On 7/16/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks, i shall take a look at those links, actually I think I did already
just copy some of the code from that testcase you mention.
Maybe you could take a look at the HotUpdatableSCADomain [1], particularly
the initContributions method? All its
I've been looking at how to bring conversational semantics back to life [1]
(as has Ant who has been worrying about the same problem). It seems that, in
resurrecting conversational semantics, a good place to start is a bit of a
reorg of itest/conversations to:
- make the test names more consisten
On 7/18/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It will, just like when we commit code to SVN. I think its necessary if
we're to provide proper oversight of whats happening on our website, do
others agree?
...ant
On 7/18/07, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ant,
> will this get
On 7/18/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Assuming we have the following declaration: reference r1 is wired to
service
s1.
http://ns1#wsdl.interface(Service1)"
callbackInterface="http://ns1#wsdl.interface(Service1Callback)"/>
http://ns1#wsdl.in
CallableReference presents an interface for setting and getting conversation
information. When it comes time to dispatch a message the information is
required in the invoker handler. There is not direct relationship between
these two structures. The current mechanism of using the
ThreadMessageCont
Can anyone familiar with the conversation aspects of the spec tell me what
is the specified way to get a conversationId in a stateless service, i.e a
service which implements an @Conversational interface but is not annotated
with
@Scope("CONVERSATION").
1 Spec (1.2.5.1 of JavaComponentImplement
More comments in line
On 7/20/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tuscany-dev"
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 3:31 PM
Su
On 7/20/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/19/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can anyone familiar with the conversation aspects of the spec tell me
what
> is the specified way to get a conversationId in a stateless service, i.ea
> ser
On 7/20/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Folks,
It is clear from reading other sections of the specification that it is
intended that @ConversationID is used in implementation classes other
than those of CONVERSATION scope.
Further down in 1.2.51 of the JavaComponentImplementation s
On 7/20/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
It seems that we all agree the callback path should be treated as a
regular
interaction using the callback interface over the selected binding. Can we
then simplify the callback processing in Tuscany as follows?
1) Normalize the callbacks
I've been having a little trouble interpreting what is meant by stateful
callbacks as defined by the various SCA specifications (in particular the
assembly
spec and the Java Annotations and APIS spec section 1.6.7.2). Here is what I
think it means. This is my interpretation and I welcome any other
I've had to extend the o.a.t.s.scope.ScopeContianer interface (not part of
our declared SPI) to add a remove(contextid) method.
The existing remove() method that takes no parameters is at odds with the
other methods in this interface. The knock on effect of this is that I can
now call
this new met
Has anyone in Tuscany made a binding that ships SOAP messages over JMS
instead of HTTP? Looking at the current code base and at the old code in the
sandbox I don't see anything.
Simon
On 7/20/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
More comments in line
On 7/20/07, Raymond Feng < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please see my comments inline.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Simo
t;
> On 7/17/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1 for each subproject to have its own.. unless we want to consciously
> > tie in some commonality through this between the subprojects.
> >
> > - Venkat
> >
> > On 7/17/07, an
snip..
There's already lots of doc about doing releases in the ASF - on the ASF
main dev pages and within the Incubator site etc.
The problem with there being lots of docs is that there are, ahem, lots of
docs. Where is the definitive set of guides that provide the detail required
to release
On 7/24/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/24/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > Has anyone in Tuscany made a binding that ships SOAP messages over JMS
> > instead of HTTP? Looking at the current code base and at the o
On 7/24/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
> Has anyone in Tuscany made a binding that ships SOAP messages over JMS
> instead of HTTP? Looking at the current code base and at the old code in
> the
> sandbox I don't see anything.
>
> Simon
On 7/24/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
> On 7/24/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Simon Laws wrote:
>> > Has anyone in Tuscany made a binding that ships SOAP messages over
JMS
>> > instead of HTTP? Lo
To get the distributed domain support up to a level that is suitable for
including in the next release I think we need to make the node configuration
and management more dynamic.
Scenarios
--
The current scenario being used to test distributed support is the
calculator-distributed sam
CompositeActivatorImpl::createServiceWire() identifies the target operation
as follows
Operation targetOperation = interfaceContractMapper.map(
targetContract.getInterface(), operation);
This can return null in some circumstances, for example, of you try to
expose a non remoteable interface as a
> >In Encoded Style: 0
> > > Out Encoded Style: 0
> > >InputMsgURI:
> > > http://www.webserviceX.NET/
> > >InputMsgName: GetQuoteSo
On 7/24/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
> Ah, thanks Mike. I didn't latch onto the implication of the word intent.
> The choice we are talking about here seems more like a concrete decision
> than an intent. Does this match well with the, erm,
-- Forwarded message --
From: ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jul 26, 2007 9:59 AM
Subject: Re: Services and WSDL files
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/26/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/26/07, Radim Kolarik <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
On 7/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Author: antelder
> Date: Fri Jul 27 01:33:09 2007
> New Revision: 560142
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=560142
> Log:
> Set svn ignores
>
> Modified:
> incubator/tuscany/java/sca/samples/calculator-webapp-ws/ (pr
In the distributed domain contributions and any updates have to be
provisioned to each node. There are many ways of doing this, ftp, http,
shred file system , etc. to the extent that Tuscany shouldn't really care
too much about how it is achieved. I would expect that at any give time a
domain at a
On 7/27/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/24/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > To get the distributed domain support up to a level that is suitable for
> > including in the next release I think we need to make the
On 7/27/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > In the distributed domain contributions and any updates have to be
> > provisioned to each node. There are many ways of doing this, ftp, http,
> > shred file system , etc. to the extent
On 7/24/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To get the distributed domain support up to a level that is suitable for
> including in the next release I think we need to make the node configuration
> and management more dynamic.
>
> Scenarios
> --
&
On 7/28/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
> ant elder wrote:
> >> I think that these URIs should be determined as part of the process of
> >> combining wires and uris specified at different levels in the SCA
> >> assembly. If the correct URIs are determined once as pa
I've started a page on the wiki (which everyone in the community can edit)
to capture any terminology that we use for future inclusion in the
documentation. The assorted SCA specifications define plenty of terminology
and I'm not proposing that that is repeated here. It would be useful,
however, to
On 7/28/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/28/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> > ant elder wrote:
> > >> I think that these URIs should be determined as part of the process
> &g
On 7/28/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Great idea Simon, sometimes I get lost with some terminologies : (, this
> will help a lot : )
>
> Adriano Crestani
>
> On 7/28/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I've
On 7/27/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/27/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Simon Laws wrote:
> > > In the distributed domain contributions and any updates have to be
> > > provisioned to each
On 7/28/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Simon.
>
> I just think the terms should be alphabetically listed ; ). And they could
> be tagged with the subproject they are related to, when it's possible.
>
> Regards,
> Adriano Crestani
I want to get the distributed version of the SCA Binding up and running
again now the new wiring code is done and the SCA Binding is only created
when required. We need to create a mechanism to switch off/override the
local SCA binding when it's not appropriate and then choose the appropriate
distr
On 8/3/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ant elder wrote:
> > On 8/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> >>
> >>> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> >>>
> [snip]
>
>
> >> Another problem is all our bi
more comments inline
On 8/6/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Comments inline.
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > I want to get the distributed version of the SCA Binding up and running
> > again now the new wiring code is done and the SCA Bind
On 8/6/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > On 8/3/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> ant elder wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 8/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PRO
We talked about this before (
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg16784.html) but
didn't come to any conclusions. So,
1/ What is the requirement?
2/ What is the technical solution?
3/ When should we try and get it done?
To get things going again here are some thoughts drawn f
t; a) Make it obvious (for example, using util. as part of the package
> name)
> >> for extension developers to understand they are optional helper/utility
> >> classes which are not part of the contract
> >> b) Only expose the utility/helper classes if they are common and
>
The Continuum build has failed with the following (probably the same as
yesterday) but I did an update earlier today and, as far as I remember, It
all went OK. I'm in the middle of a change at the moment so my build is
failing for other reasons. Anyone else seeing this locally?
Simon
[INFO]
The following appear to be missing from etc/svn-props
DISCLAIMER = svn:eol-style=native;svn:mime-type=text/plain
*.composite = svn:mime-type=text/xml;svn:eol-style=native;svn:keywords=Rev
Date
Is there a good reason? If not I'll go add them
Simon
I've just checked in some changes to move the sca binding to a separate
module and I've messed up the bindng-ejb build in the process. Bear with me
for a little while while I sort it out.
apologies.
Simon
On 8/8/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've just checked in some changes to move the sca binding to a separate
> module and I've messed up the bindng-ejb build in the process. Bear with me
> for a little while while I sort it out.
>
> apologies.
>
On 8/6/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> more comments inline
>
> On 8/6/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Comments inline.
> >
> > Simon Laws wrote:
> > > I want to get the distributed version of t
On 8/8/07, shaoguang geng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, I run "calculator-distributed" from today's svn code, but found it
> doesn't work. Since it is very new to Tuscany, I would like asking the
> designer of "distributed runtime" if latest design is on the fly. Or it is
> expecting solution
On 8/8/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just observed that, not all bindings are extending from
> AbstractBinding though all implement the interface Binding. The
> AbstractBinding class provides an implementation for the Binding
> interface and in my opinion should be
On 8/8/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/7/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > We talked about this before (
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg16784.html) but
> > didn't come to any conclusions
On 8/8/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> > +1 to move some commonly useful parts to utils area. I have also
> > ended up copying some bits of code into processors in the policy-xml
> > module.
> >
> > - Ve
On 8/9/07, shaoguang geng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Today, I found in respond to each request, Tuscany instantiate new one
> class for each. I tried binding.ws, it works as well.
>
> SCA1.0 does not specify instance management of a component, but I remember
> J2EE does not mentioned such thing
On 8/8/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Kevin Williams wrote:
> > I am interested in extending the current locate service capability to
> > support the location of services that may be running within the same
> > domain but a separate jvm. The most straightforward approach
The binding-ejb one was a mistake
host-embedded/ReallySmallRuntimeBuilder creates a SCABindingProcessor
I'll go fix the first one and test against the latest code
Thanks
Simon
On 8/9/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what required these dependency changes:
>
On 8/8/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please update the following too
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/etc/set_svn_properties.sh
>
> On 8/7/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The following
On 8/9/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Comments inline.
>
> [snip]
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > Currently getServiceReference() expects a service name so we can rely
> > on the implication that all contributed composites are notionally
>
I've just noticed that if I have a contribution directory as follows
/my/contribution/dir/mycomposite.composite
And I pass the source URL /my/contribution/dir to the contribution service
it complains that it can't find /my/contribution/mycomposite.composite.
If I pass the source URL /my/contribut
On 8/9/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, i've been seeing this today as well, seemed to be fine earlier in the
> week.
>
>...ant
>
> On 8/9/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm seeing
> >java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect
> > errors when
I need some advice on the way the code is structures. In various places in
the code I need to get at some information that logically belongs to the sca
domain. For example,
CompositeWireBuilderImpl.connectComponentReferences()
Tries to resolve services. In the distributed case this resolution may
On 8/9/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > I need some advice on the way the code is structures. In various places
> in
> > the code I need to get at some information that logically belongs to the
&g
On 8/9/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/9/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >
> > Simon Laws wrote:
> > > I need some advice on the way the code is structures. In various
> > places in
> > &g
On 8/10/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Comments inline.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
> - Original Message -
> From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 3:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Accessing glo
On 8/9/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > The binding-ejb one was a mistake
> > host-embedded/ReallySmallRuntimeBuilder creates a SCABindingProcessor
> >
> > I'll go fix the first one and test against the latest
ote that in the test case, I'm calling
> getClass().getResource("/deployables"), and that gives me a url like :
> file://deployables, and that would pass the logic to correct
> identify a "folder".
>
> On 8/9/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
On 8/10/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > On 8/10/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> What happens if you change the example a little bit to:
> >>
> >>
On 8/10/07, Ole Ersoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I also tried looking for this manually:
>
> org.apache.tuscany.sca:tuscany-binding-sca-xml:jar:1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT
>
> Here's what I find in the repository under:
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/tuscany/s
Key: TUSCANY-1526
> >>URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1526
> >>Project: Tuscany
> >> Issue Type: Bug
> >> Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
> >>Environment: All
> >>
On 8/10/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think your current directory, during the execution of the code, will
> not be mapped to the root of you project, but probably to
> target/classes or target/test-classes. Could you check that please ?
>
> On 8/1
On 8/10/07, Brady Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does anyone know where I can download the SCA schema files referenced in
> the SCA_AssemblyModel_v100?
> Specifically:
>
> * sca-core.xsd
> * sca-binding-sca.xsd
> * sca-interface-wsdl.xsd
> * sca-implementation-compos
On 8/12/07, Ole Ersoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > i.e. sca/modules/binding-sca-xml
>
> Thanks for pointing this out Jean-Sebastien.
>
> OK - I tried building the module by itself. I'm running jdk 1.6, but that
> should be ok right? I get the following:
>
> [INFO] Compiling 2 source
On 8/9/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I guess early the following week still leaves time for an August release.
> It will be real tight though so we'll all need to be quick and thorough
> with
> our RC reviews as one problem once we get to the IPMC voting and it could
> easily slip it
gt; [INFO] Total time: 48 minutes 3 seconds
> [INFO] Finished at: Sun Aug 12 22:28:52 PDT 2007
> [INFO] Final Memory: 61M/63M
> [INFO]
> ----
>
>
> On 8/12/07, Ole Ersoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On 8/13/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The Assembly Model specs mentions the 'need' for definitions of metadata
> related to implementation and binding extensions types as follows:
>
>
> "2665 In addition to the definition for the new implementation instance
> element,
On 8/13/07, Ole Ersoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Luciano, Simon,
>
> I ran it like this:
>
> mvn -U -fn clean install
>
> And it runs fine (Some test errors, but build completes) with maven 2.0.5and
> java
> 1.5.12.
>
> Thanks for all the feedback
On 8/6/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/6/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Simon Laws wrote:
> > > On 8/3/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> an
Currently in CompositeWireBuilderImpl.connectComponentReference all targets
are converted to bindings on a reference and the targets are
removed. During this process the source and target bindings are compared
until matching wireable bindings are found.
Currently only the sca binding implements Wi
On 8/15/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I always get a "Java heap space" error during the build while the itests
> are
> running these days. Runs fine if i build from within the itests folder but
> building from the top sca folder always fails. Does anyone else ever see
> this? Anyone
On 8/15/07, Ville Kaseva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I can't access http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/ website since
> yesterday.
>
> I am looking for Tuscany SDO binary release for Windows. Is it
> available from somewhere else?
>
> Yours,
>
> Ville
>
> ---
On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Raymond Feng wrote:
> > Comments inline.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Raymond
> >
> > - Original Message - From: "Simon Laws"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ant elder wrote:
> > On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> >>
> >>> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> >>>
> [snip]
>
>
> >> Another problem is all our
On 8/14/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Raymond Feng wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We aggresively create the invocation chains for each runtime wire in
> > CompositeActivatorImpl. I'm changing the code to defer the creations
> > to a later point when they are used for the first t
On 8/15/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/15/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/15/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PRO
On 8/15/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > ant elder wrote:
> > > On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> >
On 8/14/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/11/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We put together a demo [1] on Tuscany/Geronimo integration for the
> > LinuxWorld 2007. You are welcome to play with it and give us feedback.
> >
> > Please follow
On 8/14/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Axis2 1.3 has just been released so how about moving up to that? There's a
> lot of improvements and bug fixes in it and as its the level we'll likely
> go
> 1.0 with i think it would be good to get it in sooner so we have time to
> find and fixe
On 8/14/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Comments inline.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "tuscany-dev"
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 12:37 AM
&
On 8/16/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The runtime currently prints the servlet mappings to System.out when it
> starts. In order to make that kind of information easier to use, I've
> started to put together a home page that people can point their Web
> browser to, listi
> Vamsi
>
>
> On 8/14/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/14/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 8/11/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi
While reviewing support for conversational services there were a few
outstanding issues (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1511). A
couple of these issues require a little clarification of the SCA
specifications. Can someone with their SCA spec hat on help out? Here are
the two primary
On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ant elder wrote:
> > On 8/10/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Simon Laws wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 8/8/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 8/15/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Raymond Feng wrote:
> > > Comments inline.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Raymond
> > &
Just doing a clean build so that I can publish module snapshots and I get
the following. Anyone any ideas?
Simon
java2wsdl\target\classes
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
--
On 8/16/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Are you using IBM JDK ? Looks like my latest changes have some issues
> with that JDK.
>
> On 8/16/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just doing a clean build so that I can publish module snapsh
On 8/16/07, Giorgio Zoppi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> i'm highly interested in contributing to the distributed runtime.
> Actually I'm trying to understand if this component model could be the
> building block for creating autonomic components. An autonomic
> component can consist of one o
On 8/16/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I fixed it under r566814.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 12:24 PM
&g
On 8/16/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > On 8/16/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I am not referencing this class directly in my code. Can it be that
> the
> >> published
t(
> ReallySmallRuntime.java:133)
> at org.apache.tuscany.sca.host.embedded.impl.EmbeddedSCADomain.start(
> EmbeddedSCADomain.java:74)
>
>
> Vamsi
>
> On 8/17/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/16/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
org.apache.tuscany.sca
> tuscany-binding-sca-xml
> ${tuscanyVersion}
> jar
> classes
>
>
> org.apache.tuscany.sca
> tuscany-distributed
>
On 8/16/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/16/07, Giorgio Zoppi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > i'm highly interested in contributing to the distributed runtime.
> > Actually I'm trying to understand i
snip...
>
> I have temporarily disabled the build of modules binding-sca-axis2 and
> > distributed impl as they are preventing me to build.
> >
>
OK Sebastien, can you give it another try. I've put them back in. More
changes to go in but am interested to know whether they build on your system
now
OTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > I have got rid of tuscany-interface-java-runtime and
> > tuscany-interface-wsdl-runtime. Removing commonj-api resulted in a
> > NoClassDefFoundError, so I had put that dependency back. After cleaning
> up
> &g
201 - 300 of 2086 matches
Mail list logo
