.
(I may
heir pocket once the
software was ready for it, and now it is.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
RU team to have
discretion to do reasonable things, but still avoid setting an
expectation that we'll take any random thing blessed by some upstream.
And I do think that in the case of high-profile and complex things like
GNOME, and quite possibly LibreOffice, the right thing to do
unterproductive for us to have significant
barriers in the way of taking GNOME stable releases given their strong
history.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
n't try this out.
Do you intend to keep building dailies? I think you might suffer some
bitrot otherwise.
Do you think we could review how this has gone after T?
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
I'm on holiday today (and doing a somewhat bad job of it due to needing
to fix a Launchpad regression I introduced, but anyway), so won't be at
the meeting. Based on the agenda at the time of writing, it looks set
to be a fairly quiet one anyway.
--
Co
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 09:57:07AM -0500, Michael Hall wrote:
> Please add steve-edwards (https://launchpad.net/~steve-edwards) to
> ~uds-organizers team on Launchpad.
Done.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
tec
I just noticed the calendar invite for today's meeting. I'm on
paternity leave and won't be able to attend.
I expect I should be back for the next meeting.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
I'm afraid I don't think I'll be able to make tonight's meeting; we're
in last-minute baby preparation mode and I have some things to do that I
really need the evening time for! I'll try to catch up with logs
afterwards.
Sorry,
--
Colin Watson
distro_series=series, status="Published")
... source_names = sorted([pub.source_package_name for pub in pubs])
... for source_name in source_names:
... source = ubuntu.getSourcePackage(name=source_name)
... subs = source.getSubscriptions()
... print "
do
better to be clear about the exact properties we want from remixes
instead.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
that remixes are "not in fact
Ubuntu as distributed by the Ubuntu project", so there's no issue of
something that is Ubuntu including something that isn't, or any weird
semantics like that.
I think an approach like this could resolve the situation for this
particular remix without having to go down a particular line of argument
that obviously makes some Ubuntu contributors feel uncomfortable.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
ts against enabling
> the extensions, while Mark Shuttleworth's response[2] is for enabling
> them, and there doesn't appear to be a resolution of the two.
I'm still unconvinced personally, but I'll defer to Mark.
--
Colin Watson [cjwa
o core developers, and it still leaves archive admins
rubber-stamping the work done by backporters, often with a delay, rather
than just letting them do it themselves.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
ad implementation:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/914055
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
9:00 (soren no, cjwatson+pitti ifneedbe)
Thu 18:00 (soren no, cjwatson+pitti ifneedbe)
I therefore propose that we enact Mon 21:00 as our regular meeting time
until the next DST change.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mail
ly
enforced. However, given that it's referenced from the specifications,
and given Mesa upstream's reticence, we might have a hard time arguing
that we were unaware of it.
What practical functionality do we lose out on by not having these GL
extensions?
I am neither a lawyer nor an O
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 04:52:12PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 03:12:28PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I asked David Mandala if he could get in touch with Emmet. In the
> > meantime, it makes sense to me for Stefano to stand in temporarily, if
> > he&#
can contact Emmet to find out what his intentions
> are. I don't think we should remove Emmet without contacting him first.
I asked David Mandala if he could get in touch with Emmet. In the
meantime, it makes sense to me for Stefano to stand in temporarily, if
he's willing.
ies for my delay in organising this -
entirely my fault). If I hear from more people then I'll amend my post
to include their feedback.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://l
standing down.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 06:47:25PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le jeudi 08 septembre 2011 à 15:16 +0100, Colin Watson a écrit :
> > Once you've read the details below, please respond with an
> > acknowledgement and let me know if you can participate. The expected
>
; >
> > Please add Micah Gersten (micahg) to the DMB and remove Mackanzie Morgan
> > (maco.m).
>
> Congrats Micah!
>
> This should probably be announced on devel, no?
Yes, probably devel-announce actually. I think somebody on the DMB
should do that.
--
Colin Watson
an
> (maco.m).
Done. Congratulations Micah!
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
thers_with_Ubuntu
Regards,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:18:28PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Subject: Re: Help requested for Ubuntu Brainstorm response on TOPIC
I'm sorry, you can probably tell that this mail was written with the aid
of a template. :-) I've corrected the subject line now.
--
o submitted this topic to
Brainstorm to understand better. Here's how it went:
[...]
In the end, we both decided that the best course of action is X."
If you have any further questions about what is expected here, please
let me know.
Thank you in advance!
--
Colin Watson
27;s how it went:
[...]
In the end, we both decided that the best course of action is X."
If you have any further questions about what is expected here, please
let me know.
Thank you in advance!
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
pp. Ubuntu Technical Board
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
t:
[...]
In the end, we both decided that the best course of action is X."
If you have any further questions about what is expected here, please
let me know.
Thank you in advance!
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
pp. Ubuntu Technical Board
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
t:
[...]
In the end, we both decided that the best course of action is X."
If you have any further questions about what is expected here, please
let me know.
Thank you in advance!
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
pp. Ubuntu Technical Board
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
sted."
* "I didn't understand what the problem was here, so I had a
conversation on IRC with Jamie, who submitted this topic to
Brainstorm to understand better. Here's how it went:
[...]
In the end, we both decided that the best course of action is X."
I
expert Jill
about this, and here's what she suggested."
* "I didn't understand what the problem was here, so I had a
conversation on IRC with Jamie, who submitted this topic to
Brainstorm to understand better. Here's how it went:
[...]
In the end
ter. Here's how it went:
[...]
In the end, we both decided that the best course of action is X."
If you have any further questions about what is expected here, please
let me know.
Thank you in advance!
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
pp. Ubuntu Technical Board
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
t:
[...]
In the end, we both decided that the best course of action is X."
If you have any further questions about what is expected here, please
let me know.
Thank you in advance!
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
pp. Ubuntu Technical Board
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
t she suggested."
* "I didn't understand what the problem was here, so I had a
conversation on IRC with Jamie, who submitted this topic to
Brainstorm to understand better. Here's how it went:
[...]
In the end, we both decided that the best course of action is
...]
In the end, we both decided that the best course of action is X."
If you have any further questions about what is expected here, please
let me know.
Thank you in advance!
--
Colin Watson[cjwat...@canonical.com]
pp. Ubuntu Technical Board
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 09:16:34AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:36:13PM +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> > Colin and others gave me a heads-up on upcoming expirations of tech
> > board positions. Time has flown by! I think (Daniel will correct me)
> &g
dence by the developer
> community.
Agreed.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
egarding my AOB item from last meeting, this is now settled:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/08/msg00004.html
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.
u.com/idea/28045/
Suggested response type: Ensure bug filed; mentoring opportunity?
Suggested representative: Tim Penhey
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
es. The new packages are
> >
> > linux-linaro-lt-mx5 and linux-meta-linaro-lt-mx5
> >
> > These will be used by the ARM team to create an unofficial Ubuntu
> > release for the FSL i.MX53 based QuickStart board.
>
> Should be fine. @techboard
pload rights on? Thanks.
Done.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
be able to make it, due to an overlap with the
DebConf conference dinner. Sorry.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
mer and ~mbp any PPU permissions for these packages,
> and add them to the team.
Done. Please check that I got everything right.
> p.s. shouldn't the DMB be given the LP permissions required to manipulate
> package sets and PPU privileges? Shall I file a
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 06:46:11PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Some of my friends have been talking about the new European privacy
> legislation recently, which particularly affects web sites implementing
> cookies; but it occurred to me that it was probably general enough that
> i
t may well be possible to ask the Information Commissioner for guidance
on this, as I expect that it may turn on whether this kind of thing
counts as "information on the equipment of a user". Given that we're
subject to UK law and that this is a high-profile issue right now, it
seems t
d with the TB meeting.
Sorry,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
Martin just reminded me that there's a TB meeting today. Apologies
again: I will be preparing to go out to church (as it's Holy Thursday)
and won't be able to make it. I don't think I own any pending actions.
--
Colin Watson
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 05:20:02PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> I'm afraid I have to go out and won't be able to make today's TB
> meeting. Sorry for the late notice.
Oh, and re actions: I just picked seven people off the ~ubuntu-core-dev
list and sent them mail asking if th
I'm afraid I have to go out and won't be able to make today's TB
meeting. Sorry for the late notice.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/lis
ip so I wouldn't expect the
TB in general to have it, but maybe somebody else does.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
ting rather late by that point. However, it will definitely
be in Ubuntu 11.10.
-- Colin Watson (Ubuntu developer and upstream maintainer of man-db)
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
you are a expert for "man", it would be great if you could give a
> thorough analysis of the current status quo and investigate how the
> 'q' key and the available help in general could become more
> discoverable.
Acknowledged. There should be no problem with having
Hi,
Since Kate is the current Ubuntu release manager, I think it would make
sense for her to be an admin of ~ubuntu-release in Launchpad. Matt said
he felt this ought to be a TB delegation rather than him unilaterally
doing it. What do people think?
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
