On Thursday 15 February 2007 15:48, Dave Williss wrote:
Is there some Spamassassin rule that may be auto-whitelisting this
(because the forged sender is an actual account), or is Postfix confused
into thinking that the sender is local and just not running it through
SA? Now that I think about
For some reason I had 3 lines deleted in the plugin when I sent it.
here is the correct version.
-Raul Dias
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 15:26 -0300, Raul Dias wrote:
Hi,
I, as other people, needed to whitelist addresses that came from servers
with no rdns. whitelist_from is not a good option,
What happens when a clueless newbie tries to pass spam?
This happens = http://www.dias.com.br/worst-spam.txt
-Raul Dias
Raul Dias wrote:
What happens when a clueless newbie tries to pass spam?
This happens = http://www.dias.com.br/worst-spam.txt
-Raul Dias
'192.168.0.%RND_DIGIT'lol :)
i can just see getting an email with an IP of 192.168.0.450
and whats the point in trying to fake it from a 192.168
Matt Richards writes:
Raul Dias wrote:
What happens when a clueless newbie tries to pass spam?
This happens = http://www.dias.com.br/worst-spam.txt
-Raul Dias
'192.168.0.%RND_DIGIT'lol :)
i can just see getting an email with an IP of 192.168.0.450
and whats the point in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yossim wrote:
Hi folks, Hi can i learn miss identified junk mail that is store on
exchange or at the otulook clients? Can i simply copy those mails to a
folder on my Linux server and run sa-learn with the required parameters?
Kindly regards, Yossi
Dave Williss wrote:
I've started recieving a few spams a day that aren't even getting
scanned by Spamassassin. Or at least they don't get any X-Spam
headers added on.
The messages in question all have forged senders to make them look
like they came from an existing user within my own domain
Thanks Steven,
I appriciate your quick response :)
I will review the link and try to implement it on our site.
Regards,
Yossi
Steven Stern wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yossim wrote:
Hi folks, Hi can i learn miss identified junk mail that is store on
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'm assuming that there will be a Google Summer of Code 2007 going on, and
that the ASF will be involved again. So it's a good time to start thinking
about things we'd like to put up as possible projects.
We still have a number of items from last year that we could
Also, any suggestions from outside the dev team? Anyone got good ideas
for new SpamAssassin features that would be good to pay someone to work on
for 3 months?
Perhaps this is trivial, or not desired by anyone else but myself,
but I'd _love_ to be able to strip SpamAssassin tags via spamc
Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'm assuming that there will be a Google Summer of Code 2007 going on, and
that the ASF will be involved again. So it's a good time to start thinking
about things we'd like to put up as possible projects.
We still have a number of items from last
Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'm assuming that there will be a Google Summer of Code 2007 going on, and
that the ASF will be involved again. So it's a good time to start thinking
about things we'd like to put up as possible projects.
We still have a number of items from last
Also, any suggestions from outside the dev team? Anyone got good ideas
for new SpamAssassin features that would be good to pay someone to work on
for 3 months?
I believe this was once mentioned on a Justin's blog (but can't find
a ref now), the following sounds promising as an additional
Mark Martinec writes:
Also, any suggestions from outside the dev team? Anyone got good ideas
for new SpamAssassin features that would be good to pay someone to work on
for 3 months?
I believe this was once mentioned on a Justin's blog (but can't find
a ref now), the following sounds
On Feb 16, 2007, at 7:35, Justin Mason wrote:
We still have a number of items from last year that we could use
again.
Anything else that we'd like people to code up?
Also, any suggestions from outside the dev team? Anyone got good
ideas
for new SpamAssassin features that would be good to
Justin Mason writes:
Also, a related project would be to complete the pluginization of our
Bayes engine and APIs, so that other probabilistic classifiers can be
plugged in in place of, or in addition to, Bayes in SpamAssassin.
Right. I felt a need for something like this when I was switching
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Mark Martinec wrote:
I believe this was once mentioned on a Justin's blog (but can't find
a ref now), the following sounds promising as an additional classifier
to existing bayes (especially since the author comes from the same
organization as myself :)
On 6-Feb-2007, at 09:30, Sujit Choudhury wrote:
Lately there has been an increase in image spam. We are using
imageinfo.cf with ImageInfo plugin. However, this is not making a lot
of difference. We are also using virtually all the SARE rules plus
using sa-update and restarting spamd everyday.
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 09:31:13AM -0800, Dan wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 7:35, Justin Mason wrote:
We still have a number of items from last year that we could use again.
Anything else that we'd like people to code up?
Also, any suggestions from outside the dev team? Anyone got good ideas
On 29-Jan-2007, at 12:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I generally believe that end users should send thru a
smarthost, I also think it is a bad idea to restrict them to the
network provider's smarthost. They might prefer to send via their
company's SMTP instead
That's what port 587
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 11:26:22AM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
Where does the WS-SURBL info come from? I ask because the Harris
Poll email is getting tagged with it. As far as I know, I've never
received spam from them, so I'd like to check out the actual rbl.
You'd want to talk to the
On 2/16/07, Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, any suggestions from outside the dev team? Anyone got good ideas
for new SpamAssassin features that would be good to pay someone to work on
for 3 months?
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3785
Hi,
Is it possible to export a Bayes DB from a server and then append (not
restore) it to others servers ?
Sam.
--
Ce message a été vérifié par MailScanner
pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de
suspect n'a été trouvé.
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Justin Mason wrote:
Also, a related project would be to complete the pluginization of
our Bayes engine and APIs, so that other probabilistic
classifiers can be plugged in in place of, or in addition to,
Bayes in SpamAssassin.
+1
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
Steve,
I am not sure that i have anderstand the first script starting with
get_ham_spam were you use fetchmail (where the data is kept?) and the last
one get-ham-spam when you used wget command to get all the ham.spam emails.
Kindly regards,
Yossi
yossim wrote:
Thanks Steven,
I
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Justin Mason wrote:
Also, a related project would be to complete the pluginization of
our Bayes engine and APIs, so that other probabilistic
classifiers can be plugged in in place of, or in addition to,
Bayes in SpamAssassin.
+1
If that's a
On 2/16/07, LuKreme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where does the WS-SURBL info come from? I ask because the Harris
Poll email is getting tagged with it. As far as I know, I've never
received spam from them, so I'd like to check out the actual rbl.
3.0 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains a URL listed
- Full, tested, supportable multithreaded support
- Full, tested, supportable support for an asynchronous I/O model (a la
qpsmtpd-async)
- Pluggable to the point where all configuration and settings can be pulled
from anywhere (databases, files, in-memory cache) at runtime, so SA could
stay
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 15:35 +, Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'm assuming that there will be a Google Summer of Code 2007 going on, and
that the ASF will be involved again. So it's a good time to start thinking
about things we'd like to put up as possible projects.
Can anybody tell me how you are suppose to completely disable the
user configuration?
I do not want ~/.spamassassin and if I must create this directory I
want it relative to prefix as I
maintain two different releases of SA installed into a shell
account's home directory. Since I'm
the
Why then is my Bayes DB 20MEG in size right now if
=item bayes_expiry_max_db_size (default: 15)
What should be the maximum size of the Bayes tokens database? When
expiry
occurs, the Bayes system will keep either 75% of the maximum value, or
100,000 tokens, whichever has a
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 05:42:13PM -0600, Robert Nicholson wrote:
Why then is my Bayes DB 20MEG in size right now if
=item bayes_expiry_max_db_size (default: 15)
That's in number of tokens, not physical size in bytes.
100,000 tokens, whichever has a larger value. 150,000 tokens
Also, any suggestions from outside the dev team? Anyone got good ideas
for new SpamAssassin features that would be good to pay someone to work on
for 3 months?
Here's another one, to seize the opportunity when internal changes
are being contemplated:
Split the process into two parts:
-
Matthew Wilson wrote:
- Full, tested, supportable multithreaded support
- Full, tested, supportable support for an asynchronous I/O model
(a la qpsmtpd-async)
I think effort could be better spent elsewhere.
Spam checking lands itself ideally to running parallel individual
processes, with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yossim wrote:
Steve, I am not sure that i have anderstand the first script starting
with get_ham_spam were you use fetchmail (where the data is kept?) and
the last one get-ham-spam when you used wget command to get all the
ham.spam emails. Kindly
So you're saying that right now seen isn't capped like tokens right?
On Feb 16, 2007, at 5:45 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 05:42:13PM -0600, Robert Nicholson wrote:
Why then is my Bayes DB 20MEG in size right now if
=item bayes_expiry_max_db_size (default:
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 06:17:36PM -0600, Robert Nicholson wrote:
So you're saying that right now seen isn't capped like tokens right?
seen has no max size nor expiry features.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
Like any French restaurant in America, it was overpriced, noisy, moody,
and would put
Sam Przyswa wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to export a Bayes DB from a server and then append (not
restore) it to others servers ?
No, you generally can't combine two bayes databases that way. Best bet
is to pick the most complete one and use it.
For more details see a really long post on the
Well then I only care about tokens and not repeated emails can I
disable seen?
On Feb 16, 2007, at 6:19 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 06:17:36PM -0600, Robert Nicholson wrote:
So you're saying that right now seen isn't capped like tokens right?
seen has no max size
-Original Message-
From: Mark Martinec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 6:09 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Google Summer of Code 2007 ...
Matthew Wilson wrote:
- Full, tested, supportable multithreaded support
- Full, tested,
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 06:45:51PM -0600, Robert Nicholson wrote:
Well then I only care about tokens and not repeated emails can I
disable seen?
You can't disable it, but you can delete it, as previously stated.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
54% of all statistics are made up. No, make that
On Saturday February 17 2007 01:49, Matthew Wilson wrote:
I was/am primarily concerned with RAM usage for high-concurrency
situations.
Ok. Still, in my experience about 30 (maybe 50) SA processes can
fully utilize today's CPU I/O, and it's probably no big deal
to provide about 2 GB of memory
Mark Martinec writes:
On Saturday February 17 2007 01:49, Matthew Wilson wrote:
I was/am primarily concerned with RAM usage for high-concurrency
situations.
Ok. Still, in my experience about 30 (maybe 50) SA processes can
fully utilize today's CPU I/O, and it's probably no big deal
to
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:35:39 +, Justin Mason wrote:
We still have a number of items from last year that we could use again.
Anything else that we'd like people to code up?
How about an extensive statistics reporting tool, possible web-based, that can
show how well a current spamassassin
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 02:07 +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
On Saturday February 17 2007 01:49, Matthew Wilson wrote:
I was/am primarily concerned with RAM usage for high-concurrency
situations.
Ok. Still, in my experience about 30 (maybe 50) SA processes can
fully utilize today's CPU I/O,
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:01:37 -0800, Quinn Comendant wrote:
And/or a fix for the qmail+simscan per-user preferences spamc -u
issue where if an email is addressed to multiple users or an alias
spamc isn't passed the correct user.
Sorry to reply to myself, but I want to retract that last
46 matches
Mail list logo
