-Original Message-
From: Nigel Frankcom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 4:11 AM
To: SpamAssassin
Subject: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 and ImageInfo.pm
Hi All,
Is anyone else that uses ImageInfo.pm getting the following errors
after updating to 3.2.0?
I've
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:28:26 +, Ben Wylie wrote
First of all, do rawbody emails literally scan the raw email
including massive attachments? I received an email today with a 7MB
MS Word attachment. This email completely bogged down the system, as
if there were rules scanning the raw
René Berber wrote:
Sherman Lilly wrote:
[snip]
I get why they are getting through. They are spoofing the Return-Path.
Is there any way to remedy this problem?
Depends on your server. For sendmail there is:
http://ultra.ap.krakow.pl/~raj/sendmail/english.html
the
-Original Message-
From: Bob Proulx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 12:22 PM
Will Nordmeyer wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to incorporate spamassassin
into the included majordomo 1.94.x system? Idiots spam majordomo
owner
I'm running SpamAssassin on a CentOS/BlueQuartz system.
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to incorporate spamassassin into the
included majordomo 1.94.x system? Idiots spam majordomo owner and/or a
few of the majordomo lists. which results in me (as admin) getting bounce
messages when
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just a thought, but when I place rules in /etc/procmailrc, I do something
like:
:0:
*^List-ID: users.spamassassin.apache.org
/var/spool/mail/$USER
That way, if someone else on the server joins the affected list, it is put
in
I know this isn't the procmail list, but had a quick question.
My server is running SA 3.1.7 and has the following systemwide procmailrc:
SHELL=/bin/sh
#LOGFILE=$HOME/.procmail-log
#VERBOSE=on
DROPPRIVS=yes
:0fw
* 256000
| /home/spam-filter/bin/spamc -U
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, sa-russian wrote:
Hi to all!
I made a simple script that scans sendmail log files, finds IP
from which several spam messages were received, and blocks them in
sendmail access file.
I just set up something similar to block at the firewall (Linux
iptables,
Marc Perkel wrote:
Duane Hill wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm considering filing a lawsuit against Microsoft to try to get
an
order to make them make public security updates for Windows to
everyone, registered or not.
The idea is that their product Windows creates a toxic
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:01:26 -0400 Theo Van Dinter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Generally speaking, unless the defaults don't work for you for some
reason, stick with the defaults.
So, what I'm concluding is...
If I run sa-update without any other parameters, it'll create an update
dir
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Paul Dudley wrote:
If we decide to reject low grade spam messages rather than
quarantine them, is it possible to add text to the body of the
rejection message?
Rejecting (bouncing) spam is utterly pointless, as 99% of it will
have
forged sender
Highly NOT recommended... but what I have users doing is this:
Assuming you're using sendmail/procmail... set up a .procmailrc file
that checks for:
X-Spam-Level:
(8 stars = spam score 8 or better).
If it is that - dump it to /dev/null
As in:
---
SHELL=/bin/sh
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Level:
with notifications that they are failing miserably). I think that's
why I have it exclusive locked.
Unless you think I could release it on that as well? (Which might
speed things up just a tiny bit).
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 06:53:53AM -0400, Will Nordmeyer wrote:
As in:
---
SHELL=/bin
Just put
score FROM_DOMAIN_NOVOWEL lowerscore
in your local.cf
(IE:
score FROM_DOMAIN_NOVOWEL 0.3
You don't want to adjust it in the master file - your adjustment would
be overwritten everytime you upgraded.
Hi, all.
It seem that, just lately, the following rule is being hit:
Thought about that - I've shifted to a systemwide bayes and set a separate
cron job to do the expire process... things seem to be running more
stable...
--Will
-Original Message-
From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 10:18 PM
To:
Ive been running sa-update on my system and have a
few questions
My spamassassin folder is a folder structure under:
/home/spam-filter/
The sa default rules are in:
/home/spam-filter/share/spamassassin
The sa-update/spamd/spamc/spamassassin are in
/home/spam-filter/bin
Im still having trouble switching to a systemwide
Bayes. I have the following lines in my local.cf:
# Enable the Bayes system
use_bayes 1
bayes_file_mode 0777
bayes_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes/bayes
Heres the directory
drwxrwxrwx 2 nobody nobody 1024 May 19 06:07
bayes
root 2048 May 19 09:13 ..
[root bayes]#
--Will
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 14:55 +0200, Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Freitag, 19. Mai 2006 12:10 Will Nordmeyer wrote:
bayes_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes/bayes
Remember that this should be a file name. You showed a dir, maybe
as the user in question when it is processing a
message.
OK - I did the --lint and it appears to load the updates dir.
One of my problems with it, though, is that the 10_misc.cf in the
updates dir doesn't have the proper @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@.
--Will
Will Nordmeyer wrote on Fri, 19 May 2006 06:02
OK,
I changed the path in local.cf to /home/spam-filter/bayes/bayes
The owner of the dir is root, and the directory mode is 775.
The spamd daemon runs as root
I ran spamassassin -D --lint and it still pulled the bayes db to
be /root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks /root/
--Will
Will Nordmeyer
OK,
I changed the path in local.cf to /home/spam-filter/bayes/bayes
The owner of the dir is root, and the directory mode is 775.
The spamd daemon runs as root
I ran spamassassin -D --lint and it still pulled the bayes db to
be /root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks /root/
--Will
Will Nordmeyer
From: Will Nordmeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 19-May-06 16:02
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Systemwide Bayes ...
OK,
I changed the path in local.cf to /home/spam-filter/bayes/bayes
The owner of the dir is root
Craig,
How do you have procmail set up to deliver to the spam vs. likely spam
folders?
I have mine configured to folder anything with SPAM-STATUS: Yes (or
whatever that flag is)... but have been wondering about setting it up
to automatically delete anything scored in the 20+ range (for
: Friday, April 28, 2006 11:40 AM
To: Will Nordmeyer
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes troubles
Will Nordmeyer wrote:
Matt,
I ran lint this AM (I frequently forget that part :-)), and only had 2
issues -
warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: use_dcc 1
warn: config
To: Will Nordmeyer
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes troubles
Will Nordmeyer wrote:
I added the following fields to local.cf
# Enable the Bayes system
use_bayes 1
bayes_file_mode 0777
bayes_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes/bayes
But it seems that everybody's local
I'm running SA 3.1.1 on my Cobalt RaQ 4 and have been having expiration
troubles. A mail message comes in, and as part of the process, the
auto_expire runs (it seems) - it frequently times out though, leaving
the half finished expire file out there (which then results in grumpy
customers
I was having this problem for a while... then I added a confirmation block
to my guestbook - so that any post had to be confirmed.
Boom - spam stopped (I've never even gotten confirmation notices that they
tried again).
--Will
-Original Message-
From: dny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've seen this as well... it appears (to me) to be related to bayes
token expiring timeouts.
Whenever one of my clients has a timeout on their token expire, the
headers don't get written to the SPAM and the message gets sent on
without headers.
--Will
Hello everyone,
I'm a newbie here,
I've seen this as well... it appears (to me) to be related to bayes
token expiring timeouts.
Whenever one of my clients has a timeout on their token expire, the
headers don't get written to the SPAM and the message gets sent on
without headers.
--Will
Hello everyone,
I'm a newbie here,
I have bumped SpamAssassin 3.1.0 up to 10 clients (from 5)
and added round-robin to the startup routine my daemon startup now looks
like this:
daemon /home/spam-filter/bin/spamd -d -c -m 10
--round-robin --socketpath=/home/spam-filter/tmp/spamd.sock -H
/home/spam-filter/razor
But
Hi,
I did some searching on the FAQ the archives of this
list and didnt see my issue. Sometimes I (or users on my server)
receive emails that have no SpamAssassin header data.
I have SpamAssassin 3.1.0 Running via the spamd daemon (heres
the daemon startup line:
daemon
31 matches
Mail list logo
