(313) INFLUENCE: The Final Chapter

2005-08-01 Thread Ken Meier

Tuesday, August 2

Interrupt Media Group, Gapers Block, and Subsystence present the  
final installment of:


INFLUENCE.

Featuring unmixed DJ sets from:

JOSH WERNER (Antennae/Gramaphone)
COMMON FACTOR (Tactile/Soma/Planet E)
KARL MEIER (IMG/Subsystence)
KEN MEIER (IMG/Subsystence)

@ Sonotheque
1444 W Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL

Doors: 9 PM
No Cover!
21 and up

Flavorpill says: "Influence...gathers some of the city's most  
discriminating DJs and musicians for a night of unmixed sets that  
spans genres, providing the artists with an opportunity to drop some  
personal favorites that might not move the average dance floor."


http://www.gapersblock.com
http://www.subsystence.net
http://www.interrupt-media.com
http://www.sonotheque.net

Please forward!


RE: (313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread Anton Banks \(313\)
Ahh, the ever popular mail containers.

The first radio station I was on filed all of their vinyl in them.

Needless to say, the "organization" was a little out of control.


-Original Message-
From: Benoît Pueyo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 12:21 PM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) filing your records


Ok hmm well i guess the easiest is to sort records by labels (then by
cat #). You wont have to bother the name of the artist and still be able
to find easily what you want.

Alphabetical order for labels sounds quite logical, though i personnaly
prefer to sort the labels by genre, then inside genre from soft to hard
hehhe.

The BIG problem is that when you take records for a gig and dont put
them back in place becasue you are tired and/or have big hangover. Its
merely the same when you get new records you frequently listen to and
you dont want to classify.

After around one year of laziness my sorted records look like this (im
gonna soon change the IKEA furniture to some bigger IKEA one) :

http://djtioneb.free.fr/IMG_1408.jpg

and the unsorted ones look like this :

http://djtioneb.free.fr/IMG_1409.jpg

(the two bags being filled, and also being open most of the time) which
does not make the girls who come to my flat really cofortable with my
way of tidiness hmm hmm

--
Benoît.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
>
>
>
> I file my records by shape - all the round ones go in a box
> :D
>
> Actually, I tend to go with label, artist, sound.
> Depends on how I remember the artist - all UR, Red Planet, etc. goes
> together, all Axis (and Jeff Mills) into another
> then if an artist is on a particular label and I'd think  of the artist
> before the label then it goes into a section with only that artist
> If it doesn't fall into those catagories then I group it by similar
sounds.
> It's constantly changing or course
>
> Right now it's a complete mess
> MEK
>
>
>
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  com
> To
>  08/01/05 06:40 AM 313@hyperreal.org
> cc
>
>Subject
>(313) filing your records
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> get this 313, I have nearly put all my records in alphabetical order. woo.
>
> now I'm making divder cards at work "a" "b" etc... also some artists too.
> e.g. "carl craig". woo. i'm gonna have the most organised record
collection
> in the world.
>
> but, now I have a problem. say in my carl craig section, do I put 'psyche'
> in there or what, or does that go under 'p'?
>
> what about compilations? also split eps? arrrgggh.
>
> VOTE NOW> One Carl Craig Section, or "Carl Craig"/"69"/"Psyche"/"BFC" in
> seperate sections?
>
> thanks
>
> alex
> _
> - End of message text 
>
> This e-mail is sent by the above named in
> their individual, non-business capacity and
> is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
>
> PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor
> outgoing and incoming e-mails and other
> telecommunications on its e-mail and
> telecommunications systems. By replying
> to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.
>
>
>
>
>





RE: (313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread Anton Banks \(313\)
I found it works for me to always file under the original artist. The
original artist's name is most likely the most visible writing on the
record. That tends to make things easier to find.

If I have more than one record by the same artst on the same label then I
try to go by artist then catalogue number. This works well until you get to
your "Jeff Mills" section and find that there are like 5 records labeled
"Axis #9"...


-Original Message-
From: Carlos de Brito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 8:43 AM
To: Remco Doorewaard
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) filing your records


my records with cc remixes are (of course) in the cc-section.
but then: where the heck do you put that "People Make The World Go
Round" 12" with kdj AND cc remix!? that's a serious problem... ;)

c*

Remco Doorewaard wrote:
> And where do you put a record with the CC remix that you bought it for
> then?
> CC-section or original artist?
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 7:41 AM
>>To: 313@hyperreal.org
>>Subject: (313) filing your records
>>
>>get this 313, I have nearly put all my records in alphabetical order.
>
> woo.
>
>>now I'm making divder cards at work "a" "b" etc... also some artists
>
> too.
>
>>e.g. "carl craig". woo. i'm gonna have the most organised record
>>collection
>>in the world.
>>
>>but, now I have a problem. say in my carl craig section, do I put
>
> 'psyche'
>
>>in there or what, or does that go under 'p'?
>>
>>what about compilations? also split eps? arrrgggh.
>>
>>VOTE NOW> One Carl Craig Section, or "Carl Craig"/"69"/"Psyche"/"BFC"
>
> in
>
>>seperate sections?
>>
>>thanks
>>
>>alex
>>_
>>- End of message text 
>>
>>This e-mail is sent by the above named in
>>their individual, non-business capacity and
>>is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
>>
>>PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor
>>outgoing and incoming e-mails and other
>>telecommunications on its e-mail and
>>telecommunications systems. By replying
>>to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.
>>
>
>
>




Re: (313) Oh no..not again!!!

2005-08-01 Thread Thorin Teague

No worries here! Maybe we'll get another free month of service. ;)

theREALmxyzptlk wrote:


http://www.discogs.com/







(313) Oh no..not again!!!

2005-08-01 Thread theREALmxyzptlk

http://www.discogs.com/



Re: (313) recordings of interest

2005-08-01 Thread Placid

my kind of post   ;)

cheers K

Stoddard, Kamal wrote:


so...there was this record that I got a year or two or three ago by a
group called dub anarchoid trim, it was called children, really thick
dubbbed out house with a message. dope. well, there's these waaay more
hypnotic and techno mixes out of that song on mule music. the new mixes
rule over all. still really thick and throbby with more edge and drive
but still plenty of spliff to go round. for the techno and house heads
alike. make your head spin. Almost...dare I say...cosmic.

get the soma dubs vol4 if you can, the henrik schwartz remix is a
soundtrack to the martian desert, while the claro intellecto dub is one
for the electro heads that like round bas. checka.

and speaking of electro, theres a couple gentlemen by the name of
weatherall and tenniswood who have a very nice ep out on hidden library.
it's some gorgeous darker electro not too abrasive, just really
psychedelic and moody and cloudy. it's kinda slow, and chock full of
detroit references. both sides rule. it's a 7". I'm a fan of the
shufflier side definitely. the other is more hip hop than anything.
checkka.

Kamal K. Stoddard
Turner Broadcasting Systems

 



(313) recordings of interest

2005-08-01 Thread Stoddard, Kamal
so...there was this record that I got a year or two or three ago by a
group called dub anarchoid trim, it was called children, really thick
dubbbed out house with a message. dope. well, there's these waaay more
hypnotic and techno mixes out of that song on mule music. the new mixes
rule over all. still really thick and throbby with more edge and drive
but still plenty of spliff to go round. for the techno and house heads
alike. make your head spin. Almost...dare I say...cosmic.
 
get the soma dubs vol4 if you can, the henrik schwartz remix is a
soundtrack to the martian desert, while the claro intellecto dub is one
for the electro heads that like round bas. checka.
 
and speaking of electro, theres a couple gentlemen by the name of
weatherall and tenniswood who have a very nice ep out on hidden library.
it's some gorgeous darker electro not too abrasive, just really
psychedelic and moody and cloudy. it's kinda slow, and chock full of
detroit references. both sides rule. it's a 7". I'm a fan of the
shufflier side definitely. the other is more hip hop than anything.
checkka.
 
Kamal K. Stoddard
Turner Broadcasting Systems


Re: FW: (313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message --
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>You simply add the ones you just bought to the end!  Sounds silly
but it has
>advantages: 

>Guess it's not as good for "hmmm I'm playing at a disco night
tonight - what
>disco do I have available?" but alphabetical doesn't help with
that unless
>it's within genres.

your system sounds as close to mine as anyones thus far. i usually
stick my newest stuff in a certain spot so that i can grab them
when i wanna play that particular jam. otherwise, i leave them in
the order of how i unpack my records when i switch up what im
taking with me. for example, i usually keep a box and 2 post
office bins filled with the stuff im generally playing at the
moment. thats usually a nice assortment of soul, disco, boogie,
house, techno, broken beats, etc. if im playing a specialty night,
ill take all those out and repack with whatever genre im playing.
so if i wanna find something i took out, i have to remember my
selections from the nights i was playing and i know the records
are right around there. its good because it keeps me looking
through stuff so i can happen upon things i had forgotten about. i
guess this is a good thing because i can remember tracks that ive
played at particular gigs 7 years ago. thats pretty insane, im not
sure if other people can do that so this system might not work for
them ;P 

tom 


andythepooh.com


 
   


FW: (313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Benoît Pueyo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 01 August 2005 17:21
> 
> Ok hmm well i guess the easiest is to sort records by labels 
> (then by cat #)

I wasn't going to recommend my system as Alex and Robin would die laughing
since I've had one recent notorious unable-to-find-record situation.
However that was because it wasn't filed under any system but lost when I
was out of it.  This is always my downfall and I don't think any system will
guard against it.

However if we're talking about easiest I've got to nominate it.

You simply add the ones you just bought to the end!  Sounds silly but it has
advantages: 

everything stays exactly where it is so you never have to keep shuffling
records round your storage to fit more in at a certain point

you don't get behind on filing as you just keep adding the new stuff to one
end

and what you'd think was the natural disadvantage (that things are difficult
to find like that) turns out fine as in fact it's amazing what a memory you
develop for the order of the records when they never change relative
position - I have a parlour trick where I can amaze visitors to my flat
surprised by how many records are there where I close my eyes, they pull out
a record, note the title, put it back, then I open my eyes they tell me the
title and I can usually go straight to within about an inch of it.

Of course to work best you have to have been doing the system for a while
but if anyone's thinking it sounds good you could always put your existing
tunes in chronological order and then start adding (what I did some years
ago)

Guess it's not as good for "hmmm I'm playing at a disco night tonight - what
disco do I have available?" but alphabetical doesn't help with that unless
it's within genres.



FW: (313) larry heard, c.craig, j.pennington...

2005-08-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Guilherme M. Arantes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 01 August 2005 00:54
> 
> 
> all these will be and other Detroit people will be in that 
> Big Chill festival the next weekend. But I am wondering if 
> they will be performing in other UK locations. Do you have any info???
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Guilherme

Arghh it makes me so sad I'm not going this year.  Didn't realise the first
2 had been added to the line up (which wasn't looking as promising a couple
of months ago) when I made the decision not to go.  Can't change my mind now
as I'm playing at the D Percussion fest here in Manchester same time.

Plus I think they're selling out?  If not and you want to see these guys
splash out on a ticket G my friend as The Chill is absolute quality.



Re: (313) On the subject of planets

2005-08-01 Thread Thorin Teague
I would have said by measuring its size and relative brightness, but my 
approach doesn't have built-in phat beats. Tom wins.


~T

Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:


be to the earth in our lifetimes, please tell the spammers that this


occurred in August of 2003 and to please stop circulating.
 


ahh, but how do you know?

unless you have an ACME INTERGALATIC TAPE MEASURE like mine, how
   


can you
 


really tell?
   



you and your cheap generic tools. ive got a top of the line Red
Planet Intergalactic Tape Measure. it plays "Stardancer" when you
use it. its the bomb. 

tom 
 





Re: (313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread Benoît Pueyo
Ok hmm well i guess the easiest is to sort records by labels (then by 
cat #). You wont have to bother the name of the artist and still be able 
to find easily what you want.


Alphabetical order for labels sounds quite logical, though i personnaly 
prefer to sort the labels by genre, then inside genre from soft to hard 
hehhe.


The BIG problem is that when you take records for a gig and dont put 
them back in place becasue you are tired and/or have big hangover. Its 
merely the same when you get new records you frequently listen to and 
you dont want to classify.


After around one year of laziness my sorted records look like this (im 
gonna soon change the IKEA furniture to some bigger IKEA one) :


http://djtioneb.free.fr/IMG_1408.jpg

and the unsorted ones look like this :

http://djtioneb.free.fr/IMG_1409.jpg

(the two bags being filled, and also being open most of the time) which 
does not make the girls who come to my flat really cofortable with my 
way of tidiness hmm hmm


--
Benoît.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :




I file my records by shape - all the round ones go in a box
:D

Actually, I tend to go with label, artist, sound.
Depends on how I remember the artist - all UR, Red Planet, etc. goes
together, all Axis (and Jeff Mills) into another
then if an artist is on a particular label and I'd think  of the artist
before the label then it goes into a section with only that artist
If it doesn't fall into those catagories then I group it by similar sounds.
It's constantly changing or course

Right now it's a complete mess
MEK


   
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 com   
To 
 08/01/05 06:40 AM 313@hyperreal.org   
cc 
   
   Subject 
   (313) filing your records   
   
   
   
   
   
   





get this 313, I have nearly put all my records in alphabetical order. woo.

now I'm making divder cards at work "a" "b" etc... also some artists too.
e.g. "carl craig". woo. i'm gonna have the most organised record collection
in the world.

but, now I have a problem. say in my carl craig section, do I put 'psyche'
in there or what, or does that go under 'p'?

what about compilations? also split eps? arrrgggh.

VOTE NOW> One Carl Craig Section, or "Carl Craig"/"69"/"Psyche"/"BFC" in
seperate sections?

thanks

alex
_
- End of message text 

This e-mail is sent by the above named in
their individual, non-business capacity and
is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor
outgoing and incoming e-mails and other
telecommunications on its e-mail and
telecommunications systems. By replying
to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.









Re: (313) On the subject of planets

2005-08-01 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

>>If anyone gets the spam mail about Mars being the closest it
will ever
>>be to the earth in our lifetimes, please tell the spammers that this
>>occurred in August of 2003 and to please stop circulating.
>
>ahh, but how do you know?
>
>unless you have an ACME INTERGALATIC TAPE MEASURE like mine, how
can you
>really tell?

you and your cheap generic tools. ive got a top of the line Red
Planet Intergalactic Tape Measure. it plays "Stardancer" when you
use it. its the bomb. 

tom 


andythepooh.com


 
   


Re: (313) On the subject of planets

2005-08-01 Thread alex . bond
>If anyone gets the spam mail about Mars being the closest it will ever
>be to the earth in our lifetimes, please tell the spammers that this
>occurred in August of 2003 and to please stop circulating.

ahh, but how do you know?

unless you have an ACME INTERGALATIC TAPE MEASURE like mine, how can you
really tell?

_
- End of message text 

This e-mail is sent by the above named in
their individual, non-business capacity and
is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor
outgoing and incoming e-mails and other
telecommunications on its e-mail and
telecommunications systems. By replying
to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.



Re: (313) On the subject of planets

2005-08-01 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight




Really?  Damn, I had my bags all packed and the ladder ready to go.

MEK


   
 Thorin Teague 
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 >  To 
   313@hyperreal.org   
 08/01/05 11:02 AM  cc 
   
   Subject 
   (313) On the subject of planets 
   
   
   
   
   
   




If anyone gets the spam mail about Mars being the closest it will ever
be to the earth in our lifetimes, please tell the spammers that this
occurred in August of 2003 and to please stop circulating.

Doing my part against viral misinformation.




(313) On the subject of planets

2005-08-01 Thread Thorin Teague
If anyone gets the spam mail about Mars being the closest it will ever 
be to the earth in our lifetimes, please tell the spammers that this 
occurred in August of 2003 and to please stop circulating.


Doing my part against viral misinformation.


Re: (313) New 10th planet fittingly named after Detroit Techno mailing list

2005-08-01 Thread Thorin Teague
It's not actually a planet. Neither is Pluto. But when you spend 
kajillions of dollars in funding looking for a 9th and 10th planet, you 
find them.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


hang on a minute???

10th Planet "UB313" = PLANET DELSIN

p.s. how do you find a planet? seems like a big f**king thing to lose to
me. I mean, I'm always losing my mobile phone, but sheeet.
the dude that found this must have a big telescope in his bedroom.
_
 





Re: (313) KDJ33 - Ampapella

2005-08-01 Thread Derek Plaslaiko.





just got mine today. its mostly the same, if not identical. Sounds like 
this one might be a bit more chopped up than the one he played.



Yeah, im gonna say its essential, but thats nonly because when he played 
it at the fest, it drove me nuts and ive wanted it ever since.


is it essential to the tune that its going for on ebay??

hardly.


derek.






On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:


-- Original Message --
From: "Derek Plaslaiko." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


ampapella was the shades of jae-ish cut he played at the first demf,
right? or are there ather tracks on it as well?


i suppose its possible (i havent heard that set), though im pretty
sure its got bits of amp fiddler vocals in it and i dont think he
was doing stuff with kenny that long ago. its actually more like
track 4 in that its kinda tracky and repetitive but teases you
with unexpected edits and cutups. then near the end it comes into
a more stripped down bit with kenny talking on it. good stuff, but
hardly essential.

tom


andythepooh.com







RE: (313) New 10th planet fittingly named after Detroit Techno mailing list

2005-08-01 Thread Stoddard, Kamal

>313 is higher

Word.

 A little out of comission lately all, but this brought me out.  Nice
post about the planet. That's techno, and so on topic it hurts.

Haha!
>313 is cut into two parts

Anyone wanna guess what the two parts are? Ha! 

Kamal K. Stoddard
Turner Broadcasting Systems
 
 PS. I Got pics from MJQ this weekend (not that many though). Kai effed
it up real good. I was taking pictures to ease the pain of having to
stand in the dj booth and dance while leaning on a crutch (torn
ligaments). It lifted my spirits though... Well that and those cookies
(pure fxcking magic, ah). I'll have to find one of those free host
places online to put them up.
 

> -Original Message-
> From: carl morris plugtwo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 10:16 AM
> To: Odeluga, Ken; 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: Re: (313) New 10th planet fittingly named after Detroit 
> Techno mailing list
> 
> Hmmm..
> 
> Maybe I could get the last word on this?
> http://www.googlism.com/index.htm?ism=313&type=1
> 
> cheers
> 
> carl morris
> Plug Two
> t +442920190151
> 
> 
> 
> Odeluga, Ken wrote:
> 
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Greg Earle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: 30 July 2005 06:45
> >To: 313@hyperreal.org
> >Subject: (313) New 10th planet fittingly named after Detroit Techno 
> >mailing list
> >
> >2003 UB313.  Look it up.  I'm not kidding.
> >
> >http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/30/science/30planet.html? 
> >hp&ex=1122696000&en=8500b2cc7e8e63c0&ei=5094&partner=homepage
> >
> >"The new object - as yet unnamed, but temporarily known as
> 2003 UB313 -
> >  is now 9 billion miles away from the Sun, or 97 times as
> far away as
> >  Earth and about three times Pluto's current distance from the Sun.
> >  Its 560-year elliptical orbit brings it as close as 3.3
> billion miles.
> >  Pluto's orbit ranges from 2.7 billion miles to 4.6 billion."
> >
> >And you wondered why Detroit Techno concerned itself with
> space travel
> >and space exploration ...
> >
> > - Greg
> >
> >
> >
> >Is this a technical serial number which occurs by coincidence or is 
> >this a name chosen by someone? Could be a D fan! (OK, OK, I
> know it's
> >unlikely. :)
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 


RE: (313) larry heard, c.craig, j.pennington...

2005-08-01 Thread Hardie, Nick
Indeed, Larry Heard's playing T-Funkshun at The Cavern, The Beatles' old 
stomping ground.

More details can be found here - 
http://www.tfunkshun.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1203

Nick

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 August 2005 09:01
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) larry heard, c.craig, j.pennington...


Hey Gui!

Dunno about all the others, but Larry Heard is on in Liverpool on friday!
We're all going over, pikey crew.

Also, saturday theres a big free festival called depercussion (in
manchester). would be a good weekend, come up!

alex
_
- End of message text 

This e-mail is sent by the above named in
their individual, non-business capacity and
is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor
outgoing and incoming e-mails and other
telecommunications on its e-mail and
telecommunications systems. By replying
to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.




RE: (313) Drunken mix - Through the Bone

2005-08-01 Thread Tristan Watkins
Note to self: you get what you pay for - even with hosting. Pretty much 
everything went down over the weekend, but I'm assured it should be sorted now. 
I've tested here and from a few external locations. So far so good. Sorry again 
about the problems. 

Tristan

- Original Message - 
From: "Diego Simak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
<313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2005 2:38 PM
Subject: SPAM-MED: RE: (313) Drunken mix - Through the Bone


The DNS can not resolve the www.phonopsia.co.uk name.
It is alright?

Diego
>-- Mensaje original --
>Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 10:42:03 -
>From: "Robert Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <313@hyperreal.org>
>Subject: RE: (313) Drunken mix - Through the Bone
>
>
>That's timing me out? :(
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Tristan Watkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 28 July 2005 13:26
>To: 313@hyperreal.org
>Subject: RE: (313) Drunken mix - Through the Bone
>
>
>Err... make that: 
>http://www.phonopsia.co.uk/mixes/TristanWatkinsThroughTheBone24-07-05.mp3
>
>- Original Message - 
>From: "Tristan Watkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <313@hyperreal.org>
>Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 2:16 PM
>Subject: (313) Drunken mix - Through the Bone
>
>
>I recorded a mix on Sunday. It's a product of the aftermath following To
>the Bone, Chaz 'n Dave's party where Alex was spinning at George IV in Brixton
>last Saturday. The afterparty wound up back at mine, so I had to escape
~15
>of London's most fiendish afterwards, taking refuge with the subwoofer,
randomly
>recording this mix. It's certainly not my best mixing, but there's some
nice
>tracks that didn't make it onto other mixes I've recorded, has some Summery
>parts, and some newer stuff I rather like. Encoded at 192 Kbps. Enjoy! 
>
>STOP PRESS!!! This is an exclusive preview to [313] at the moment because
>my blog is acting up and Little Detroit is down. Consider yourselves 
>priveleged.
>;) Oh, and I just randomly pressed record after a few songs, and accidentally
>killed it at 90 minutes in, if you're wondering about the fade in at the
>beginning and the abrupt ending. It will fit on an 80 minute CD though.

>
>http://www.phonopsia.com/mixes/TristanWatkinsThroughTheBone24-07-05.mp3

>
>Tracklist:
>
>DJ Gregory - Attend 1 [Kitsune] 
>
>Julien Jabre - Paixao [Elias] 
>
>DJ Minx - A Walk in the Park (Wink's Run Through the Park Interpretation)
>[Minus] 
>
>Kai Alce - M-7 [Mahogani] 
>
>Silvio Manuel - La Mente Oscura que es Carlo Marx [Ferrispark] 
>
>Aardvarck - Cult Copy Pt 3 (Mix 2) [Rush Hour] 
>
>KLF vs. Ricardo Villalobos - What Time is Love? (Veto Retro Mix #2) [Blaou]
>
>
>Henrik Schwarz - Jeff [Zeppelin Recordings] 
>
>Just One - Soul Revolution [Neroli] 
>
>Kahil El'Zabar & The Kemit Sources - Our Time is Now (Kemit Sources Mix)
>[Deeper Soul] 
>
>Iz & Diz - Mouth (Brad Peep's Remix for Friends [Classic] 
>
>Inner City - Do Ya (Carl Craig Build Up Remix) [Network] 
>
>Deep Dish - Won't Stop [Yoshi Toshi] 
>
>Dusk - Honcho Sex God [Peacefrog] 
>
>Soulphiction - Scattered Brains [Philpot] 
>
>Moodymann - Shades of Jae [KDJ]




Re: (313) New 10th planet fittingly named after Detroit Techno mailing list

2005-08-01 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight




>313 is deployable to anywhere in the world and is self sustainable for 30
days

sounds like UR soldiers to me!


"313 is 313 is"
MEK



   
 carl morris   
 plugtwo   
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]  To 
 > "Odeluga, Ken"  
   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
 08/01/05 09:15 AM 313@hyperreal.org   
cc 
   
   Subject 
   Re: (313) New 10th planet fittingly 
   named after Detroit Techno mailing  
   list
   
   
   
   
   
   




Hmmm..

Maybe I could get the last word on this?
http://www.googlism.com/index.htm?ism=313&type=1

cheers

carl morris
Plug Two
t +442920190151



Odeluga, Ken wrote:

>-Original Message-
>From: Greg Earle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 30 July 2005 06:45
>To: 313@hyperreal.org
>Subject: (313) New 10th planet fittingly named after Detroit Techno
>mailing list
>
>2003 UB313.  Look it up.  I'm not kidding.
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/30/science/30planet.html?
>hp&ex=1122696000&en=8500b2cc7e8e63c0&ei=5094&partner=homepage
>
>"The new object - as yet unnamed, but temporarily known as 2003 UB313 -
>  is now 9 billion miles away from the Sun, or 97 times as far away as
>  Earth and about three times Pluto's current distance from the Sun.
>  Its 560-year elliptical orbit brings it as close as 3.3 billion miles.
>  Pluto's orbit ranges from 2.7 billion miles to 4.6 billion."
>
>And you wondered why Detroit Techno concerned itself with
>space travel and space exploration ...
>
>- Greg
>
>
>
>Is this a technical serial number which occurs by coincidence or is this
>a name chosen by someone? Could be a D fan! (OK, OK, I know it's
>unlikely. :)
>
>
>
>




Re: (313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight




I file my records by shape - all the round ones go in a box
:D

Actually, I tend to go with label, artist, sound.
Depends on how I remember the artist - all UR, Red Planet, etc. goes
together, all Axis (and Jeff Mills) into another
then if an artist is on a particular label and I'd think  of the artist
before the label then it goes into a section with only that artist
If it doesn't fall into those catagories then I group it by similar sounds.
It's constantly changing or course

Right now it's a complete mess
MEK


   
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 com   
To 
 08/01/05 06:40 AM 313@hyperreal.org   
cc 
   
   Subject 
   (313) filing your records   
   
   
   
   
   
   




get this 313, I have nearly put all my records in alphabetical order. woo.

now I'm making divder cards at work "a" "b" etc... also some artists too.
e.g. "carl craig". woo. i'm gonna have the most organised record collection
in the world.

but, now I have a problem. say in my carl craig section, do I put 'psyche'
in there or what, or does that go under 'p'?

what about compilations? also split eps? arrrgggh.

VOTE NOW> One Carl Craig Section, or "Carl Craig"/"69"/"Psyche"/"BFC" in
seperate sections?

thanks

alex
_
- End of message text 

This e-mail is sent by the above named in
their individual, non-business capacity and
is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor
outgoing and incoming e-mails and other
telecommunications on its e-mail and
telecommunications systems. By replying
to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.





Re: (313) New 10th planet fittingly named after Detroit Techno mailing list

2005-08-01 Thread alex . bond
hang on a minute???

10th Planet "UB313" = PLANET DELSIN

p.s. how do you find a planet? seems like a big f**king thing to lose to
me. I mean, I'm always losing my mobile phone, but sheeet.
the dude that found this must have a big telescope in his bedroom.
_
- End of message text 

This e-mail is sent by the above named in
their individual, non-business capacity and
is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor
outgoing and incoming e-mails and other
telecommunications on its e-mail and
telecommunications systems. By replying
to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.



Re: (313) New 10th planet fittingly named after Detroit Techno mailing list

2005-08-01 Thread Martin Dust




Is this a technical serial number which occurs by coincidence or is 
this

a name chosen by someone? Could be a D fan! (OK, OK, I know it's
unlikely. :)





Surely a D fan would have gone for:
2010 UR 313  ;)



Re: (313) New 10th planet fittingly named after Detroit Techno mailing list

2005-08-01 Thread carl morris plugtwo

Hmmm..

Maybe I could get the last word on this?
http://www.googlism.com/index.htm?ism=313&type=1

cheers

carl morris
Plug Two
t +442920190151



Odeluga, Ken wrote:


-Original Message-
From: Greg Earle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 30 July 2005 06:45

To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313) New 10th planet fittingly named after Detroit Techno
mailing list

2003 UB313.  Look it up.  I'm not kidding.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/30/science/30planet.html? 
hp&ex=1122696000&en=8500b2cc7e8e63c0&ei=5094&partner=homepage


"The new object - as yet unnamed, but temporarily known as 2003 UB313 -
 is now 9 billion miles away from the Sun, or 97 times as far away as
 Earth and about three times Pluto's current distance from the Sun.
 Its 560-year elliptical orbit brings it as close as 3.3 billion miles.
 Pluto's orbit ranges from 2.7 billion miles to 4.6 billion."

And you wondered why Detroit Techno concerned itself with
space travel and space exploration ...

- Greg



Is this a technical serial number which occurs by coincidence or is this
a name chosen by someone? Could be a D fan! (OK, OK, I know it's
unlikely. :)


 



RE: (313) New 10th planet fittingly named after Detroit Techno mailing list

2005-08-01 Thread Odeluga, Ken
-Original Message-
From: Greg Earle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 30 July 2005 06:45
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313) New 10th planet fittingly named after Detroit Techno
mailing list

2003 UB313.  Look it up.  I'm not kidding.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/30/science/30planet.html? 
hp&ex=1122696000&en=8500b2cc7e8e63c0&ei=5094&partner=homepage

"The new object - as yet unnamed, but temporarily known as 2003 UB313 -
  is now 9 billion miles away from the Sun, or 97 times as far away as
  Earth and about three times Pluto's current distance from the Sun.
  Its 560-year elliptical orbit brings it as close as 3.3 billion miles.
  Pluto's orbit ranges from 2.7 billion miles to 4.6 billion."

And you wondered why Detroit Techno concerned itself with
space travel and space exploration ...

- Greg



Is this a technical serial number which occurs by coincidence or is this
a name chosen by someone? Could be a D fan! (OK, OK, I know it's
unlikely. :)



Re: (313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread Thorin Teague

Ooops. Next time I'll drink my coffee before posting.
That was intended to be in reply to this:

--
my records with cc remixes are (of course) in the cc-section.
but then: where the heck do you put that "People Make The World Go 
Round" 12" with kdj AND cc remix!? that's a serious problem... ;)


c*

---

Thorin Teague wrote:

Looks like you'll have to buy a second copy and file it under both. 
It's the only viable solution.





Re: (313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread Thorin Teague
Looks like you'll have to buy a second copy and file it under both. It's 
the only viable solution.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


And where do you put a record with the CC remix that you bought it for
then?
CC-section or original artist?
   



yes. this is one of the q's.

file this q under: "what is the meaning of life" or "what came first the
chicken or the egg"
 





RE: (313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread Remco Doorewaard
Yeah me too! I have everything 'more or less' sorted per genre (detroit
techno, harder/minimal techno, house, electro etc) en per genre sorted
on label, unless I have several records from 1 artist (fi. CC), these
are sorted on artist name!

So Kenny Larkin - Azimuth is in the Detroit section under Kenny Larkin
and not with the rest of my Warp records. 

It's as stated earlier, if you can find your record within [your time
here] seconds/minutes then I guess you have done a good job.

> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Verzonden: maandag 1 augustus 2005 14:39
> Aan: Remco Doorewaard
> CC: 313@hyperreal.org
> Onderwerp: Re: (313) filing your records
> 
> > And where do you put a record with the CC remix that you bought it
for
> > then?
> > CC-section or original artist?
> 
> 
> carl craig section definitely :)
> 
> robin...



Re: (313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread alex . bond
> And where do you put a record with the CC remix that you bought it for
> then?
> CC-section or original artist?

yes. this is one of the q's.

file this q under: "what is the meaning of life" or "what came first the
chicken or the egg"
_
- End of message text 

This e-mail is sent by the above named in
their individual, non-business capacity and
is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor
outgoing and incoming e-mails and other
telecommunications on its e-mail and
telecommunications systems. By replying
to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.



Re: (313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread Carlos de Brito

my records with cc remixes are (of course) in the cc-section.
but then: where the heck do you put that "People Make The World Go 
Round" 12" with kdj AND cc remix!? that's a serious problem... ;)


c*

Remco Doorewaard wrote:

And where do you put a record with the CC remix that you bought it for
then? 
CC-section or original artist?




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 7:41 AM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313) filing your records

get this 313, I have nearly put all my records in alphabetical order.


woo.


now I'm making divder cards at work "a" "b" etc... also some artists


too.


e.g. "carl craig". woo. i'm gonna have the most organised record
collection
in the world.

but, now I have a problem. say in my carl craig section, do I put


'psyche'


in there or what, or does that go under 'p'?

what about compilations? also split eps? arrrgggh.

VOTE NOW> One Carl Craig Section, or "Carl Craig"/"69"/"Psyche"/"BFC"


in


seperate sections?

thanks

alex
_
- End of message text 

This e-mail is sent by the above named in
their individual, non-business capacity and
is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor
outgoing and incoming e-mails and other
telecommunications on its e-mail and
telecommunications systems. By replying
to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.







Re: (313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread robin

And where do you put a record with the CC remix that you bought it for
then?
CC-section or original artist?



carl craig section definitely :)

robin...



Re: (313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread fab.
well technically, if you file alphabetically psyche would go under P 
regardless of who it is.


i file according to geographical region of the label (detroit, berlin, 
chicago, cologne etc), and alphabetically between labels and the records are 
sorted according to catalog number.
except for chicago acid house, theo parrish and moodymann - they have their 
own categories, although the records within these categories are listed 
according to label and cat. number.


it might not be the most straightforward but i find everything super 
easy


fab.
- Original Message - 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 1:40 PM
Subject: (313) filing your records



get this 313, I have nearly put all my records in alphabetical order. woo.

now I'm making divder cards at work "a" "b" etc... also some artists too.
e.g. "carl craig". woo. i'm gonna have the most organised record 
collection

in the world.

but, now I have a problem. say in my carl craig section, do I put 'psyche'
in there or what, or does that go under 'p'?

what about compilations? also split eps? arrrgggh.

VOTE NOW> One Carl Craig Section, or "Carl Craig"/"69"/"Psyche"/"BFC" in
seperate sections?

thanks

alex
_
- End of message text 

This e-mail is sent by the above named in
their individual, non-business capacity and
is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor
outgoing and incoming e-mails and other
telecommunications on its e-mail and
telecommunications systems. By replying
to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.








RE: (313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread Remco Doorewaard
And where do you put a record with the CC remix that you bought it for
then? 
CC-section or original artist?

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 7:41 AM
> To: 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: (313) filing your records
> 
> get this 313, I have nearly put all my records in alphabetical order.
woo.
> 
> now I'm making divder cards at work "a" "b" etc... also some artists
too.
> e.g. "carl craig". woo. i'm gonna have the most organised record
> collection
> in the world.
> 
> but, now I have a problem. say in my carl craig section, do I put
'psyche'
> in there or what, or does that go under 'p'?
> 
> what about compilations? also split eps? arrrgggh.
> 
> VOTE NOW> One Carl Craig Section, or "Carl Craig"/"69"/"Psyche"/"BFC"
in
> seperate sections?
> 
> thanks
> 
> alex
> _
> - End of message text 
> 
> This e-mail is sent by the above named in
> their individual, non-business capacity and
> is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
> 
> PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor
> outgoing and incoming e-mails and other
> telecommunications on its e-mail and
> telecommunications systems. By replying
> to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.
> 



RE: (313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread Lee Herrington
Alphabetize by label, and then sort each release within that label by
catalogue number.  Or you could leave little piles of EP's and LP's strewn
about the floor of your attic.  It all depends on what kind of mood you're
in.

Cheers,
lrh



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 7:41 AM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313) filing your records

get this 313, I have nearly put all my records in alphabetical order. woo.

now I'm making divder cards at work "a" "b" etc... also some artists too.
e.g. "carl craig". woo. i'm gonna have the most organised record collection
in the world.

but, now I have a problem. say in my carl craig section, do I put 'psyche'
in there or what, or does that go under 'p'?

what about compilations? also split eps? arrrgggh.

VOTE NOW> One Carl Craig Section, or "Carl Craig"/"69"/"Psyche"/"BFC" in
seperate sections?

thanks

alex
_
- End of message text 

This e-mail is sent by the above named in
their individual, non-business capacity and
is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor
outgoing and incoming e-mails and other
telecommunications on its e-mail and
telecommunications systems. By replying
to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.




RE: (313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread alex . bond
>When will we see some pictures?

h, no pictures remco. it's very high security.

"pikey laboratoire de pieces rare"

i cannot reveal the formulas that are concocted behind the closed doors.
very top secret. you need the special cosmic handshake to get in.

; )
_
- End of message text 

This e-mail is sent by the above named in
their individual, non-business capacity and
is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor
outgoing and incoming e-mails and other
telecommunications on its e-mail and
telecommunications systems. By replying
to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.



RE: (313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread Remco Doorewaard
When will we see some pictures?

> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Verzonden: maandag 1 augustus 2005 14:00
> Aan: 313@hyperreal.org
> Onderwerp: Re: (313) filing your records
> 
> >alphabetical
> 
> oh, I'm the alphabet kid for sure.
> 
> you should see my "Q" section, its rrright.
> 
> check it out, I love it, I've been doing it all weekend. I can't
believe
> the records I've found, my collection is half ok at the mo, good
spread.
> ahh, I've smoked half a ton of weed this weekend and listened to all
the
> stupid records I've got, was mucho fun. and i did my fantasy football
> team.
> 
> also, now i am making dividers so its like a library. god i love it, i
am
> a
> square. i'm never going out ever again.
> _
> - End of message text 
> 
> This e-mail is sent by the above named in
> their individual, non-business capacity and
> is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
> 
> PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor
> outgoing and incoming e-mails and other
> telecommunications on its e-mail and
> telecommunications systems. By replying
> to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.



RE: (313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread Pryor, Ryan N
I have mine filed alphabetically by label, A-Z. And then the artists
contained in each label, alphabetically A-Z.


Re: (313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread alex . bond
>alphabetical

oh, I'm the alphabet kid for sure.

you should see my "Q" section, its rrright.

check it out, I love it, I've been doing it all weekend. I can't believe
the records I've found, my collection is half ok at the mo, good spread.
ahh, I've smoked half a ton of weed this weekend and listened to all the
stupid records I've got, was mucho fun. and i did my fantasy football team.

also, now i am making dividers so its like a library. god i love it, i am a
square. i'm never going out ever again.
_
- End of message text 

This e-mail is sent by the above named in
their individual, non-business capacity and
is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor
outgoing and incoming e-mails and other
telecommunications on its e-mail and
telecommunications systems. By replying
to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.



Re: (313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread robin
get this 313, I have nearly put all my records in alphabetical order. 
woo.


now I'm making divder cards at work "a" "b" etc... also some artists 
too.
e.g. "carl craig". woo. i'm gonna have the most organised record 
collection

in the world.

but, now I have a problem. say in my carl craig section, do I put 
'psyche'

in there or what, or does that go under 'p'?

what about compilations? also split eps? arrrgggh.

VOTE NOW> One Carl Craig Section, or "Carl Craig"/"69"/"Psyche"/"BFC" 
in

seperate sections?



hahahaha i spent ages mulling over all this when i sorted my vinyl and 
i came to the conclusion there's no 'best way' to do this. i didn't do 
alphabetical i just did sections with type of music and label and then 
some sections for people like carl craig, ur, kdj, derrick may etc


the best way is the way that you will go back later and and most likely 
find the record you're looking for. for me it's the above at the mo but 
could change next year when i look over it again :)


robin...



RE: (313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread alex . bond
>I've also got my records filed alphabetically. As for the compilations, I
>file them in a separate section by record label.

ooh. maybe thats a good idea. "compilations section" seperate sections for
genres I reckon. ooh.
_
- End of message text 

This e-mail is sent by the above named in
their individual, non-business capacity and
is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor
outgoing and incoming e-mails and other
telecommunications on its e-mail and
telecommunications systems. By replying
to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.



RE: (313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread Anton Banks \(313\)
I've also got my records filed alphabetically. As for the compilations, I
file them in a separate section by record label.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 7:41 AM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313) filing your records


get this 313, I have nearly put all my records in alphabetical order. woo.

now I'm making divder cards at work "a" "b" etc... also some artists too.
e.g. "carl craig". woo. i'm gonna have the most organised record collection
in the world.

but, now I have a problem. say in my carl craig section, do I put 'psyche'
in there or what, or does that go under 'p'?

what about compilations? also split eps? arrrgggh.

VOTE NOW> One Carl Craig Section, or "Carl Craig"/"69"/"Psyche"/"BFC" in
seperate sections?

thanks

alex
_
- End of message text 

This e-mail is sent by the above named in
their individual, non-business capacity and
is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor
outgoing and incoming e-mails and other
telecommunications on its e-mail and
telecommunications systems. By replying
to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.





(313) filing your records

2005-08-01 Thread alex . bond
get this 313, I have nearly put all my records in alphabetical order. woo.

now I'm making divder cards at work "a" "b" etc... also some artists too.
e.g. "carl craig". woo. i'm gonna have the most organised record collection
in the world.

but, now I have a problem. say in my carl craig section, do I put 'psyche'
in there or what, or does that go under 'p'?

what about compilations? also split eps? arrrgggh.

VOTE NOW> One Carl Craig Section, or "Carl Craig"/"69"/"Psyche"/"BFC" in
seperate sections?

thanks

alex
_
- End of message text 

This e-mail is sent by the above named in
their individual, non-business capacity and
is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor
outgoing and incoming e-mails and other
telecommunications on its e-mail and
telecommunications systems. By replying
to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.



Re: (313) larry heard, c.craig, j.pennington...

2005-08-01 Thread alex . bond
Hey Gui!

Dunno about all the others, but Larry Heard is on in Liverpool on friday!
We're all going over, pikey crew.

Also, saturday theres a big free festival called depercussion (in
manchester). would be a good weekend, come up!

alex
_
- End of message text 

This e-mail is sent by the above named in
their individual, non-business capacity and
is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor
outgoing and incoming e-mails and other
telecommunications on its e-mail and
telecommunications systems. By replying
to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring.



Re: (313) DJ Heart

2005-08-01 Thread James_Bucknell
Heather Heart is part of the Sonic Groove crew with brothers Adam X and
Frankie Bones. Heather and Adam were partners. Heather's from Brooklyn, New
York.
She's my favourite dj of the Sonic Groove crew.
james
www.jbucknell.com



   
 "Stewart Caig"
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 soul.co.uk>To 
   "313" <313@hyperreal.org>   
 29/07/05 07:52 PM  cc 
   
   Subject 
   Re: (313) DJ Heart  
   
   
   
   
   
   




> I've heard of heather heart. dunno who that is though. thought she was
from
> nyc maybe.

Heather Heart is Frankie Bones' missus, used to work at Sonic Groove.
Definatly not from Detroit


ForwardSourceID:NT000216F2



(313) dj harvey interview

2005-08-01 Thread Guilherme Menegon Arantes

not really 313, but may interest some of you:

http://www.djhistorymix.com/smf/index.php?topic=6227.0

G