Re: can we find a solution to bug #820895 (show Process Name in log files) (imaginative solution/description presented)?

2012/1/30, HSO : > Firewall "in to" Network Manager & > NetHogs allgo. form source code "in to" System Monitor, code > > For me - Cool :-) > > Firewall - iptables + Some of part of code fwbuilder can be use ? > > > > -- > > "powiedz mi, a zapomnę, pokaż -- a zapamiętam, pozwól mi działać, a > zroz

Re: can we find a solution to bug #820895 (show Process Name in log files) (imaginative solution/description presented)?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robbie Williamson wrote on 29/01/12 21:39: > > On 01/26/2012 11:12 PM, nick rundy wrote: ... >> >> Just to be clear, I'm not asking that an application-firewall >> (as Jason Todd was speaking of) be created to solve this problem. >> I'm totally fine

Re: can we find a solution to bug #820895 (show Process Name in log files) (imaginative solution/description presented)?

of their > applications & system. > > > Thank you so much for reading/listening to my concerns on this issue. I > hope I have been clear in my descriptions :-) > > > >> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:30:52 -0600 >> From: rob...@ubuntu.com >> To: jtodd

Bug 657901 (Kernel having a required dependency of wireless tools)

I was wondering if we could get the kernel team to fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/657901 before the Kernel freeze since it's an LTS. I'm all for it being installed by default as a recommend but I would certainly love to remove it too much like we are able to r

RE: can we find a solution to bug #820895 (show Process Name in log files) (imaginative solution/description presented)?

pe I have been clear in my descriptions :-) > Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:30:52 -0600 > From: rob...@ubuntu.com > To: jtodd...@hotmail.com > CC: nru...@hotmail.com; ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com > Subject: Re: can we find a solution to bug #820895 (show Process Name i

Re: can we find a solution to bug #820895 (show Process Name in log files)?

came out. > The way Linux deals with applications and internet connections has not > evolved to a consumer-desktop-level. In an age where privacy and > security are very important, it's going to need to address this to gain > more users. I was sad to see Bug 820895 marked as Won'

RE: can we find a solution to bug #820895 (show Process Name in log files)?

rity are very important, it's going to need to address this to gain more users. I was sad to see Bug 820895 marked as Won't Fix. I personally tried to get my friend to start using ubuntu. But he grew frustrated with no application firewall capabilities. He posted in the ubuntu-for

Subject: can we find a solution to bug #820895 (show Process Name in log files)?

> > > Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:22:13 -0500 > From: nick rundy > To: > Subject: can we find a solution to bug #820895 (show Process Name in >log files)? > A lot of people want to have a log of the outgoing internet connections of > applications

RE: can we find a solution to bug #820895 (show Process Name in log files)?

really appreciate your suggestion. > Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:55:18 -0500 > From: ps...@ubuntu.com > To: nru...@hotmail.com > CC: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com > Subject: Re: can we find a solution to bug #820895 (show Process Name in log > files)? > > -BEGIN PGP

can we find a solution to bug #820895 (show Process Name in log files)?

Is there anything that can be done to create some way for Ubuntu users to get the capability of having a static record of what application/s made an outgoing connection? Since bug 820895 has been closed, perhaps some other solution can be created or put on the planning board? A lot of

please fix Bug #820895 for Pangolin release

Bug #820895 really needs fixing! Ubuntu logs do not keep a record of what PROCESS was blocked when the GUFW firewall blocks an outgoing connection attempt. PLEASE fix this for Precise Pangolin. Not having any firewall logging capabilities for Outgoing connection attempts is a major

Re: Correct package to file bug against for the text installer

the 64-bit alternate image gets errors, because of empty i386 > > packages files. Is that a bug with the CD build, the cdromupgrade > > program, with apt or with a back-end program? > > Start with the debian-installer package in Ubuntu. We'll reassign on > from there as ne

Re: Correct package to file bug against for the text installer

es. Is that a bug with the CD build, the cdromupgrade > program, with apt or with a back-end program? Start with the debian-installer package in Ubuntu. We'll reassign on from there as necessary. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com] -- Ubuntu-d

Correct package to file bug against for the text installer

I have downloaded the ISO images for the ubuntu oneiric beta 1, and burnt them to CDRW media. Running the cdrom upgrade using a CD created from the 64-bit alternate image gets errors, because of empty i386 packages files. Is that a bug with the CD build, the cdromupgrade program, with apt or

Re: subject [Bug 844965] Re: "Ubuntu Classic" session selection missing from unity-greeter.

Le 08/09/2011 20:44, Vernon Cole a écrit : I submitted a bug report to oneiric beta this morning due to the fact that i was unable to switch the Unity desktop off and revert to standard gnome. I assumed that it was an oversight. Apparently not. This is the answer I recieved: v v v v v from Omer

Re: subject [Bug 844965] Re: "Ubuntu Classic" session selection missing from unity-greeter.

On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 12:44:03PM -0600, Vernon Cole wrote: > I submitted a bug report to oneiric beta this morning due to the fact > that i was unable to switch the Unity desktop off and revert to > standard gnome. I assumed that it was an oversight. Apparently not. > This is

Re: subject [Bug 844965] Re: "Ubuntu Classic" session selection missing from unity-greeter.

I get with Unity. > > Since then I have resorted to apologizing to all the newbies that I install > Linux to. And immediately switch them to Gnome 3 where they are much > happier. > > IMHO, the Unity experiment should continue as a side project and whatever > good comes out of it s

Re: subject [Bug 844965] Re: "Ubuntu Classic" session selection missing from unity-greeter.

re much happier. IMHO, the Unity experiment should continue as a side project and whatever good comes out of it should be ported to Gnome. -- A bug magnet El Sep 8, 2011, a las 14:44, Vernon Cole escribió: > I submitted a bug report to oneiric beta this morning due to the fact > that i was

subject [Bug 844965] Re: "Ubuntu Classic" session selection missing from unity-greeter.

I submitted a bug report to oneiric beta this morning due to the fact that i was unable to switch the Unity desktop off and revert to standard gnome. I assumed that it was an oversight. Apparently not. This is the answer I recieved: v v v v v from Omer Akram om2...@ubuntu.com via canonical.com

Re: 2.6.38-11-generic re-introduced old bug on Gateway FX6850-51u

As I recall, following the kernel upgrade, I was trying to update my system from the command line, using aptitude, and it warned of a conflict and asked for confirmation to replace grub-efi-amd64 with grub-pc, which I denied. I think update-manager queried about a "partial upgrade", so I thought it

Re: 2.6.38-11-generic re-introduced old bug on Gateway FX6850-51u

> system.  On next kernel update (where halting/rebooting problem was >> fixed), updater replaced grub-efi with grub-pc. > > This *really* shouldn't happen and is a bug that needs to be addressed, > regardless of any of the other stuff here.  The logs in /var/log/apt/ > and

Re: 2.6.38-11-generic re-introduced old bug on Gateway FX6850-51u

s > fixed), updater replaced grub-efi with grub-pc. This *really* shouldn't happen and is a bug that needs to be addressed, regardless of any of the other stuff here. The logs in /var/log/apt/ and possibly /var/log/dist-upgrade/ may help to figure out why the package management system felt it

Re: 2.6.38-11-generic re-introduced old bug on Gateway FX6850-51u

> I'm bringing this up, since I think I was actually able to reboot the > system without it hanging once or twice between applying last kernel > upgrade, and switching back to grub-efi. > > I'm not sure how and why would choice of boot loader (grub-pc vs. > grub-efi) affect shutting down the syst

Re: 2.6.38-11-generic re-introduced old bug on Gateway FX6850-51u

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote: > It looks like 2.6.38-11 re-introduced old bug, where kernel would hang > on halt or reboot.  The bug was present on the original kernel shipped > with Ubuntu 11.04 (2.6.38-8, if my memory serves me right), and fixed >

2.6.38-11-generic re-introduced old bug on Gateway FX6850-51u

It looks like 2.6.38-11 re-introduced old bug, where kernel would hang on halt or reboot. The bug was present on the original kernel shipped with Ubuntu 11.04 (2.6.38-8, if my memory serves me right), and fixed in the very next kernel update. However, with 2.6.38-11, the problem is back. In

I opend the ticket on boost bug, its ticket number is 5751

Dear Scott: [Boost C++ Libraries] #5751: can not (find) compile boost/thread/read_write_mutex.hpp Thanks your point out. And I think it is boost programers's responsiblity to keep code compatible from old version with new version, rather than wipe out old one each new release cameout. hop

Re: Natty touchpad button bug

Hi Brian, Thank you for bring this to attention. May I ask if you have logged a but? If not, a bug report would be very helpful, and help you track if it got fixed. The easiest and most complete way is to use "ubuntu-bug". Open a terminal and type: ubuntu-bug xorg then follow the p

Natty touchpad button bug

Guys, Sorry if this is the wrong place to post this, but I just wanted to make sure that you had seen this. I have a lenovo w510 laptop running natty. This laptop has two mice. A red trackpoint mouse and a touchpad. A couple of days ago, one of the updates killed the buttons for the touchpa

fuse-utils, libfuse2 bug introduced in 2.8.4-1ubuntu1.3

Hi, I'm reporting this bug to the list because it's listed as the Maintainer for the fuse-utils and fuse-utils packages. Basically, fuse stopped working properly with the 2.8.4-1ubuntu1.3 update around 2011-03-01. The bug prevents mounting sshfs or TrueCrypt volumes (and probably

Re: [Ubuntu-bugcontrol] Fwd: [Bug 701471] Re: Sync libevent 2.0.10 from Debian experimental

;d be > > happy to help in any other way possible.. > > > > Andreas Noteng > > > > Original Message > > Subject: [Bug 701471] Re: Sync libevent 2.0.10 from Debian experimental > > Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:55:53 - > > From: Krzys

Re: Major bug in intel xserver driver on ubuntu 10.10

doing at the > time. > > I reported the bug to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/696957 > > but I've heard nothing further. Where do I go from here? I'd really like to > get this bug fixed. > There's even a patch

Major bug in intel xserver driver on ubuntu 10.10

d the bug to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/696957 but I've heard nothing further. Where do I go from here? I'd really like to get this bug fixed. There's even a patch on my bug report that fixes the bug. Thanks Liam -- Ubuntu-d

Re: ungetc and fseek/ftell cause segmentation bug

d an innocent statement such as printf("\n") anywhere BEFORE the seek to end, the execution crashes but instead of the long dump a segfault is reported on fclose, and the return value is 139, not 134. If this is not a bug, then it would be good to have this interesting behavior d

ungetc and fseek/ftell cause segmentation bug

Hi everybody, I encounter a bug with ungetc on many different glibc system, though all are ubuntu, at least debain I thought this place would be right. My problem is a segmentation fault on fclose, that happens when I run the following short test program. Assume a file named abc exists and it

Re: Discussion about bug #615504

On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 11:56 -0300, Leandro de Oliveira wrote: > I thought not having a versionless symlink was a bug, but it seems to > be an explicit decision, if that is the case, then java apps using > bluetooth will always need the user to install libbluetooth-dev > instead of b

Re: Discussion about bug #615504

same build with bluez version 3 and version 4. I thought not having a versionless symlink was a bug, but it seems to be an explicit decision, if that is the case, then java apps using bluetooth will always need the user to install libbluetooth-dev instead of being able to work with the latest ve

Re: Discussion about bug #615504

Hello Leandro, Leandro de Oliveira [2010-08-16 15:29 -0300]: > The main issue is that a symlink named libbluetooth.so is required for > bluecove to work without user intervention. This sounds like a build system bug of bluecove. Library packages must not install a versionless libfoo.so s

Discussion about bug #615504

Hi, I've filed a question that was transformed into a bug was redirected for discussion in some mailing list. I'm guessing this is the right one. Here is a direct link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/615504 The main issue is that a symlink named libbluetooth.so is required fo

strace for a thunderbird bug, since I can't use launchpad ~_~

My 'net is broke enough that I can't log in to freaking Launchpad. Been trying for 40 minutes, the page won't load. Here's an strace for whichever bug # it is. I just updated Thunderbird in 10.04, and now I can't switch to the Inbox tab or else it eats infinite mem

Re: bug reporting and file descriptors...

is a text file, the interesting bit may be at the end > (especially in the case of a log file). You would also need a blacklist > for some files so that they are never uploaded (such as /etc/shadow). We are talking here about bugs in gstreamer having problems with certain media files. Other use

Re: bug reporting and file descriptors...

eing that knowing that one of the files descriptors points to a well known file (like anything in /etc) may help analyse the cause of the bug. Having said that, knowing that one of the file descriptors points to /home/user/.gvfs/something-or-other may be useful too. Maybe replace /home/user wi

Re: bug reporting and file descriptors...

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 14:10:23 (CEST), Martin Pitt wrote: > Reinhard Tartler [2010-07-22 13:00 +0200]: >> > 7 -> /home/daniel/test.mp3 >> > >> > Would it make sense to have this information, or have I overlooked >> > something? >> >> I think it would be incredibly helpful. > > Note that we got

Re: bug reporting and file descriptors...

Reinhard Tartler [2010-07-22 13:00 +0200]: > > 7 -> /home/daniel/test.mp3 > > > > Would it make sense to have this information, or have I overlooked > > something? > > I think it would be incredibly helpful. Note that we got quite a lot of complaints when hooks exposed arbitrary paths to files o

Re: bug reporting and file descriptors...

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 23:27:38 (CEST), Daniel J Blueman wrote: > With certain types of bug, it really helps to know what file > descriptors were open at the time of crashing. > > For example, gstreamer is crashing in libavformat, however no > information was gathered to show the

bug reporting and file descriptors...

With certain types of bug, it really helps to know what file descriptors were open at the time of crashing. For example, gstreamer is crashing in libavformat, however no information was gathered to show the path of inodes attached to the file descriptors [1], where it would be immediately clear

IPv6 rooute rule adding bug

There is error using "ip" and "route" command when you want to add new route to ipv6. I experienced similar error programming routing protocol using netlink. for 'ip" error: RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument for "route" error: SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument e.g: ifconfig eth1 inet6 add 301::1/64

Re: Launchpad bug linking to U1 client spec behind a secret login

On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 06:49:50PM -0700, Dylan McCall wrote: > > I was hunting for information on the bug (it _is_ a bug, right?) where > the U1 Nautilus extension in Maverick shows its bar thingy all the time, > instead of just under folders that are synced. > (I would hope that&

Launchpad bug linking to U1 client spec behind a secret login

Hi! I was hunting for information on the bug (it _is_ a bug, right?) where the U1 Nautilus extension in Maverick shows its bar thingy all the time, instead of just under folders that are synced. (I would hope that's a bug, by the way…) I found this in Launchpad: http://code.launchpad.net

Re: Announcing the Next Ubuntu Bug Day! - Thursday 24th June 2010

Can you look NUMO soc and G.hn from ncomputing.com and homegridforum.org Thanks 2010/6/22 Kamus > Fellow Ubuntu Triagers! > > This week's Bug Day target is *drum roll please* fontconfig! > > * 49 New bugs need a hug > > * 4 Incompletes bugs need a status check >

live cd bug or missing feature

Hello, While working on a custom livecd (based on Kubuntu 9.10 LiveCd) I stumbled upon a 100% reproducible bug (or better missing feature to go to a wishlist): - boot from the livecd - create a new user with admin rights and encrypted home - logout ubuntu - login with new user - copy a

Is it a bug of kexec?

ow', and I found that all processes are killed, but it does not perform umounting or syncing. So I think it is a bug of either kexec or shutdown. -- Best regards, Bill Lee -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://

Re: Why do some updates skip proposed? (launchpad bug 589163)

Err thanks... my bad with the Android client ;-) Speaking with regard to this update in particular the patch that broke kvm on certain systems was to fix a kvm security issue cve-2010-0419. The fix was to revert the patch that dealt with the error until a better patch can be developed... The con

Fwd: Re: Why do some updates skip proposed? (launchpad bug 589163)

Oops missed reply to all.. Sent from Android mobile -- Forwarded message -- From: "James Hogarth" Date: Jun 4, 2010 1:36 AM Subject: Re: Why do some updates skip proposed? (launchpad bug 589163) To: "Arand Nash" Given the nature of the regression in thi

Re: Why do some updates skip proposed? (launchpad bug 589163)

is broke KVM guests on an LTS release no less (and kvm is > pushed by Ubuntu as the virtualisation system to use) it presents a > reasonably serious problem. > > How did this get straight to release with no testing in proposed? > > What is the point of having proposed for bug tes

Why do some updates skip proposed? (launchpad bug 589163)

this get straight to release with no testing in proposed? What is the point of having proposed for bug testing if a released package never goes through it - especially for something as critically important to the core system as the kernel? Hopefully the issue can be fixed soon so those of us who

libpam-runtime: /etc/pam.d/common-auth bug?

Here to answer my own question after a little more RTFM. The preceding common-auth lines are set up using the new-fangled jump feature: -- auth [success=2 default=ignore] pam_unix.so nullok_secure auth [success=1 default=ignore] pam_ldap.so use_first_pass # here's the fallba

libpam-runtime: /etc/pam.d/common-auth bug?

This list is actually cited as the package maintainer in the package status for libpam-runtime, so I thought I would run this by here first before filing a bug against the package just in case I'm terribly confused. Both in the /usr/share/pam/common-auth template and in various instantiatio

Re: Kernel bug in Intel driver

It is a great encouragement to know that this Intel bug is being treated so seriously. It also helps, greatly, to have an idea of the timescale involved so that users, like myself, can plan. For that reason I have posted your comment to the bug report. Thank you for all that is being done

Re: Kernel bug in Intel driver

org-video-intel/+bug/456902 > I'm not entirely sure what more you expect from that bug - it's importance high, has had an upstream developer participating, and an awesome member of the x-swat team providing PPA testing packages. The fact that it remains unfixed is not due to any lac

Bug#577721:

Attaching update to the kbsd patch, should resolve the issue for you all. Have a nice day. Regards -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0'; Index: patches/gdc-fix-build-kbsd.dpatch === --- patches/gdc-fix-build-kbsd.dp

Re: Kernel bug in Intel driver

Also, what about this one, which freezes graphics on a large number of Intel boards? (Is Intel a small, insignificant manufacturer whose products are not a priority?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/456902 On 16 April 2010 03:21, Ryan Dwyer wrote

Kernel bug in Intel driver

What are the chances of having this fixed before Lucid's release? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/554432 Basically, the computer crashes when a video is played. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscri

openshot crashes because of a libmlt bug

Hello everybody, I like to raise attention on this bug which crashes openshot. An openshot developer pointed out that it is an libmlt but and this is the official libmlt e-mail address, that's why I wrote you. Thanks in advance. Bug link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/555769 -- U

A preventative fix for bug 557177 (the "... erased all my data in /" one)

I read mdz's post and saw the one line fix: -cd "${MOUNTPOINT}" +cd "${MOUNTPOINT:?mount point not specified}" and wondered if there might be a better long-term preventative fix for this: run all init scripts with "set -o errexit -o

Re: Qt Creator major bug

On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:37:38 +0200 Ioannis Vranos wrote: > OS: Ubuntu 9.10 x64. > > > Qt Creator has a major show-stopper bug, it can't run an application whe > the Run button is pressed. > > > See the screenshot attached. > > > >

Re: File a new bug or re-open an old one

gt; To: Bruce Miller > Cc: Ubuntu developer list > Sent: Mon, March 29, 2010 11:36:56 AM > Subject: Re: File a new bug or re-open an old one > > On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:59:10 -0700 (PDT) Bruce Miller < > ymailto="mailto:subscr...@brmiller.ca"; > href="mailto:

Re: File a new bug or re-open an old one

that you are raising a point that *can* be discussed here. But usually, for bug management, ubuntu-bugsq...@lists.ubuntu.com or ubuntu-bugcont...@lists.launchpad.net are the ideal MLs. > The focus of this message is one bug which the Apport retracer on > Launchpad tagged as a duplicate. T

File a new bug or re-open an old one

I am not an Ubuntu developer; I learn a lot, however, from lurking on this list. If this is not the right forum to raise this issue, I would be grateful for a pointer in a better direction. I use Kubuntu. I have many years experience at breaking development software and of filing bug reports

Re: A bug of Linux in Ubuntu 10.04

On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 18:07 +0530, Chandru wrote: > You seem to have been bitten by this Virtualbox bug. > http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/6100 > > > The fix is available in the Lucid's Virtualbox . Yes but that's not much use for people who use Karmic and want to te

Re: A bug of Linux in Ubuntu 10.04

is '2.6.32-16-generic #25-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 9 >> 16:33:52 UTC 2010'. >> The Virtual Box OSE is running in Ubuntu 9.10 and its version is >> '3.0.8_OSE r53138'. >> Ubuntu 9.10 can work with this version of Virtual Box. So I think this >> problem can b

Re: A bug of Linux in Ubuntu 10.04

2010'. > The Virtual Box OSE is running in Ubuntu 9.10 and its version is > '3.0.8_OSE r53138'. > Ubuntu 9.10 can work with this version of Virtual Box. So I think this > problem can be sovled. I wish Lucid LTS will become better. > > Best wishes, > Bill Lee >

Re: A bug of Linux in Ubuntu 10.04

You seem to have been bitten by this Virtualbox bug. http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/6100 <http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/6100> The fix is available in the Lucid's Virtualbox . -- Chandra Sekar.S On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Bill Lee wrote: > First of all, as a foreign E

A bug of Linux in Ubuntu 10.04

First of all, as a foreign English speaker, I may not be able to express myself complete. If you have difficult understand this mail, I feel sorry. I ran Ubuntu 10.04 on Virtual Box OSE, and find that the ACPI part of Linux Ubuntu 10.04 cannot work with Virtual Box OSE. System will hold up when loa

Re: ubuntu-bug reports too much;

On 19 March 2010 13:55, Rene Veerman wrote: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/541875 > > ubuntu-bug auto-attached these files; > >    *   BootDmesg.txt  (49.8 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8") >    * CurrentDmesg.txt (2.1 KiB

Re: ubuntu-bug reports too much;

On 19 March 2010 12:55, Rene Veerman wrote: > by the looks of it i can't even delete 'm from launchpad.. :S > You can. On the right hand side see "Bug attachments". Click 'edit' next to the one you want to delete then click "Delete attachment"

ubuntu-bug reports too much;

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/541875 ubuntu-bug auto-attached these files; * BootDmesg.txt (49.8 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8") * CurrentDmesg.txt (2.1 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8") * Dependencies.txt (4.6 KiB, text/p

Re: Bug: python2.5-minimal

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:34:28AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > On 15 March 2010 15:48, wrote: > > Hi All > > > > I am using this list for my bug report because using "ubuntu-bug" > > did not work. I could not establish a connection to the bug database

Re: Bug: python2.5-minimal

On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 04:48:55PM +0100, mail2geo...@gmx-topmail.de wrote: > I have done something wrong using ths list for my bug report, please > let me know. I can only do better if I know that something is wrong. This list is not for bug reports. There should be a way for you to file t

Re: Bug: python2.5-minimal

On 15 March 2010 15:48, wrote: > Hi All > > I am using this list for my bug report because using "ubuntu-bug" did not > work. I could not establish a connection to the bug database (continuous > errors). > You can try https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+fil

Bug: python2.5-minimal

Hi All I am using this list for my bug report because using "ubuntu-bug" did not work. I could not establish a connection to the bug database (continuous errors). My bug report is as follows: Richte python2.5-minimal ein (2.5.4-1ubuntu6.1) ... Linking and byte-compiling packages f

Possible Bindwood Bug?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm working on an extension for Thunderbird to sync its contacts with DesktopCouch. It's based heavily on the Bindwood code. In the course of my poking around, I noticed the following lines in sync.js (from line 101): // create a random

RE: ubuntu-bug (was Bug reporting for Ubuntu Server? WTF?)

Even if you have X, another problem is that ubuntu-bug and apport ignore the $(HTTP_PROXY|http_proxy) variable, so it becomes very difficult to file bugs from work if you're behind a non-transparent proxy. -Original Message- From: ubuntu-devel-discuss-boun...@lists.ubunt

ubuntu-bug (was Bug reporting for Ubuntu Server? WTF?)

> Subject: Re: Bug reporting for Ubuntu Server? WTF? > From: Brian Murray > Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:49:58 -0800 > > The ReportingBugs wiki page also has a section about "Filing bugs when > off-line" which discusses how to use apport-cli to save a report that > y

Re: Bug reporting for Ubuntu Server? WTF?

On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 11:47 -0700, Charlie Kravetz wrote: > Having used all these methods to file bugs, I have never been stopped > from commenting on the bug report before all of the automatic methods > attached the log files and filled in commentary. I think the problem is that u

Re: Bug reporting for Ubuntu Server? WTF?

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:17:47PM -0600, Patrick Goetz wrote: > I just filed a bug against the 64-bit Karmic (9.10) server edition on > bugs.launchpad.net and noticed that the process appears to have > regressed considerably. > > First of all, there is no longer any clear in

Re: Bug reporting for Ubuntu Server? WTF?

On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:17:47 -0600 Patrick Goetz wrote: > I just filed a bug against the 64-bit Karmic (9.10) server edition on > bugs.launchpad.net and noticed that the process appears to have > regressed considerably. > > First of all, there is no longer any clear indicati

Bug reporting for Ubuntu Server? WTF?

I just filed a bug against the 64-bit Karmic (9.10) server edition on bugs.launchpad.net and noticed that the process appears to have regressed considerably. First of all, there is no longer any clear indication on the front page of bugs.launchpad.net about how one goes about filing a bug

bug libapache2-mod-php5 5.2.10.dfsg.1-2ubuntu6.3

$gdb /usr/sbin/apache2 GNU gdb (GDB) 7.0-ubuntu Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANT

Re: Midnight Commander: bug report and patch

Hi, Daniel - On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 12:25:25AM -0500, Daniel Chen wrote: > On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Ben Okopnik wrote: > > I tried reporting this bug in Launchpad more about a week back, and > > never got any response. Since it's a pretty big one (zip file content

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

ount of the > fact that I've run into the same problem on Gentoo, with the same > version I was being asked to test. You are talking about bug #367318? It was me, who commented on this bug report. Let me clarify some points: * I never wrote that the bug is invalid or does not exis

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Daniel Chen wrote: > I'll ask because the phrasing is ambiguous, and I can't tell whether > my cynicism radar is errant. Pure self irony from my side, as I was looking over the thread that I started, realizing that I often forgot about the logical next step in the

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Patrick Freundt wrote: > You should not only rant at people like Richard Stallman you also need > to provide patches like him. I'll ask because the phrasing is ambiguous, and I can't tell whether my cynicism radar is errant. Are you implying that people with uplo

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Daniel Chen wrote: > your patch Right, I often forget about that ... You should not only rant at people like Richard Stallman you also need to provide patches like him. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Shentino wrote: > Unfortunately, it recently got the wave-off as now it no longer builds under > Lucid and I'm being asked to test a new upstream version, when I know that I uploaded 3:4.7.0-1ubuntu1 last night, so if you're willing to respin your patch against th

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

I've sorta had this dance with a problem in mc that, due to improper perms on cons.saver, prevented the usage of C-o to flop the screen in and out. I uploaded a patch that highlighted the problem and I thought that someone would eventually get around to testing it. Unfortunately, it recently got

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Michael Bienia wrote: > You know that your Ubuntu systems also checks for package updates > automatically? So it goes online without your consent too. As I said before, firefox is just one exaple of multiple topics. > And I don't want a dialog popping up asking

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

On 2010-01-06 11:36:09 +0100, Patrick Freundt wrote: > We dont talk about an unpleasant background color or desired or > unwanted functionality. We talk about a default configuration of a > browser that goes online to download data without my consent. And the > very least to expect is that its prom

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Markus Hitter wrote: > What to do now? Battle again, how we used to battle proprietary software once. Because many people had good reasons to dislike proprietary software. And whats happening here is that companies mix Free Software with the old, poisoned busine

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

Am 06.01.2010 um 11:36 schrieb Patrick Freundt: > ... but maybe Gentoo and other source based distributions are going to > have a revival and Canonical is discovered as the new Microsoft. Patrick, just a week ago you defended Ubuntu so much and now you play with going away? Doesn't match my c

Re: proper procedure regarding bug reports

On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Robbie Williamson wrote: > Is it a bug that we don't > automatically enable and password protect your screensaver in Ubuntu? Maybe. > or that we don't automatically encrypt all your data? Maybe. > Perhaps you will get farther opening a bu

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >