[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/14/2005 5:36:34 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nice Isogesis
You glory in your "ignorance," and then use "isogesis." Just showin off ??
JD
There
In a message dated 2/14/2005 5:36:34 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nice Isogesis
You glory in your "ignorance," and then use "isogesis." Just showin off ??
JD
"likeness" of sinful flesh EQUALS sin dwelling in it?
Nice Isogesis
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Judy wrote:> Jesus when he walked this earth in a body> of flesh because His flesh did not have sin> dwelling in it.Yes it did.Romans 8:3-4(3) For what the law could not do, in that it was we
jt: I have nothing at all to "cover up" Bill. If
I am wrong and you show me where in scripture that is in balance and context I
will thank you for it. Terry has a unique way of expressing himself but if
I understand him correctly he is not saying that Jesus had a fallen Adamic sin
nature
Judy wrote:
> Jesus when he walked this earth in a body
> of flesh because His flesh did not have sin
> dwelling in it.
Yes it did.
Romans 8:3-4
(3) For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh,
God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin,
condem
nglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 7:33
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Nature of
Jesus (God's image)
Bill when you use the term "the nature of humanity"
you are using a theological term and I have no idea whether or
Bill when you use the term "the nature of humanity" you
are using a theological term and I have no idea whether or not you are saying
the same thing as I am. This is what I have been talking about all
along. You claim Jesus had a fallen Adamic nature just like us. Paul
describes how this
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005
7:46 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The
Nature of Jesus (God's image)
No problem with His human body
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Nature of
Jesus (God's image)
No problem with His human body Bill, it was then just
like ours is now but without the taint of sin - like Romans 7 would not have
applied to him as it does to us. Today he has a transformed body that
can walk through
No problem with His human body Bill, it was then just
like ours is now but without the taint of sin - like Romans 7 would not have
applied to him as it does to us. Today he has a transformed body that can
walk through walls. judyt
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 06:19:52 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL P
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 6:01
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Nature of
Jesus (God's image)
Bill:It would appear that you have two who
disagree (Judy, Kevin) and, one 'what's the big deal' (Terry). Are you able to
'flesh out' (pun inte
005 6:01
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Nature of
Jesus (God's image)
Because Jesus did not have Adam for a father he did not recieve a
sin nature
Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:21:36 -0700 "Bill Tayl
about the nature of his human body, isn't it, Judy?
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 5:55
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Nature of
Jesus (G
ge -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 14, 2005 07:55
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Nature of
Jesus (God's image)
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:21:36 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL P
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:21:36 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
That's the wrong question, Kevin. We can discuss
the particulars of those natures if you like, but Judy's claim is that
Jesus did not have TWO natures. Do you agree with her?
Bill
jt: Kevin, I say he had a huma
15 matches
Mail list logo
