Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread yussel
i only said that to turn the screws since Thomas for some reson seems
exceptionally opposed to the track.

ah- this is the 313 i know and love.



On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Renegade808 wrote:

 At Les is not the end all be all track for everyonesome love it and i
 am sure obviously some don'teveryone hears differently.just
 because someone does'nt agree does'nt mean they don't get it.

 and no one has to see Innerzone live to understand it either (maybe this
 is what you had to do to understand it). the original track is on wax
 and i would say its a good representation of the track...like i said some
 feel it and some don't.  i like the track and other CC stuff but i
 would'nt go telling peeps they don't get it if they don't like the same
 tracks i do..geesh

 michael
 www.renegaderhythms.com






 
 what's with the undying love
 
  wow- a little overdramatic, yeah?
 
  what's with the love of anything you like?
 
  i just really like the track. i think those opening chords are as classic
  as anything from the genre. And so does CC as he rerecorded it with
  Innerzone Orchestra and repeatedly stated that he viewed the song as one
  of his standards
 
 
 
  On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:
 
  did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that
  remarkable really, especially compared to other things CC has
  done. whats with the undying love for this track?
 
  tom
 
  
  andythepooh.com
 
 
 
 
 
 



Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread Renegade808
i hear yahey at least this time we are all bickering about something
that is very 313 related  :-)


michael

www.renegaderhythms.com




 i only said that to turn the screws since Thomas for some reson seems
 exceptionally opposed to the track.

 ah- this is the 313 i know and love.



 On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Renegade808 wrote:

 At Les is not the end all be all track for everyonesome love it and
 i
 am sure obviously some don'teveryone hears differently.just
 because someone does'nt agree does'nt mean they don't get it.

 and no one has to see Innerzone live to understand it either (maybe this
 is what you had to do to understand it). the original track is on
 wax
 and i would say its a good representation of the track...like i said
 some
 feel it and some don't.  i like the track and other CC stuff but i
 would'nt go telling peeps they don't get it if they don't like the same
 tracks i do..geesh

 michael
 www.renegaderhythms.com






 
 what's with the undying love
 
  wow- a little overdramatic, yeah?
 
  what's with the love of anything you like?
 
  i just really like the track. i think those opening chords are as
 classic
  as anything from the genre. And so does CC as he rerecorded it with
  Innerzone Orchestra and repeatedly stated that he viewed the song as
 one
  of his standards
 
 
 
  On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:
 
  did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that
  remarkable really, especially compared to other things CC has
  done. whats with the undying love for this track?
 
  tom
 
  
  andythepooh.com
 
 
 
 
 
 




Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

i only said that to turn the screws since Thomas for some reson 
seems
exceptionally opposed to the track.

im not opposed to it at all, really. i just cant see why it is 
considered such a classic, it just doesnt have that sound to me. 
im going to go give both versions a listen real quick and ill see 
how i feel about it this time. 

tom 


andythepooh.com


 
   


Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread Ken Odeluga

Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 18:14:57 -0500
To: 313@hyperreal.org
From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- Original Message --
From: M : A : T : R : I : X [EMAIL PROTECTED]


just this: it instantly makes the rain go away and the sun shines

brightly.

day or night.


which version is it that has all these magickal properties? the CC
or the innerzone orchestra one?

tom



I'll say the original purely electronic version ...  is like a song of 
innocence and of experience, in the same breath.


k



(313) Re: 313 Digest 16 Dec 2004 23:03:15 -0000 Issue 2397

2004-12-17 Thread Dan . Butler

I agree that D.E.C. really hit the mark with the ambient stuff, but I'd go
for the first album
Soundtrack (313) (appropriately) as the real deal. Most people probably
will know it
already, but for sheer beauty and understated class it's hard to beat.

Someone else said Kao-tic Harmony. Yeah well, that intro - wow!
Pretty much impossible not to love.


cheers,

Dan


-- Original Message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

hi folks.  just curious about which detroit-produced ambient trax
you would
consider your favorites.  right now I'm hooked on gathering
light, by
detroit escalator company.  that track just pulls me out of
whatever I'm
doing.





Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread Dan . Butler
Instant hard-on while hugging someone?
Could be construed as being overly friendly!

cheers,

Dan (who must go and sit down for a while after
two posts to the list in one day!)

--

Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 23:18:59 +0100
To:  313@hyperreal.org
From: Ronny Pries [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (313) At Les
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

let me think,

instant hard-on
tear in the left eye
urgent need to hug someone

forgot something?

rp

Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:
 did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that
 remarkable really, especially compared to other things CC has
 done. whats with the undying love for this track?

 tom






(313) My Theo Buys

2004-12-17 Thread Martin Dust

Ugly Edits 1-6
Eclectic Aesthetic
Lights Down Low
Live In Detroit
Paradox
That Day
These Days
You Forgot
Baby Steps

I'm having a Theo day

Martin



RE: (313) My Theo Buys

2004-12-17 Thread mislav bobic
Welcome to the club!!

-Original Message-
From: Martin Dust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 5:00 PM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313) My Theo Buys

Ugly Edits 1-6
Eclectic Aesthetic
Lights Down Low
Live In Detroit
Paradox
That Day
These Days
You Forgot
Baby Steps

I'm having a Theo day

Martin







Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread ha




geesh ... so after your rather successful alex rant you are the new
moral watchdog round here eh?

let me see.. geesh  yussel's opinion is not the end all be all
opinion for everyone . some agree and i'm sure some obviously don't
 GET IT?

jesus christ ... i get told all the time here in vienna that in the
anglo-saxon sphere (contrary to for example continental europe), at
least in academic circles, debaters are perfectly used to use sharp
attacks, absolute negations, controversial statements, though
arguments... tough in giving  tough in taking... so please try to
comply and give a fvcking straight retort (softened by irony if you
wish  can, hey alex i miss you, get out of your cave!) to an
opinion you don't like instead of whining about it's partiality



Renegade808 wrote:

  At Les is not the end all be all track for everyonesome love it and i
am sure obviously some don'teveryone hears differently.just
because someone does'nt agree does'nt mean they don't get it.

and no one has to see Innerzone live to understand it either (maybe this
is what you had to do to understand it). the original track is on wax
and i would say its a good representation of the track...like i said some
feel it and some don't.  i like the track and other CC stuff but i
would'nt go telling peeps they don't get it if they don't like the same
tracks i do..geesh

michael
www.renegaderhythms.com






  
  

  what's with the undying love
  

wow- a little overdramatic, yeah?

what's with the "love" of anything you like?

i just really like the track. i think those opening chords are as classic
as anything from the genre. And so does CC as he rerecorded it with
Innerzone Orchestra and repeatedly stated that he viewed the song as one
of his "standards"



On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:



  did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that
remarkable really, especially compared to other things CC has
done. whats with the undying love for this track?

tom


andythepooh.com





  

  
  
  





Re: (313) Re: 313 Digest 16 Dec 2004 23:03:15 -0000 Issue 2397

2004-12-17 Thread Klaas-Jan Jongsma
Well if we consider Kao-tic Harmony and At Les to be detroit ambient let me 
throw in Tedra from Kenny Larkin deep as H3ll

KJ


On Friday, December 17, 2004, at 09:27AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I agree that D.E.C. really hit the mark with the ambient stuff, but I'd go
for the first album
Soundtrack (313) (appropriately) as the real deal. Most people probably
will know it
already, but for sheer beauty and understated class it's hard to beat.

Someone else said Kao-tic Harmony. Yeah well, that intro - wow!
Pretty much impossible not to love.




-- Original Message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

hi folks.  just curious about which detroit-produced ambient trax
you would
consider your favorites.  right now I'm hooked on gathering
light, by
detroit escalator company.  that track just pulls me out of
whatever I'm
doing.



(313) Re:(313) My Theo Buys

2004-12-17 Thread dUbspencer
the these days mixes are great

check out 'dis on the baby steps ep: Lake Shore Drive


Am 17.12.2004 9:59 Uhr schrieb Martin Dust unter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Ugly Edits 1-6
 Eclectic Aesthetic
 Lights Down Low
 Live In Detroit
 Paradox
 That Day
 These Days
 You Forgot
 Baby Steps
 
 I'm having a Theo day
 
 Martin
 




RE: (313) RE: detroit ambient

2004-12-17 Thread Mann, Ravinder
To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to 
http://disclaimer.leedsmet.ac.uk/email.htm



I think Indio is John Beltran, he did 10 days of Blue on Peacefrog. Thats
got its ambient moments. Great late late night listening.

*

For me, one of the best (and most overlooked) Detroit-related (I don't 
think it was made in Detroit though) ambient tracks, *ever* ;-), is

'Snowdrifts' by Indio. It's On the 'Time : Space' cd on Transmat, for 
those who don't know. If you're one them I'd humbly advise that you 
need to hear it.

k


RE: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-Original Message-
From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 16 December 2004 21:44

 did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that remarkable
really, especially compared to other things CC has done. whats with the
undying love for this track?

Ronny and Sean I salute you!
For me it's just that it's probably my favourite piece of music ever.

The original electronic piece is the one - for me the other version loses
much of the appeal of the original by being played in a more 'real
instrument' version.

Not that (not having done so) I wouldn't love to see Innerzone O doing it
live.

Obviously since music's a subjective thing it's fine not to like a track
that others like, that's always gonna be the case, doesn't necessarily mean
you don't 'get it', maybe you 'get it' but you don't want it.
It does happen on occasion though that you have a sudden epiphany with a
piece of music and whole new vistas open up for you, it's happened to me
many times (for example I remember it happening to me at a rave in Scotland
a dozen or so years back with Speedy J 'Pullover', a track that I'd always
thought boring before, when suddenly I appreciated it's repetitiveness was
it's asset not it's problem, that track makes me giggle to this day).
(Still waiting to have one of these moments with the whole Theo / KDJ
thing.)

Turn down the moral watchdog!  Big up the bickering!  Bring back Alex!



Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread De Block, Mario
it might be needless nonsense to bug you with but actually i didn't know but
since a few years that 'At Les' meant 'At Lesley's', hinting at one of Carl's
former girlfriends. Then again, being asked for his main inspiration, Carl
said, simply, 'sex'.
M

[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:



 -Original Message-
 From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 16 December 2004 21:44

  did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that remarkable
 really, especially compared to other things CC has done. whats with the
 undying love for this track?

 Ronny and Sean I salute you!
 For me it's just that it's probably my favourite piece of music ever.

 The original electronic piece is the one - for me the other version loses
 much of the appeal of the original by being played in a more 'real
 instrument' version.

 Not that (not having done so) I wouldn't love to see Innerzone O doing it
 live.

 Obviously since music's a subjective thing it's fine not to like a track
 that others like, that's always gonna be the case, doesn't necessarily mean
 you don't 'get it', maybe you 'get it' but you don't want it.
 It does happen on occasion though that you have a sudden epiphany with a
 piece of music and whole new vistas open up for you, it's happened to me
 many times (for example I remember it happening to me at a rave in Scotland
 a dozen or so years back with Speedy J 'Pullover', a track that I'd always
 thought boring before, when suddenly I appreciated it's repetitiveness was
 it's asset not it's problem, that track makes me giggle to this day).
 (Still waiting to have one of these moments with the whole Theo / KDJ
 thing.)

 Turn down the moral watchdog!  Big up the bickering!  Bring back Alex!



RE: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-Original Message-
From: De Block, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

it might be needless nonsense to bug you with but actually i didn't know
but since a few years that 'At Les' meant 'At Lesley's'
hinting at one of Carl's former girlfriends.

Hey that's not bugging, it's not something I knew.  And when it comes to
favourite tracks no piece of trivia is too small!

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:

Schreef (not a word I've heard before, is it a bit like) good grief!

Actually there's some excuse for this, our (my crew here in stick-poking
Manchester UK) night is called 'That Amazing Thing!'
See www.thatamazingthing.com .  Nobody's ever commented on the (admittedly
very short) mixes on here.  Does that mean they suck?
The idea being it would make it sound good as people would have to say
things like I went to that amazing thing last night.
Yes, we're stupid.



Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread Renegade808
 if someone told me that i don't get it  because i dont like a classic
track...well to me that stinks of arrogance...not everyone has to think
__ track is a classic...and i was just letting yussel know my
opinion of thatso why should you care  did i say something to
you just go back underneath your rock and let me bicker and whine
just like everyone else on this dang list!!!moral watchdog??? ha ha
now thats funny, i dont think so  i'll leave that up to the
others who feel its there role to protect the innocent


michael
www.renegaderhythms.com








 geesh ... so after your rather successful alex rant you are the new
 moral watchdog round here eh?

 let me see.. geesh  yussel's opinion is not the end all be all
 opinion for everyone . some agree and i'm sure some obviously don't
   GET IT?

 jesus christ ... i get told all the time here in vienna that in the
 anglo-saxon sphere (contrary to for example continental europe), at
 least in academic circles, debaters are perfectly used to use sharp
 attacks, absolute negations, controversial statements, though
 arguments... tough in giving  tough in taking...  so please try to
 comply and give a fvcking straight retort (softened by irony if you
 wish  can, hey alex i miss you, get out of your cave!) to an
 opinion you don't like instead of whining about it's partiality



 Renegade808 wrote:

   At Les is not the end all be all track for everyonesome love it and
 i
 am sure obviously some don'teveryone hears differently.just
 because someone does'nt agree does'nt mean they don't get it.

 and no one has to see Innerzone live to understand it either (maybe this
 is what you had to do to understand it). the original track is on wax
 and i would say its a good representation of the track...like i said some
 feel it and some don't.  i like the track and other CC stuff but i
 would'nt go telling peeps they don't get it if they don't like the same
 tracks i do..geesh

 michael
 www.renegaderhythms.com









   what's with the undying love


 wow- a little overdramatic, yeah?

 what's with the love of anything you like?

 i just really like the track. i think those opening chords are as classic
 as anything from the genre. And so does CC as he rerecorded it with
 Innerzone Orchestra and repeatedly stated that he viewed the song as one
 of his standards



 On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:



   did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that
 remarkable really, especially compared to other things CC has
 done. whats with the undying love for this track?

 tom

 
 andythepooh.com
















RE: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread Ryan Snowden
Some people will never get it.  It's what separates us from the 99.9% of
commercial wanna-be it people :)  I've always been a bit sceptical on the
classics - either you were there or you were not.  It's like watching the
cartoons you did as a kid?

Apart from all this, it's a dead end topic

-Original Message-
From: Renegade808 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, 17 December 2004 10:13 PM
To: ha
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) At Les

 if someone told me that i don't get it  because i dont like a classic
track...well to me that stinks of arrogance...not everyone has to think
__ track is a classic...and i was just letting yussel know my opinion
of thatso why should you care  did i say something to you just
go back underneath your rock and let me bicker and whine
just like everyone else on this dang list!!!moral watchdog??? ha ha
now thats funny, i dont think so  i'll leave that up to the others
who feel its there role to protect the innocent


michael
www.renegaderhythms.com








 geesh ... so after your rather successful alex rant you are the new 
 moral watchdog round here eh?

 let me see.. geesh  yussel's opinion is not the end all be all 
 opinion for everyone . some agree and i'm sure some obviously 
 don't   GET IT?

 jesus christ ... i get told all the time here in vienna that in the 
 anglo-saxon sphere (contrary to for example continental europe), at 
 least in academic circles, debaters are perfectly used to use sharp 
 attacks, absolute negations, controversial statements, though 
 arguments... tough in giving  tough in taking...  so please try to 
 comply and give a fvcking straight retort (softened by irony if you 
 wish  can, hey alex i miss you, get out of your cave!) to an opinion 
 you don't like instead of whining about it's partiality



 Renegade808 wrote:

   At Les is not the end all be all track for everyonesome love it 
 and i am sure obviously some don'teveryone hears 
 differently.just because someone does'nt agree does'nt mean they 
 don't get it.

 and no one has to see Innerzone live to understand it either (maybe 
 this is what you had to do to understand it). the original track 
 is on wax and i would say its a good representation of the 
 track...like i said some feel it and some don't.  i like the track and 
 other CC stuff but i would'nt go telling peeps they don't get it if 
 they don't like the same tracks i do..geesh

 michael
 www.renegaderhythms.com









   what's with the undying love


 wow- a little overdramatic, yeah?

 what's with the love of anything you like?

 i just really like the track. i think those opening chords are as 
 classic as anything from the genre. And so does CC as he rerecorded it 
 with Innerzone Orchestra and repeatedly stated that he viewed the song 
 as one of his standards



 On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:



   did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that 
 remarkable really, especially compared to other things CC has done. 
 whats with the undying love for this track?

 tom

 
 andythepooh.com


















Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread robin


oh change the record michael.

no, really, lets talk about records.

tssk

robin...

On 17 Dec 2004, at 11:13, Renegade808 wrote:

 if someone told me that i don't get it  because i dont like a 
classic

track...well to me that stinks of arrogance...not everyone has to think
__ track is a classic...and i was just letting yussel know my
opinion of thatso why should you care  did i say something to
you just go back underneath your rock and let me bicker and whine
just like everyone else on this dang list!!!moral watchdog??? ha ha
now thats funny, i dont think so  i'll leave that up to the
others who feel its there role to protect the innocent




(313) New mixes Carl Craig interview

2004-12-17 Thread philip
http://www.cypher-music.net

Mixes from Chris Rooney (D1), Joe Mc Hugh (Invisible Armies) and Philip Ryan (cypher-music.net)

(old) Interview with Carl Craig

Lots more DJ mixes and interviews to follow

Phil 



(313) Re: Aphex Twin ££££

2004-12-17 Thread Greg Earle

Supposedly, there's an Analord track in this mix, which also has
a lot of Detroit flava:

http://www.magnetize.biz/Mixes/Magnetize.Mix_05.12.2004%20.mp3

Maurice Joshua - This Is Acid (Trax)
The Party Boy - The Twilight Zone (Urban)
Phortune - Can You Feel The Bass (Public)
Daniel Bell - Phreak Yo Body (Logistic)
Donnacha Costello - Grape B (Minimise)
Robert Calvin - Azid Life (Turbo)
808 State - Automatic (RePHLeX)
Mathew Jonson - Ultraviolet Dream (M_nus)
Der Zyklus - Elektronisches Zeitecho (IDG)
Thomas Brinkmann - Ulla 1 (Ernst)
Americhord - Midnight (D1)
Surgeon - Krautrock III (Tresor)
Analog Fingerprints - Battle 101 (Plasmek)
The Hacker - Nothing Lasts (Missile)
Wild Planet - Fuel (430 West)
Arcon - Element Exposure (Stripe)
Metroneem - Skip Code (Satamile)
Spinks vs. Kalbata - Contact Jerusalem (Buffalo Frequency)
Mike Dred - Oxycute (RS)
Psylocity - Pump it (PSI49net)
Phased Energy Rectification - Phased Energy Rectification (Roulette)
Dirty Hospital - Stobhill (Rottenrow)
The Advent - Innerstate (IDG)
Autechre - Rsdio (Warp)

I can't make out what the Analord track is, however.  Surely not
the 808 State?!?

- Greg



Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread yussel
i never thought saying i like a carl craig record would cause this sort of
meltdown

this list sucks now.



\

On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, robin wrote:


 oh change the record michael.

 no, really, lets talk about records.

 tssk

 robin...

 On 17 Dec 2004, at 11:13, Renegade808 wrote:

   if someone told me that i don't get it  because i dont like a
  classic
  track...well to me that stinks of arrogance...not everyone has to think
  __ track is a classic...and i was just letting yussel know my
  opinion of thatso why should you care  did i say something to
  you just go back underneath your rock and let me bicker and whine
  just like everyone else on this dang list!!!moral watchdog??? ha ha
  now thats funny, i dont think so  i'll leave that up to the
  others who feel its there role to protect the innocent




(313) lookin' to get my brink on

2004-12-17 Thread thomas ironside ainslie

wise list,

i've been a fan of thomas brinkmann for a while, yet i don't own much 
of his material.  so i've got a couple questions:


which Soul Center album should i pick up if i can only afford one of 
them?

and
what's that album called where all the track titles are names of women? 
 (karin on the dan bell mix cd is fantastic)


thanks

tom




--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.synthetictom.com



Re: (313) lookin' to get my brink on

2004-12-17 Thread yussel
For my money, Soul Center 2 is the best one. Lots of great preacher man
style samples (though not bombastic like Green Velvet, if that's what your
thinking).

Actually the first track on the new Dark Comedy CD reminded me of Soul
Center 2 a great deal.

And here's the other album you're asking about:
http://www.discogs.com/release/1142




On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, thomas ironside ainslie wrote:

 wise list,

 i've been a fan of thomas brinkmann for a while, yet i don't own much
 of his material.  so i've got a couple questions:

 which Soul Center album should i pick up if i can only afford one of
 them?
 and
 what's that album called where all the track titles are names of women?
   (karin on the dan bell mix cd is fantastic)

 thanks

 tom




 --
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.synthetictom.com




(313) Submerge Parteeee

2004-12-17 Thread Martin Dust

http://www.submerge.com/2004/party.gif



Re: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread Ronny Pries

Man, that sex must have been the bomb. ;)

Ronny

De Block, Mario wrote:

it might be needless nonsense to bug you with but actually i didn't know but
since a few years that 'At Les' meant 'At Lesley's', hinting at one of Carl's
former girlfriends. Then again, being asked for his main inspiration, Carl
said, simply, 'sex'.
M

[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:




-Original Message-
From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 December 2004 21:44



did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that remarkable


really, especially compared to other things CC has done. whats with the
undying love for this track?

Ronny and Sean I salute you!
For me it's just that it's probably my favourite piece of music ever.

The original electronic piece is the one - for me the other version loses
much of the appeal of the original by being played in a more 'real
instrument' version.

Not that (not having done so) I wouldn't love to see Innerzone O doing it
live.

Obviously since music's a subjective thing it's fine not to like a track
that others like, that's always gonna be the case, doesn't necessarily mean
you don't 'get it', maybe you 'get it' but you don't want it.
It does happen on occasion though that you have a sudden epiphany with a
piece of music and whole new vistas open up for you, it's happened to me
many times (for example I remember it happening to me at a rave in Scotland
a dozen or so years back with Speedy J 'Pullover', a track that I'd always
thought boring before, when suddenly I appreciated it's repetitiveness was
it's asset not it's problem, that track makes me giggle to this day).
(Still waiting to have one of these moments with the whole Theo / KDJ
thing.)

Turn down the moral watchdog!  Big up the bickering!  Bring back Alex!






RE: (313) At Les

2004-12-17 Thread Pascal Louwes
To my humble opinion

At Les is one very good example of CCs many techno masterpieces


Nuff said...

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Ronny Pries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Verzonden: vrijdag 17 december 2004 21:17
Aan: 313@hyperreal.org
Onderwerp: Re: (313) At Les

Man, that sex must have been the bomb. ;)

Ronny

De Block, Mario wrote:
 it might be needless nonsense to bug you with but actually i didn't 
 know but since a few years that 'At Les' meant 'At Lesley's', hinting 
 at one of Carl's former girlfriends. Then again, being asked for his 
 main inspiration, Carl said, simply, 'sex'.
 M
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
 
 

-Original Message-
From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 December 2004 21:44


did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that remarkable

really, especially compared to other things CC has done. whats with 
the undying love for this track?

Ronny and Sean I salute you!
For me it's just that it's probably my favourite piece of music ever.

The original electronic piece is the one - for me the other version 
loses much of the appeal of the original by being played in a more 
'real instrument' version.

Not that (not having done so) I wouldn't love to see Innerzone O doing 
it live.

Obviously since music's a subjective thing it's fine not to like a 
track that others like, that's always gonna be the case, doesn't 
necessarily mean you don't 'get it', maybe you 'get it' but you don't want
it.
It does happen on occasion though that you have a sudden epiphany with 
a piece of music and whole new vistas open up for you, it's happened 
to me many times (for example I remember it happening to me at a rave 
in Scotland a dozen or so years back with Speedy J 'Pullover', a track 
that I'd always thought boring before, when suddenly I appreciated 
it's repetitiveness was it's asset not it's problem, that track makes me
giggle to this day).
(Still waiting to have one of these moments with the whole Theo / KDJ
thing.)

Turn down the moral watchdog!  Big up the bickering!  Bring back Alex!
 
 
 




(313) Movement promo CD

2004-12-17 Thread Pascal Louwes
my fellow soldiers
 
That movement 2004 CD transmat released, is that strictly (CD) promo
material or has any of it ever been released on vinyl?
 
So much sweet stuff on that album!
 
Paz
aka
Son Rev




(313) OT: TB-303 and TR-606 fonts!

2004-12-17 Thread Greg Earle
http://createdigitalmusic.com/index.php? 
option=com_contenttask=viewid=106Itemid=44


Which in turn links to

http://www.fonts.com/findfonts/detail.asp?pid=402096

and

http://www.fonts.com/findfonts/detail.asp?pid=402098

- Greg (Tastes Great!  At Les!  Tastes Great!  At Les!)



RE: (313) OT: TB-303 and TR-606 fonts!

2004-12-17 Thread Gerald
Damn! Why couldn't you have posted this a week ago!

...before I had the flyer designed and printed for an upcoming Acid
House event. ;)

G

--
website: www.gerald-matrix.com 
event organiser  writer - www.kickmagazine.ca
host of 'equinox radio' on l'electrique @ www.netmusique.com
member - P U SHER www.pusher.foundationmusic.com


-Original Message-
From: Greg Earle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 5:12 PM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313) OT: TB-303 and TR-606 fonts!

http://createdigitalmusic.com/index.php? 
option=com_contenttask=viewid=106Itemid=44

Which in turn links to

http://www.fonts.com/findfonts/detail.asp?pid=402096

and

http://www.fonts.com/findfonts/detail.asp?pid=402098

- Greg (Tastes Great!  At Les!  Tastes Great!  At Les!)



Re: (313) Movement promo CD

2004-12-17 Thread Matt Kane's Brain
Well, at least the Matthew Dear and Jeff Mills tracks have been 
released on vinyl (on Leave Luck to Heaven and Axis 9c+d respectively)


On Dec 17, 2004, at 17:02, Pascal Louwes wrote:


my fellow soldiers

That movement 2004 CD transmat released, is that strictly (CD) promo
material or has any of it ever been released on vinyl?

So much sweet stuff on that album!

Paz
aka
Son Rev



--
matt kane's brain
http://hydrogenproject.com
aim - mkbatwerk || mkbwriu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: (313) OT: TB-303 and TR-606 fonts!

2004-12-17 Thread Renegade808
cool fontsnice to have a 303 font :-)   never know when you might need
them.do they have anymore classic synth fonts on this site? kinda
looked but not sure...   i'm looking for a Sequential Circuits fontand
maybe and Arp one.

michael
www.renegaderhythms.com







 http://createdigitalmusic.com/index.php?
 option=com_contenttask=viewid=106Itemid=44

 Which in turn links to

 http://www.fonts.com/findfonts/detail.asp?pid=402096

 and

 http://www.fonts.com/findfonts/detail.asp?pid=402098

   - Greg (Tastes Great!  At Les!  Tastes Great!  At Les!)




(313) S7g remixed by IONIC!

2004-12-17 Thread IONIC!
Organoise - Sector 7g / ionic! RMX

http://www.ionic.com.ar/organoise-sector7g_remixed_by_ionic.mp3







www.ionic.com.ar




Re: (313) Huge discography (was too quiet? too pac!)

2004-12-17 Thread atomly
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 what other dance/electronic labels are up around there (and still in
 operation)?
 Tresor? Strictly Rhythm?

Tresor has around the same as Djax-Up-Beats (Tresor proper has just
under 220).

Dance Mania has 284 and is no longer in business.

Strictly Rhythm has ___WAY___ more (~700) than either, but they're not
longer in business. 

By far the most releases I know of on any electronic label, though, is 
ZYX.  They completely blow anybody else I can think of out of the water:

http://www.discogs.com/label/ZYX+Music

-- 
:: atomly ::

[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] : www.atomly.com ...
[ atomiq records : po box 805319 chicago il 60680 : 312.804.5389 ...
[ e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for atomly info and updates ...


Re: (313) Huge discography (was too quiet? too pac!)

2004-12-17 Thread Ronny Pries

zyx doesn't count much as it didn't had any specific direction, it was
(or still is?) just a license dump.

ronny

atomly wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


what other dance/electronic labels are up around there (and still in
operation)?
Tresor? Strictly Rhythm?



Tresor has around the same as Djax-Up-Beats (Tresor proper has just
under 220).

Dance Mania has 284 and is no longer in business.

Strictly Rhythm has ___WAY___ more (~700) than either, but they're not
longer in business. 

By far the most releases I know of on any electronic label, though, is 
ZYX.  They completely blow anybody else I can think of out of the water:


http://www.discogs.com/label/ZYX+Music



Re: (313) Huge discography (was too quiet? too pac!)

2004-12-17 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight




Aren't a majority of their releases licensed from other labels though?

Should have made it clearer that I was talking about labels that have
*original* releases. There's tons of labels that have made their entire
business out of licensing. It's easier to release music that way - all the
artist development is done for you. Let someone else do the AR part.

But you're right ZYX's discog is massively huge and they've covered the
spectrum of electronic music too

MEK




   
 atomly
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 m To 
   313@hyperreal.org   
 12/17/2004 04:49   cc 
 PM
   Subject 
   Re: (313) Huge discography (was too 
   quiet? too pac!)
   
   
   
   
   
   




[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 what other dance/electronic labels are up around there (and still in
 operation)?
 Tresor? Strictly Rhythm?

Tresor has around the same as Djax-Up-Beats (Tresor proper has just
under 220).

Dance Mania has 284 and is no longer in business.

Strictly Rhythm has ___WAY___ more (~700) than either, but they're not
longer in business.

By far the most releases I know of on any electronic label, though, is
ZYX.  They completely blow anybody else I can think of out of the water:

 http://www.discogs.com/label/ZYX+Music

--
:: atomly ::

[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] : www.atomly.com ...
[ atomiq records : po box 805319 chicago il 60680 : 312.804.5389 ...
[ e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for atomly info and updates ...