A quick question for the zeromq experts if I may?
Given a DEALER to ROUTER zeromq connection which is able to operate
asynchronously; what is the best way to coordinate inbound and outbound
message handling such that the DEALER socket is not blocked and an
application is able to react and send
e future?
Riskybiz.
Message: 29
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:29:01 +0200
From: Pieter Hintjens
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] DEALER-ROUTER question.
To: ZeroMQ development list
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Please read the Guide and work through the examples, it has lot
Please read the Guide and work through the examples, it has lots of
explanation and examples of how to do this kind of thing.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Riskybiz wrote:
> A quick question for the zeromq experts if I may?
>
>
>
> Given a DEALER to ROUTER zeromq connection which is able to o
>
> I hope you will view my feedback as constructive.
>
> All that said; which part of the guide should I read to solve my
> DEALER-ROUTER issue, can I be confident that any associated zguide example
> will actually work and help me to further understand how to solve my own
constructive.
>
> All that said; which part of the guide should I read to solve my
> DEALER-ROUTER issue, can I be confident that any associated zguide example
> will actually work and help me to further understand how to solve my own
> zeromq issues in the future?
>
>
> Riskybiz.
hich part of the guide should I read to solve my
> DEALER-ROUTER issue, can I be confident that any associated zguide example
> will actually work and help me to further understand how to solve my own
> zeromq issues in the future?
>
>
> Riskybiz.
>
>
> Message: 29
> Date:
back as constructive.
>
> All that said; which part of the guide should I read to solve my
> DEALER-ROUTER issue, can I be confident that any associated zguide example
> will actually work and help me to further understand how to solve my own
> zeromq issues in the future?
>
>
>
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:10 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Pieter: Would it be possible to put all the examples of the guide into
> a git project and have them included in the auto compile done for
> every pull request?
The examples are in a subdirectory of the Guide git project, and we
coul
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 09:51:50AM +0200, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:10 AM, Goswin von Brederlow
> wrote:
>
> > Pieter: Would it be possible to put all the examples of the guide into
> > a git project and have them included in the auto compile done for
> > every pull requ
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Goswin von Brederlow
wrote:
> If the two get merged then why not merge the zsock class with the
> libzqm socket structure. Use it as is for the zsock interface and cast
> it to void * for the sake of the old API. A true merge and not just
> layering the czmq API
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:06:29AM +0200, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> This is one of those rare roadmap / vision threads.
>
> Concretely all this has to happen first:
>
> - release 4.0.5 sometime very soon
> - release 4.1.0 RC sometime later
> - update Guide for 4.1
> - release CZMQ v3.0 RC
>
> I t
Conceptually I like the idea of czmq folding back into libzmq. While
requiring both llibzmq and czmq for a language binding that wraps czmq
isn't the end of the world, it is an additional complexity.
I very much look forward to the czmq 3.0 release, and I'm hoping to have
goczmq feature complete
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Goswin von Brederlow
wrote:
> One last thing and then I will get back to work.
Ah, work, that mysterious thing we do when we're not talking about it :-)
> The zring class in CZMQ I feel is still experimental and I would like
> to keep that in flux some more, ma
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:46:20PM +0200, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Goswin von Brederlow
> wrote:
>
> > One last thing and then I will get back to work.
>
> Ah, work, that mysterious thing we do when we're not talking about it :-)
>
> > The zring class in CZMQ I
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Do you actually need it?
After all the work, that's a sad question. What I see are too-large
patches done in "I want to try this yet I've not defined a clean
problem statement" directions, which stress other people, create lots
of di
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 06:34:32PM +0200, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Goswin von Brederlow
> wrote:
>
> > Do you actually need it?
>
> After all the work, that's a sad question. What I see are too-large
> patches done in "I want to try this yet I've not defined a c
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> How much of the time was spend on merging zhash support into zring?
Ah, sure. That was a short job and can certainly be kicked out again later.
Sorry, my bad.
> I think what doesn't quite work right is this:
>...
That 'discuss' pa
Hi,
I'm implementing a DEALER/ROUTER schema in which messages are sent from
DEALER to ROUTER only, no messages are sent back. My question is related to
HWMs in both sockets.
When reaching the SNDHWM in DEALER socket, application will block (this is
clear in documentation), however, it is not clea
The behavior is defined here: http://rfc.zeromq.org/spec:28
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Diego Fons wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm implementing a DEALER/ROUTER schema in which messages are sent from
> DEALER to ROUTER only, no messages are sent back. My question is related to
> HWMs in both sockets.
>
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
