On 2021-06-16 16:42, Jared Geiger wrote:
Does Ribbon/Sonus charge extra for it even in passthrough modes
On my Ribbon C15s, there is no extra charge/license for G722. However,
we do need to pay licenses for SIP trunks in general, which is by far
the largest barrier towards modernizing our pho
I've seen an increase in G722 calls and I've seen a few AMR-WB calls get
through too for our International vendors. Its still relatively new for
them outside of the IPX/VoLTE market. I've had a large PTT ask to help with
end to end testing for AMR-WB with them. A handful of International vendors
ar
On 2021-06-14 12:07, Richard Jobson wrote:
before going to the PSTN which is clamped at G.711 narrowband
This is starting to get a /little/ bit better, but progress is painfully
slow. For example, Inteliquent supports G722, you just need to ask for
it to be enabled on your SIP trunks with th
e Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
>
>
> --
> *From: *"Calvin Ellison"
> *To: *"Mike Hammett"
> *Cc: *"VoiceOps&qu
ense.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Calvin Ellison"
To: "Mike Hammett"
Cc: "VoiceOps"
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2
://www.midwest-ix.com
>
>
>
> --
> *From: *"Mike Hammett"
> *To: *"VoiceOps"
> *Sent: *Sunday, June 13, 2021 1:11:30 PM
> *Subject: *[VoiceOps] Call Quality
>
> I've heard a variety of complaints and concerns over
http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
>
>
> From: "Tim Bray via VoiceOps"
> To: voiceops@voiceops.org
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 4:36:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Call Quality
>
> On 14/06/2
ops-boun...@voiceops.org>> On Behalf
Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 4:46 PM
To: Tim Bray mailto:t...@kooky.org>>
Cc: voiceops@voiceops.org<mailto:voiceops@voiceops.org>
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Call Quality
God, I hope customers don't hold their carriers respons
ammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Bray via VoiceOps" < voiceops@voiceops.org >
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 4:36:55 PM
Sub
ip.com
From: VoiceOps On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 4:46 PM
To: Tim Bray
Cc: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Call Quality
God, I hope customers don't hold their carriers responsible for inappropriate
use of speakerphones.
Yes, I'm sure the complai
uot;
> *To: *voiceops@voiceops.org
> *Sent: *Monday, June 14, 2021 4:36:55 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [VoiceOps] Call Quality
>
> On 14/06/2021 22:25, Mike Hammett wrote:
> > One of the concerns I heard was echo. On a purely digital call, what
> > would be the cause of echo?
>
> E
ez"
> *To: *voiceops@voiceops.org
> *Sent: *Monday, June 14, 2021 4:37:38 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [VoiceOps] Call Quality
>
> So are you saying that you've experienced echo on a fully VoIP call? IP
> handset to IP handset, without some sort of analog interface other than in
/www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Bray via VoiceOps"
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 4:36:55 PM
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Call Quality
On 14/06/2021 22:25, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
From: "Carlos Alvarez"
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 4:37:38 PM
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Call Quality
So are you saying that you've experienced echo on a fully VoIP call? IP handset
to IP handset, without some sort of analog interface other than in
t;
>
> From: "Carlos Alvarez"
> To: voiceops@voiceops.org
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 4:31:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Call Quality
>
> Well, no call is purely digital, the endpoints are still analog, as is the
> meatbag behind the handset. I can't ima
On 14/06/2021 22:25, Mike Hammett wrote:
One of the concerns I heard was echo. On a purely digital call, what
would be the cause of echo?
Echo, as in hearing yourself coming back with a delay?
Sound flying from the speaker to the microphone at the far end. Dodgy
speaker phone, poor plastic de
ix.com
>
>
>
> --
> *From: *"Carlos Alvarez"
> *To: *voiceops@voiceops.org
> *Sent: *Monday, June 14, 2021 4:31:07 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [VoiceOps] Call Quality
>
> Well, no call is purely digital, the endpoints are still analog
: "Carlos Alvarez"
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 4:31:07 PM
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Call Quality
Well, no call is purely digital, the endpoints are still analog, as is the
meatbag behind the handset. I can't imagine any way you can create echo in the
d
est Internet Exchange
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
>
>
> --
> *From: *"Mike Hammett"
> *To: *"VoiceOps"
> *Sent: *Sunday, June 13, 2021 1:11:30 PM
> *Subject: *[VoiceOps] Call Quality
>
> I've heard a variety of complaints and
quot;
To: "VoiceOps"
Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2021 1:11:30 PM
Subject: [VoiceOps] Call Quality
I've heard a variety of complaints and concerns over the years about call
quality. How are these quality issues introduced? As long as pipes and
equipment aren't overloaded, wh
14, 2021 at 3:23 AM
To: Mike Hammett ,
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Call Quality
Hi,
It depends on your definition of pipes not too overloaded. And I'm presuming
from mention of pipes that you mean network induced call quality problems.
Usually bufferbloat. Routers with too much memory ca
e Hammett" mailto:voice...@ics-il.net>>
*To: *"VoiceOps" mailto:voiceops@voiceops.org>>
*Sent: *Sunday, June 13, 2021 1:11:30 PM
*Subject: *[VoiceOps] Call Quality
I've heard a variety of complaints and concerns over the years about
call qualit
;
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
>
>
> ------
> *From: *"Mike Hammett"
> *To: *"VoiceOps"
is where almost all of the problems occur?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett"
To: "VoiceOps"
Sent: Sunday, June 13, 20
Hi,
It depends on your definition of pipes not too overloaded. And I'm
presuming from mention of pipes that you mean network induced call
quality problems.
Usually bufferbloat. Routers with too much memory cause a lot of
latency at the point of a fast to slow transition in the network.
Not sure how useful it is Mike, but thought of a couple of examples:
Dropped packets
(eg from radio interfaces)
NAT
(eg one-way audio caused by broken ALGs, or lost signalling due to
state table timeouts)
Pete
> On 14/06/2021, at 6:11 AM, Mike Hammett
I've heard a variety of complaints and concerns over the years about call
quality. How are these quality issues introduced? As long as pipes and
equipment aren't overloaded, where is a quality issue to come from?
Obviously, the closer you are to the handsets, the less opportunity there is
f
So is it safe to assume the access line is POTS/analog? If so, you have POTS
from local Malaysian LEC to your network? Are you Connecting to your network
via a SIP trunk? If so, you can capture the IP packets where it enters your
network using Wireshark (or any other tool which captures RTP eg
On 11 July 2016 at 13:38, wrote:
> This may be a silly question.is there any way that I can get a MOS or
> PESQ score for a call?
See this blog:
https://txlab.wordpress.com/2015/06/02/quality-assurance-for-voip-calls-2/
And this:
http://voxserv.ch/demolab.html
>
> I have an access line in
Try AQuA: http://sevana.biz/products/aqua/
Aviv
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 01:38 PM, mgra...@mstvp.com wrote:
> This may be a silly question.is there any way that I can get a MOS
> or PESQ score for a call?
>
> I have an access line in Malaysia that's really quite bad quality. The
> provide
If it’s a VOIP call you can grab stats from it using a number of different
products.
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of
mgra...@mstvp.com
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 3:38 PM
To: voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: [VoiceOps] Call Quality Scoring?
This may be a silly
This may be a silly question.is there any way that I can get a MOS or PESQ
score for a call?
I have an access line in Malaysia that's really quite bad quality. The provider
says it "sounds fine to them."
I'd like to have some empirical evidence that it's bad. I've setup an automated
sy
Our TW Telecom rep changed email accounts today to level3.com .
I wonder when the networks will merge or if Level 3 now will upgrade all of
TW Telecoms ports.
Aryn H. K. Nakaoka
anaka...@trinet-hi.com
Direct: 808.356.2901
Fax : 808.356.2919
Call me with our Browser Phone : https://encrypted
Hello,
On 3 November 2014 23:23, Aryn Nakaoka 808.356.2901
wrote:
> It'll be interesting now that L3 and TWTC are one.
>
> http://investors.level3.com/investor-relations/presentations-and-events/default.aspx
>
>
I thought this had already happened based on this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TW_T
It'll be interesting now that L3 and TWTC are one.
http://investors.level3.com/investor-relations/presentations-and-events/default.aspx
Aryn H. K. Nakaoka
anaka...@trinet-hi.com
Direct: 808.356.2901
Fax : 808.356.2919
Call me with our Browser Phone : https://encrypted.alohatone.com/356290
Yes we have a customer reporting issues with calls going across L3 to one
our SBCs in LA. Does not seem to be widespread for us yet, we have have L3
and TWTC in LA and it seems to be isolated to L3. The customer also uses
Intelepeer and they are having the same packet loss from them.
On Mon, Nov 3
Hello Pete,
On 3 November 2014 09:08, Pete E wrote:
> Anyone seeing heavy call quality problems? We're still trying to narrow down
> but appears to be Level3/Global Crossing?
>
Yes, at work we use 8x8.com which is level 3 and a few calls over the
past hour or so are broken up badly but when tryin
Anyone seeing heavy call quality problems? We're still trying to narrow
down but appears to be Level3/Global Crossing?
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
38 matches
Mail list logo
