The defense and intelligence competition has produced much innovation and
technology improvement to commercial interests spinoffs which includes
nuclear power, the computer, software, GPS, TNT, space science, the
internet, air travel, electronics, RADAR, to name just a few.
The defense use and d
that is a rule that I've learn in professional training about innovation.
inovators are:
- foreigners in their domain (other country, culture, industry, diploma,
speciality). so they understand that the things can be different from what
it is in their company/industry/domain...
- they gave a networ
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:32:28 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Toyota showed an advanced hybrid car at the Geneva International Auto Show.
>It gets 60 km/l (141 mpg). In Japanese:
>
>http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/atmoney/news/20120411-OYT1T01265.htm
>
>- Jed
It's appallingly ugly!
Terry Blanton wrote:
> I seriously doubt any procurement officer would be involved in
> this transaction. I would think all this would occur at a much higher
> pay grade.
>
Given the way he treated the people from NASA and others, you would have to
be crazy to deal with him at any level. It wo
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> He told me he did not want the technology used by the military because he is
> a pacifist.
Capitalism trumps being a pacifist. :-)
> I have no idea if that is how he truly felt. Perhaps, as you suggest, it was
> actually because he was alr
Terry Blanton wrote:
>
> The way I took it was that, he already had a relationship with the
> military and no military licenses were available.
>
He told me he did not want the technology used by the military because he
is a pacifist.
I have no idea if that is how he truly felt. Perhaps, as you
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Last year, Rossi insisted that he would never do business with the military.
Is that what he said? I remember it differently. He was talking
about selling licenses but not for military applications.
The way I took it was that, he already h
Von: Jed Rothwell
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Gesendet: 21:13 Donnerstag, 12.April 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Rossi: "The 1 MW plant is for military purpose"
> Last year, Rossi insisted that he would never do business with
the military. Now this! He is inconsisten
Many writers such as Christensen have pointed out that innovation tends to
come from outside an industry. Containerized shipping is a classic
example. It was developed by Malcom McLean, and industry outsider. That is
why cold fusion is unlikely to be developed by mainstream energy companies.
Inno
Strange paper, don't you think?
Excess heat due to isotope exchange cannot be more than a small fraction of
an eV per atom exchanged, and alumina does not absorb all that much water...
so what are we talking about? A few joules at most ?
What a wasted effort. I cannot imagine the motivation to ex
Rossi’s reactor is attractive to the US military because of its very high
power density. The E-Cat catalyst (AKA secret sauce) reduces the size and
weight of the LENR core by a factor of 100 over a non-catalyzed reactor.
One gram of nickel in a E-Cat does the work of 100 grams in non-catalyzed
reac
Going back over a decade to when several top level LENR researchers at a
National Lab were using lithium hydroxide with deuterium (Claytor and
Tuggle) in cold fusion cells, and getting results including the production
of tritium and 4He - there has been speculation in an ostensibly unrelated
field.
Last year, Rossi insisted that he would never do business with the
military. Now this! He is inconsistent, to say the least.
- Jed
At 09:33 AM 4/11/2012, Jones Beene wrote:
The most interesting distinction
in all of physics comes into focus with
Ni-H, assuming that it is NOT a nuclear reaction (as normally
understood).
There is no proof that Ni-H is primarily nuclear, and many indications
that
it is not, and there are also i
Toyota showed an advanced hybrid car at the Geneva International Auto Show.
It gets 60 km/l (141 mpg). In Japanese:
http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/atmoney/news/20120411-OYT1T01265.htm
- Jed
a fun-back-of the-napkin-calculation wrt interstellar space travel.
Suppose, you have the technology to accelerate a spacecraft to 0.5 lightspeed.
The distance to travel is 10 lightyears, which takes some 20years.
Now consider that:
You need a fairly large vehicle, which is not the size of your t
Robert Lynn wrote:
The energy costs for launching via a gun launch or a rocket won't be
> much different to a space elevator given the parasitic weight of the
> climber's laser receivers, motors, radiators, wheels etc
The payload of a lifter is 70% of the mass, with present technology. The
payl
IF Rossi's e-cat is real, it never made sense that anyone would use
a world changing technology for something as mundane as heating a
industrial building.
What are the odds Rossi is stating the facts? (See below.)
Lou Pagnucco
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=614&cpage=1#comment-21
The energy costs for launching via a gun launch or a rocket won't be
much different to a space elevator given the parasitic weight of the
climber's laser receivers, motors, radiators, wheels etc plus <25%
efficient electricity transmission to the elevator so need on the
order of 100kWh per kg paylo
19 matches
Mail list logo
