RW skrev den 2013-07-04 19:18:
SA 3.1.1
That's nearly 7 years old; and probably the real source of your
problem.
and awl in this release have hardcoded /16 in awl code, where it later
is freely set to /8 /16 /24 /32 ipranges where /24 is new perfered
another reason to upgrade
--
senders
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 08:45:47 -0400
1611mac wrote:
> I inherited this site/email system in which autowhitelist had been
> running but spam and ham never properly marked so I believe all email
> to be "auto-whitelisted."\\
Autowhitelist doesn't actually whitelist. What it
I inherited this site/email system in which autowhitelist had been running but
spam and ham never properly marked so I believe all email to be
"auto-whitelisted."\\
I turned auto-whitelist off with: use_auto_whitelist 0
However, I found this in a header: -4.4 AWL AWL: From: address
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 08.07.11 18:05, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
>>Would not it make sense to add autowhitelisting based on Return-Path:
>>header (envelope sender) to auto whitelist mailing lists?
>>[ It may be triggered only when List-Id: header is present. ]
>
> No. Have you never be
On 08.07.11 18:05, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
Would not it make sense to add autowhitelisting based on Return-Path:
header (envelope sender) to auto whitelist mailing lists?
[ It may be triggered only when List-Id: header is present. ]
No.
Have you never been subscribed to someone's mailing lis
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello Andrzej Adam Filip,
>
> Am 2011-07-08 18:05:11, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
>> Would not it make sense to add autowhitelisting based on Return-Path:
>> header (envelope sender) to auto whitelist mailing lists?
>> [ It may be triggered only when List-Id: header i
Hello Andrzej Adam Filip,
Am 2011-07-08 18:05:11, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> Would not it make sense to add autowhitelisting based on Return-Path:
> header (envelope sender) to auto whitelist mailing lists?
> [ It may be triggered only when List-Id: header is present. ]
Not even the half o
Would not it make sense to add autowhitelisting based on Return-Path:
header (envelope sender) to auto whitelist mailing lists?
[ It may be triggered only when List-Id: header is present. ]
--
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu
Fame is a vapor; popularity an accident; the only eart
Ok, so I setup the mysql autowhitelisting db connection info in SA and
then ran the lint test and it appears everything is connecting fine. I
am though seeing any data logged. According to the local.conf,
autowhitelisting is enabled by default. I am using version 3.3.1 and it
is setup with Mai
--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Where can I find sa-awlUtil as it does not appear to be in the download file
> ?
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
Hmmm, it looks like someone has been editing the wiki in ways that don't
match anything in any released or unreleased version of SA.
The tool is named check-
Hi,
Where can I find sa-awlUtil as it does not appear to be in the download file ?
Best Regards,
--
SplatNIX IT Services :: Innovation through collaboration
: AutoWhitelist
On Tuesday 29 May 2007 9:55 am, Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury wrote:
> I was interested in the following plugin and hence AutoWhitelist:
> SAGrey
> SAGrey is two-phased, in that it first looks to see if the current score
> of the current message exceeds the user-defined threshold v
On Tuesday 29 May 2007 9:55 am, Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury wrote:
> I was interested in the following plugin and hence AutoWhitelist:
> SAGrey
> SAGrey is two-phased, in that it first looks to see if the current score
> of the current message exceeds the user-defined threshold value (as
22
> To: Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AutoWhitelist
>
> Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury wrote:
>
>> I am using spamassassin 3.1.7 (even now) on SLES 9 (64-bit). I am
>> having configuring the AutoWhitelist to work properly.
AbbaComm.Net wrote:
> are any ISP's out there using AWL and finding it "extremely" effective to
> the zillionth power?
I saw no reason to disable it when I first set up a spamfilter server
for the small ISP I started working for originally. This was ~SA2.4, so
there were no DNS-based URI tests an
I was interested in the following plugin and hence AutoWhitelist:
SAGrey
SAGrey is two-phased, in that it first looks to see if the current score
of the current message exceeds the user-defined threshold value (as set
in one of the cf files), and then looks to see if the message sender's
emai
On Tue, 29 May 2007, AbbaComm.Net wrote:
I purposely set
use_auto_whitelist 0
are any ISP's out there using AWL and finding it "extremely" effective to
the zillionth power?
I have it shut off as well at the server level (local.cf). However, I do
provide the option to be turned on at the pe
I purposely set
use_auto_whitelist 0
are any ISP's out there using AWL and finding it "extremely" effective to
the zillionth power?
- rh
--
Abba Communications
Spokane, WA
www.abbacomm.net
Sorry, my mistake. I have to set use_auto_whitelist 1.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 May 2007 13:37
To: Matt Kettler
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: AutoWhitelist
How about in local.cf setting
How about in local.cf setting
use_auto_whitelist 1
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 May 2007 13:22
To: Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: AutoWhitelist
Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury wrote:
> I am using spamassas
Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury wrote:
> I am using spamassassin 3.1.7 (even now) on SLES 9 (64-bit). I am
> having configuring the AutoWhitelist to work properly. Any help will
> be appreciated.
>
What are you trying to configure about it?
It should be enabled by default, if not, un
I am using spamassassin 3.1.7 (even now) on SLES 9 (64-bit). I am
having configuring the AutoWhitelist to work properly. Any help will
be appreciated.
Many thanks
--
Sujit Choudhury
ISLS
University of Westminster
Ext 3851 / 1779
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 08:34:40AM -0800, RobertH wrote:
> In reading the docs on autowhitelist it told me about v310.pre and this
> setting
>
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AWL
>
> do I need to comment out this below in the v310.pre or leave it alone and
>
We are using 3.17 on this particular server
In reading the docs on autowhitelist it told me about v310.pre and this
setting
# AWL - do auto-whitelist checks
#
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AWL
do I need to comment out this below in the v310.pre or leave it alone and
add the below
We are using 3.17 on this particular server
In reading the docs on autowhitelist it told me about v310.pre and this
setting
# AWL - do auto-whitelist checks
#
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AWL
do I need to comment out this below in the v310.pre or leave it alone and
add the below
Codger wrote:
> Regardless of challenge-response or
> greylisting, [...], the idea is the same...
No, those ideas are very different, both in practice, philosophy and results.
One of them is intended as a verification of the sender, the other is intended
to differentiate between connections fr
, which is (perforce) *after* the greylisting
tool has had its shot at the message.
Are you thinking of leveraging the SA autowhitelist database to adjust
the behavior of your greylist tool, whatever that is?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PR
Yes, everyone is correct that I called a challenge-response
incorrectly as greylisting. Sorry about that. Greylisting on CG Pro
however is implemented a little differently... I can adjust the
initial SMTP response time so it isn't specific to a user but
accomplishes the same thing. Regardle
ate) message history, that might work fairly well.
> What is then happening is that their contacts are getting a high
> negative score in the autowhitelist sql database. This has
> prevented legitimate email from being snagged by spamassassin
> many, many times
If I may sugges
autogreylist database as part of, but separate from, the
autowhitelist in SA? Or even if you think this is all a bad thing to
The subject line mentions autowhitelist as a Greylist. Your message
isn't about greylisting.
You could keep a database of the users/keywords and configure your
an
egative score points. What
would protect those messages?
> What is then happening is that their contacts are getting a high
> negative score in the autowhitelist sql database. This has prevented
> legitimate email from being snagged by spamassassin many, many times
I am not usin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Codger wrote:
> > I was wondering about anyone's thoughts toward having a real
> > autogreylist database as part of, but separate from, the autowhitelist
> > in SA? Or even if you think this is all a bad thing to do in t
suggested they just all
keep it in their signature for all their communications.
What is then happening is that their contacts are getting a high
negative score in the autowhitelist sql database. This has prevented
legitimate email from being snagged by spamassassin many, many times
I
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 09:30:46PM -0500, Robert Nicholson wrote:
> So these dbm databases seem to be platform dependent so how can you
> export from one platform and import to another?
They're Berkeley DB files, so you can use the appropriate BDB tools
to dump/load.
For bayes there's also the
Robert Nicholson wrote:
> So these dbm databases seem to be platform dependent so how can you
> export from one platform and import to another?
>
For bayes, check out the "--backup" and "--restore" options to sa-learn:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/dist/doc/sa-learn.html
For the AWL..
So these dbm databases seem to be platform dependent so how can you
export from one platform and import to another?
core. The
AWL should match spam, nonspam, etc. The score decides what the AWL
thinks of the message.
Please read up on how the AWL works:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutoWhitelist
And be sure to read about why the scores don't always make sense:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/
Heute (20.05.2006/23:53 Uhr) schrieb Pablo Allietti,
> On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:54:13PM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
>> Heute (20.05.2006/22:47 Uhr) schrieb Pablo Allietti,
>>
> perfect.
> exist any way to do that for all users??? because i do that for me only.
sorry, I don`t know. I have a syst
AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
> >>
> >> AWL is not a normal rule. Please read
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutoWhitelist.
> >>
>
> > perfect. i have this in the check_auto_whitel\ist
> > 0.2
y a score but i dont have a 50_score
>> > How i modify this score?
>> >
>> > 7.5 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
>>
>> AWL is not a normal rule. Please read
>> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutoWhitelist.
>>
my system and i want
> >>> to modify a score but i dont have a 50_score
> >>> How i modify this score?
> >>>
> >>> 7.5 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
> >> AWL is not a normal rule. Please read
> >&
>>> How i modify this score?
>>>
>>> 7.5 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
>> AWL is not a normal rule. Please read
>> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutoWhitelist.
>>
>
> perfect. i have this in the che
core?
> >
> > 7.5 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
>
> AWL is not a normal rule. Please read
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutoWhitelist.
>
perfect. i have this in the check_auto_whitel\ist
0.2 (0.5/2) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip
t a normal rule. Please read
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutoWhitelist.
What you can do is change auto_whitelist_factor in the preferences to lower
the weight of the AWL. See
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html.
--
Magnus Holmgren[
hi all, i have spamassassin for freebsd running in my system and i want
to modify a score but i dont have a 50_score
How i modify this score?
7.5 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
--
thanks
: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: AutoWhiteList
I seem to be at a loss. I have installed SA 3.0.4 on two identical
machines. Both machines are running CentOS4.1. Other software loaded would
include:
Sendmail 8-13.4-1 (from src rpm)
Clamav 0-86 (tar file)
MailScanner 4.44.1-1 (tar
I seem to be at a loss. I have installed SA 3.0.4 on two identical
machines. Both machines are running CentOS4.1. Other software loaded would
include:
Sendmail 8-13.4-1 (from src rpm)
Clamav 0-86 (tar file)
MailScanner 4.44.1-1 (tar)
MailWatch 1.0.1 (tar)
phpMyAdmin 2.6.3-pl1 (tar)
Webmin 1.210
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 12:22:35AM -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> I'm looking into converting to using SQL and I saw the conversion of the
> bayes data but nothing for the autowhitelist. Anyone?
tools/convert_awl_dbm_to_sql
Michael
pgpNw0HVHpcPD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I'm looking into converting to using SQL and I saw the conversion of the
bayes data but nothing for the autowhitelist. Anyone?
TIA
--
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say
I have setup SA to use a site-wide autowhitelist as described in the
SA3.01 README, but I don't think it is working.
I added the following lines to my local.cf file:
auto_whitelist_path /var/spool/spamassassin/auto-whitelist
auto_whitelist_file_mode 0666
So far the
At 01:27 PM 10/1/2004, Scott Taylor wrote:
This is the only line I can see that looks like might be a problem.
debug: diag: module not installed: Razor2::Client::Agent ('require' failed)
Only thing is: I can't find this module at CPAN. Closest thing I can find
is Mail-Audit-2.1 :(
That should be i
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 10:27:20AM -0700, Scott Taylor wrote:
> This is the only line I can see that looks like might be a problem.
> debug: diag: module not installed: Razor2::Client::Agent ('require' failed)
>
> Only thing is: I can't find this module at CPAN. Closest thing I can find
> is Mail
Matt Kettler said:
> At 12:10 PM 10/1/2004, Scott Taylor wrote:
>> > Do you have DB_File installed
>>
>>appears not.
>>
>>Anything else I need to do with it?
>
> That should cover it. You can always run a spamassassin --lint -D and look
> at the debug output. It should tell you if SA is skipping v
At 12:10 PM 10/1/2004, Scott Taylor wrote:
> Do you have DB_File installed
appears not.
Anything else I need to do with it?
That should cover it. You can always run a spamassassin --lint -D and look
at the debug output. It should tell you if SA is skipping various optional
features due to lack of
Matt Kettler said:
> At 11:15 AM 10/1/2004, Scott Taylor wrote:
>>I just installed SpammAssasin 3.0.0, on RHES3, after fixing the LANG as
>> it
>>still seems to have problems with utf-8. Anyhow, after reading about the
>>AutoWhitelist I looked and the directory /var
At 11:15 AM 10/1/2004, Scott Taylor wrote:
I just installed SpammAssasin 3.0.0, on RHES3, after fixing the LANG as it
still seems to have problems with utf-8. Anyhow, after reading about the
AutoWhitelist I looked and the directory /var/spool/spamassassin did not
exist and I get autolearn=failed
Hello,
I just installed SpammAssasin 3.0.0, on RHES3, after fixing the LANG as it
still seems to have problems with utf-8. Anyhow, after reading about the
AutoWhitelist I looked and the directory /var/spool/spamassassin did not
exist and I get autolearn=failed in my headers. Maybe something
57 matches
Mail list logo
