OT: Mail/Spam Stats and MRTG

Does anyone have any suggestions for using mrtg to produce a graph showing the amount of received email and how much of it was flagged as spam? I am using mrtg, sendmail, and procmail on all the same server. Thanks! ...Jake -- Jake Colman Sr. Applications Developer Principia Partners LLC

Re: procmailrc being bypassed - again

>>>>> "DBF" == David B Funk writes: DBF> On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Jake Colman wrote: >> >> I posted this problem last week and was told that it might be due to an >> SA problem when overwhelmed by too many connections. This problem only

procmailrc being bypassed - again

. What do I do about this?! TIA! ...Jake -- Jake Colman Sr. Applications Developer Principia Partners LLC Harborside Financial Center 1001 Plaza Two Jersey City, NJ 07311 (201) 209-2467 www.principiapartners.com

Re: max-conn-per-child spamd flag?

ttle 3 Does this make sense? Should I (can I) reduce the numebr of sendmail children to better match spamd? Thanks for your help and insight. ...Jake -- Jake Colman Sr. Applications Developer Principia Partners LLC Harborside Financial Center 1001 Plaza Two Jersey City, NJ 07311 (201) 209-2467 www.principiapartners.com

Re: Is Bayes Really Necessary?

lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MK> Jake Colman wrote: >>>>>>> "CS" == Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> CS> If you are using SA 3.x, support is already included. You simply have CS> to create the config file, restart

Re: Is Bayes Really Necessary?

confused. The usage page on the site says to create a simple .cf file containing a number of lines. Is that it? If I have that .cf file in my /etc/mail/spamassassin directory it will all simply work? Yes, I have Net::DNS since I am already doing all the other net checks. ...Jake -- Jake C

Re: Is Bayes Really Necessary?

>>>>> "CS" == Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> -----Original Message- >> From: Jake Colman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 10:09 AM >> To: users@spamassas

Is Bayes Really Necessary?

Given the rather complete set of rules that ship with SA and which can expanded with SARE, does bayes learning really help? Won't the rules catch pretty much everything anyway? -- Jake Colman Sr. Applications Developer Principia Partners LLC Harborside Financial Center 1001 Plaza Two J

Re: Procmail Recipe Problem

are more sendmails than there are spamd processes? Thanks for your help! ...Jake -- Jake Colman Sr. Applications Developer Principia Partners LLC Harborside Financial Center 1001 Plaza Two Jersey City, NJ 07311 (201) 209-2467 www.principiapartners.com

Procmail Recipe Problem

pam How can I modify this to tag emails and prove that they went through this recipe? This will allow me to know for certain whether some email are somehow falling throiugh the cracks or something else is going on. TIA! ...Jake -- Jake Colman Sr. Applications Developer Principia Partners LLC Ha

Re: Cannnot open bayes database permission denied

>>>>> "MK" == Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MK> Jake Colman wrote: >> I am seeing this error in my maillog. I followed the directions in the >> wiki for creating site-wide bayes database, razor and pyzor. I think I >&

Cannnot open bayes database permission denied

ode 0770'. The .../spamassassin directory is owned by the 'spam' group and has permissions rwxrwsr-x. I use spamc/spamd which executes as the user to whom the spam is addressd. So each user has been added to the spam group as well. Any suggestions what I may have missed? -- Jake Col

Re: SA Sometimes Being Bypassed?

>>>>> "w" == wolfgang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: w> In an older episode (Friday 20 May 2005 18:07), Jake Colman wrote: >> When my server is up, all email is processed by my SA. If my server is >> down, my email is held for me at the ba

Re: SA Sometimes Being Bypassed?

relays mail for a user only if it came in from a MK> secondary MX. MK> Looking at the Received: path and size of some of the messages should clear up MK> what's going on. -- Jake Colman Sr. Applications Developer Principia Partners LLC Harborside Financial Center 1001 Plaza Two Jersey City, NJ 07311 (201) 209-2467 www.principiapartners.com

Re: SA Sometimes Being Bypassed?

MH> -- MH> Martin Hepworth MH> Snr Systems Administrator MH> Solid State Logic MH> Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300 MH> Jake Colman wrote: >> If my sendmail server is down, a backup MX in a different domain catches all >> my email. When my sendmail ser

Re: SA Sometimes Being Bypassed?

>>>>> "MK" == Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MK> Jake Colman wrote: >> If my sendmail server is down, a backup MX in a different domain catches all >> my email. When my sendmail server comes back up, the backup MX dumps all the

SA Being Bypassed?

be true - which means that something else is going on and I am misstating this? TIA! ...Jake -- Jake Colman Sr. Applications Developer Principia Partners LLC Harborside Financial Center 1001 Plaza Two Jersey City, NJ 07311 (201) 209-2467 www.principiapartners.com

Test Posting

Does this work? My last two posts did not seem to make it to the list... -- Jake Colman Sr. Applications Developer Principia Partners LLC Harborside Financial Center 1001 Plaza Two Jersey City, NJ 07311 (201) 209-2467 www.principiapartners.com

SA Sometimes Being Bypassed?

e? I beleive that what I am saying is accurate because if I examine the email headers for emails sent by the backup MX, they do not have my X-Spam headers. Thanks for any help. -- Jake Colman Sr. Applications Developer Principia Partners LLC Harborside Financial Center 1001 Plaza Two Jersey City, NJ

Re: SpamAssassin Suddenly Not Catching Spam

es database so that all users share the same database? This is a home network and mail server we all have the same idea as to what's spam. I want one person (myself) to do the spam training and have everyone benefit. By the way, I use spamc/spamd and a global procmailrc to do my filter

Re: SpamAssassin Suddenly Not Catching Spam

writes: KP> You can begin by looking at the headers of false negatives and see KP> what rules they are hitting. Are they hitting any negatively-scored KP> rules? KP> Jake Colman wrote: >> I upgraded from SA 2.x to 3.x a few weeks ago. I also installed the Ru

SpamAssassin Suddenly Not Catching Spam

prior to my upgrade. Is there some way for me to figure out why SA is not doing its thing for me? -- Jake Colman Sr. Applications Developer Principia Partners LLC Harborside Financial Center 1001 Plaza Two Jersey City, NJ 07311 (201) 209-2467 www.principiapartners.com