for any particular Ni isotope. I do not think separation would be difficult.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Eric Walker
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Newly published US20140034116A1 patent application
regarding LENR
On
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
A key question is how easy it is to enrich Ni. This should be easy to
> answer. Note in my comment I suggested that particular organic Ni
> compounds may be selectively sensitive to tuned laser based on the isotope
> they contain and hence sele
to accomplish
separation.
Do you remember when the topic was discussed before. I would like to review
that thread.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Eric Walker
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Newly published US20140034116A1
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Bob Cook wrote:
Ni-62 and Ni64 are not a big constituents of natural Ni--Ni-58 is the
> largest at about 68.3%. However, they both provide about 4.5% of the
> natural Ni isotopes. Both Ni-62 and Ni-64 would transmute to stable Cu -63
> and Cu-65 upon absorption
particles capable of spin changes available for participation, including
electrons.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: "Jones Beene"
To:
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 12:21 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Newly published US20140034116A1 patent application
regarding LENR
Origin
Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
Ni-62 and Ni64 are not a big constituents of natural Ni--Ni-58 is the
largest at about 68.3%. However, they both provide about 4.5% of the
natural Ni isotopes. Both Ni-62 and Ni-64 would transmute to stable Cu -63
and Cu-65 upon absorption of a proton
y simple.
One should investigate the Company that is making Rossi's Ni powder to see
if they do isotope enrichment work.
Bob
The
- Original Message -
From: "Jones Beene"
To:
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 10:34 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Newly published US20140034116A1 pate
From: Teslaalset
The most remarkable takeaway of US20140034116A1 is that the
inventors point out that using ionized 1/1 (light) Hydrogen, only two Nickel
isotopes are suitable: Ni62 and Ni64. This is particulary interesting since
they published this
The most remarkable takeaway of US20140034116A1 is that the inventors point
out that using ionized 1/1 (light) Hydrogen, only two Nickel isotopes are
suitable: Ni62 and Ni64. This is particulary interesting since they
published this in their provisional patent application back in August 2012.
Rossi
There is no bibliography on this patent. This is odd.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
From: Bob Cook
"The potential energy for these three bodies, an electron between two
positives, is always attractive. This positive-negative-positive three-body
configuration is the starting point and initial condition for a three-body
association reaction.Nickel may also work as a catalyst as
riginal Message -
From: Teslaalset
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Newly published US20140034116A1 patent application
regarding LENR
Improved link:
http://www.google.com/patents/US20140034116
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Tes
bodied reaction as described above.
I think this should be referred to as the slippery watermelon seed effect.
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
From: Teslaalset
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Newly published US20140034116A1
Improved link:
http://www.google.com/patents/US20140034116
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Teslaalset wrote:
> US20140034116A1 patent application published regarding a description of
> LENR methods to generate energy, including the options to generate
> electricity. The inventors actually don't
US20140034116A1 patent application published regarding a description of
LENR methods to generate energy, including the options to generate
electricity. The inventors actually don't mention the term LENR, but
indicated that the actual physical effects are still unknown.
Ni - H is part of it, but the
15 matches
Mail list logo
