> I don't know how 'aggressive' strategy 7 needed to be in order
> to secure access to the knowledge base..
I meant that they were aggressive in getting the access mechanism for us
in the first place. If I remember correctly, a couple years ago or so
there was a nice announcement in the email new
I don't know how 'aggressive' strategy 7 needed to be in oder to secure
access to the knowledge base..
I took one phone call to them after I was booted from IBM because S7 held
the license, and I was on in no time flat
If a VAR is going to make excuses and deny access, its time to review when
the
Brian:
"I remember an speech years ago by an MV vendor proudly saying that 80% of
his business was repeat business. He saw that as customer care. I saw it as
lack of outreach. Who was right?"
For a few years, he; for the rest, you! Remember, in the long run we're all
dead, so, it's no surprise
As an IBM reseller of U2 products, I can assure you that your VAR or
reseller can request that their users get access to the IBM
documentation. You just need to ask the vendor who charges you for U2 support.
Ken
At 05:47 PM 11/10/2006, you wrote:
>Stevenson, Charles wrote:
>>First, my own var,
Conspiracy Theory:
Maybe IBM does not want a future MV environment, maybe they hope
everyone will go to DB2...if so, then I hope it works. I think more
likely they would go to Microsoft, where information is readily
available.
;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[
Exactly !
A good knowledge flow opens people's eyes and creates opportunities.
And it's not just an end user issue. Without knowledge flow where will the next
generation of vars come from? Who will bring new blood and investment? How will
we encourage developers into our market ? How much more