Re: Customize Label presentation at BeanEditForm based on it's validations

Hi, Looks like this was not fixed in 5.0.16 as Howard asserts in TAP5-328. I confirmed the problem is present in 5.0.16, 5.1.0.5 and 5.2.0-SNAPSHOT. I somewhat agree with Howard's preference with respect to the patch but would appreciate an alterna

Re: T5 - Persisting content injected with FormInjector after a failed submit

t no cigar. Regards, and thanks, Patrick 2009/3/11 Patrick Moriarty : > Hi, > > I've been experimenting with using a FormInjector to inject a Block > containing a FormFragment to allow me to reconfigure part of a form when a > select option is picked. > > The idea was to hi

Re: T5.1 + JSONArray

I've also seen this behaviour and ended up turning off GZip compression for "application/json" mime type. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-469. Patrick 2009/3/12 Howard Lewis Ship > It's possible that XmlHttpRequest may not handle GZIPed responses > correctly; I'm looking into it

T5 - Persisting content injected with FormInjector after a failed submit

form is submitted and fails validation. When the page is rendered again the injected content is gone but validation messages for fields contained in it are shown! Has anyone used FormInjector in this way? Thanks, Patrick Moriarty Annadale Technologies Ltd.

Re: T5: application/json response and GZip compression

See TAP5-467, TAP5-468, TAP5-469. 2009/1/26 Patrick Moriarty > My pleasure, most of the time ;) > > I'll create a couple of JIRA issues for these. > > Patrick > > 2009/1/23 Howard Lewis Ship > >> These all sound like issues that should be added to JIRA

Re: T5: application/json response and GZip compression

My pleasure, most of the time ;) I'll create a couple of JIRA issues for these. Patrick 2009/1/23 Howard Lewis Ship > These all sound like issues that should be added to JIRA. Thanks for > hanging out on the bleeding edge! > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Patrick

Re: T5: application/json response and GZip compression

I've resorted to returning a TextStreamResponse with "application/json" as the content type in order to bypass gzip compression. 2009/1/23 Patrick Moriarty : > Looks like adding "application/json" to the configuration for > ResponseCompressionAnalyzer doesn'

Re: T5: application/json response and GZip compression

ssionAnalyzer should probably ignore the charset and any other parameters in isCompressable() Patrick 2009/1/23 Patrick Moriarty : > Hi, > > Since the recent introduction of gzip compression returning a > JSONObject from a mixin event method results in an empty responseText > in Fir

T5: application/json response and GZip compression

Hi, Since the recent introduction of gzip compression returning a JSONObject from a mixin event method results in an empty responseText in Firefox. It seems there is some problem with Content-Type: application/json and Content-Encoding: gzip headers that prevents the response from being decompres

Re: [T5] Using Autocomplete.configure to specify an afterUpdateElement function

an > afterUpdateElement function > > i think there's already a jira for this > > On 7/9/08, Patrick Moriarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Although I can subclass Autocomplete and implement the > > configure(JSONObject) method to spec

[T5] Using Autocomplete.configure to specify an afterUpdateElement function

Hi, Although I can subclass Autocomplete and implement the configure(JSONObject) method to specify an afterUpdateElement, the fuction I specify (as a String here) gets surrounded by double-quotes by JSONObject.toString() Thus it is not interpreted as a function. It would be nice if I could use s

Re: T5.0.13 - Oracle10gDialect class not found

Found https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-2428 which would seem to explain it. On 04/07/2008, Patrick Moriarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, > > It looks like the tapestry-hibernate pom.xml was changed and > provided was removed from the hibernate dependen

Re: T5.0.13 - Oracle10gDialect class not found

m. I couldn't find any reference to this in the Tapestry JIRA but will log an issue if necessary . Paudi org.hibernate hibernate 3.2.2.ga javax.transaction jta On 04/07/2008, Patrick Moriarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > After

T5.0.13 - Oracle10gDialect class not found

Hi, After switching to 5.0.13, I can't start my Tapestry + Spring [2.5.4] + Hibernate [3.2.6.ga] application with any oracle dialect other than Oracle9Dialect, which is now deprecated. Funny enough, the deprecation warning, present when using 5.0.12 with Oracle9Dialect, is no longer showing! Any

Re: T5.0.11-SNAPSHOT - tapestry-hibernate out of date

MAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Typical Maven bullshit. Some of their plugins have broken and it's > > screwing up the nightly build. I'll see what I can do but don't have > > an ETA. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 2:09 AM, P

Re: Howard deserves praise

e last major hurdle. > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Patrick Moriarty > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks Howard, any news on when we can expect FormSupport to be > available? > > > > Render queue error in SetupRender[xxx/xxx.xxx]: No object of

Re: Howard deserves praise

Thanks Howard, any news on when we can expect FormSupport to be available? Render queue error in SetupRender[xxx/xxx.xxx]: No object of type org.apache.tapestry.services.FormSupport is available from the Environment. Available types are org.apache.tapestry.PageRenderSupport, org.apache.tapestry.Va

T5.0.11-SNAPSHOT - tapestry-hibernate out of date

Hi, I'm getting a ClassDefNotFound exception on org/apache/tapestry/internal/services/ClassNameLocator from org.apache.tapestry.hibernate.HibernateModule in tapestry-hibernate-5.0.11-20080222.120050-13.jar. The class has moved to org.apache.tapestry.ioc.services in tapestry-ioc-5.0.11-20080224.12

Re: Latest snapshot breaks my contributed translator

We implemented getType(). For example, public Class getType() { return BigDecimal.class; } But we observe the same behaviour. Looks like the lookup by type isn't working correctly. On 08/02/2008, Kevin Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It looks like the Translator interface has been ch