Re: [Wicket-user] using feedback not based on labels

Igor Vaynberg wrote: hrm, so now if you want to join the two what do you do in getMessages() of the compound impl? create a new arraylist and merge messages from the other two? do you do the merged array generation on every call or keep it in a transient field? i copy the code from Feeedba

Re: [Wicket-user] using feedback not based on labels

hrm, so now if you want to join the two what do you do in getMessages() of the compound impl?create a new arraylist and merge messages from the other two? do you do the merged array generation on every call or keep it in a transient field? -IgorOn 5/9/06, Ittay Dror <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ok, i

Re: [Wicket-user] using feedback not based on labels

ok, i have it. how do i send it? i created an AbstractFeedbackMessages, which has 2 abstract methods: isReadonly() and getMessages(). the rest use them i'm thinking of maybe change it to ReadonlyFeedbackMessages and FeedbackMessages which will extend it, and CompoundFeedbackMessages will exten

Re: [Wicket-user] using feedback not based on labels

yep although i think an abstract base class suffices will try to do it shortly. Igor Vaynberg wrote: maybe you can submit a patch here is what i would suggest extract IFeedbackMessages interface from FeedbackMessages and create a CompoundFeedbackMessages impl, that way you can join the sess

Re: [Wicket-user] using feedback not based on labels

maybe you can submit a patchhere is what i would suggestextract IFeedbackMessages interface from FeedbackMessages and create a CompoundFeedbackMessages impl, that way you can join the session and page messages yourself and still use the same utility methods in FeedbackMessages on the joined collect

Re: [Wicket-user] using feedback not based on labels

Igor Vaynberg wrote: so you want to use it outside the model? outside of an IModel context, yes. but then feedbackpanel.anyMessage(int level) is just Page.getFeedbackMessages().hasAnyMessage(new ErrorLevelFeedbackMessage(level)) no? no, because the model joins the page messages and se

Re: [Wicket-user] using feedback not based on labels

so you want to use it outside the model?but then feedbackpanel.anyMessage(int level) is justPage.getFeedbackMessages().hasAnyMessage(new ErrorLevelFeedbackMessage(level)) no?-Igor On 5/9/06, Ittay Dror <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: it will be too much of a pain, since most issues are because i'm using

Re: [Wicket-user] Fragment rendering

That makes perfect sense. Luck for me by the time I use that feature, it'll be on by default. Thanks,  - Jason B. Igor Vaynberg wrote: you only need to set the setting if the fragment is going to be rendererd by a different component then the one whose markup its defined in. for example,

Re: [Wicket-user] using feedback not based on labels

it will be too much of a pain, since most issues are because i'm using wicket in an existing application, built on struts. however, i would appriciate it if you could answer some specific questions. i'm trying to create my own feedback panel. an issue i encountered is that FeedbackPanel has th

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

Heh, that's funny, of course you didn't, I did. -Matej Eelco Hillenius wrote: > On 5/9/06, Matej Knopp < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: >> Igor Vaynberg wrote: >> I don't mind API breaks. Not at all. If I touch code that is not a part >> of

Re: [Wicket-user] using feedback not based on labels

give us an html snippet of what you want as the end result and tell us where the components are. it is very difficult to talk on such a huge abstraction level.-IgorOn 5/9/06, Ittay Dror <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Igor Vaynberg wrote:> but what is really a problem then i dont understand? all you wa

Re: [Wicket-user] using feedback not based on labels

Igor Vaynberg wrote: but what is really a problem then i dont understand? all you want to do is write out some javascript based on feedback messages? instead of using a feedbackpanel add a label that writes out the javascript you want. you can get the messages using Page.getFeedbackMessages()

[Wicket-user] can feedback panel be generalized?

the FeedbackPanel component has a lot of non-trivial functionality, that makes it hard to write my own customized version of it. especially, adding other components, or controlling existing ones is hackish (i have to use Component.get() and visitChildren) maybe have FeedbackPanel use a Feedbac

Re: [Wicket-user] using feedback not based on labels

but what is really a problem then i dont understand? all you want to do is write out some _javascript_ based on feedback messages? instead of using a feedbackpanel add a label that writes out the _javascript_ you want. you can get the messages using Page.getFeedbackMessages()so something like this

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

Eelco Hillenius wrote: On 5/9/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Igor Vaynberg wrote: I don't mind API breaks. Not at all. If I touch code that is not a part of "Stable" API, I take the risk of having to change my code when wicket version changes. I really don't mind. Well, not every

Re: [Wicket-user] using feedback not based on labels

thanx, i did look and you do amazing things with wicket however, i still want to do it as i first suggested. the reason is that the function i mentioned is not that simple and has a lot of "gui" logic in it, which i don't want to move inside my java code. thanx, ittay Eelco Hillenius wrote:

Re: [Wicket-user] using feedback not based on labels

It's explained in the javadocs. And check out the YUI projects from wicket-stuff and like at the Slider component which has an example of it. Also, see bottom of http://chillenious.wordpress.com/2006/05/03/wicket-header-contributions-with-behaviors/ Eelco On 5/9/06, Ittay Dror <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

Eelco Hillenius wrote:> On 5/9/06, Matej Knopp < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> Igor Vaynberg wrote:>> I don't mind API breaks. Not at all. If I touch code that is not a part>> of "Stable" API, I take the risk of having to change my code when wicket >> version changes. I really don't mind.hey!! i didn

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

Anyway, I don't want to sound grumpy or bitter. I really do appreciate all the hard work you guys do on Wicket. Wicket has made an incredible progress and I really like the way it's heading. I'm using wicket for almost year and half now and it seems that I'm not going to abandon it any soon :)

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

Eelco Hillenius wrote: On 5/9/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Igor Vaynberg wrote: I don't mind API breaks. Not at all. If I touch code that is not a part of "Stable" API, I take the risk of having to change my code when wicket version changes. I really don't mind. Well, not everyon

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

On 5/9/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Igor Vaynberg wrote: I don't mind API breaks. Not at all. If I touch code that is not a part of "Stable" API, I take the risk of having to change my code when wicket version changes. I really don't mind. Well, not everyone agrees with you. Some

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

Wicket really isn't perfect. But it's really getting closer and closer :) -Matej Eelco Hillenius wrote: Yeah, Wicket is not perfect and neither are we. That's why we discuss here and see whether we can reach common ground. Then everyone will be happy! :) Eelco On 5/9/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

Igor Vaynberg wrote: I don't mind API breaks. Not at all. If I touch code that is not a part of "Stable" API, I take the risk of having to change my code when wicket version changes. I really don't mind. What I do mind is the (occasional) lack of flexibility and things that keep me from exten

Re: [Wicket-user] MaskConverter: isn't a better way?

to elaborate a littlelets say we did let you use a setterthen we have to keep a reference to the converter in the Component, so when serialized it is one more object - that almost never changes - that has to be serialized. making components session footprint even bigger. also if we let you use a se

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

Yeah, Wicket is not perfect and neither are we. That's why we discuss here and see whether we can reach common ground. Then everyone will be happy! :) Eelco On 5/9/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: the flipside is of course that we were able to refactor a ton without breaking too muc

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

the flipside is of course that we were able to refactor a ton without breaking too much api. you can argue that 1.2 has a lot of api breaks, but if you compare code in 1.2 to 1.1 they can almost be different frameworks. -IgorOn 5/9/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If WicketMessageTagHandl

Re: [Wicket-user] Fragment rendering

you only need to set the setting if the fragment is going to be rendererd by a different component then the one whose markup its defined in.for example, if you were going to use the fragment that is defiend in your page to create a panel that you add to a column inside a datatable - then you have t

[Wicket-user] Visibility of clearInput method

Could the FormComponent#clearInput() be made public?   This is my scenario:    * a recipient property on my model object  * a DropDown (that listens to selection change events) lets users select from a list of Recipient beans  * a TextField is bound to the email field for the model object's reci

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

If WicketMessageTagHandler can get resource.getContainerInfo(), why my filter can't? There's something about this that doesn't make me feel entirely good. Why can't my filter get this information? Or even better, why can't my MarkupParser get this information? Is it /that/ internal? IMHO som

Re: [Wicket-user] Filterable ListViews

On 5/9/06, Michiel Trimpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for the feedback, I've gotten the basics working but I have two remaining problems:   How do I filter on reference Objects, not stringsyou mean in the DropDownChoice you want to get an object reference back?you sho

Re: [Wicket-user] changing images with Ajax

heh, i think its random enough. how many decimal places does it show? but you guys can do whatever you want of course :)-IgorOn 5/9/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:System.nanoTime () is @since 1.5, so I don't think it's usable anyway :)Johan Compagner wrote:> i think millis will do. If y

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

this was never meant to be postprocessedusers are not meant to output wicket:i18n:key to the attribute using an attribute modifier and expect it to work.this was only meant as a preprocessing step toloading the markup. after that users are on their own. of course then we need to figure out where th

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: Problem loading DatePicker inside Panel through AjaxLink

well, my concern is to make this automatic.for example:when a component contributes func whatever() { } through that contribution needs to magically merge. or when a component contributes a { color:red; } that also has to magically get mergedbut from what i have seen there is no way to do that, yo

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

Well, it looks that this is not as easy as it seemed to be. I've made a MarkupFilter that translates the string. But I need to give it ContainerInfo of current markup resource (same as WicketMessageTagHandler gets). The problem is that I can't touch markup (or markup.getResource) in my Localize

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

+1 or juergen can come up with a nice way to do it in our Tags introducing a special MessageTag that is just handles like the RawInputTag for tagsthat only consist of a i18n key. And append auto something in the Wicket Component Tag attribute if it is a wicket component that also has a i18n attribu

Re: [Wicket-user] component input handling (was: why is MarkupContainer.add final?)

should we rfe for 2.0?-IgorOn 5/9/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: rawinput should also be a string[] but the problem is if we change that then getValue()/getRawInput() and maybe als getModelValue all should also change and that will affect a lot... johan On 5/9/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EM

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-example Japanese translation

Yeah, it's UTF-8. Don't forget to set the encoding type in your editor. That's done for Eclipse if you update. Eelco On 5/9/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What encoding () did you use for FormInput_ja.html. My browser shows some rubbish which I don't think is japanese. It do

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

I think this kind of substition is fine. A slippery slope, but as long as we resist substituting anything else than just static text, we'll be fine. Eelco On 5/9/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What would be your suggestion on how to localize HTML which contains plenty of text

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

What would be your suggestion on how to localize HTML which contains plenty of text which needs to be localized? Juergen On 5/9/06, Justin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Personally, I find the concept of any sort of templating/text substitutio

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Personally, I find the concept of any sort of templating/text substitution a little distasteful. Things would start looking like velocity or JSP and I can't afford the alcohol to make that livable... Juergen Donnerstag wrote: > On 5/9/06, Eelco

RE: [Wicket-user] Concurrent Modification Exception -- NEVER MIND!

Never mind!  The problem had nothing to do with Wicket.  My error was trying to delete elements of the very list I was iterating:     for (CheckboxData cbd : listToBePruned ){   if ( !cbd.isChecked() ) {     listToBePruned.remove(cbd);   }     }   A different looping stra

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

But it realy shouldn't be a quick fix. IMO we should first improve the general resource chain. Additional an text based filter in between would be very easy than. Juergen Well, we consider you being the markup masta :) I'm certainly not in favor of a quick fix anytime, anywhere in Wicket. Quic

[Wicket-user] Concurrent Modification Exception

I created a CheckboxData type containing a boolean (checked) and a label.   I created a CheckboxDataPanel whose constructor takes a CheckboxData object, and which displays a checkbox and the label – each using a PropertyModel built from the Checkbox Data object.   I constructed a ListVi

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-example Japanese translation

Cool! Thanks a lot. One thing: it is advisable to start your page's markup files with: So that the encoding is set properly. If that is not put in the markup, it renders quite funny on my box :) Maybe you want to take a look at these buttons too? You can look at FormInputApplication.init to se

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket-example Japanese translation

What encoding () did you use for FormInput_ja.html. My browser shows some rubbish which I don't think is japanese. It doesn't seem to be UTF-8. Juergen On 5/9/06, Takeshi Matsuba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi I am Japanese Wicket user. I translate three files of Wicket-examples . FormInput_ja

[Wicket-user] wicket-example Japanese translation

Hi I am Japanese Wicket user. I translate three files of Wicket-examples . FormInput_ja.html FormInput_ja.properties FoemInputApplication.properties see attached file thanks wicket-example_ja.tar Description: Binary data

Re: [Wicket-user] using feedback not based on labels

The templating function is deliberately kept simple. If you want it's pretty easy to create your own template thingies using e.g. Velocity or Freemarker. But in this case, it's probably sufficient to just concatenate the list yourself and do substitution of one variable placeholder. Thus: in your

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

On 5/9/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What I definitively like about the pre-processor/ filter is that it is very efficient. Only for static messages though, but that's the whole idea on these special tags/ attributes anyway. But it realy shouldn't be a quick fix. IMO we should

Re: [Wicket-user] MaskConverter: isn't a better way?

:) It's not to bluntly stop the discussion or anything. I just that it might not be obvious to everyone that creating custom components/ a set of base widgets tailored to your need/ taste works great. Eelco On 5/9/06, Bruno Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sure... I got the message. :) ---

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

What I definitively like about the pre-processor/ filter is that it is very efficient. Only for static messages though, but that's the whole idea on these special tags/ attributes anyway. I don't know. If we can reach a consensus on the best way, I'd be okay with adopting something that works out

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

So are we saying that there is going to be some MarkupFilter to replace whatever the developer decides to use for a localization demarcator?I had another idea.  What if wicket:message was enhanced?  Would something like this work:   This way we could still have the previewability of the HTML page a

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

Martijn is writing about localization for Wicket In Action now. I'm sure he'd appreciate it if someone would write up some notes about how to do this on the WIKI. Eelco On 5/9/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Matej Knopp wrote: > Juergen Donnerstag wrote: >> On 5/9/06, Matej Knopp <[

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

On 5/9/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: $${key}? Or whatever you want. I don't need this behavior to be in wicket core. I'm much more interested in clean and simple preprocessing filters, something wicket lacks currently. -Matej Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. If we have that plu

Re: [Wicket-user] using feedback not based on labels

ok, i got most of it. last question: can the template have a way to loop on a list? if not, then how do you suggest i templatize the messages, so their formatting is kept in the js file? thanx, ittay Ittay Dror wrote: Eelco Hillenius wrote: Or take a look at what's in wicket.extensions.ut

Re: [Wicket-user] MaskConverter: isn't a better way?

Sure... I got the message. :)On 5/9/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yep. Bruno, It's trivial to make your own component classes - probablytextfields, no? - that have an API that's more to your taste. It's one of Wicket's main ideas to make creating custom components easy, so whynot m

Re: [Wicket-user] Fragment rendering

Juergen Donnerstag wrote: you need to register it. It is not yet activated by default application.getPageSettings().addComponentResolver(new FragmentResolver()); Strangely enough I just used fragments over the weekend and didn't have to set this setting. What confused me was not having to add

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

Matej Knopp wrote: Juergen Donnerstag wrote: On 5/9/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: $${key}? Or whatever you want. I don't need this behavior to be in wicket core. I'm much more interested in clean and simple preprocessing filters, something wicket lacks currently. Oh, stupid me. It

RE: [Wicket-user] Filterable ListViews

Thanks for the feedback, I’ve gotten the basics working but I have two remaining problems:   How do I filter on reference Objects, not strings Can I make my code filter on partial matches as well?   This is my code excerpt so far:   IColumn[] columns = new IColumn[3]; c

Re: [Wicket-user] changing images with Ajax

System.nanoTime() is @since 1.5, so I don't think it's usable anyway :) Johan Compagner wrote: i think millis will do. If you have a request in the same milli second for the same image. Then the image should really be the same, What can possible change in 1 milli! :) johan On 5/9/06, *Marti

Re: [Wicket-user] MaskConverter: isn't a better way?

Yep. Bruno, It's trivial to make your own component classes - probably textfields, no? - that have an API that's more to your taste. It's one of Wicket's main ideas to make creating custom components easy, so why not make use of that? Eelco On 5/9/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [Wicket-user] using feedback not based on labels

Eelco Hillenius wrote: Or take a look at what's in wicket.extensions.util.resource and look at the Slider component in YUI for an example. I think it's cleaner like that (keep the javascript in seperate files and run some variable substitution over it). what do you mean by 'variable substitut

Re: [Wicket-user] changing images with Ajax

i think millis will do. If you have a request in the same milli second for the same image.Then the image should really be the same, What can possible change in 1 milli! :)johan On 5/9/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/9/06, Matej Knopp < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Johan Compagner

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

I haven't looked into it deeper, but it sounds to me that we could make it slightly easier. We already have post processing filters, so personally I would think we would be consistent to have pre processing filters too. I know the functionality to do this is there already, but we might come up wit

Re: [Wicket-user] using feedback not based on labels

Or take a look at what's in wicket.extensions.util.resource and look at the Slider component in YUI for an example. I think it's cleaner like that (keep the javascript in seperate files and run some variable substitution over it). Eelco On 5/9/06, Ittay Dror <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi, i ha

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

Juergen Donnerstag wrote: On 5/9/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: $${key}? Or whatever you want. I don't need this behavior to be in wicket core. I'm much more interested in clean and simple preprocessing filters, something wicket lacks currently. Unfortunately IMarkupFilter does not

Re: [Wicket-user] What should be used: PatternValidator or MaskConverter/MaskFormatter ?

Typically you'd use the validator when you only want to validate whether the input follows a certain pattern. But if you want a string to be formatted between input and ouput, such a converter makes sense. Eelco On 5/9/06, Bruno Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What's the difference between t

[Wicket-user] using feedback not based on labels

hi, i have a feedback based on javascript. basically, i want to populate a javascript function's body with all messages, so it will show them one by one. the final result will be like: function showFeedback() { var message; message += "first feedback\n"; message += "seco

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

On 5/9/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: $${key}? Or whatever you want. I don't need this behavior to be in wicket core. I'm much more interested in clean and simple preprocessing filters, something wicket lacks currently. That is true, we don't have something that allow to pre-proces

Re: [Wicket-user] changing images with Ajax

On 5/9/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Johan Compagner wrote:> still the question remains how random is random ;)right. maybe one shared atomically increased integer would do better job?System.nanoTime() should do the trick :-) Martijn

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

$${key}? Or whatever you want. I don't need this behavior to be in wicket core. I'm much more interested in clean and simple preprocessing filters, something wicket lacks currently. -Matej Bruno Borges wrote: And how should I write if I want to literally output ${key} to the user? On 5/9/06

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

Bruno Borges wrote: This is completely different. ${key} is simply replaced by a string from property file. No EL, no expressions, no ognl, nothing. Just a simple string. Comparing to${key} which one is simpler? -Matej Sure it works, but... if Wicket is going to have ${key}... ${so

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

Sure it works, but... if Wicket is going to have ${key}... ${something} in htmls, let's go back to JSP 2.0 and use EL... just a thoughtOn 5/9/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:So far I can say it works well for me. The only problematic (or cumbersome) thing was that I had to make my own  R

Re: [Wicket-user] What should be used: PatternValidator or MaskConverter/MaskFormatter ?

The difference is that a validator only does it job when data comes in.A converter also works on data that goes out.And the difference in incomming data isn't that great, they are doing the same thing.Except thata converter throws an conversion exception and that will be a TypeValidator error messa

Re: [Wicket-user] changing images with Ajax

Johan Compagner wrote: still the question remains how random is random ;) right. maybe one shared atomically increased integer would do better job? On 5/9/06, *Igor Vaynberg* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: just checked it into core the param looks like this w

Re: [Wicket-user] MaskConverter: isn't a better way?

because there is only one converter and validators must be stored in a list.This is all to keep the internal state of a component as clean as possible.You don't have to create an anon class. You can return there a normal class or a inner class if you want. johanOn 5/9/06, Bruno Borges <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [Wicket-user] MaskConverter: isn't a better way?

I really don't like the idea of having too many properties that must be "get" through anonymous classes.Why there's no setConverter(IConverter c) just like add(IValidator v) returning the object itself? see yaOn 5/9/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: currently not. What could be better

[Wicket-user] What should be used: PatternValidator or MaskConverter/MaskFormatter ?

What's the difference between these two components and where they fit better?-- Bruno Borges[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sun Certified Java Programmer for 1.4Sun Certified Web Component Developer for 1.4

Re: [Wicket-user] How to overrite Application.properties properly?

I found the problem. BIOS... (In portuguese, means: "Stupid Ignorant Operating the System)... :)On 5/9/06, Martijn Dashorst < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: foo/pkg/    MyWebApplication.properties    MyWebApplication.javafoo/pkg/pages    FooPage.properties    FooPage.html     FooPage.javaShould work. Ca

Re: [Wicket-user] component input handling

> convertedinput and rawinput are 2 completely seperate things.> rawinput really caches the raw string data. So that forms can render > themselfs again without doing any validation or conversion.why not use getInput()? why not have getInput() use rawInput internally, for caching?Thats what getValue

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

So far I can say it works well for me. The only problematic (or cumbersome) thing was that I had to make my own ResourceStreamLocator and ResourceStream to have this done. Having some kind of preprocessing filters (with methods like String processString(String) or InputStream processS

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

That is also a possibiltyThat we pre process the markup even before the markup parser handles it.Then we just replace all wicket:i18n:key:XX (or whatever we call it) and then parse the markup.johan On 5/9/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I solved this some time ago with own "preproces

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

I solved this some time ago with own "preprocessor" that replaces ${key} with the value from property files. I know this is not very wicket-like, but the markup looks much simpler with ${key} then with -Matej Igor Vaynberg wrote: why not? in a preview you would get a button with text "wicke

Re: [Wicket-user] component input handling

Johan Compagner wrote: there are several components in html that return multipy entries for example ListMultiplyChoice (SELECT tag) or Checkboxes withing the same group. convertedinput and rawinput are 2 completely seperate things. rawinput really caches the raw string data. So that forms ca

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

>> 3 is by far the worst when it comes done to performance. Because we have to > do it everytime for every request> even if there isn't a tag like that.. And if it is then we have to> manipulate (string concatting and copying) the buffer> And it can only be done when the person does buffer the resp

Re: [Wicket-user] component input handling

there are several components in html that return multipy entriesfor example ListMultiplyChoice (SELECT tag) or Checkboxes withing the same group.convertedinput and rawinput are 2 completely seperate things. rawinput really caches the raw string data. So that forms can render themselfs again without

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

On 5/9/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think 1 is much more performant when it isn't a wicket component because then the markup is stored under a locale and that markup is preparsed for everything. Can't be faster then that. That is how WicketMessageTagHandler works today. It m

Re: [Wicket-user] changing images with Ajax

still the question remains how random is random ;)On 5/9/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: just checked it into corethe param looks like this wicket:antiCache=random -IgorOn 5/8/06, Bruno Borges < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:This could go to Wicket Core. But before this happens, one note:

Re: [Wicket-user] component input handling

for me, it is hard to distinguish getInput from getInputAsArray. what use cases do you have of the returned array having more than 1 string? if that happens, why not use several components, each assigned an index, and still returning getInput (by getRequest().getParameters(name)[idx]). returning

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: Problem loading DatePicker inside Panel through AjaxLink

Hello Igor not sure how iframes behave here, but it is possible to call javascript functions in one frame, which is defined in another frame, which then again can do anything with the calling frame. Done this a couple of years ago (when frames where still en vogue ;), but as it turned out, nothing

Re: [Wicket-user] ListChoice changes appearance from dropdown to listbox

A ListChoice should always be a List instead of a DropDown (for a drop down we have the DropDownChoice)I don't know why you see a difference it shouldn't look at all to the model that holds the selection.It only looks at the choices: tag.put("size", Math.min(maxRows, getChoices().size()));so i gues

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

I think 1 is much more performant when it isn't a wicket componentbecause then the markup is stored under a locale and that markup is preparsed for everything.Can't be faster then that.3 is by far the worst when it comes done to performance. Because we have to do it everytime for every request even

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

We do something similar for autolinks already. Actually I think there at least 3 solutions: 1) If no wicket:id is present than replace the attribute on the fly and add it to the markup stream as if it were RawMarkup. Con: changes to the properties at runtime are not taken into account. Tags with w

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

Or we use one of these post-processing filters. That way components might even clear them or insert new ones, and only the resulting markup will be processed. Eelco On 5/9/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: the problem i see is are we going to check every tag's attribute (wicket co

Re: [Wicket-user] Localization

the problem i see is are we going to check every tag's attribute (wicket component or not) for such a thing? And if it is not a wicket component we make it a special (none raw markup) tag?and if it is a wicket component already we just put a special object in the tags attributes? johanOn 5/9/06, Ee

[Wicket-user] ListChoice changes appearance from dropdown to listbox

Hi   Im not sure if this is the intended functionality, but I belive I’ve discovered an oddity or featureJ.   When I use the constructor which also takes a model (ListChoice("dropdown_job", new Model(),myList, new myRenderer)) my listchoice is no longer displayed as a dropdown but as a

Re: [Wicket-user] MaskConverter: isn't a better way?

currently not. What could be better in your eyes?We will overhaul the converter interface in the next version so that it should be simpler.johanOn 5/9/06, Bruno Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is the only way I know (better: I learned from Wiki/Docs/Examples) on how to use MaskConverter:Tex

Re: [Wicket-user] component input handling

Object?ughhThen we have to cast and or check for it everywhere. Because getInput() is used for a lot of things,What it could be is always and String[] but then we just have getInputAsArray()and i guess thats the method we should use as much as possible everywhere. which we already do for the conver

Re: [Wicket-user] component input handling

i don't see why there should be a getInputAsArray. it seems to me there should be an 'Object getInput()', which will usually return getRequest().getParameter(getInputName()), but for some components, that for some reason require multiple inputs, it will return getRequest().getParameters(getIn

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket "pages" embedded in jsps

oh, one last thing. i think it would be nicer if embedded pages can extend panels. i'm not sure if it is possible (so when including a url, the panel class will be called) ittay Ittay Dror wrote: ok, this is what i did given the existing wicket code. i'm sure it can be done better by changing

Re: [Wicket-user] page map with hot deploy

yes but the strange this is. if the request starts. All pagemaps are walked over and the session is set to themCan you debug that and tell me why that doesn't happen for you?Look at Session.init() and Session.visitPageMaps ()They should walk over all the attributes in the session and what is a page

  1   2   >