Hi Musachy,
I'll try to build version 2.0.3 . Thanks for you help!
Alexandre
- Original Message -
From: "Musachy Barroso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List"
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: [S2] dropdowndatetimepic
Hi Alexandre,
The datepicker tag has been on the move between 2.0.1 -> 2.0.3. I would
suggest not to use 2.0.2, and wait until the next stable build is
released, must likely 2.0.3. If you can't wait, and decide to build
from source, and still have the same problem, let us know.
regards
musa
Hi,
Previously, when I was using version 2.0.1, my JSP was:
The property dataCadastro in bean equipamento (property of my action) is from
type java.util.Date . It's worked!
Now, I'm using the actual version that I´ve copied from
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.2/ .
The tag was mo
I do not know if you did see my comment to WW-1605.
It somehow produces endless loop ...
Dariusz Wojtas
On 1/7/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ok, here is the right one:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1605
musachy
--
ok, here is the right one:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1605
musachy
Dariusz Wojtas wrote:
Will it work with all modes of the parent form? (ajax, xhtml) as
expected?
Did anyone recognize the issue with textarea?
If included inside a form with theme="ajax" then it automatically
Will it work with all modes of the parent form? (ajax, xhtml) as expected?
Did anyone recognize the issue with textarea?
If included inside a form with theme="ajax" then it automatically is
ajaxified (rich text) instead of just being rendered in a table row
with two cols.
btw, I am just sitting
I swear I haven't been drinking today :). I will do a similar fix for
the dropdowndatetimepicker
musachy
Dariusz Wojtas wrote:
Maybe this fix helps, but for autocompleter.
I asked for dropdowndatetimepicker :)
Greetings
Dariusz Wojtas
On 1/7/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe this fix helps, but for autocompleter.
I asked for dropdowndatetimepicker :)
Greetings
Dariusz Wojtas
On 1/7/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I logged this ticket with a simple patch:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1602
(remember to remove theme="ajax" for the
I logged this ticket with a simple patch:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1602
(remember to remove theme="ajax" for the ones that you want it to render
the label)
regards
musachy
Dariusz Wojtas wrote:
Hi,
I am absolutely nod in mood to be the 1st class troublemaker for S2
ajax s
Dariusz Wojtas wrote:
Hi,
I am absolutely nod in mood to be the 1st class troublemaker for S2
ajax support - which is very nice - but real life usage brings some
questions.
Don't lose your faith, must of the fixes have been recommended by you :)
I have a form using theme ajax.
And I have so
Hi,
I am absolutely nod in mood to be the 1st class troublemaker for S2
ajax support - which is very nice - but real life usage brings some
questions.
I have a form using theme ajax.
And I have some:
fields inside.
Fields 'textfield' and 'select' do create a row in table with 2 cols:
label, f
The latest patch fixed all issues that I had before with this tag.
I tested it with various displayFormat values
-MM-dd
MM
dd-MM-
and it always worked as expected.
Thanks a lot.
Dariusz Wojtas
On 12/29/06, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I attached a new patch to WW
I attached a new patch to WW-1579, the name of the textfield will now be
"dojo.${name}". This will make the "params" interceptor throw an
exception, WW-1551 is asking to ignore such parameters. In the meanwhile
you can implement ParameterNameAware on your action and ignore anything
that starts
That's even better idea :)
If you know how - I am 100% with you.
Darek
On 12/29/06, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think we need to submit two at all, just one on the RFC 3379
format (the one that works), the other one, which is the one on the
textbox should be prefixed with
I don't think we need to submit two at all, just one on the RFC 3379
format (the one that works), the other one, which is the one on the
textbox should be prefixed with "dojo." so S2 ignores it (that's another
issue by the way).
regards
musachy
Dariusz Wojtas wrote:
Great news!
I have applie
Great news!
I have applied the patch for me, tested and it reads the property perfectly :)
It is now correctly initialized.
Good work. Thanks!
But some issue is still there - format of the data submitted with the form.
If I use it this way:
Produced URL:
/my.action?=2006-12-25&end=2006-12
I logged a ticket for this issue, with a patch:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1579
The tag was not reading the value from properties. Now it will get the
value from the property specified in "name", the value needs to be of
type Date, or any object whose toString method returns an
Hi Dariusz
The thing is that the dropdowndatetimepicker is expecting the value to
be an string, which is wrong, I will submit a patch to fix it so if the
value is of type Date, it will format it using "saveFormat", and then
use it as the value. Now, I'm not sure what to do to with the submit,
Hi,
I ma trying to use the dropdowndatetimepicker tag but with little success.
My Action defines field
java.util.Date registrationDate;
And here is my JSP part:
Questions that I's like to ask:
a) how do I force the tag to load initially with a value from the property?
If I set the prope
19 matches
Mail list logo